Law Updates

Subject

Summary: Introduction The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), under the Department of Consumer Affairs, notified three Indian Standards through the Gazette of India Extraordinary (Reference: CG-DL-E-15062026-273461). All three standards came into force on 2 June 2026. Two standards revise existing requirements for petroleum tank calibration and dairy effluent management while one introduces India's first dedicated specification for jute shopping bags. The Three Standards S. No. No., Year & Title of the Indian Standards Established Date of Establishment No. , Year & Title of the Indian Standards to be Withdrawn, if any Date of Withdrawal 1 IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products- Calibration of Vertical Cylindrical Tanks Part 2 Optical-Reference-Line Method or Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging Method (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS/ISO 7507-2: 2005 Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products- Calibration of Vertical Cylindrical Tanks Part 2 Optical-Reference-Line Method 02 December 2026 2 IS 8682: 2026 Treatment and Disposal of Effluents of Dairy Industry- Guidelines (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 8682- 1977 Guide for Treatment and Disposal of Effluents of Dairy Industry 02 December 2026 3 IS 19726: 2026 Textiles- Jute Shopping Bag- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA Key transition fact: For Standards 1 and 2, the old versions remain valid concurrently until 2 December 2026, giving industry a 6-month transition period to migrate to the new standards. Standard 3 (IS 19726 for Jute Shopping Bags) is a brand-new standard with no predecessor. Standard 1: IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 Petroleum Tank Calibration The standard introduces Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging (EODR) alongside the traditional Optical-Reference-Line method. EODR enables faster calibration, improved accuracy, digital tank models and better deformation detection. What Changed The old IS/ISO 7507-2: 2005 only covered the Optical-Reference-Line (ORL) Method for calibrating vertical cylindrical petroleum storage tanks. The new 2022 revision (now adopted as Indian Standard) adds the Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging (EODR) Method, a significantly more advanced, technology-driven calibration approach. Optical-Reference-Line Method: Uses a theodolite and reference targets to measure tank shell geometry. Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging Method (EODR): Uses laser-based distance measuring instruments (total stations, laser scanners) to generate a comprehensive 3D digital model of the tank shell for calibration purposes. This produces: More accurate strapping tables Faster calibration turnaround Better detection of tank shell deformations Digital records of tank geometry for long-term comparison Who Is Affected The adoption of the revised standard will impact a wide range of stakeholders involved in petroleum storage, handling, measurement, and calibration activities across India, including: Oil and gas companies operating petroleum storage tanks, including IOC, BPCL, HPCL, ONGC, private refineries, and fuel depots. Petrochemical companies store liquid petroleum products. Aviation fuel storage operators at airports and defence facilities. Port and terminal operators manage crude oil and petroleum product storage. Calibration service providers are currently conducting Optical-Reference-Line (ORL) based tank calibration. Legal Metrology authorities that rely on tank calibration certificates for revenue, customs, excise, and fiscal measurement purposes. Why BIS Implemented This Standard As petroleum measurement systems become more technology-driven and globally integrated, BIS introduced this revision to improve calibration accuracy, support international best practices and strengthen measurement reliability across the sector. 1. EODR Technology Is Now the Global Industry Standard The previous Indian standard was developed when Electro-Optical Distance-Ranging (EODR) technology was still emerging. Since then, EODR has become the preferred calibration method worldwide because it: Delivers faster calibration compared to traditional methods. Provides highly accurate measurements with sub-millimetre precision. Creates permanent digital records of tank geometry. Detects tank shell deformations that may not be visible through conventional techniques. 2. Improved Custody Transfer Accuracy Petroleum storage tanks play a critical role in measuring crude oil and petroleum products during commercial transactions. Accurate calibration helps: Minimise revenue losses arising from measurement errors. Reduce disputes between buyers and sellers. Strengthen transparency in custody transfer operations. Improve confidence in fiscal measurement systems. 3. ISO Harmonisation The adoption of IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 aligns India's requirements with the latest international ISO standard, ensuring that calibration practices and certificates are recognised and accepted by global trading partners. Impact on Petroleum Tank-Owning Businesses During the transition period, businesses will gain greater flexibility in tank calibration while preparing for full adoption of the revised standard. All new tank calibrations commissioned from 2 June 2026 can use either ORL or EODR methods. The EODR method becomes formally recognised in India for the first time, allowing calibration service providers to offer EODR-based calibration with full IS/ISO backing. Businesses using EODR instruments for tank calibration will no longer need to justify the methodology to Legal Metrology authorities or commercial counterparties. After 2 December 2026: Calibration certificates issued under the old 2005 standard are no longer backed by a valid BIS standard. All new calibration work must reference IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022. Existing calibration tables generated under old IS remain valid until the next scheduled recalibration. For calibration service providers: Must upgrade their capabilities to include EODR instruments (laser total stations, 3D laser scanners). Must update their quality management systems and calibration reports to reference the new IS/ISO. Training of technical staff on EODR methodology and data processing becomes necessary. Standard 2: IS 8682: 2026- Dairy Industry Effluent Treatment and Disposal: What Changed IS 8682: 2026 replaces the nearly 50-year-old IS 8682: 1977 guideline for dairy effluent management. The earlier standard was developed when modern wastewater treatment technologies, ZLD systems, and current environmental regulations did not exist. The revised standard updates guidance on: Modern dairy wastewater characteristics Advanced treatment technologies, including biological and membrane systems Current CPCB discharge requirements Biogas recovery from dairy effluents Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) considerations Sludge management and reuse Monitoring, record-keeping, and reporting requirements Who Is Affected The revised standard affects businesses and stakeholders involved in dairy processing and wastewater management including: Large dairy processors such as Amul, Mother Dairy, Nestle India, Britannia, Dodla Dairy, and Parag Milk Foods. State cooperative dairy plants Cheese, butter, paneer, ghee, and UHT milk manufacturers FSSAI-licensed dairy units Environmental consultants ETP designers and operators SPCB and CPCB officials Why BIS Implemented This Standard Now The revision reflects the rapid growth of India's dairy industry and the increasing focus on environmental compliance and water conservation. The Existing Standard Was Outdated India's dairy processing sector has expanded significantly since 1977, making the older guideline inadequate for modern wastewater management challenges. Growing Environmental Compliance Pressure CPCB directives and NGT orders have highlighted concerns regarding river and groundwater pollution caused by inadequately treated dairy effluents. Water Conservation and ZLD Requirements Many states are encouraging industries to improve water recycling and adopt ZLD practices where feasible. Supporting Dairy Export Growth Modern environmental management standards help Indian dairy businesses meet international expectations and strengthen export competitiveness. Impact on Dairy Businesses Dairy businesses should use the transition period to assess current wastewater management practices and prepare for compliance with the revised standard. Immediate Actions Required (June-December 2026) Conduct an ETP Audit Review existing ETP performance against IS 8682: 2026 Identify gaps in treatment efficiency, sludge handling, and monitoring systems Plan Necessary Upgrades Assess whether ETP expansion or technology upgrades are required Allocate budgets for future improvements Update Compliance Documentation Reference IS 8682: 2026 in environmental management plans and compliance reports Improve Monitoring and Record-Keeping Implement recommended monitoring practices Maintain proper digital records of effluent quality After 2 December 2026 IS 8682: 1977 will be withdrawn IS 8682: 2026 will become the sole applicable BIS guideline for dairy effluent management Future compliance and environmental audits will be based on the revised standard Standard 3: IS 19726: 2026 Jute Shopping Bag Specification IS 19726: 2026 is India's first dedicated national standard for jute shopping bags. Until now, manufacturers and sellers operated without a specific Indian Standard defining minimum quality, performance, safety, and labelling requirements for jute shopping bags. The new standard is expected to establish uniform requirements covering product quality, durability, safety, and traceability across the industry. Key Requirements under the Standard Physical and Mechanical Properties The standard introduces measurable performance parameters to ensure jute bags are suitable for repeated consumer use. Fabric weight (GSM) requirements for structural integrity Tensile strength requirements in warp and weft directions Tear strength specifications Load-bearing capacity testing, including handle pull-out and vertical load tests Dimensional Requirements The standard is expected to bring consistency to bag sizes and construction specifications. Minimum dimensions for small, medium, and large bags Handle length and width requirements Handle attachment strength specifications Material Quality Material quality requirements aim to improve durability and product consistency. Jute fibre quality requirements Stitching and seam specifications Handle material specifications, including jute, rope, and webbing handles Safety Requirements Consumer safety requirements are expected to address chemical and material-related concerns. Restrictions on harmful dyes and finishing chemicals Heavy metal limits Requirements regarding allergens and hazardous substances Performance Testing Performance testing will help verify product durability under actual usage conditions. Repeated-use durability testing Water resistance testing for coated variants, where applicable Labelling Requirements The standard also introduces traceability and consumer information requirements. Declaration of jute content percentage Details of finishing treatments used Reference to compliance with IS 19726: 2026 Who Is Affected The introduction of this standard will influence the entire jute bag value chain, from manufacturing and retailing to exports and procurement. Jute bag manufacturers across West Bengal, Bihar, Assam and Odisha Jute handicraft and handloom producers Importers and retailers selling jute bags FMCG and retail companies using jute bags for packaging and branding E-commerce sellers on online marketplaces Export houses supplying jute bags to international buyers Why BIS Created This Standard Now The standard has been introduced to support India's growing jute sector while ensuring consistent quality across domestic and export markets. 1.    Single-Use Plastic Ban Driving Jute Demand: The gradual reduction of single-use plastics has significantly increased demand for reusable jute shopping bags. More manufacturers have entered the market Product quality has become highly inconsistent Retailers increasingly require standardised quality specifications Export buyers seek documented quality assurance 2.    Export Market Requirements: Global buyers increasingly require documented product specifications and safety compliance. Declared product specifications Chemical safety compliance requirements Performance testing data 3.    Consumer Protection: Growing retail and e-commerce sales have highlighted significant quality variations in jute shopping bags. Wide differences in strength and durability Inconsistent GSM and construction quality Non-disclosure of blended fibres in some products 4.    Promoting "Made from Jute" as a Premium Eco-Standard: A nationally recognised standard strengthens India's position as a leading producer of quality jute products. Enables verifiable quality claims Supports national jute promotion initiatives Aligns with Make in India and Atmanirbhar Bharat objectives Impact on Jute Bag Businesses The new standard creates a clear quality benchmark that businesses can use for manufacturing, procurement and exports. Manufacturers Manufacturers will need to evaluate existing products against the new specifications and address any compliance gaps. Test current product lines against IS 19726: 2026 requirements Upgrade products that fail quality or safety parameters Consider voluntary BIS certification where commercially beneficial Use compliance as a competitive advantage in domestic and export markets Retailers and Brand Users Retailers and brand owners can use the standard to improve supplier qualification and product consistency. Update supplier agreements to reference IS 19726: 2026 Align procurement specifications with the new requirements Establish clearer supplier evaluation criteria Strengthen quality assurance programs Communicate compliance claims to consumers Exporters The standard provides exporters with a recognised quality framework that can strengthen buyer confidence and market access. Use compliance reports during export qualification processes Support submissions to international retail buyers Strengthen sustainability and ESG documentation Improve credibility in competitive export markets How to Achieve Compliance with All Three Standards Businesses should use the transition period proactively to review existing practices, identify compliance gaps and implement necessary improvements. For IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 (Petroleum Tank Calibration) Review existing calibration program: Identify which tanks are due for recalibration in the next 12-18 months. Update calibration procedures: Amend internal QMS documents to reference IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 for future calibrations. Engage calibration service providers with EODR capability:  Where EODR is preferred or required, select service providers equipped with laser total stations and trained in EODR data processing. Update calibration certificates: Ensure next calibration certificates reference the new standard. Notify legal metrology and commercial counterparties: Update fiscal measurement documentation to reference revised IS/ISO. For IS 8682: 2026 (Dairy Effluent) Obtain and study IS 8682: 2026: Access the full revised standard from BIS. Commission ETP technical audit against new standard parameters: By an independent CPCB/NABL-approved environmental consultant. Prepare a gap-closure plan with timeline: Covering ETP upgrade, monitoring system installation, and documentation upgrades. Update SPCB submissions: Consent to Operate (CTO) applications and renewals should reference IS 8682: 2026 compliance. Train ETP operations team: On new parameters, monitoring frequencies, and record-keeping requirements. For IS 19726: 2026 (Jute Shopping Bags) Obtain IS 19726: 2026 from BIS: Through the BIS online shop. Test current product range: At a NABL-accredited textile testing lab against standard parameters. Address non-conformities: Redesign products that fail any specification (GSM, tensile, load, chemical safety). Update product documentation: Technical data sheets and product labels to declare IS 19726: 2026 compliance. Seek voluntary BIS certification (if needed for export markets or premium retail positioning). Benefits for Businesses The revised standards provide businesses with stronger compliance frameworks, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced market credibility.  Petroleum Tank Calibration Benefit Details Technology Freedom Businesses can now use faster, more accurate EODR calibration with full IS backing Fiscal Accuracy More accurate tank calibration reduces custody transfer disputes and measurement-related revenue loss International Credibility IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 is the current international standard calibration certificates are internationally recognised Reduced Calibration Downtime EODR is significantly faster than ORL reducing tank downtime during calibration Dairy Effluent Benefit Details Regulatory Risk Reduction Compliance with updated IS reduces SPCB enforcement action risk Export Market Access Modern EMS documentation aligned with IS 8682: 2026 supports EU and global market access Water Cost Savings ZLD and water recycling guidance reduces fresh water consumption significant savings for water-intensive dairy operations NGT Protection Documented compliance with the current IS gives dairy plants a strong legal position in any NGT or SPCB proceedings Jute Shopping Bags Benefit Details Export Differentiation IS 19726: 2026 compliance is a verifiable, internationally credible quality claim Market Access Premium retailers and FMCG brands requiring quality-specified jute bags are a better, higher-value customer segment Consumer Trust Standardized quality means fewer returns, complaints, and reputational damage Plastic Substitute Positioning IS-compliant jute bags are a credible, premium-positioned alternative to plastic carry bags Is This the Right Decision? All three standards represent correct, overdue, and well-timed regulatory action by BIS: IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022: Adopting the current ISO version, which adds EODR as a formally recognised method, is simply good housekeeping for India's petroleum measurement infrastructure. No reasonable argument for burden here. IS 8682: 2026: A 49-year-old standard was wholly inadequate for modern dairy industry scale and current environmental requirements. The revision is long overdue and strongly justified by environmental pollution evidence. IS 19726: 2026: Creating a new standard for a fast-growing, export-oriented product category is proactive, progressive policymaking. It rewards quality-conscious manufacturers and protects consumers. The 6-month concurrent validity period (until 2 December 2026) for the first two standards shows BIS is being practically calibrated, not disruptively abrupt. How These Standards Improve Environment and Consumer Satisfaction Together, these standards support cleaner industrial practices, better-quality products and improved confidence among consumers and regulators. Environmental Improvements Dairy effluent (IS 8682: 2026): Directly addresses India's most significant dairy sector environmental problem untreated or undertreated effluent reaching rivers, lakes, and groundwater. Jute bags (IS 19726: 2026): A durable, specification-compliant jute bag lasts longer- fewer bags discarded- less jute fiber waste- better plastic substitution per unit of resource. Petroleum tanks (IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022): More accurate calibration- more accurate custody measurement- less over-pumping/under-pumping tolerance abuse- marginally better spill prevention and inventory control. Consumer Satisfaction Jute bags: Consumers buying IS 19726-compliant bags get bags that reliably hold the declared weight, don't tear at handles, and are free from harmful chemicals exactly what they expect from a premium eco-product. Petroleum/fuel: More accurate tank calibration- more accurate dispensing measurement at bulk supply level- fairer deals for industrial fuel buyers. Dairy products: Cleaner dairy wastewater management- less local water body contamination- safer water sources in dairy-intensive rural areas where millions of people depend on groundwater. Corpseed’s Compliance Support Services Businesses affected by these new standards may require technical, compliance, testing, and documentation support during the transition period. 1.    BIS Certification and Compliance Advisory (Corpseed) Service Target Client Opportunity IS 19726: 2026 compliance testing coordination and BIS certification Jute bag manufacturers, exporters Since no previous standard existed, entire market needs guidance IS 8682: 2026 ETP audit and SPCB compliance Dairy plants, milk cooperatives Significant 1977 standard revision is a complete overhaul IS/ISO 7507-2: 2022 calibration advisory Petroleum companies, calibration firms Technical advisory on EODR adoption 2. Environmental Consultancy for Dairy Sector Assessment of existing effluent treatment systems against the requirements of IS 8682: 2026. Guidance on identifying compliance gaps and planning necessary upgrades to treatment infrastructure. Assistance with environmental documentation and regulatory submissions related to SPCB requirements. 3. Jute Bag Quality Testing and Export Certification Assistance in arranging product testing through NABL-accredited laboratories as per IS 19726: 2026 requirements. Preparation of compliance documentation required by retailers, importers, and export buyers. Guidance on chemical safety requirements, including testing for restricted dyes and heavy metals for international markets. 4. Petroleum Tank Metrology Services Support petrochemical and oil companies in: Identifying EODR-capable calibration service providers. Updating calibration certificates and legal metrology documentation. QMS documentation update to reference revised IS/ISO.

