GPCB to Inspect Hazardous Waste Recyclers and Authorised Users Every Six Months
GPCB will inspect hazardous waste recyclers and authorised users every six months to check SOP compliance, waste records, equipment, outputs, and residues.
Schedule a Call Back
200+ hazardous waste authorisation assignments since 2018
Clients include PMS Waste Management, Daebak India Recycler, Ganix Rubber Recycling, K2 Recyclers, Enershell Alloys and Steel, JK Cement, Sskbp India Alloy, Venkateshwara Roto Pack, Ganpati Petrochem, Servotech Renewable Power System, Alten India, Blubble (12 of 200+ served since 2018).
A few more clients we've served in this industryHide the list
- Recycling and waste management
- PMS Waste Management · Daebak India Recycler · Ganix Rubber Recycling · K2 Recyclers
- Engineering and manufacturing
- Enershell Alloys and Steel · JK Cement · Sskbp India Alloy
- Chemicals and materials
- Venkateshwara Roto Pack · Ganpati Petrochem
- More clients
- Servotech Renewable Power System · Alten India · Blubble · Ecowise Trading · SNS Metpro Industries · OTT Scientific India · GS E-Commerce · Metalmaze Steel and Copper · Swiss Singapore India · Webmeditech Healthcare · Gorevive · Innovation Elephants · Magnetic Faac India · Enzolt Energy · Venture Fruit · Ratuman · Aagya Global Metallic PVC Traders · Chakr Innovation · Garuda Power · Lata Motors · Laukya Imports and Exports · Lucky Carbo · Ors Cables · Rainboweucalyptus Technologies
Introduction
The Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) has issued an order directing inspections of hazardous waste recyclers and authorized users at least once every six months to ensure compliance with SOPs, waste records, and other operating standards.
Each inspection will cover seven vital elements, including the relevant CPCB SOP, authorizations, waste quantity, material balance, plant systems, product control, and residue handling.
The circular does not create a new licence, fee, filing, or Rule 9 approval process. Its main effect is closer, more regular checks of existing compliance. The direction is available through the official GPCB circular.
GPCB Hazardous Waste Inspection Circular 2026 at a Glance
| Particular | Verified details |
| Issuing authority | Gujarat Pollution Control Board |
| Document type | Circular |
| Subject | Periodic detailed inspection of recyclers and actual users of hazardous waste |
| Date of issue | 7 July 2026, based on the approval and e-sign details |
| Effective date | Not expressly specified |
| Governing framework | Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016, mainly Rule 9 |
| Main stakeholders | GPCB Regional Offices, hazardous waste recyclers, and Rule 9 actual users |
| Core change | Detailed inspection at least once every six months |
| Separate business deadline | Not expressly specified |
| Nature of requirement | Mandatory administrative direction to GPCB offices; practical compliance impact on covered facilities |
The order changes how often and how deeply covered facilities will be checked. It does not replace the waste-specific CPCB SOP or the conditions written in each authorisation.
The Regulatory Framework
The Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 were made under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. They govern the safe management, recycling, recovery, reuse, and use of hazardous and other wastes.
An "actual user" processes hazardous or other waste for reuse, recycling, recovery, pre-processing, or use, including co-processing. Rule 9 requires authorisation from the State Pollution Control Board in accordance with CPCB SOPs or guidelines. If no SOP exists, it provides for CPCB approval based on trial runs. Rule 10 allows new SOPs or guidelines from time to time. These provisions appear in the official India Code copy of the 2016 Rules.
Role of CPCB and GPCB
The CPCB develops SOPs and guidelines for certain applications involving hazardous waste. They may include process, facility, pollution control, monitoring, product, and end-use criteria. They form the technical foundation for safe utilization.
The GPCB is the state-level Pollution Control Board for Gujarat. It implements and monitors the authorization process. The circular dated July 2026 sets out the inspection frequency and the items to be inspected.
Continuing compliance under Rule 9
Rule 9 approval is tied to the authorised waste and use. Waste receipts, plant operations, outputs, and residue management must continue to match the applicable conditions.
The circular focuses on actual operation to support your ongoing safety and environmental protection efforts. It checks whether the approved basis for recycling or use still exists at your site, emphasizing our shared goal of compliance and safety.
Why This Was Implemented?