Subject

Summary: What BIS has Notified? BIS published this amendment notification on 11 June 2026 under Ref: HQ-PUB015/1/2020-PUB-BIS (1554), signed by Chitra Gupta, Scientist G & DDG (Hallmarking and Training). This notification issues Amendment No. 1 (June 2026) to three existing Indian Standards, meaning these are targeted, surgical updates to existing standards rather than full replacements. Complete Schedule of the Three Amended Standards S. No Standard Title Amendment Effective Date Old Version Valid Until 1 IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 Eye and Face Protection for Occupational Use- Part 1: General Requirements (First Revision) [ISO 16321-1: 2021] Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 2 IS 16144: 2014 Food Grain Storage Godowns- Code of Practice Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 3 IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 Respiratory Protective Devices- Methods of Test and Test Equipment, Part 6: Mechanical Resistance/Strength of Components and Connections (First Revision) [ISO 16900-6: 2021] Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 Implementation Timeline Gazette notification date: 11 June 2026 Amendment effective date: 10 June 2026 (all three) Concurrent validity: The standards without the amendment remain valid until 9 December 2026 Final compliance deadline: 9 December 2026, after which only the amended versions are recognized The 6-month transition window (10 June → 9 December 2026) is the industry's window to update all products, test reports, certifications, and operational procedures referencing these standards. Standard 1: IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022- Eye and Face Protection for Occupational Use The Standard in Context IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 is India's national standard governing general requirements for eye and face protectors used in occupational settings. It adopts ISO 16321-1: 2021 as the base and covers: Safety spectacles and goggles for industrial, chemical, and general workshop use. Face shields for grinding, welding, and chemical splash protection Welding filters and screens. Lens performance requirements: optical clarity, refractive power, prismatic deviation, light transmission Frame and housing requirements: mechanical strength, material compatibility, resistance to ignition Field of vision requirements Marking and user information requirements The parent IS 8521 Part 1: 2022 was itself the first revision, updating older standards to align with the new ISO 16321 series (which replaced the earlier ISO 16321: 2005 and related parts). Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 makes targeted corrections or additions to specific clauses within the 2022 version. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Since the document provides the metadata (amendment number, dates) but not the clause-level amendment text, the nature of Amendment No. 1 to IS 8521 (Part 1) is inferred from typical BIS amendment practice and the ISO 16321-1: 2021 framework: Corrigenda or clarification to specific clauses that generated industry queries or ambiguity post-2022 publication Updated test method references within the standard typically cross-reference to other parts of IS 8521 or allied IS (e.g., IS 17274 respiratory protection test methods amended in the same batch, suggesting a coordinated update) Material or chemical restriction updates aligning lens or frame material requirements with current REACH or BIS chemical restriction norms Revised marking requirements updated ISI mark placement, user information leaflet content, or shelf-life labelling for anti-fog coatings. Who is Affected? The revised standard will have implications across the personal protective equipment (PPE) ecosystem, affecting not only manufacturers and importers of eye and face protection equipment but also industries where the use of protective eyewear is mandatory under workplace safety regulations. The key stakeholders impacted by this development are outlined below: 1.    Manufacturers of eye and face protection equipment: Industrial safety equipment manufacturers (3M India, Honeywell Safety India, Karam Industries, Mallcom India, Safari Industries, Frontier Safety, dozens of MSMEs across Jalandhar, Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai) Welding equipment manufacturers are producing integrated face shields. Importers of safety spectacles, goggles, and face shields 2.    End-user industries with mandatory PPE compliance: Construction and infrastructure- every construction site under building regulations and Labor Code requires eye protection in specified operations. Mining- DGMS (Directorate General of Mines Safety) mandates eye protection in hazardous zones. Chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing- eye/face protection in chemical handling Metal fabrication and welding- grinding and welding operations Automotive manufacturing- machine operators and assembly workers IT/electronics manufacturing- soldering, chemical etching 3.    Regulatory authorities: DGFASLI (Directorate General Factory Advice Service and Labor Institutes) and Factory Inspectorates who enforce eye protection compliance under the Factories Act and Labor Codes OISD (Oil Industry Safety Directorate) for petroleum sector eye protection requirements DGMS for the mining sector Why BIS Amended this Standard? The amendment to IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 reflects BIS's ongoing efforts to strengthen product quality, improve worker safety, and align Indian standards with evolving industry and regulatory requirements. Several factors are likely to have contributed to the decision to revise the standard, including changes in occupational safety regulations, market surveillance findings, and developments within the PPE manufacturing sector. 1. Occupational Safety is a National Priority: Post-Labour Code Reforms. India's four new Labor Codes, including the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, have shifted the regulatory architecture for worker safety. The implementation of the OSHWC Code and associated rules has created renewed focus on PPE standards: Eye and face injuries are among the most common occupational injuries. Correcting or clarifying IS 8521 Part 1 ensures consistent product quality and enforcement. DGFASLI and State Factory Inspectorates use BIS standards as the reference for PPE compliance audits 2. Market Monitoring Findings:  BIS conducts regular market surveillance (including testing of BIS-certified products). Amendment No. 1 may address: Non-conformity patterns detected in surveillance testing Industry-reported interpretation issues Gaps between IS 8521: 2022 and its ISO 16321-1: 2021 source standard 3. Post-COVID Surge in PPE Manufacturing:  The COVID-19 period saw rapid expansion of PPE manufacturing in India. Many new manufacturers entered the eye protection market, and Amendment No. 1 may tighten specific parameters where new production has shown inconsistency. Impact on Eye and Face Protection Businesses The introduction of Amendment No. 1 to IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 will also require manufacturers, importers, and end-user organizations to review their existing compliance frameworks and ensure alignment with the revised requirements. While the amendment may not necessitate significant changes for every stakeholder, proactive compliance assessment will be essential before the implementation deadline. 1. For BIS ISI-Certified Manufacturers Must review Amendment No. 1 clauses as published For each amended clause, determine whether: Their current product design and testing already complies. They need to modify product design, materials, or manufacturing process. They need to conduct additional or revised testing. If product modification is required: submit revised test reports to a BIS-designated lab and update BIS licence documentation before 9 December 2026 If no product modification is required: record the compliance verification assessment internally and maintain it as evidence for BIS surveillance inspections. 2. For Importers Importers of eye and face protection products under BIS FMCS (Foreign Manufacturer Certification Scheme) must: Ensure foreign manufacturers are informed of Amendment No. 1 Verify compliance of imported products with amended IS 8521 Part 1 requirements Update FMCS certificate where test reports need updating 3. For End-User Companies Update procurement specifications to reference IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022, including Amendment No. 1 June 2026. When next reviewing PPE vendor approvals, verify that certified products comply with the amended standard. Include amended standard reference in Safety Management System documentation. Standard 2: IS 16144: 2014 Food grain Storage Godowns Code of Practice The Standard in Context IS 16144: 2014 is India's Code of Practice for food grain storage godowns, the primary national standard governing the design, construction, operation, and management of storage facilities for food grains (wheat, rice, pulses, coarse cereals, oilseeds). This standard cover: Structural requirements: Foundation, floor, wall, and roof specifications for grain godowns. Ventilation requirements: Natural and mechanical ventilation to control the temperature and moisture. Moisture and humidity management: Vapor barriers, damp-proof courses, moisture monitoring. Pest management: Fumigation provisions, aeration systems, pest monitoring. Fire safety: Firefighting infrastructure, clearance requirements. Operational requirements: Stacking patterns, stack heights, cleaning protocols. Record keeping: Stock records, quality monitoring, inspection logs. Safety and health: Worker safety in storage operations. This is a 2014 standard, 12 years old, receiving its first amendment. Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 updates specific operational or technical clauses. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Based on the evolving policy and operational landscape in Indian food grain storage, Amendment No. 1 to IS 16144: 2014 most likely addresses: Silo and steel bin storage provisions: India has rapidly expanded scientific bulk storage (steel silos) alongside traditional godown storage. The amendment may add or revise provisions for bin/silo storage operations Fumigation safety updates: Revised protocols for phosphine fumigation, including the updated gas-tight sealing requirements, phosphine monitoring standards, and worker safety protocols (aligned with the current CIBRC and DGFASLI guidance) Cold storage provisions for millets and high-oil grains: Reflecting national policy push for millet production (2023 was International Year of Millets) Digital record-keeping and monitoring provisions: Recognizing that modern warehouse management uses IoT-based temperature, humidity, and CO₂ monitoring Updated fire safety requirements: Potentially updated distances, firefighting equipment specifications. Solar power integration: Provisions for solar panels on godown rooftops are increasingly common and need guidance on installation without compromising structural integrity Who is Affected? The revised standard is expected to impact a wide range of stakeholders involved in the storage, handling, financing, regulation, and insurance of food grains. Both public and private sector entities that operate or rely on warehousing infrastructure will need to assess their compliance with the updated requirements. 1. Direct stakeholders: Food Corporation of India (FCI) operates the largest network of foodgrain storage facilities in the world (over 600 lakh metric tons capacity) Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) and State Warehousing Corporations (SWCs) across all states NAFED, NCCF, and other commodity procurement agencies State civil supplies corporations and state food departments Private warehousing companies (All Cargo, DHL Supply Chain, Mahindra Logistics, hundreds of registered warehouse service providers under WDRA) Commodity traders and agricultural produce traders with licensed storage facilities Cold storage operators storing temperature-sensitive foodgrains and pulses FSSAI-licensed food storage operators (FSSAI references storage standards in its food safety regulations) 2. Indirect stakeholders: Farmers and Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) also using storage facilities for post-harvest management under PM-ASA and other schemes. Banks and NBFCs providing warehouse receipt financing who require IS-compliant storage as a condition of their lending programs. Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority (WDRA), which requires IS compliance in accredited warehouses Insurance companies providing crop storage insurance using IS compliance as an underwriting consideration. Why BIS Amended IS 16144? The revision of the food grain storage standard reflects the growing need to strengthen India's agricultural storage infrastructure, improve food security, enhance safety practices, and align warehousing systems with emerging national priorities. Several factors are likely to have influenced the decision to update the standard. India's Food Security Imperatives: India manages the world's largest buffer stock of food grains, over 80 million metric tons at peak. Post-harvest storage losses in India have historically been estimated at 5-10% of grain production, billions of kilograms wasted annually due to poor storage. Updating storage standards directly addresses this massive national economic loss. PMGSY / PM-ASA Expansion Creating New Storage Infrastructure:  The Pradhan Mantri Annadata Aay Sanrakshan Abhiyan (PM-AASHA) and expanded MSP procurement are driving the construction of thousands of new primary agricultural market and storage facilities. These new facilities must be built to current standards. PM Gati Shakti and National Logistics Policy: The National Logistics Policy 2022 identified inadequate agricultural storage as a major supply chain bottleneck. The government's Rs 1 lakh crore push for storage infrastructure (announced in Union Budget 2023-24), creating 700 lakh metric tons of decentralized cooperative and PACS-level storage, makes updating the storage code of practice urgent. Fumigation Safety Incidents:  Phosphine fumigation-related deaths and accidents at grain storage facilities have been reported across multiple states. The amendment may tighten safety protocols specifically around confined-space entry, phosphine monitoring equipment requirements, and rescue protocols. Climate Change Resilience:  Higher ambient temperatures and humidity variability, direct consequences of climate change, are stressing existing storage infrastructure. The amendment likely adds guidance on climate-adaptive storage design. Impact on Food Storage Businesses The introduction of Amendment No. 1 to IS 16144:2014 will also require various stakeholders across the warehousing, logistics, agriculture, finance, and insurance sectors to review their existing practices and ensure that compliance with the revised requirements. The amendment is also expected to influence both operational procedures and future infrastructure development. 1. For Government and Public Sector Warehousing FCI, CWC, SWCs, and state food departments must: Review all godowns against Amendment No. 1 requirements by 9 December 2026 Prepare the capital expenditure plans for any structural or operational upgrades. Update their Standard Operating Procedures for storage operations to incorporate amended IS requirements. Train godown managers and warehouse supervisors on updated requirements. 2.    For Private Warehousing and Logistics Companies Companies with WDRA-accredited warehouses must: Verify continued accreditation compliance under amended IS 16144 Update their WDRA accreditation documentation to reference IS 16144: 2014 with Amendment No. 1 Companies applying for new WDRA accreditation after 10 June 2026: Must design and operate per the amended standard from day one 3.    