The circular states that CPCB has issued waste-specific SOPs and guidelines. These instruments may cover the recycling or utilisation process, minimum facilities, pollution controls, environmental safeguards, records, monitoring, product quality, and permitted end use.
Such conditions apply throughout facility operations. They are not limited to the date when an authorisation is granted. GPCB therefore instructed its offices to verify continuing compliance through periodic field inspection.
The objective here is that of enforcement consistency. Every installation will need to be inspected against its SOP, authorization, and permissions using the same seven criteria.
Periodic inspection will uncover problems that may go undetected through a desk assessment. A report or registry will reveal the amount of waste managed. It may not indicate whether there is enough storage capacity, whether the pollution control equipment was operating, or whether the end product met any use restrictions. The field assessment will enable officials to match up the approved site with actual physical data.
The six-month minimum also reduces the chance that a serious mismatch remains unseen for a long period. GPCB allows the detailed check to be combined with a routine inspection. This can reduce duplicate visits when the combined inspection covers the full scope and properly records the findings.
What Has Changed
The circular introduces a minimum inspection frequency and a detailed scope of verification. It also explains when a routine inspection may count.
| Compliance area | Earlier position stated in the circular | New direction | Business meaning |
| Inspection frequency | Earlier position stated in the circular | At least once every six months | Covered facilities face recurring detailed review |
| Inspection scope | No earlier checklist is described | Seven areas must be checked | Records, plant operations, outputs, and residues may be reviewed together |
| Routine inspection | Earlier treatment is not stated. | It may only count once the full SOP and authorisation scope have been checked and recorded. | A general site visit is not enough |
| Stricter schedules | Existing tighter conditions may already apply | Tighter SOP, authorisation, CPCB, or GPCB frequency continues | The six-month rule cannot be used as a relaxation |
The source does not claim that inspections did not occur earlier. It only creates a clear minimum frequency for the detailed checks covered by this circular.
Analysis of the Seven Inspection Areas
| Inspection area | What GPCB must verify | Practical meaning for the facility |
| Applicable CPCB SOP or guideline | Compliance with waste-specific requirements and prescribed minimum facilities | The authorised process and site setup must match the relevant technical conditions |
| Authorisation and permissions | Compliance with every applicable condition | Actual operations must remain within approved activities and limits |
| Waste source, category, and quantity | Whether waste received and processed matches authorised details | Inputs from an unapproved source or a quantity mismatch may be identified |
| Waste-to-output reconciliation | Waste received and consumed compared with product, output, and residues | The full material flow must be credible and explainable |
| Equipment and safeguards | Adequacy and actual operation of equipment, storage, pollution controls, and safeguards | Installed systems must work in practice |
| Product and end-use controls | Product specifications, use restrictions, and monitoring where prescribed | Output must meet applicable conditions and follow permitted end use |
| Residue management | Proper management and disposal of residues and other process waste | Secondary waste must follow the approved route |
The inspection is broader than just reviewing documents. It involves verifying the permits issued, physical operations carried out, and quantities handled. The specific technical requirements will depend on the waste type, process, and facility.
SOP requirements and minimum facilities
The inspection starts by reviewing the right CPCB SOP for the waste. The conditions depend on the type of waste and intended use. Therefore, there cannot be a single checklist that can apply to all facilities.
The approved process must suit the facility's location. A change in equipment, waste source, product, or intended use may impact compliance. The circular does not provide an amendment procedure but may highlight any non-reviewed differences.
Authorised waste and material reconciliation
GPCB must verify the authorised waste source, category, and quantity. It must then compare receipts and consumption with outputs and residues.
This material balance explains where the input went during a selected period. The circular gives no formula or acceptable variance. The result must therefore come from reliable plant data, including relevant figures for stock, consumption, output, loss, and residue.
Actual operation of equipment and safeguards
Adequacy and functionality are necessary for the circular. The installed equipment may be inadequate or ineffective due to damage, bypassing, insufficient capacity, or non-functionality. This is true even for storage, pollution control, and safeguards.
There should be a readiness that involves physical assessment when the equipment is in use. The list of equipment is insufficient. It is the SOP that matters here.
Product controls, end use, and residues
Some waste uses require a product to meet stated specifications or remain within a limited end use. GPCB must check these restrictions wherever they apply.