For FPO and PACS Storage Facilities New storage facilities being constructed under PM cooperative storage schemes: Engineering designs must be drawn to IS 16144: 2014 + Amendment No. 1 Project management consultants must include amendment compliance as a design specification. 4.    For Banks and Insurers Banks financing warehouse receipt (pledge/hypothecation) transactions must update their warehouse eligibility criteria to require IS 16144: 2014 + Amendment No. 1 compliance. Insurance companies providing crop storage insurance should add amended IS compliance as a policy condition in new policies issued after 9 December 2026 Standard 3: IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 Respiratory Protective Devices Test Methods, Part 6: Mechanical Resistance/Strength The Standard in Context IS 17274 is India's multi-part standard series for respiratory protective devices (RPDs), the technical backbone of mask, respirator, and breathing apparatus testing in India. It adopts the ISO 16900 series as the base. Part 6 specifically covers test methods for evaluating the mechanical resistance and strength of RPD components and connections, including: Headband and harness testing: Tensile strength, elongation, and durability of head straps Valve testing: Mechanical resistance of inhalation and exhalation valves under cyclic breathing simulation Facepiece connection testing: Mechanical strength of connections between facepiece body, filters, cartridges, and exhalation valves Body strength testing: Resistance to deformation and distortion of the facepiece body. Connector and thread testing: Mechanical integrity of bayonet, screw, and push-fit connections. Drop and impact resistance: Drop test protocols for complete assembled devices. This Part 6 (2023) itself was the first revision, meaning it had already incorporated one round of ISO updates. Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 makes further targeted corrections or updates. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Amendment No. 1 to IS 17274 Part 6 most likely addresses: Coordination with IS 8521 (Part 1) Amendment No. 1: Both are in the same notification batch, strongly suggesting the amendments are technically interlinked. RPD and eye/face protection are often used together in combination PPE configurations. Shared test or marking provisions may need simultaneous updating. Updated test equipment specifications: Revised specifications for tensile testing rigs, cycling breathing machines, or torque measurement equipment Additional test conditions: For RPDs intended for extreme temperature or humidity environments Correction of errors or inconsistencies: Identified since the 2023 publication through PESO, BIS tech committee, or ISO feedback Who is Affected? The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 will impact a broad range of stakeholders involved in the manufacturing, testing, certification, procurement, and use of respiratory protective devices (RPDs). The key affected groups are outlined below: 1. Respiratory protective device manufacturers: Major RPD manufacturers: 3M India, Honeywell Safety Products India, Karam Industries, Venus Safety, Mallcom India, Scott Safety India, and hundreds of MSME manufacturers in Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra N95 and FFP2/FFP3 respirator manufacturers (COVID-19 expansion created many new manufacturers) Gas mask and SCBA (Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus) manufacturers for industrial and defense use Half-face and full-face elastomeric respirator manufacturers 2. Test laboratories: SITRA (South India Textile Research Association) key BIS-designated lab for PPE testing DRDO laboratories conducting RPD testing for defense procurement NABL-accredited independent labs providing commercial RPD testing services 3. Industrial users with mandatory RPD compliance: Chemical industry: handling toxic gases, vapors, particulates. Pharmaceutical manufacturing: containment and operator protection. Mining and tunneling: dust and toxic gas control Firefighting: SCBA use Construction: silica dust, asbestos abatement Agricultural sector: pesticide applicators Why BIS Amended IS 17274 Part 6? The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6) reflects BIS's continued focus on strengthening the quality, reliability, and safety performance of respiratory protective devices (RPDs). The revision is likely to be driven by evolving industry requirements, increased workplace safety expectations, and the need to maintain consistency across India's personal protective equipment (PPE) standards framework. 1. Post-COVID RPD Manufacturing Quality Control- India's rapid expansion of domestic N95 and other RPD manufacturing during COVID-19 created a large new manufacturing base. Post-pandemic surveillance of this industry found: Quality inconsistencies in mechanical construction (headband failures, valve leakage from mechanical failure) The amendment tightens and clarifies mechanical testing requirements to address these quality gaps. 2. Occupational Health Enforcement Under New Labor Codes- The OSHWC Code 2020 and its state-level rules are increasing enforcement of RPD use in industries including: Chemical plants Pharmaceutical manufacturing Mining and quarrying Updated mechanical testing standards for RPDs ensure that all RPDs in these workplaces meet current safety benchmarks. 3. Harmonization Between PPE Standards- Issuing Amendment No. 1 to both IS 8521 Part 1 (eye protection) and IS 17274 Part 6 (RPD testing) in the same notification batch is deliberate; it reflects BIS's systems approach to PPE standards, ensuring that combination PPE scenarios (e.g., full-face respirator with integrated eye protection) are covered coherently. 4. India's Defence and Emergency Response Procurement- DRDO, Indian Army (Chemical Corps), and National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) procure RPDs based on IS standards. Amendment No. 1 keeps the IS current with evolving military and civil protection operational requirements. Impact on Respiratory Protective Device Businesses The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 will require manufacturers, testing laboratories, and industrial users of respiratory protective devices to review their compliance processes and ensure alignment with the updated requirements. Stakeholders should assess the implications of the amendment well before the implementation deadline to avoid any disruptions in certification, procurement, and product approvals. 1.    For BIS ISI-Certified RPD Manufacturers Review Amendment No. 1 to IS 17274 Part 6 clauses upon BIS publication of the amendment document Assess impact on: Test methods used in their BIS licence-linked test reports Their in-house QC testing procedures for mechanical resistance If test methods change: commission revised testing at BIS-designated lab and update licence documentation by 9 December 2026 Update QMS (ISO 9001 / BIS factory QMS) test procedures to reference the amended standard 2.    For Test Laboratories Update SOPs for all mechanical resistance tests covered by IS 17274 Part 6 Verify and validate the test equipment against any revised specification in the amendment Update NABL accreditation scope to reference the amended standard Communicate updated test capabilities to RPD manufacturer clients. 3.    For Industrial Procurement Teams Update RPD procurement specifications to reference IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 with Amendment No. 1, June 2026 During the next vendor/product requalification cycle, request updated test certificates from suppliers How Businesses Across All Three Standards Will Achieve Compliance? The amendments introduced across the three standards require businesses to adopt a structured compliance approach. While the specific technical requirements may differ for each standard, the overall compliance framework remains largely similar and can be implemented through the following steps: Step 1: Obtain the Amendments from BIS Purchase Amendment No. 1 documents for each relevant standard from the BIS online shop (shop.bis.gov.in). These amendments are typically 1–10 pages and contain the specific clause additions, deletions, or some modifications. Step 2: Conduct a Gap Assessment For each amended clause: What does the amendment change vs the current version? Does the current product/facility/process comply with the amended requirement? If not, what needs to change: design, material, process, equipment, or documentation? Step 3: Implement Changes For each gap identified: Product manufacturers: Modify design, material, or process; commission revised testing at a BIS-designated lab. Storage facility operators: Implement operational or structural changes; update SOPs. Test laboratories: Update SOPs, validate any new test equipment requirements. Step 4: Update Documentation and Certifications Update BIS licence application files (for ISI-certified manufacturers) Revise procurement specifications, quality plans, and management system documentation Update any product labelling, user manuals, or declaration of conformity that references the standard. Step 5: Complete Before 9 December 2026 This is a firm date after which only the amended standard versions are recognized. All BIS-certified products, accredited facilities, and procurement contracts must reference the amended standards by this date. Benefits for Businesses After Implementation While compliance with Amendment No. 1 may require initial review and process updates, the revised standard offers several long-term benefits for businesses operating in the respiratory protective device (RPD) ecosystem. 1. For PPE Manufacturers (Eye and Face, Respiratory) Benefit Details Product Credibility ISI-certified PPE complying with amended standards carries stronger market credibility in government, industrial, and institutional procurement Export Opportunities IS standards aligned with ISO 16321-1 and ISO 16900-6 enable export to markets that recognize ISO-based national standards Reduced Liability Risk PPE failure causing injury is a major legal and reputational risk. Compliance with the latest amended standard is the strongest available defense Market Access Government tenders (CPWD, PSUs, defence) mandating IS compliance will require updated certification amendment compliance to maintain tender eligibility 2. For Food Storage Operators Benefit Details Reduced Post-Harvest Losses Updated storage practices = less grain spoilage = direct financial benefit for FCI, CWC, traders, and farmers WDRA Accreditation Maintenance Continued access to warehouse receipt financing, which is a critical working capital instrument for grain traders and FPOs Insurance Compliance Reduced storage loss claims → better insurance experience → lower premiums over time Worker Safety Updated fumigation and operational safety protocols protect godown workers from phosphine exposure and other hazards Is this the Right Decision? All three amendments represent correct and proportionate regulatory action. Key reasons: Standard Justification IS 8521 Part 1 India's OSHWC Code implementation makes PPE standards updates essential, post-COVID expansion of eye protection manufacturing makes quality tightening appropriate IS 16144 Post-harvest food loss is a Rs 90,000+ Cr annual problem; updating the storage code of practice is an obvious, necessary step for India's food security agenda IS 17274 Part 6 Coordinated RPD testing standard update alongside eye protection amendments shows systematic, coherent PPE standards management The 6-month transition window is appropriately calibrated sufficient for most businesses to assess and comply without operational disruption. How do these Amendments Improve Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, and Environmental Conditions? The amendments introduced across these standards are designed not only to strengthen regulatory compliance but also to enhance product quality, improve user confidence, and promote more sustainable and responsible industry practices. Their benefits extend beyond manufacturers to consumers, workers, regulators, and the broader environment. 1. Quality Improvements Eye and Face Protection: Clearer, more comprehensive performance requirements mean all ISI-certified products must actually protect eyes from the specified hazards at the specified intensity levels. Amendment-driven quality tightening reduces the market presence of safety spectacles that pass current tests but fail under real-world industrial conditions. Food Grain Storage: Updated operational requirements translate directly into less grain damaged by moisture, pests, fumigation accidents, and structural failures quality preservation in storage: better-quality grain reaching mills and consumers. Respiratory Devices: Tighter mechanical testing reduces failures in the field: headbands that don't snap, valves that don't fail, connections that don't leak. Every improvement in mechanical integrity of an RPD directly protects the wearer's health. Consumer and Worker Satisfaction Workers wearing the updated-standard eye protection and RPDs get genuine protection rather than false comfort. Grain consumers benefit from better-stored, less-contaminated grain reaching processing plants. Farmers selling stored grain under WDRA-accredited warehouse receipts benefit from better-maintained grain quality and therefore better realization prices. 2. Environmental Improvements Food grain Storage: Reducing post-harvest storage losses means less land, water, fertilizer, and agricultural inputs are wasted a massive embedded resource saving. Better fumigation protocols under amended IS 16144 reduce phosphine gas release into the atmosphere and prevent groundwater contamination from fumigant residues. Reduced spoilage means less rotted grain entering waste streams. PPE Manufacturing and Disposal: Longer-lasting PPE (better mechanical strength) means less frequent replacement, directly reducing PPE waste volumes, which are a significant environmental problem (masks, respirators, and goggles are not easily recyclable). Business Opportunities for Corpseed 1. BIS PPE Certification and Licence Management Service Target Clients Details IS 8521 (Part 1) licence amendment or fresh ISI certification Safety spectacle and face shield manufacturers Manage testing, documentation, and BIS interface IS 17274 Part 6 test method update advisory RPD manufacturers with existing BIS licences Review amendment impact, coordinate revised lab testing Combination PPE (RPD + eye) compliance advisory Industrial manufacturers making combo products Navigate both amendments simultaneously FMCS update for imported PPE Importers of safety glasses, goggles, respirators Update foreign manufacturer's Indian certification 2. Food Storage Compliance Advisory Service Target Clients Details IS 16144 Amendment No. 1 compliance audit Private warehousing companies, WDRA-registered warehouses Gap assessment and remediation planning New storage facility IS 16144 design review Agricultural infrastructure project developers Verify designs against the amended standard before construction WDRA accreditation advisory New and existing registered warehouses Maintain/obtain WDRA accreditation under amended IS 3. Industrial Safety Compliance Packages Bundle PPE-related BIS certification services with broader occupational health compliance under OSHWC Code rules Target chemical plants, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and mining companies facing increased DGFASLI/DGMS scrutiny Offer an "OSHWC PPE Compliance Pack" inventory all PPE in use, verify current IS compliance, identify upgrades needed post-amendments, manage BIS certification for in house manufactured or imported PPE.

Subject

Summary: Introduction The Bureau of Indian Standards ( BIS ) has notified 17 Indian Standards through Notification Ref. HQ-PUB013/1/2020-PUB-BIS (1548), effective from 2 June 2026. Of these 9 are revisions of existing standards and 8 are newly introduced standards. BIS has provided a six-month transition period, allowing the previous versions of revised standards to remain valid until 2 December 2026. The notification impacts manufacturers, testing laboratories, exporters and other businesses operating in the affected sectors. Complete Schedule of All 17 Standards S. No. No., Year & Title of the Indian Standards Established Date of Establishment No. , Year & Title of the Indian Standards to be Withdrawn, if any Date of Withdrawal 1 IS 75: 2026 Linseed/Flaxseed Oil, Raw and Refined- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 75- 1973 Specification for Linseed Oil, Raw and Refined (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 2 IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026 Methods of Sampling and Test for Paints, Varnishes and Related Products Part 5 Mechanical Test on Paint Films Section 1 Hardness Tests (Fourth Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1)-1988 Methods of Sampling and Test for Paints, Varnishes and Related Products Part 5 Mechanical Test on Paint Films Section 1 Hardness Tests (Third Revision) 02 December 2026 3 IS 887: 2026 Animal Tallow- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 887- 1977 Specification for Animal Tallow (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 4 IS 1420: 2026 Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 1420: 1989 Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate-Specification (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 5 IS 12410: 2026 Soil Reclamation- Terminology (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 12410- 1988 Terminology Related to Soil Reclamation 02 December 2026 6 IS 13213: 2026 Solvent-Borne Polyurethane Enamel Paint (Two Pack)- Specification (Second Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 13213: 2018 Polyurethane Full Gloss Enamel (Two Pack)-Specification (First Revision) IS 16239: 2021 Polyurethane Matt Finish (Two Pack) -Specification 02 December 2026 7 IS 14684: 2026 Total Nitrogen and Nitrogen Compounds in Soils- Methods of Determination (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 14684: 1999 Determination of Nitrogen and Nitrogenous Compounds in Soils 02 December 2026 8 IS 14685: 2026 Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soils- Methods of Determination (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 14685: 1999 Determination of Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soils 02 December 2026 9 IS 15386: 2026 ISO 15081: 2011 Pressurized Irrigation Systems- Graphical Symbols (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 15386: 2003 Pressurized Irrigation Systems- Graphic Symbols 02 December 2026 10 IS 19809: 2026 ISO 20122: 2024 Vegetable Oils-Determination of Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons (MOSH) and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH) with Online-Coupled High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection (HPLC-GCFID) Analysis-Method for Low Limit of Quantification 02 June 2026 NA NA 11 IS 19851: 2026 Hydnocarpus Pentandra (Buch.-Ham.) Oken Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 12 IS 19852: 2026 Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 13 IS 19853: 2026 Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Flower for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 14 IS 19854: 2026 Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br., ex DC. Whole Plant for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 15 IS 19855: 2026 Phyla nodiflora (L.) Greene Whole Plant for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 16 IS 19858: 2026 Preparation of Cattu Tablet (Herbal Extract Tablet) Code of Practice 02 June 2026 NA NA 17 IS 19861: 2026 Strychnos nux-vomica L. Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA Implementation Timeline Establishment date: 2 June 2026 (all 17 standards) Gazette notification: 3 June 2026 Concurrent validity of old IS versions: Until 2 December 2026. Old IS withdrawal: 2 December 2026 after which only the 2026 versions are valid. New standards (no predecessor): Operative from 2 June 2026 immediately applicable. Group 1: Linseed (Flaxseed) Oil- IS 75: 2026 The revision of IS 75 marks an important step towards improving the quality, safety, and testing requirements for linseed oil used across multiple industries. What Has Changed? BIS has revised the Indian Standard for linseed (flaxseed) oil by introducing IS 75: 2026, replacing the older IS 75: 1973 standard. Linseed oil is widely used in paints and coatings, edible oil products, Ayurveda, nutraceuticals, and leather treatment applications. The revised standard is expected to modernize quality and safety requirements by introducing: Updated physicochemical parameters such as acid value, iodine value, and saponification value. Stricter limits for contaminants including heavy metals and pesticide residues. Modern testing methods aligned with current national and international practices. Clearer classification of industrial-grade, food-grade, and pharmaceutical-grade linseed oil. Who Will Be Affected? The revision will impact several stakeholders across industries, including: Edible oil and nutraceutical manufacturers. Paint and coating manufacturers using linseed oil as a raw material. Ayurvedic and traditional medicine manufacturers. Leather treatment product manufacturers. Testing laboratories and importers of linseed oil. Why Did BIS Revise the Standard? The previous version of the standard was issued more than 50 years ago and no longer reflected current industry requirements. BIS has updated the standard to improve product quality, strengthen consumer safety, and align with modern manufacturing practices. The revision is also driven by: Growing demand for flaxseed oil in the nutraceutical sector. Increased focus on contaminant control and food safety. The need for better raw material quality standards for paint and coating manufacturers. Impact on Businesses Companies that deal with linseed oil might need to examine their current offerings and quality control procedures. Manufacturers might have to update standards, carry out new testing and make sure suppliers follow the updated guidelines. Key areas requiring attention include: Product testing and quality verification. Supplier compliance assessments. Updates to technical documentation and quality records. BIS certification and license amendments, where applicable. How to Comply? To prepare for the transition, businesses should: Obtain and review IS 75: 2026. Compare current specifications with the revised requirements. Conduct testing through NABL-accredited laboratories. Update supplier agreements and inspection procedures. Revise BIS certification applications and compliance documents. Group 2: Paint Products The paint industry has received two important updates under the latest BIS notification . These revisions aim to modernise paint testing methods, improve product performance standards, and simplify compliance requirements for manufacturers and testing laboratories. IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026- Paint Hardness Testing: What Has Changed? IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026 updates the methodology used to measure the hardness of paint films, a key parameter for evaluating the durability and scratch resistance of coatings. The revised standard introduces several improvements, including: Additional testing methods such as instrumented indentation testing, and updated pencil hardness testing. Alignment of Konig and Persoz pendulum hardness tests with current ISO standards. Updated temperature, and humidity requirements for testing conditions. Clear guidance on referee test methods for dispute resolution. Recognition of modern digital and computer controlled testing equipment. Who Will Be Affected? The revised testing standard will impact: Decorative, industrial, automotive, marine and wood-finish paint manufacturers. Independent paint testing laboratories. Certification bodies and regulatory authorities involved in quality assessments. IS 13213: 2026- Solvent-Borne Polyurethane Enamel Paint (Two Pack) IS 13213: 2026 is one of the most significant revisions in this notification. The standard combines the earlier gloss and matt polyurethane paint standards into a single framework while introducing updated technical requirements. What Has Changed? The revised standard introduces three major changes: Consolidation of Standards: Manufacturers now have a single standard covering both gloss and matt finish PU paints, reducing confusion, and simplifying compliance requirements. Updated Chemical Requirements: The standard introduces revised quality and safety parameters including: Updated VOC limits to support environmental and workplace safety objectives. Revised restrictions on heavy metals such as lead, chromium, and cadmium. Updated requirements for binders and hardeners based on current PU coating technologies. Performance Enhancements: The revision also strengthens performance requirements through: Higher weather resistance testing standards. Updated gloss retention requirements. Revised adhesion criteria. Expanded chemical resistance testing. Who Will Be Affected? The revised standard will affect: Polyurethane paint manufacturers. Industrial coating applicators and fabricators. Furniture and wood-finish manufacturers. Automotive coating companies. Importers and distributors of PU paints. Why Did BIS Revise IS 13213? The polyurethane coatings market has evolved significantly over the past few years, creating a need for updated technical requirements. BIS has revised the standard to reflect modern coating technologies, align with international practices, and simplify compliance by replacing two separate standards with a single comprehensive framework. The update also supports environmental goals through stricter VOC and heavy metal requirements. Impact on Paint Businesses Manufacturers producing BIS-certified PU paints will need to: Update BIS licence references to IS 13213: 2026. Obtain fresh test reports based on the revised requirements. Complete the transition before the withdrawal of the previous standards. Industrial users and procurement teams should also update tender specifications and technical documents to reference the new standard. Group 3: Soil Testing Standards The latest BIS notification introduces important updates for soil testing and land reclamation standards. These revisions are intended to align soil analysis methods with modern scientific practices while supporting India's agricultural productivity, environmental monitoring, and land restoration initiatives. IS 12410: 2026: Soil Reclamation Terminology: What Has Changed? IS 12410: 2026 updates the terminology used in soil reclamation activities, replacing the earlier 1988 version. Soil reclamation plays a vital role in restoring degraded, saline, waterlogged, and polluted land for productive use. The revised standard updates definitions and terminology to reflect modern practices, including: Phytoremediation and bioremediation techniques. Soil carbon sequestration and climate-related initiatives. Precision soil amendment methods. Advanced approaches for reclaiming sodic and acidic soils. The update also aligns Indian terminology with internationally recognised soil science frameworks and environmental programmes. IS 14684: 2026, Determination of Total Nitrogen and Nitrogen Compounds in Soil: What Has Changed? The revised standard modernises the methods used to measure nitrogen content in soil, replacing testing procedures that have been in place since 1999. Key updates include: Improved Kjeldahl digestion procedures. Introduction of automated nitrogen analysers and combustion-based testing methods. Updated methods for measuring ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite levels. Lower detection limits for improved testing accuracy. Enhanced quality assurance and calibration requirements. IS 14685: 2026- Determination of Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soil: What Has Changed? This revision updates the analytical methods used to determine sulphur content in soil and incorporates modern laboratory technologies. Major changes include: Advanced combustion-based sulphur analysis methods. Revised sulphate determination procedures. Introduction of ICP-OES and ICP-MS testing techniques. Improved detection capabilities for low sulphur concentrations. Who Will Be Affected? The revised soil standards will impact a wide range of stakeholders, including: Government and private soil testing laboratories. NABL-accredited testing facilities. Agricultural universities and research institutions. Fertiliser manufacturers and agribusiness companies. Environmental consultants and EIA professionals. Mining companies conducting land rehabilitation studies. Infrastructure developers involved in land reclamation projects. State agriculture departments operating soil testing programmes. Why Did BIS Revise These Standards? The revisions support India's growing focus on soil health, sustainable agriculture, and environmental management. Modern testing methods provide more accurate data for fertiliser recommendations, land restoration projects and environmental assessments. The updates also align Indian standards with current international practices and scientific advancements, helping laboratories generate more reliable and globally comparable results. Impact on Businesses and Laboratories The revised standards may require organisations involved in soil testing, agriculture, environmental consulting, and land reclamation to take several compliance-related actions, including: Updating laboratory testing methods to align with the revised BIS standards.  Validating and calibrating analytical equipment based on the new testing requirements.  Revising quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures.  Updating NABL accreditation scopes and technical documentation where applicable.  Training laboratory personnel on the revised testing methodologies and terminology.  