Residues remain part of the compliance chain. Any residue or other process waste must follow the route approved for that facility.
Who Is Covered by the Circular?
| Stakeholder | Covered? | Relevant condition | Main responsibility |
| GPCB Regional Officers and Unit Heads | Directly covered | Addressed by the circular | Plan, conduct, verify, and record detailed inspections |
| Hazardous waste recyclers in Gujarat | Covered | Facility recycles hazardous waste under applicable approval conditions | Maintain continuing compliance with the relevant SOP and authorisation |
| Rule 9 actual users in Gujarat | Covered | Authorised to use hazardous waste as a resource | Follow approved waste, process, monitoring, product, and residue conditions |
| Other waste generators, transporters, or disposal facilities | Not automatically covered | Covered only if they also fall within a stated category or another legal direction applies | Follow their separately applicable rules and permissions. |
Implementation Timeline/Norms
The circular was approved and signed on 7 July 2026. It does not state a separate effective date or explain how the first six-month period will be calculated.
The mandatory frequency is "at least once in every six months." A routine visit may be combined with such a periodicity only after complete verification and documentation of all relevant SOPs and the authorisation scope.
No specific time limit for compliance is prescribed to the industries. The absence of an effective date shall not be considered a transition period by any covered unit. Any additional monitoring or inspection schedule that exists in the SOP/guidelines/authorisation/CPCB/GPCB order shall remain applicable.
Compliance Requirements for GPCB and Covered Facilities
Duties for GPCB offices
The direction is mandatory for GPCB offices. They must inspect every six months, check all seven areas, record the findings, and maintain a tighter frequency if warranted.
Controls tested at covered facilities
Covered facilities are not subject to a new approval duty. GPCB will instead test these continuing controls:
- Authorised waste sources, categories, and quantities.
- Applicable process, facility, pollution-control, and safeguard conditions.
- Waste, stock, output, and residue reconciliation.
- Product specifications, end-use restrictions, and monitoring where prescribed.
- Approved management and disposal of process residues.
Impact on Businesses
| Stakeholder | Immediate impact | Cost or operational effect | Main concern |
| Hazardous waste recyclers | Detailed review every six months at minimum | More regular site and record readiness | Aligning inputs, process, output, and residues |
| Rule 9 actual users | Closer checking of utilisation conditions | More coordination across purchasing, production, stores, and environment teams | Remaining within the approved process and waste limits |
| MSME facilities | No separate exemption | Staff time and system costs may be harder to absorb | Keeping records and controls ready throughout the year |
| GPCB Regional Offices | Recurring inspection and reporting duty | More detailed field work | Consistent verification and clear inspection reports |
The circular does not introduce an inspection fee, financial limit, or new testing charge. However, businesses may still face indirect costs. These may include staff time, equipment maintenance, required monitoring, improved waste record-keeping systems, employee training, and corrective work.
Hazardous Waste Recyclers
Recyclers must show that the waste received matches the source, category, and quantity allowed under their authorisation.
Their records should clearly connect:
- Waste received and stored
- Waste used in the recycling process
- Products or materials recovered
- Residues generated after recycling
Maintaining complete records is only one part of compliance. Storage areas, process equipment, pollution-control systems, and residue-disposal methods must also meet the applicable CPCB SOP and authorisation conditions.
Rule 9 Actual Users
Actual users must demonstrate that the hazardous waste is used only through the approved process. Waste purchase records, production data, quality reports, and environmental records should contain matching information.
Product and dispatch teams should also understand any limits placed on the final product. A compliance issue may arise if a waste-derived product is sold or used for a purpose that is not permitted under the applicable SOP or authorisation.
MSMEs and Smaller Facilities
The circular does not provide any separate relaxation for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). Smaller facilities may face the same inspection requirements as larger units, even if they have fewer technical employees.
Their main costs may relate to:
- Improving waste and production records
- Maintaining equipment and pollution controls
- Completing required monitoring
- Training employees
- Obtaining professional compliance support
This does not mean that every MSME needs a new system. The required action will depend on its current practices, authorised waste, operating process, and applicable SOP. A focused compliance review can identify genuine gaps and prevent unnecessary spending.
Management and Internal Teams
The inspection may entail cooperation between different departments. The stores department will have waste receipt data. The production department will have details of consumption and production. The quality department will ensure that the final product meets the required standards. The environmental department will handle approvals and residue.