Reviewing soil analysis reports, fertiliser recommendation systems, and environmental assessment protocols. Why BIS Revised All Three Soil Standards The Soil Health Card Scheme has created a national network of thousands of soil testing labs, generating data that drives fertilizer recommendations for millions of Indian farmers. Using 1999 and 1988-era analytical methods creates: Inaccurate nitrogen and sulphur data Incorrect fertilizer recommendations Suboptimal crop yields and input wastage Updating IS 14684 and IS 14685 ensures that every lab in the national network is using scientifically current methods. Soil Degradation Policy India's National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) and its soil health components require rigorous, updated methodology for: Monitoring soil carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur across the agricultural landscape. Tracking changes over time (critical for climate reporting). Evaluating the impact of soil reclamation interventions. International Harmonisation Global soil science has moved to combustion-based, automated CNS analysis (Dumas method) and ICP-based methods for most elements. The 1999 IS versions were based on older wet chemistry methods. Updating aligns India with: ISO soil testing standards FAO's recommended soil analytical methods EU's soil monitoring framework methods (relevant for Indian agricultural exports). Food and Export Safety Soil nitrogen and sulphur data underpin: Food safety assessments (nitrate levels in produce depend on soil nitrate supply). Export compliance for vegetables and grains where nitrate content is regulated by EU/USA importers. Impact on Soil Testing Businesses All NABL-accredited soil testing laboratories will need to align their systems with the revised standards: SOP Updates  Laboratories must update Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to reference IS 14684: 2026 and IS 14685: 2026 by 2 December 2026. Method documentation and reporting formats must reflect revised standards. Method Validation  Labs switching from older analytical methods must re-validate updated procedures. Ensure consistency, accuracy, and compliance with revised testing protocols. NABL Accreditation Scope  Update testing scope in the NABL online portal to include revised methods and standards. Maintain alignment with accreditation requirements during transition. Equipment Upgrades  Labs without advanced instruments like combustion CNS analysers or ICP-OES may need to:  Plan capital expenditure for equipment procurement. Or establish referral arrangements with equipped laboratories for specialized testing. Government Laboratory Compliance  State agriculture departments must issue updated technical orders. Ensure all government soil testing labs adopt revised method references before 2 December 2026. Standard 10: IS 19809: 2026- Vegetable Oils (MOSH & MOAH Testing): What It Is? This is a new Indian Standard introducing the testing framework for Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons (MOSH) and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH) in vegetable oils. Based on ISO 20122: 2024  Uses advanced analytical method: HPLC–GC–FID (High Performance Liquid Chromatography + Gas Chromatography + Flame Ionization Detection)  Why It Is Important? MOSH and MOAH are hazardous contaminants that can enter vegetable oils through: Lubricating oils used in food processing machinery  Printing inks and adhesives in food packaging (especially recycled materials)  Environmental contamination during production and storage  Mineral oil-based agricultural sprays  Health and Safety Concerns MOAH: Potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic, especially polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). MOSH: Accumulates in human tissues (fatty tissue and lymph nodes) with uncertain long-term effects. Increasing regulatory scrutiny globally, including EU food safety limits under Regulation (EU) 2023/2419. Who Is Affected? This standard has wide industry impact across the food and export ecosystem: Edible oil manufacturers such as Adani Wilmar (Fortune), Ruchi Soya/Patanjali, Marico, Godrej Agrovet, Cargill India, and Bunge India. Importers and exporters of vegetable oils Food manufacturers using edible oils in: Snack foods  Bakery products  Ready-to-eat meals  Confectionery items  Food testing and analytical laboratories  Export-oriented food businesses targeting EU and other regulated markets Why BIS Created This Standard Now Concerns around food safety, export requirements, and rising global scrutiny have made it necessary to introduce a clear testing framework at this stage. 1. EU Market Access India exports significant quantities of edible oils and oil-containing foods to the EU. The EU's 2023 MOSH/MOAH Regulation requires exporters to demonstrate compliance through validated test methods. IS 19809: 2026 (adopting ISO 20122: 2024) gives Indian labs a recognised national standard for conducting these tests. 2. FSSAI Pre-emptive Alignment FSSAI is expected to introduce MOSH/MOAH limits for edible oils in India (following international precedent). Having IS 19809: 2026 as the recognized test method standard ensures Indian labs are ready to test against these future limits. 3. Consumer Protection Even without mandatory limits today, sophisticated Indian consumers and retailers are beginning to ask about MOSH/MOAH in premium and organic oil brands. IS 19809: 2026 enables credible, IS-backed testing. Standards 11-17: Traditional Medicine Standards BIS notified seven new Indian Standards for traditional medicinal materials and herbal formulations all entirely new (no predecessor): Standard Material Common Name/Use IS 19851: 2026 Hydnocarpus pentandra seed Chaulmoogra traditionally used in skin diseases IS 19852: 2026 Butea monosperma seed Flame of the Forest / Palash seed fever, liver, skin diseases IS 19853: 2026 Nelumbo nucifera flower Lotus flower cardiac health, Ayurveda IS 19854: 2026 Alternanthera sessilis whole plant Sessile joy weed traditional hepatoprotective IS 19855: 2026 Phyla nodiflora whole plant Frog fruit Ayurveda, hair and skin preparations IS 19858: 2026 Cattu Tablet (Herbal Extract Tablet) Code of Practice Traditional herbal extract tablet preparation IS 19861: 2026 Strychnos nux-vomica seed Nux vomica Ayurveda (in specific controlled doses) Who Is Affected Ayurvedic medicine manufacturers (Dabur, Himalaya, Hamdard, Baidyanath, Zandu/Emami, Patanjali Ayurved, thousands of smaller units). AYUSH raw material suppliers and herb traders Cattu tablet manufacturers traditional preparation specific to South India, particularly Tamil Nadu and Kerala Herbal extract manufacturers supplying Ayurveda and traditional medicine companies NABL-accredited labs testing herbal/AYUSH raw materials Why BIS Created These Standards? As the AYUSH sector continues to expand in India and international markets, the need for consistent quality standards has become increasingly important. 1. AYUSH Sector Standardisation Priority Since 2021, the Ministry of AYUSH has been actively working with BIS to strengthen standardisation across traditional medicine supply chains. Developing individual Indian Standards for medicinal plant materials helps establish a common standard for quality, and authenticity. These standards help define: Identity requirements- ensuring the correct botanical species and plant part are used Purity requirements- preventing adulteration and ensuring the correct variety is supplied Quality parameters- including ash values, extractive values, and marker compound specifications Contaminant limits- covering heavy metals, pesticide residues, aflatoxins, and other impurities By setting clear specifications, BIS aims to improve consistency across cultivation, processing, testing, and manufacturing activities. 2. Export Market Access India's AYUSH exports now exceed Rs18,000 crore annually, making quality assurance a critical trade requirement. Importers and regulatory authorities in markets such as the EU, USA, Japan and the Middle East increasingly require: National or internationally recognised specification standards. NABL-accredited laboratory test reports. Evidence of consistent quality and traceability throughout the supply chain. These BIS standards provide a recognised framework that supports export documentation and enhances the credibility of Indian AYUSH products globally. 2. Preventing Adulteration and Misidentification Many medicinal plant materials are traded in dried or processed forms, making accurate identification difficult. This creates a risk of substitution, adulteration or use of incorrect plant parts. The risk is particularly significant for botanicals such as ‘Strychnos nux-vomica’ where improper identification can have serious safety implications. The new standards address these concerns by including: Botanical and microscopic identification criteria Chemical profiling requirements Purity specifications Defined quality benchmarks These measures help reduce the risk of adulteration while improving consumer safety and product reliability. Animal Tallow and Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate These revisions modernise long-standing industrial standards, bringing them in line with current manufacturing practices, safety expectations, and international quality requirements. Standard 3: IS 887: 2026- Animal Tallow (Third Revision): What Changed This standard replaces IS 887:1977, updating a specification that had remained largely unchanged for nearly five decades. Animal tallow continues to be an important industrial raw material used in: Soap and detergent manufacturing Candle production Leather processing and treatment Rubber and polymer processing Industrial lubricants and specialty chemicals The 2026 revision introduces several important updates: Revised fatty acid composition requirements using modern FAME analysis methods. Updated limits for free fatty acids (FFA) and peroxide value. Improved moisture and impurity specifications. New contaminant requirements covering substances such as pesticides and dioxins. Traceability provisions relating to animal origin and BSE-risk management for cattle-derived tallow. Who Is Affected? The revised standard impacts: Soap and detergent manufacturers Candle manufacturers Leather processing companies Tallow rendering and processing businesses Rubber and polymer manufacturers Importers and traders dealing in animal-derived industrial fats Standard 4: IS 1420: 2026:-Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate (Third Revision): What Changed This standard replaces IS 1420:1989 and updates quality requirements for light basic magnesium carbonate to reflect current industrial, pharmaceutical, and food-grade applications. The material is widely used in: Rubber manufacturing as a reinforcing filler Paints and coatings as a filler and pigment extender Pharmaceutical formulations as an antacid excipient and flow aid Food products as an anti-caking agent (E504) and acidity regulator Cosmetics and personal care products as an alternative to talc The 2026 revision includes: Updated purity specifications based on magnesium carbonate content. Revised heavy metal limits for lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. Particle size distribution requirements for improved performance consistency. Updated moisture content and loss-on-ignition limits. Modernised test methods aligned with current international laboratory practices. Who Is Affected? The revised standard will primarily affect: Rubber manufacturers Paint and coating companies Pharmaceutical excipient manufacturers and suppliers Food additive manufacturers and distributors Cosmetic and personal care product manufacturers Testing laboratories responsible for quality verification Why These Revisions Matter Both standards replace specifications that were several decades old. By updating quality requirements, testing methods, contaminant controls, and traceability provisions, BIS is ensuring that Indian manufacturers can meet modern regulatory expectations while maintaining product quality, safety and competitiveness in domestic and international markets. Benefits for All Affected Businesses The latest BIS standards provide businesses with clearer compliance requirements, improved market credibility, and stronger regulatory support across industries. Immediate Compliance Benefits Benefit Details Single Authoritative Reference Every affected sector now has a current, version-controlled IS eliminating use of outdated standards in contracts and tenders Export Documentation Credibility Updated IS aligned with ISO enables Indian exporters to reference internationally credible standards Legal Protection BIS-certified products under updated standards are protected in consumer disputes and FSSAI/regulatory proceedings Competitive Differentiation Companies that quickly migrate to 2026-compliant certification gain a quality leadership signal over slower competitors Sector-Specific Benefits Sector Key Benefit Paint manufacturers Consolidated IS 13213 reduces compliance documentation burden; updated hardness test methods improve product design feedback Edible oil manufacturers IS 19809 enables EU-compliant MOSH/MOAH testing protecting existing export contracts Soil testing labs Updated methods improve data quality for India's Soil Health Card program AYUSH manufacturers BIS-backed raw material specifications improve product consistency, enable export, and protect against adulteration liability Irrigation industry Updated graphical symbols ensure engineering designs are internationally compatible Is This the Right Decision? All 17 standards in this notification represent necessary, well-calibrated, and overdue regulatory modernization: Several standards were 50+ years old (IS 75 from 1973, IS 887 from 1977) entirely inadequate for modern industry. The 6-month concurrent validity period gives businesses time to transition without operational disruption. The new traditional medicine standards fill a genuine gap India's AYUSH sector had been operating without national IS for many of its key raw materials. IS 19809 (MOSH/MOAH) is forward-looking and directly protects India's edible oil export competitiveness with the EU. The only reasonable concern is lab capacity BIS-designated labs and NABL-accredited facilities may face a surge in testing requests as multiple sectors simultaneously need to validate products against revised IS. This is a genuine transition management challenge, but one that BIS's own technical infrastructure must support. Corpseed's Compliance Support Services The revised BIS standards may require businesses to update certifications, testing procedures, and documentation. Corpseed can assist throughout the compliance process. 1. BIS Certification and License Upgrade Services Standard Service Target Client IS 75: 2026 Linseed oil ISI license fresh application or amendment Edible oil manufacturers, paint raw material suppliers IS 13213: 2026 PU paint ISI license migration from IS 13213 : 2018 and IS 16239 : 2021 All two-pack PU paint manufacturers IS 887: 2026 Animal tallow ISI certification Tallow rendering, soap, candle manufacturers IS 1420: 2026 Magnesium carbonate certification Pharmaceutical excipient, paint filler, rubber filler suppliers IS 19851-19855, 19861 Traditional medicine raw material certification AYUSH manufacturers 2. MOSH/MOAH Compliance Advisory (IS 19809) Help edible oil manufacturers: Find NABL labs equipped with HPLC-GC-FID for IS 19809-compliant testing. Build MOSH/MOAH compliance documentation for EU export buyers. Assess packaging material suppliers' mineral oil risk. 3. Soil Testing Lab Compliance Advisory Help state and private soil labs: Update NABL accreditation scope to IS 14684: 2026 and IS 14685: 2026. Develop revised SOPs for updated methods. Source reference materials and equipment for new analytical methods. 4. AYUSH and Traditional Medicine Compliance Coordinate BIS certification for: AYUSH raw material suppliers seeking IS 19851–19861 compliance. Cattu tablet manufacturers seeking IS 19858 Code of Practice compliance. Bundle with: AYUSH manufacturer licence compliance GMP certification support Heavy metal and pesticide testing coordination for herbal raw materials. 5. Paint Industry Consolidated Compliance Packages For paint companies managing both IS 13213 and hardness testing (IS 101 Part 5/Sec 1): Full BIS licence migration + testing coordination + documentation update. Presented as a single "Paint IS 2026 Upgrade Pack".

Subject

Summary: Background: The Footwear QCO Framework India's footwear sector is also governed by the two landmark Quality Control Orders (QCOs) notified by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Act, 2016: Footwear Made from Leather and Other Materials (Quality Control) Order, 2024- Covering 12 footwear product categories, including leather shoes, leather boots, school shoes, safety footwear, and sandals made of leather and composite materials. Footwear Made from All Rubber and All Polymeric Material and Its Components (Quality Control) Order, 2024 - Covering 8 footwear product categories and 4 categories of outsoles, including rubber Hawaii chappals, rubber slippers, PVC sandals, EVA/TPR/PU sandals, and polymeric outsoles. On August 1, 2024, both QCOs  took effect, requiring all importers and manufacturers to obtain BIS certification ( ISI Mark ) to sell covered footwear  in India. From formal leather shoes and sports footwear to mass-market rubber chappals and PVC sandals, the listed categories collectively account for the vast bulk of footwear marketed in India. The QCO framework applies to:  Domestic manufacturers (must obtain a BIS licence under Scheme I) Importers (must obtain BIS Foreign Manufacturer Certification Scheme / FMCS certificate) Traders and distributors (bear downstream liability for selling uncertified stock) What the 2026 Amendment Says and What Changed? The June 2026 amendment to both footwear QCOs introduced two significant changes: 1. Extension of old stock clearance deadline from 31 July 2026 to 31 July 2027:  The original stock clearance provision (introduced by S.O. 3700(E) dated 30 August 2024) allowed manufacturers and importers who had declared old uncertified stock to BIS under Section 18(4) of the BIS Act to sell that stock until 31 July 2026. The 2026 amendment extends this deadline by one full year to 31 July 2027. 2. Special exemption for R&D imports: A new rule from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry permits importers to import shoes without BIS certification only for R&D purposes, subject to: Limitations on quantity (just as much as required for R&D) Declarations of end use filed with customs and BIS No commercial R&D import sales  Key Dates and Implementation Timeline Milestone Date Footwear QCOs came into force (both orders) 1 August 2024 Original old stock clearance deadline 30 June 2025 First extension of old stock clearance 31 July 2026 (S.O. 3700(E), August 2024) Second extension (2026 Amendment) 31 July 2027 R&D import exemption effective From the date of the 2026 amendment notification (June 2026) Deadline for new BIS licence applications for manufacturers already in the market Ongoing ASAP for uncertified manufacturers Latest deadline for mandatory BIS certification (new production) Effective from 1 August 2024 (no extension for new production) Why the Deadline Was Extended: The Core Reasons The extension of the Footwear Quality Control Order (QCO) compliance deadline was driven by a combination of industry, operational, and regulatory factors. Below are a few key reasons that influenced the government's decision to provide the additional time for compliance: 1. Scale and Complexity of India's Footwear Industry The breadth and diversity of India's footwear industry are among the main causes of the extension. In addition to a huge network of MSMEs, cottage industries, and unofficial producers dispersed around significant footwear clusters, the sector is made up of thousands of organized manufacturers. It was quite difficult to certify so many units in the initial time frame since BIS certification under Scheme-I required factory inspections, product testing, paperwork review, and license approval. The extension gives BIS and manufacturers more time to successfully finish the certification procedure.  2. Existing Inventory Across the Supply Chain At the time the Quality Control Order (QCO) came into force, manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, and retailers were holding substantial inventories of footwear that had been legally produced or imported before the implementation date. Requiring immediate compliance could have resulted in large-scale inventory losses, supply chain disruptions, and shortages of affordable footwear products. The extension allows the businesses to liquidate existing stock while transitioning to BIS-certified products gradually. 3. MSME and Informal Sector Readiness Challenges Small and medium-sized businesses make up a sizable section of India's footwear manufacturing sector, and they frequently have inadequate infrastructure for regulatory compliance and quality control. To comprehend the BIS standards, modernize production procedures, carry out product testing, and receive certification, many firms need more time. The expansion acknowledges these real-world difficulties and facilitates a more seamless shift to compliance without unduly burdening smaller companies financially. 4. Testing and Certification Capacity Constraints Another major obstacle has been the availability of testing facilities recognized by BIS. Due to several quality control programs across industries, testing facilities have seen a rise in demand, which has caused manufacturers seeking certification to have to wait longer. For shoe makers nationwide, the extended schedule offers a chance to increase testing capacity, eliminate bottlenecks, and enhance access to certification services.  5. Industry Feedback and Stakeholder Consultations The government's participatory approach to implementing the regulations is reflected in the extension. Concerns about certification schedules, inventory control, compliance expenses, and infrastructure constraints were brought up by trade associations and industry associations. The government chose a more realistic implementation schedule that strikes a balance between quality goals and industrial readiness after taking these arguments into account. 6. Encouraging Research, Development, and Innovation The amendment also includes concerns about research and development efforts in the footwear industry. To create cutting-edge products, manufacturers are depending more and more on imported prototypes, sample materials, and new technology. For such limited-quantity R&D imports, requiring BIS certification resulted in needless compliance obstacles. It is anticipated that the implementation of an exemption for legitimate R&D will promote innovation, quicken product development, and encourage the use of cutting-edge materials and manufacturing techniques.  Impact on Businesses in India in 2026 The extension of the compliance deadline and the introduction of the R&D exemption will have varying implications across the footwear value chain. While the amendment provides operational relief to businesses holding existing inventory, it also reinforces the need for long-term compliance with BIS certification requirements. 1. Domestic Footwear Manufacturers The longer time frame for stock clearance will be very advantageous to domestic producers. Companies can sell their uncertified inventory until July 31, 2027, if they reported it to BIS before August 1, 2024. This will help businesses better manage their inventory and prevent financial losses from forced liquidation. The certification requirements for new production are not, however, lessened by the extension. Before being sold in the Indian market, every footwear produced after August 1, 2024, must continue to adhere to the relevant BIS requirements and have the ISI mark. As a result, manufacturers should keep working toward BIS certification and bolster their quality control procedures. The extra time gives MSMEs the chance to modernize facilities, enhance quality control procedures, and finish the certification process with assistance from government and industry initiatives. 2. Footwear Importers The longer time frame for selling current stock will help importers with declared pre-August 2024 inventory, lowering the risk of inventory losses and related business difficulties. However, the modification does not change the compliance requirements for new imports, which still need to adhere to the relevant BIS certification standards. The R&D exemption, which allows the import of product samples, prototype footwear, material swatches, and restricted test quantities for research, development, and product assessment reasons without incurring complete certification requirements, is a significant advantage for importers. It is anticipated that this will encourage product development and innovation throughout the industry.  3. Retailers and Distributors Distributors, wholesalers, and retailers with reported inventory have more time to liquidate their current stock without worrying about legal or regulatory ramifications. The expansion offers more freedom in inventory management and assists companies in avoiding aggressive pricing tactics that may have a detrimental impact on profitability. Also, distribution networks and organized retail chains can now match their transition plans with the updated schedule, guaranteeing a more seamless transition to fully BIS-certified product portfolios while coordinating the certification milestones with their supplier base.  4. Footwear Exporters For footwear exporters, the amendment reduces compliance pressures associated with managing both domestic and export-oriented production lines. Manufacturers serving multiple markets can benefit from additional flexibility in inventory management while continuing to align domestic products with BIS requirements. The R&D exemption is particularly beneficial for exporters developing new products and materials, as it allows access to imported samples and technologies without creating unnecessary certification hurdles during the product development phase. 5. E-Commerce Marketplaces Online marketplaces are essential for guaranteeing adherence to the Footwear QCO. The extended deadline gives the platforms more time to enhance compliance monitoring systems, fortify seller verification procedures, and enable a seamless transition to BIS-certified footwear listings. Additionally, the amendment lowers the possibility of enforcement proceedings pertaining to declared heritage stock. In accordance with the updated regulatory timeframe, it allows marketplaces to update seller onboarding, product verification, and compliance frameworks.  How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance Within the Extended Timeline For Manufacturers Phase 1 (Now- December 2026): Certification Priority Apply for BIS Licence immediately under Scheme I- Submit application on BIS online portal (manakaonline.bis.gov.in) which includes Factory layout and quality control plan, Product samples for initial testing, Quality management documentation and Manufacturing process flow charts. Engage a BIS-designated testing lab- Select labs notified by BIS for the specific product category (rubber, leather, polymeric) and submit product samples for testing against relevant IS standards: IS 5557 (Leather shoes) IS 10702 (Rubber Hawaii chappals) IS 11544 (Rubber slippers) IS 6721 (Sandals and slippers) IS 15298 (Safety footwear) Factory Assessment- Prepare for BIS factory inspection covering: Raw material quality controls In-process testing equipment Finished product testing capability Record-keeping and traceability systems Address Non-conformities- Implement corrections for any gaps identified in testing or factory assessment. Receive Licence and Begin Marking Use the ISI mark correctly as per the BIS marking requirements. Maintain the licence through periodic renewal and surveillance testing. Phase 2 (January- July 2027): Old Stock Liquidation Systematically clear all declared old stock Maintain separate SKU tracking for certified vs declared old stock Ensure sales teams and dealers understand the stock categories and their respective deadlines For Importers Apply for BIS FMCS (Scheme II) certification- FMCS requires: Foreign manufacturer's factory assessment (either in-country by BIS or through BIS-designated foreign labs) Product testing at BIS-designated labs Appointment of an Authorised Indian Representative (AIR) Designate and brief Authorised Indian Representative (AIR) AIR handles ongoing compliance, labelling, and BIS correspondence from India AIR bears legal responsibility for compliance in India Manage declared old stock within the July 2027 deadline Track declared stock quantities separately Ensure they are fully liquidated before 31 July 2027 R&D imports: Document the R&D purpose clearly Prepare end-use declarations for customs and BIS Keep quantities within what is genuinely needed for R&D Benefits for Businesses After the Extension Immediate and Tangible Benefits Benefit Description 12 More Months for Inventory Clearance Declaring old stock can be sold until July 2027, preventing massive write-offs and preserving working capital No Forced Discounting Retailers can liquidate old stock at normal prices over 12 months instead of panic discounting before July 2026 R&D Freedom Designers and product developers can import material samples and prototypes without going through the full FMCS, accelerating innovation Manufacturing Investment Planning More time for MSME units to invest in quality upgrades, testing equipment, and process improvements without a cash crunch Export Pipeline Continuity Dual-market manufacturers are not distracted from export commitments by the domestic compliance crisis Legal Clarity A clear cut-off date (July 2027) and a stock declaration framework eliminate ambiguity in enforcement Medium-Term Benefits (FY2027) Benefit Description Sector-Wide Quality Improvement By July 2027, the entire industry will have had 3 years (since August 2024) to transition, enabling more thorough, genuine quality upgrades BIS Lab and Infrastructure Scale-Up An extended timeline allows BIS to expand testing infrastructure, reducing future backlogs Cluster Development Industry clusters can implement collective certification programmes, cluster-level testing, and shared quality infrastructure during the extension Consumer Confidence Building Gradual market transition means consumers begin associating the ISI mark with genuine quality assurance rather than a regulatory checkbox Is This the Right Decision or an Unnecessary Extension? Why It Is a Necessary and Well-Calibrated Extension Reason Explanation Scale of the Challenge 4,500+ formal units + hundreds of thousands of informal producers cannot all be certified in 2 years, the extension acknowledges this honestly Proportionality Forcing July 2026 clearance would have been disproportionately harsh on MSMEs and retailers who had no means to accelerate certification Preserving Affordable Footwear Supply Sudden market disruption would have reduced the availability of low-cost footwear for bottom-of-the-pyramid consumers Supporting "Make in India" The goal of QCOs is to improve Indian manufacturing, not to destroy small producers. Extensions give domestic producers time to upgrade while still keeping importers under the same transition obligation Consistent Pattern Multiple other QCOs (textiles, furniture, electrical appliances, machinery) have also received extensions footwear extension is part of a calibrated, pragmatic approach R&D Exemption is Progressive Adding R&D import exemption shows nuanced policymaking strict on commercial sales, flexible on innovation Where This Could Be Seen as Unnecessary Concern Context Repeated Extensions Signal Weak Enforcement This is the second extension for old stock clearance (June 2025 → July 2026 → July 2027). Repeated deferrals may reduce the credibility of future QCO deadlines Delay in Consumer Protection Every month of extension is a month in which substandard, uncertified footwear continues to be sold, potentially harming consumers who buy unsafe or poor-quality products Unfair Advantage for Non-Compliant Players Manufacturers who have obtained BIS certification are competing against uncertified players who are still selling old stock. The extension prolongs this unfair competition Balanced verdict: The extension is a correct and pragmatic decision given the ground realities of India's footwear sector. However, it must be the last extension; further deferrals would permanently undermine the QCO's quality assurance objective and unfairly penalise the many manufacturers who have invested in BIS certification on schedule. How the Extension Improves Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, Environment, and Ethical Practices 1. Quality Improvements Over Extended Timeline Genuine Quality Upgrades Take Time- Manufacturers who now have until July 2027 can: Invest in proper testing equipment (durability testers, flex testers, material strength Train QC staff on IS standard requirements Build testing) Sustainable quality systems rather than just chasing a paper certificate Higher-Quality New Production Immediately- All footwear manufactured after August 2024 must already be BIS-certified the extension only applies to old stock. This means the market is already seeing a quality improvement in new production. Reduction in Substandard Imports- Foreign manufacturers must obtain FMCS certification, which involves factory assessment and product testing in India. This is already eliminating the worst-quality imports. 2. Consumer Satisfaction Traceability- ISI-marked footwear has a licence number traceable to the specific manufacturer and product standard, giving consumers recourse in case of quality failure. Durability Standard- Relevant IS standards for footwear specify requirements for: Bond strength (sole attachment) Abrasion resistance Flex durability Dimensional accuracy This means ISI-marked footwear is tested to perform - not just labelled. Safety Footwear- Safety footwear (IS 15298) meeting BIS standards protects workers from: Crush injuries (steel toe cap performance) Penetration (anti-puncture midsole) Chemical and electrical hazards (insulation properties) The QCO ensures these life-critical products actually meet specified protections. School Shoes and Children's Footwear- IS 10348 (school shoes) specifies requirements for: Breathability Flex resistance Heel height limits are appropriate for growing feet Mandatory BIS certification for school shoes directly protects children's health. 3. Environmental Improvements Material Quality Standards- BIS standards specify that materials used in footwear must meet minimum quality benchmarks indirectly: Reducing use of sub-grade, poorly stabilised PVC (which degrades rapidly and increases plastic waste) Encouraging use of properly compounded rubber (which has better recyclability and longer life) Product Longevity Reduced Waste- Footwear that meets durability standards lasts longer, directly reducing: The volume of footwear waste generated annually. The rate of fast-fashion footwear disposal Reduction in Illegal Imports- The QCO, once fully enforced, will: Eliminate the entry of poorly manufactured footwear that bypasses environmental controls (e.g., use of heavy metals in dyes, poorly treated leather, toxic adhesives) Ensure that imported footwear meets the same material safety standards as domestic production. 4. Ethical Practices in the Industry Level Playing Field- Once fully enforced, no manufacturer can undercut ethical, quality-conscious players by using inferior materials and skipping testing costs Worker Safety Improvement- The quality standards for safety footwear protect industrial workers, reducing occupational injuries from inadequate footwear. MSMEs Enter Formal Economy- BIS certification pushes informal manufacturers to: Register formally Maintain proper records Pay applicable taxes and dues. This improves their access to formal credit, government schemes, and export opportunities. Business Opportunities Created by the QCO and the Extension 1. BIS Certification Services (Highest Priority for Corpseed)- The extended timeline creates a well-defined, time-bound compliance window: Service Target Clients Revenue Potential in rupees BIS Scheme I (ISI Mark) for domestic manufacturers Small and mid-sized footwear manufacturers across the Agra, Kanpur, Chennai, and Kolkata clusters 75,000- ₹2,50,000 per unit BIS FMCS Scheme II for foreign manufacturers Chinese, Vietnamese, Bangladeshi, and Italian footwear OEMs exporting to India ₹1,50,000 – ₹5,00,000 per manufacturer BIS licence renewal and surveillance support All existing certified manufacturers ₹40,000 – ₹1,00,000 per year Old stock declaration advisory and BIS Section 18(4) compliance Manufacturers/importers holding declared stock until July 2027 ₹30,000 – ₹75,000 per engagement R&D import exemption documentation Footwear brands and designers importing samples ₹25,000 – ₹50,000 per engagement Authorised Indian Representative (AIR) services Foreign manufacturers ₹1,50,000 – ₹3,00,000 per year 2. Lab Testing Coordination and Sample Management For footwear certification, product testing is a mandatory, recurring bottleneck Corpseed can also act as a coordination layer: Identifying appropriate BIS-designated labs for each product category. Managing sample logistics Ensuring correct sample quantities and formats are submitted Tracking the test reports and timelines 3. Quality Management and Factory Preparation Services Many MSME footwear manufacturers also need: Factory readiness audits before the BIS inspection. Process documentation (quality plan, testing SOPs, batch records). Minor facility upgrades (dedicated testing area, properly calibrated equipment) Corpseed can bundle this with the certification application as a "Factory Readiness + BIS Certification Pack" 4. E-Commerce Seller Compliance Packages Online footwear sellers on Amazon, Flipkart, and Meesho: Need to verify and upload the BIS certification for all the listed products. Risk account suspension or legal action for selling uncertified products after the stock clearance deadline. Package: Verify existing product certifications Apply for BIS for uncertified SKUs Maintain a certification tracker for their catalogue 5. Footwear Brand Consulting and Market Entry International footwear brands looking to: Sell directly in India (FMCS route) Set up Indian manufacturing (Scheme I route) Source from Indian manufacturers (verification of supplier certification) Full market entry compliance advisory, including: BIS FMCS Trademark registration GST and import compliance Retail trade licensing Corpseed's Priority Action for Footwear QCO Given the July 2027 final deadline, the next 12 months represent the peak conversion window for BIS footwear certification services. The urgency is real, but manageable every MSME manufacturer and importer still operating without BIS certification on their new production is in technical violation today and needs help. The right message for Corpseed is: " The government has given you until July 2027 for old stock, but your new production already needs BIS certification. Don't wait. Start now, complete before the rush ."