There might be some problems due to the use of different terminology or units of measurement. Consistent record-keeping will help prevent mistakes.
How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance
Confirm applicability. Check whether the facility is a hazardous waste recycler or a Rule 9 authorised actual user under GPCB jurisdiction.
- Identify the controlling instruments. Use the correct CPCB SOP or guideline, GPCB authorisation, consent conditions, and related permissions.
- Map each condition to site practice. Link the requirement to the responsible team, operating area, monitoring activity, and available evidence.
- Reconcile the complete waste flow. Compare authorised inputs with receipts, stock, consumption, product or output, and residues.
- Inspect physical controls. Check process equipment, storage, pollution-control systems, and environmental safeguards under actual operating conditions.
- Close verified gaps. Record corrective work and keep supporting information ready for GPCB.
This sequence is a recommended inspection-readiness plan. The circular itself does not prescribe a new application or filing procedure.
Facilities with limited internal capacity may use environmental compliance services for condition mapping and verified gap closure.
Assign responsibility across the facility.
| Compliance area | Suggested responsible function | Main internal check |
| Authorisation and SOP mapping | Environment or compliance team | Every condition is linked to an operating control |
| Waste receipt and storage | Stores and environment teams | Source, category, quantity, and storage match approval conditions |
| Consumption and output | Production team | Consumption and output data use a consistent period and unit |
| Product controls | Quality and commercial teams | Specifications, monitoring, and end-use conditions are followed where prescribed. |
| Residue management | Production and environment teams | Residues are measured, recorded, stored, and sent through the approved route. |
| Equipment and safeguards | Engineering and operations teams | Systems are adequate, maintained, and operating during production |
This is a recommended map. The circular does not assign duties to company departments. Each facility should set ownership for its own organisation.
Maintain inspection readiness between visits.
Six-monthly inspections do not imply six-monthly compliance. SOP and authorisation requirements hold true for operations as well. Internal audits should identify gaps before impacting many months of data.
A condition register can relate the requirement to its corresponding control and ownership. The period for reconciliation should be uniform. The physical systems should be audited during operations. The corrective action should document the gap, deadline, work, and closure.
The circular requires no particular software or internal audit format. Existing systems may be used if they show accurate information and effective control.
Benefits for Businesses
When audits are done regularly, it helps businesses find problems before an official inspection. They also make waste handling and plant operations easier to manage.
The main benefits include:
- Waste records become easier to check and explain.
- Waste is purchased only from approved sources and under authorised categories.
- Stock differences, process losses, and missing residue details can be identified earlier.
- Pollution-control equipment receives regular maintenance and attention.
- Product specifications and end-use restrictions are less likely to be overlooked.
- Different departments can work with the same information.
- Compliance gaps can be corrected before they become larger problems.
These benefits are possible only when the facility follows the required controls in practice. Well-arranged documents cannot replace working equipment, safe storage, proper waste handling, or correct residue disposal.
Continuous compliance can also help in business planning. Reliable information about waste, production, output, and residues provides insight into how efficiently the process is going. Regular checks on the equipment will prevent unnecessary breakdowns or delays.
Clear responsibility also helps during an inspection. When each department understands its role, the business can provide accurate information without disturbing normal operations.
Strong compliance can also build trust. Waste generators want assurance that hazardous waste is being sent to a responsible and authorised facility. Buyers may also want confidence that waste-derived products meet the required specifications and end-use conditions.
A good compliance record does not guarantee new business. However, it can support stronger commercial relationships, business credibility, and continued market access.
Compliance Challenges and Cost Implications
The main challenge is staying ready throughout the year. The circular does not provide a separate inspection date for each facility. Businesses must therefore keep their records, equipment, and operating controls up to date, rather than preparing only in advance of a scheduled visit.
Some practical challenges may include:
- Different departments may use different names, units, or reporting periods for waste, products, and residues.
- A facility may need to comply with several SOPs, authorisation, consent, and monitoring conditions simultaneously.
- Old or poorly maintained equipment may require repair or replacement.
- MSMEs may have limited staff to manage environmental records and prepare for inspections.
- Correcting several gaps together may increase short-term costs.
The notice does not mention any inspection fee or precise cost involved for compliance. Costs will vary depending on the condition of the facility, CPCB standard operating procedure, monitoring, equipment status, waste classification, and personnel within the organization.
A facility with proper systems may need only minor improvements. A business with weak records or physical gaps may need more time, technical support, and corrective work.
Regulatory and Business Risks of Inspection Gaps
The circular does not prescribe a fine or create a new statutory penalty. Monetary penalty claims cannot be made from this source.
Rule 7 of the 2016 Rules provides a separate authorisation consequence. The State Pollution Control Board may suspend or cancel an authorisation when its holder fails to follow an authorisation condition, the Environment (Protection) Act, or the Rules. A reasonable opportunity of being heard must be given, and reasons must be recorded in writing. Rule 7 appears in the official India Code document.
Practical risks may include corrective directions, closer scrutiny, internal production delay, or difficulty during an authorisation review. The actual response will depend on the finding and the legal process followed by GPCB.
Is This the Right Decision or an Additional Burden?
The six-monthly inspection requirement can improve hazardous waste control, but it may also increase the operational burden on recyclers and authorised users.
| Assessment area | Why the decision is justified | Possible burden on businesses |
| Environmental protection | Regular inspections can detect unsafe handling, weak pollution controls, and improper residue disposal. | Facilities may need to spend more on maintenance, monitoring, and corrective work. |
| Continuous compliance | The inspection checks whether CPCB SOPs and authorisation conditions are followed during actual operations. | Businesses must remain inspection-ready throughout the year instead of preparing only during renewal. |
| Waste verification | The inspection checks whether CPCB SOPs and authorisation conditions are followed during actual operations. | Procurement, stores, and compliance teams may need stronger coordination and record control. |
| Material reconciliation | Matching waste receipts with consumption, output, and residues can identify unexplained differences. | Preparing an accurate material balance can be difficult when different departments maintain their own data. |
| Material reconciliation | Physical checks can confirm that process equipment, storage, and pollution-control systems are working properly. | Repairing or upgrading inadequate systems may require time and capital spending. |
| Impact on MSMEs | A common inspection standard supports equal environmental protection across facilities. | Smaller businesses may have limited staff, technical knowledge, and funds for regular compliance reviews. |
| Routine inspection integration | GPCB allows the detailed inspection to be combined with a routine visit when the full scope is checked and recorded. | The combined inspection may take longer, but it can reduce duplicate visits. |
| Long-term business value | Regular compliance can improve operational control, business credibility, and regulatory readiness. | The benefits may appear gradually, while compliance costs may arise immediately. |
Balanced View
This decision is quite sensible because recycling and processing of hazardous wastes should be under continuous supervision. An authorization in itself does not necessarily indicate that the equipment is functioning properly or that the quantity of waste is being handled correctly.
The following may result in increased expenses and bureaucracy, particularly for MSMEs. For GPCB, it is imperative to conduct inspections consistently, avoid repeated visits, and ensure that each observation relates to an SOP, authorization, or regulatory requirement.
Business Opportunities Created
The direction can increase demand for document-specific support, including:
- Waste-flow accounting and reconciliation systems.
- Compliance gap assessment against CPCB SOPs and GPCB conditions.
- Environmental audit services and inspection-readiness reviews.
- Pollution-control checks and monitoring support where required.
- Staff training and ongoing waste management compliance services.
Service providers must understand the relevant waste and utilisation process. A generic checklist may miss a product restriction, material-balance condition, or minimum facility requirement.
This direction could promote better environmental systems internally. Software firms can provide record-keeping of waste flow and condition. Technical experts can conduct reviews of pollution control methods. Laboratories could facilitate monitoring where an appropriate SOP or authorization exists for testing. Training firms can assist plant personnel in understanding the connection among waste input, production, and residuals.
These are service opportunities, not guaranteed revenue. Demand will depend on the number of covered facilities, their existing controls, and the gaps found during internal or GPCB review.
Best Practices for Six-Monthly Inspection Readiness
The following points are recommended controls. They are not new legal duties created by the circular.
- Keep one current register covering the SOP, authorisation, consents, and other permissions.
- Use the same waste names, quantities, units, and periods across departments.
- Review reconciliation and pollution-control performance before an inspection is due.
- Assign corrective action and check for tighter monitoring schedules.
Compliance Risks to Avoid
Considering an authorization as a validation of every operating condition being met.