Subject

Summary: The 2026 government order on petrol and diesel supply through retail outlets mainly targets bulk / industrial consumers buying from petrol pumps, rather than ordinary vehicle owners. It tightens control on how fuel is sold at retail outlets to protect genuine retail consumers and prevent misuse of subsidized, or price-controlled supplies. What the New 2026 Order Says and From When? The Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel (Temporary Regulation of Supply through Retail Outlets) Order, 2026 has been issued by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas under the Essential Commodities Act. Key features: Industrial, commercial and institutional consumers are temporarily barred from purchasing petrol and diesel through retail fuel stations. Such bulk consumers must meet their fuel requirements through: Their own consumer pumps, or Bulk supply channels specifically meant for industrial/commercial use. Retail outlets (petrol pumps): Can dispense diesel only into vehicle fuel tanks or PESO-approved containers. Cannot sell more than 200 litres of diesel per day to any one customer or vehicle. Fuel purchased at retail cannot be resold or diverted for industrial use. Oil marketing companies (PSU OMCs and private authorised marketers) and retail dealers are responsible for ensuring compliance. The order is: Initially valid for up to 90 days from notification. Can be extended through a fresh order if required. The notification is dated 11 June 2026, and comes into effect immediately on publication, i.e., mid-June 2026. Why the Government Implemented This Order and the Need? The order was introduced to maintain discipline in fuel distribution, prevent misuse of retail fuel channels and ensure uninterrupted availability of petrol and diesel for ordinary consumers. 1. Preventing Arbitrage and Diversion Some industrial and commercial consumers had shifted from bulk procurement to retail petrol pumps.  Retail fuel prices were relatively more stable compared to bulk rates.  This increased pressure on retail outlets and disrupted normal supply patterns.  The order ensures that retail channels primarily serve vehicle users.  2. Protecting General Consumers Petrol pumps are intended to cater to private motorists and transport operators.  Large industrial purchases can lead to longer queues and local supply constraints.  Restricting bulk purchases helps improve fuel availability for ordinary consumers. 3. Maintaining Fuel Distribution Discipline Retail and bulk fuel channels are designed for different categories of consumers.  Industrial demand through retail outlets can affect demand forecasting and logistics planning.  The order redirects bulk consumers back to designated supply arrangements. 4. Safety and Compliance Transporting fuel in unapproved containers increases safety risks.  The order permits dispensing only into vehicle fuel tanks and PESO-approved containers.  This supports safer handling practices and better compliance with existing regulations. Impact on Businesses in India in 2026  The new restrictions will affect businesses differently depending on how they source and consume fuel. While some may need to adjust their procurement practices others could benefit from a more predictable supply environment. Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Fuel Consumers This includes: factories, mines, construction companies, transport fleets, large institutions, genset operators, etc. Impact: Cannot source bulk daily diesel/petrol from roadside retail pumps: Must- Use their own consumer pumps (registered as such), or Enter into / revert to bulk supply agreements with OMCs / authorised marketers. Purchasing limits: Daily retail purchases capped at 200 litres per customer per pump and strictly not for resale. Operationally: Some companies that were opportunistically using retail outlets must change logistics and possibly revive bulk contracts. Cost effect: Where bulk rates are higher than artificially suppressed retail rates: This removes a subsidy-like advantage bulk consumers were enjoying by buying at retail. Conversely: It stabilizes the market and prevents industrial consumers from effectively being subsidized at the expense of retail supplies. Fuel Retail Outlet Dealers Impact: Retail dealers must now: Enforce “no bulk sales” to industrial/commercial consumers. Ensure: Diesel is only dispensed into vehicle tanks or PESO-approved containers. 200 liter per customer per day limit is not breached. Fuel sold is not for resale. They face: Additional monitoring and record-keeping burden. Potential confrontation with long-standing industrial customers who previously bought large volumes at pumps. But they also benefit from: More predictable retail demand. Less risk of: Dry outs caused by big industrial purchases. Regulatory scrutiny for diversion. Oil Marketing Companies (PSU and Private) Impact: Must clearly segregate retail and bulk channels- Industrial demand to be routed through bulk sales. Retail supplies protected primarily for genuine vehicle consumption. Must strengthen- Monitoring of retail outlet sales patterns. Detection of unusually high volume repeated sales to the same industrial buyers. Operationally- Some logistical adjustments in moving supplies between bulk depots and retail stations. Financially: The move helps curb losses where- Retail prices are kept stable. Bulk prices reflect more market-linked rates. Logistics and Transport Businesses Fleet operators who: Used to tank up multiple trucks at retail pumps or Move fuel in large drums from retail pumps for off-site storage, Will now need: Proper bulk contracts. Possibly on site consumer pumps for fleet fueling. Short-term impact: Some disruption and paperwork while shifting back into bulk supply regimes. Long-term: More predictable supply and clear contractual pricing. How Businesses Will Be Compliant  Businesses that rely on petrol and diesel for their operations should review their current sourcing practices and align them with the requirements of the new order to avoid operational disruptions and compliance concerns. 1. For Industrial / Commercial Consumers The new order is likely to affect businesses that depend on retail fuel outlets for day-to-day operational needs, particularly where fuel consumption is high. Consider entering into, or reactivating, bulk supply agreements with authorised oil marketing companies if operational requirements exceed the prescribed retail limits. Ensure that consumer pumps and storage facilities, wherever applicable comply with PESO requirements and relevant state regulations. Restrict retail fuel purchases to vehicle refuelling and limited quantities permitted under the order through PESO-approved containers. Communicate the revised requirements internally so that employees and drivers are aware of the restrictions on large-volume retail fuel purchases. 2. For Petrol Pump Dealers Update internal procedures and train staff on the restrictions applicable to industrial, and commercial fuel purchases. Verify that diesel is dispensed only into vehicle fuel tanks or PESO-approved containers in accordance with the order. Display clear notices at retail outlets informing customers about the revised conditions & applicable purchase restrictions. Maintain appropriate records of high volume transactions and monitor purchases approaching the prescribed limits where required. Cooperate with inspections conducted by oil marketing companies and promptly address any instances of non-compliance or suspected misuse. Benefits Businesses Get After Implementation While the order may require certain businesses to adjust their fuel procurement practices, it aims to improve fuel availability, support better distribution planning and reduce the risk of supply disruptions. For Retail Consumers and Small Businesses Better Availability at Petrol Pumps Less risk of “no diesel / no petrol” signs because industrial volumes are not draining pump stocks. Reduced Queues and Waiting Time Pumps are less crowded by tankers or large containers filling up. Improved Safety Fewer unsafe practices like filling drums, barrels, or makeshift containers at retail outlets. For Oil Marketing Companies and Government Reduced Arbitrage Losses Industrial consumers cannot exploit lower retail prices when bulk prices are higher. More Accurate Demand Planning Clear split between retail and bulk demand improves refinery and logistics planning. Stronger Supply Assurance Narrative Government can genuinely say: “Retail consumers are protected, supplies are adequate and not being diverted.” For Industrial Consumers (Longer Term) Stable Bulk Supply Contracts Clear contractual terms, planned deliveries, and better pricing transparency. Regulatory Certainty Operating through properly licensed consumer pumps and bulk supplies reduces legal risk. Is This the Right Decision or an Additional Burden? The order has sparked debate among stakeholders. While it imposes additional obligations on some businesses. It also addresses concerns around diversion, safety and equitable access to fuel supplies. Why It Is a Reasonable and Necessary Decision Aspect Rationale Consumer Protection Ensures retail fuel remains available for ordinary motorists and small businesses. Supply Discipline Stops industrial buyers from distorting retail demand and creating artificial local shortages. Financial Fairness Prevents bulk users from benefiting from retail pricing policies meant to shield households and small users. Safety Reduces large volume handling at retail pumps in uncontrolled containers and trucks. Temporary, Targeted Order is explicitly temporary (90 days) and can be reviewed/withdrawn if conditions normalize. Where It Feels Like an Additional Burden Stakeholder Burden Industrial Consumers Lose short-term price arbitrage and the convenience of fueling from nearby pumps. Retail Dealers Additional monitoring and potential disputes with industrial customers. Small Fleet Operators Need to structure fueling and storage more formally instead of ad hoc retail pumping. Balanced view: The order may create some short-term challenges for industrial consumers and petrol pump dealers, particularly for those who have been relying on retail outlets for higher fuel requirements. However, the measure is intended to prevent misuse of retail fuel channels and ensure that petrol and diesel remain readily available for everyday consumers. How It Improves Quality, Satisfaction, and System Efficiency  The new order is expected to reduce pressure on retail fuel outlets and make petrol and diesel more readily available for vehicle owners, small businesses and other regular consumers. Improved fuel availability at retail outlets: When large industrial buyers rely on bulk supply arrangements instead of petrol pumps, retail stations are better equipped to meet the needs of everyday consumers and small businesses. A smoother experience for consumers: Reduced pressure on fuel stations can help minimize long queues and unexpected stock shortages, making the refuelling process more convenient. Better planning and supply management: A clear distinction between retail and bulk demand allows oil marketing companies to forecast requirements more accurately and strengthen distribution efficiency. Safer fuel handling practices: Restricting diesel sales to vehicle tanks and PESO-approved containers helps reduce the chances of unsafe storage and transportation of fuel. Fuel reaches the right users: The order discourages large commercial buyers from relying on retail outlets, helping petrol pumps continue serving individual consumers and small businesses as intended. Stronger confidence in the fuel distribution system: A well-regulated supply chain improves reliability, reassures consumers about fuel availability, and supports the overall stability of the market. Corpseed Advisory Services to ensure Business Readiness to Compliance Acclimating to new regulatory requirements often demands operational as well as compliance adjustments. Professional guidance can help businesses understand their obligations and enforce suitable fuel management practices. 1. Bulk Fuel Supply and Logistics Support Assistance in transitioning from retail fuel purchases to appropriate bulk supply arrangements. Support in coordinating on-site fuel infrastructure requirements based on business needs. Guidance on establishing efficient fuel management practices for large-scale operations. 2. Consumer Pump and PESO Compliance Assistance Advisory on consumer pump licensing requirements and applicable approvals. Support in understanding PESO requirements for fuel storage and dispensing facilities. Assistance in identifying compliance obligations related to fuel handling and safety. 3. Documentation and Contractual Guidance Support in reviewing bulk fuel procurement requirements and related documentation. Assistance in understanding supply agreements with authorised fuel suppliers. Guidance to help businesses maintain records necessary for regulatory compliance. 4. Technology and Fuel Monitoring Solutions Advisory on implementing fuel tracking and monitoring systems for improved visibility. Support in adopting RFID and telemetry-based fuel management solutions. Guidance on using fuel consumption analytics to improve control and reduce losses.