- Getting waste from any source, category, or quantity other than what is permitted.
- Failure to reconcile stock, production, or residues.
- Having pollution control equipment installed but not functional.
- Failure to comply with conditions of product, end use, reporting, or monitoring.
- Treating a routine visit as complete without full verification and reporting.
These are control risks drawn from the circular's inspection scope. Their prevalence across the industry is not claimed.
What to Expect Next
The circular mentions only regular inspections, not one-off drives.
The document does not state any amendments, reporting systems, charges, or deadlines for future inspections. It also does not mention the inspection date on a per-facility basis. The business houses need to be aware that their operation would be inspected against the required SOP and authorisation.
How Can Corpseed Help?
Corpseed can support hazardous waste recyclers and Rule 9 actual users with environmental compliance services tailored to the GPCB inspection requirements.
1. Applicability Assessment
Corpseed can help determine whether the circular applies to a particular facility.
- Review the nature of the recycling or utilisation activity.
- Check whether the facility is an authorised recycler or Rule 9 actual user.
- Identify the waste categories and activities covered by the authorisation.
2. CPCB SOP and Authorisation Review
The applicable CPCB SOP and GPCB authorisation can be reviewed together.
- Identify the correct waste-specific SOP or guideline.
- Map SOP conditions against the existing authorisation.
- Check whether actual operations remain within approved limits.
- Identify any stricter monitoring or inspection conditions.
3. Compliance Gap Assessment
Corpseed can conduct a compliance gap analysis before the GPCB inspection.
- The regulatory requirements are compared with the current site practices.
- Gaps in the process equipment, storage, pollution control, and safety precautions can be identified.
- Check the product specifications and any limitations on end uses.
4. Waste Records and Material Reconciliation
Support can be provided for reviewing the complete movement of hazardous waste.
- Compare authorised quantities with waste receipts and consumption.
- Reconcile opening stock, closing stock, output, and residues.
- Identify differences between production and compliance records.
- Help organise information in a clear and consistent format.
5. Site Inspection Readiness
Environmental Audit Services of Corpseed may help prepare sites for physical verification.
- Verify if the necessary equipment and storage facilities are available.
- Check whether the pollution control equipment is functioning as required.
- Assess residue management and disposal practices.
- Help internal teams prepare for inspection-related questions.
6. Corrective-Action Support
Where a gap is identified, Corpseed can help organise the response.
- Classify the gap depending on the SOP or authorization requirement.
- Allocate the corrective action to the appropriate internal team.
- Check the progress of the action taken and supporting evidence.
- Check whether the problem has been successfully closed.
7. Authorisation and Renewal Support
In the event of a requirement for a separate authorisation update or renewal, Corpseed can assist with regulatory requirements.
- Check existing authorisation and validity.
- Check if changes in operations involve any regulatory action.
- Assist in completing the application and supporting documents.
- Assist in licence renewal and regulatory approval, if needed.
8. Ongoing Compliance Support
Ongoing assistance will ensure that facilities remain prepared even between inspections.
- Regular assessment of authorisation and SOP conditions.
- Internal environmental compliance assessment.
- Waste data and material balance assessments.
- Monitoring of corrective action plan and renewal date.
- Operational change compliance advisory services.
Corpseed's Core Message
Inspection readiness is not limited to arranging documents before a GPCB visit. The authorised waste, actual process, plant equipment, product output, pollution controls, and residues must all match.
Corpseed helps businesses understand these requirements, identify genuine gaps, and prepare practical corrective actions. Final approval and inspection decisions remain with GPCB and depend on the facility's actual compliance.
Hazardous waste recyclers and Rule 9 actual users in Gujarat may contact Corpseed for environmental compliance services, compliance gap assessment, and inspection-readiness support.
About the Author
Mahek Sancheti
Content WriterMahek Sancheti, BAJMC graduate with a deep passion for writing. As a content writer, video content creator, creative content creator, and scriptwriter, I bring stories to life through words and visuals. I honed my skills by working with a prominent news agency, where I excelled in crafting compelling narratives and engaging content. Coming from a journalism and mass communication background I have skills to craft engaging narratives that captivate audiences. With a keen interest in writing and creativity, I aim to deliver impactful and meaningful content that resonates with diverse audiences.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mahek-sancheti-837196212