Subject

Summary: Background: The Ammonium Nitrate Regulatory Framework Ammonium Nitrate (AN) is one of the most tightly regulated substances in India due to its dual-use nature it is an essential input for: Agriculture includes fertilizer, primarily in compound fertilizers and straight ammonium nitrate where permitted. Mining and infrastructure are a core explosive ingredient in ANFO Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil. Industrial processes include quarrying, demolition, coal mining, and infrastructure construction. The primary regulatory framework is the Ammonium Nitrate Rules, 2012, notified under the Explosives Act, 1884, and administered by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through the Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organization (PESO). The rules govern: Manufacture of ammonium nitrate Import and export of ammonium nitrate Storage at licensed storehouses Transportation across India Possession by end users India's history with ammonium nitrate is marked by serious safety incidents globally and domestically, the Beirut explosion of 2020 (2,750 tons of AN triggered a catastrophic blast), and various incidents in Indian ports and mining operations have kept ammonium nitrate under sharp regulatory scrutiny. The Ammonium Nitrate (Amendment) Rules, 2025, had already extended the license validity from 5 years to 10 years (effective April 2025). The Draft Amendment Rules, 2026 go further, proposing structural reforms in the security monitoring and license administration. What the Draft Ammonium Nitrate Amendment Rules 2026 Propose? On February 3, 2026, the draft regulations were released in the Official Gazette under G.S.R. 104(E), with a 30-day period for public comment. After considering any complaints and suggestions, the final notification will be sent. The main suggestions are listed below:  1. CCTV surveillance is required in ammonium nitrate storage facilities: The installation of CCTV cameras at all authorized ammonium nitrate storage facilities is the most important recommended modification. Important components: Continuous 24×7 monitoring of storehouse premises through CCTV Secure digital access to CCTV feeds must be provided to: PESO (the licensing authority) District Magistrate / local authority (for emergency response planning) Designated police authority Minimum retention period for CCTV footage must be stored for a specified minimum period (typically 30–90 days, as may be specified in the final rules) Tamper-proof and weather-resistant cameras must be capable of operating in the environmental conditions of the storehouse location. Coverage requirements say all entry and exit points, storage areas, loading/unloading zones, and perimeter to be covered. Failure protocol operators must notify PESO within a defined timeframe in case of CCTV system failure and restore functionality within a specified period. 2. Licences Transfer Reforms: The second major proposal addresses the transfer of ammonium nitrate licences, a provision that previously had limited or ambiguous procedural framework: Formal licence transfer mechanism for licences held for: Storage Possession Transport (including clarity on whose licence applies when a vehicle is provided by the transporter vs by the consignee/consignor) Transfer triggers being contemplated include: Change of ownership of business (e.g., sale of a mining company's assets) Transfer on the death of a sole proprietor Corporate mergers and amalgamations Assignment of licensed premises as part of a going concern sale Clarity on transport licences: Whether the vehicle is supplied by the consignor, consignee, or a third-party carrier, the draft also makes it clear whose transport licence is applicable based on the agreement. This directly resolves a long-standing cause of misunderstanding in compliance and enforcement.  •    Digitization of licence transfer process through the PESO online portal, reducing the need for physical visits and paper-based applications. 3. Refined Definitions and Operational Clarity Updating definitions to align with: Current industry practices in mining and infrastructure Advances in AN emulsion technology (emulsion matrix, heavy ANFO, etc.) Clearer language on: What constitutes "possession" vs "storage" Quantity thresholds for different compliance obligations Implementation Date The implementation timeline for the proposed rules begins with the draft notification issued on 3 February 2026. Following the publication of the draft, stakeholders were provided a 30-day public comment period from the date copies of the Gazette were made available to the public, with the deadline for submitting objections and suggestions falling approximately in early March 2026. After reviewing and considering all feedback received during this consultation period, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) will issue the final rules through a subsequent Gazette notification. As per the draft provisions, the rules will come into force on the date of their final publication in the Official Gazette, meaning enforcement will commence immediately upon notification. Based on the expected timeline for finalization and review of public comments, the final notification and enforcement are anticipated to take place in mid-to-late 2026.  Why DPIIT Implemented these Reforms: The Core Need 1. Post-Beirut Global Reset on Ammonium Nitrate Safety: The 2020 Beirut port explosion caused by improperly stored ammonium nitrate was a watershed event globally that prompted comprehensive reviews of AN storage safety frameworks worldwide, forced governments, including India's, to evaluate whether current surveillance and access control mechanisms were adequate, and India's own audit of major AN storage sites revealed gaps in real-time monitoring. Mandatory CCTV is the direct, technology-enabled response to Beirut: if authorities can see what is happening at every licensed storehouse in real time, catastrophic accumulation and mishandling are detected before they become irreversible. 2. Preventing Diversion to Terrorist and Criminal Activity: Ammonium nitrate is the primary ingredient in improvised explosive devices (IEDs). India has experienced: Multiple IED attacks using AN-based explosives Illegal diversion of mining-grade AN from authorized supply chains 3. Accident Prevention and Emergency Response: In addition to intentional misuse, AN storehouse is at risk for flooding (wet AN can self-ignite under certain conditions), contamination (mixing with incompatible materials), and fire (AN decomposes under fire conditions and can release poisonous fumes and deflagrate). Fire services, PESO inspectors, and district magistrates have access to CCTV feeds.  4. Alignment with Broader DPIIT Safety Modernization: D PIIT's Explosives Division (under which AN Rules fall) has been systematically modernizing all its regulatory frameworks: 2021: SMPV, Calcium Carbide, and AN amendment 2025: AN licence validity extended to 10 years 2026: CCTV, licence transfer, and definitional refinements This is part of a sustained effort to bring India's explosives and hazardous chemical regulatory framework to global best practices while simultaneously reducing unnecessary administrative burden. Impact on Businesses in India in 2026 Businesses that store, transport, import, manufacture, and use ammonium nitrate (AN) will be directly impacted by the proposed revisions. The main effects on the industry are listed below:  Mining and Quarrying Companies: Mining and quarrying businesses, including coal, iron ore, limestone, granite, and aggregate operators, will be most affected as they hold a large number of AN licences. They will be required to install CCTV systems with round-the-clock monitoring capabilities at licensed AN storehouse and provide remote access to authorities. Companies operating multiple storage facilities may face higher compliance costs. The draft also simplifies licence transfers during mergers and acquisitions. Construction and Infrastructure Companies: Businesses that utilize AN-based explosives in roads, tunnels, railroads, dams, and other infrastructure projects must install CCTV systems at storage facilities and account for these expenses in future project budgets. To ensure compliance throughout the project lifespan, temporary project sites may need portable surveillance systems. Manufacturers and importers of explosives: Manufacturers of ANFO, emulsion explosives, and other AN-based explosives are required to make sure that their storage facilities meet the new CCTV regulations and give regulators remote access. Additionally, importers who store AN in ports or warehouses must guarantee sufficient surveillance coverage.  Transporters: The draft makes transport license obligations more clear, particularly when the owner of the vehicle and the owner of the products are not the same. This is anticipated to minimize disagreements during shipping and inspections and lessen compliance issues. Fertilizer Companies: CCTV cameras and remote access for authorities must be installed by fertilizer plants, blending facilities, and storage facilities that hold authorized amounts of AN. Additionally, businesses going through mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring will be able to preserve operational continuity thanks to the more transparent license transfer requirements.  How Businesses Will Be Compliant? Step-by-Step Compliance Pathway for businesses is as follows: Step 1: Conduct an Inventory of Licensed AN Storage Facilities Begin by identifying all licensed ammonium nitrate storage locations and assessing their layout, entry and exit points, existing security arrangements, and network connectivity to understand site-specific compliance requirements. Step 2: Create a CCTV surveillance system that complies.  To create a CCTV strategy that guarantees full coverage of the storeroom, includes suitable camera specifications, offers sufficient video storage, and permits safe remote access for regulatory authorities, hire a qualified security systems supplier. Step 3: Evaluate the Needs for Connectivity Analyse each site's internet or network connectivity availability and dependability. To guarantee continuous monitoring access, remote locations could need specialized communication infrastructure or backup connectivity options.  Step 4: Install and Test the Surveillance Infrastructure. Deploy the CCTV system, configure video storage and retention settings, verify the remote access functionality, and test system performance to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Step 5: Establish Access Management Procedures Create secure access credentials for authorised authorities and implement a process for maintaining user records, monitoring access activity, and safeguarding system security. Step 6: Implement Ongoing Maintenance and Reporting Protocols Develop a preventive maintenance schedule for surveillance equipment and establish standard operating procedures for reporting system failures, notifying authorities, and carrying out timely corrective actions. Step 7: Manage Licence Transfers During Ownership Changes Businesses undergoing mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring should submit the required transfer application and supporting documents through the PESO portal and obtain approval before operational control changes hands. Benefits Businesses Get After Implementation 1. Operational and Compliance Benefits Benefit Details Business Continuity in M&A Clear licence transfer process enables seamless operational continuity when mining or infrastructure businesses are bought, sold, or merged Reduced Transport Disputes Clarity on whose transport licence applies eliminates enforcement disputes during transit, fewer delays, and fewer penalties Lower Risk of Unauthorised Access CCTV deters theft, tampering, and unauthorized entry, directly protecting valuable AN inventory Real-Time Incident Response CCTV provides immediate evidence and situational awareness in case of fire, flood, or security breach Insurance Benefit Demonstrable security infrastructure (CCTV + remote monitoring) may reduce insurance premiums for an AN storage facility Regulatory Relationship Providing transparent remote access to PESO builds a more collaborative, trust-based relationship with the regulator 2. Safety Benefits Benefit Explanation Accident Prevention Continuous CCTV monitoring helps detect unusual conditions such as smoke, unauthorized equipment usage, and potential safety hazards at an early stage, enabling quicker emergency response and reducing the risk of major incidents. Deterrence of Mishandling Employees, contractors, and visitors are more likely to follow safety procedures and handle ammonium nitrate responsibly when they know the storage facility is under constant surveillance. Evidentiary Value CCTV footage serves as valuable evidence during investigations, supporting insurance claims, facilitating root cause analysis, and helping companies defend against false allegations of negligence or non-compliance. Is This a Right Decision or an Additional Burden? 1. Why It Is the Right Decision Aspect Reason Post-Beirut Imperative Mandatory surveillance of large AN storage is the global standard post-2020. India must be aligned. Proportionate to the Risk AN is a category-A hazardous substance robust surveillance requirements are proportionate to the catastrophic potential consequences of mishandling. Enables Law Enforcement Remote access for police and DM directly supports India's counter-terrorism and industrial safety frameworks. Long Overdue CCTV requirements for hazardous chemical storage are normal in comparable jurisdictions (EU, USA, Australia); India is catching up. Licence Transfer Fills a Real Gap The absence of clear transfer procedures was causing genuine business operational problems; fixing it is straightforward, and responsive governance. Digital Governance Remote digital access for PESO replaces periodic physical inspections as the primary real-time oversight mechanism. 2. Where It Adds Burden Concern Context CapEx for CCTV Infrastructure Small quarrying businesses or individual mine operators may find the investment significant Network Connectivity at Remote Sites Mines and quarries in remote areas often lack reliable internet; achieving compliant remote access will require additional infrastructure investment Ongoing Maintenance CCTV systems require ongoing maintenance, power backup, and upgrades, a recurring compliance cost Cybersecurity Responsibility Providing remote access to multiple government authorities requires proper cybersecurity measures and an additional technical obligation Balanced verdict: The burden is real but proportionate. The safety and security case for mandatory CCTV monitoring of ammonium nitrate storage is overwhelming. The cost of a single serious incident in terms of human life, environmental damage, property destruction, and legal liability would vastly outweigh the aggregate cost of CCTV compliance across the industry. This is unambiguously the right decision. How the Amendment improve quality, Environmental Conditions, and Ethical Practices? Below are the Broader Benefits of the Proposed Amendments that are as follows: 1. Improved Industrial Safety and Operational Standards By encouraging increased responsibility and compliance, the mandated CCTV surveillance requirements are anticipated to improve all the safety governance throughout ammonium nitrate (AN) storage facilities. In addition to improving supervisory control and encouraging adherence to the established safety procedures, continuous monitoring helps organizations detect and resolve safety infractions more successfully. Additionally, the availability of recorded video can greatly improve the quality of incident investigations by assisting businesses and authorities in precisely identifying the underlying causes, differentiating between isolated incidents and systemic flaws, and putting corrective measures in place that lessen the chance of recurrence.  2. Enhanced Environmental Protection The proposed measures can help minimise the environmental risks associated with ammonium nitrate storage. Incidents involving AN, such as fires or explosions, have the potential to cause soil contamination, air pollution from hazardous combustion by-products, and water contamination through runoff. Continuous surveillance and early detection capabilities can also facilitate faster emergency response, thereby reducing the severity and environmental impact of such incidents. Furthermore, increased monitoring is likely to encourage better housekeeping practices, compliance with prescribed storage distances, proper drainage management, and the segregation of incompatible substances at storage sites. 3. Strengthening Ethical and Responsible Industry Practices The introduction of the enhanced surveillance and clearer regulatory controls is also expected to improve the transparency and accountability throughout the ammonium nitrate supply chain. Continuous monitoring and robust licence management can reduce the risk of diversion of AN for unauthorised or illegal purposes while creating a traceable record from manufacture or import through to end use. The amendments also promote the accountability among storehouse operators, transporters, contractors, and facility managers by ensuring that compliance activities are documented and verifiable. Importantly, these measures help to establish a level playing field across the industry by ensuring that all the licence holders are subject to consistent security and compliance requirements. Business Opportunities Emerging from the Proposed Amendments 1. Growth in Demand for CCTV and Security Integration Services The proposed mandatory surveillance requirements are expected to create significant opportunities for security technology providers, system integrators, and surveillance infrastructure companies. Businesses that can design, supply, install, and maintain CCTV systems in accordance with regulatory requirements are likely to experience increased demand from mining operators, construction companies, explosive manufacturers, and other licensed ammonium nitrate (AN) storage facilities. Particularly strong demand is expected for the specialized surveillance solutions, including pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) cameras for large-area monitoring, infrared cameras for round-the-clock surveillance, explosion-resistant cameras for the hazardous environments, industrial-grade Network Video Recorders (NVRs), and secure remote-access platforms that enable regulatory oversight. In addition, long-term maintenance and support contracts are likely to become an important service segment as organizations seek to ensure continuous compliance. 2. Expansion Opportunities for Network Connectivity Providers The demand for dependable communication infrastructure will also rise as a result of the surveillance requirements, especially in remote mining and industrial areas where network connectivity may now be restricted. Businesses may need to upgrade or implement specialized connectivity solutions in order to facilitate ongoing surveillance and remote access by regulatory authorities. Telecom companies, IT infrastructure providers, and suppliers of connectivity solutions that offer satellite communication services, industrial-grade 4G/5G networking solutions, dedicated fiber connectivity, wireless leased lines, and other robust communication technologies will benefit from this. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed revisions will encourage investment in digital infrastructure in the mining, explosives, and manufacturing sectors.  3. PESO Licence Compliance Advisory (Direct Opportunity for Corpseed Corpseed can build an "Ammonium Nitrate Licence Compliance Pack": Service Target Client Fresh AN licence application (storage, possession, transport) New mining projects, quarries, and construction companies Licence renewal management (10-year cycle post 2025 amendment) Existing licence holders Licence transfer advisory and application (M&A, succession, restructuring) Mining companies in merger/acquisition processes CCTV compliance documentation and PESO interface Mining and explosives operators are setting up CCTV Third-party inspection agency (TPIA) coordination Certification and inspection-linked compliance 5. Increased Demand for Safety Audit and Compliance Services It is anticipated that the implementation of required CCTV surveillance at ammonium nitrate (AN) storage facilities will open up new opportunities for audit firms, safety consultants, and compliance experts. In order to evaluate regulatory preparedness, confirm surveillance coverage, and continue to comply with PESO standards, organizations will need more and more expert assistance. Pre-inspection compliance audits, yearly safety management reviews, CCTV system evaluations, and emergency response planning services are all possible offerings from the service providers. These services can also assist companies in finding compliance gaps, improving risk management procedures, and guaranteeing ongoing adherence to legal requirements.  6. Legal and Advisory Services for Licence Transfers There will probably be a need for specialized legal and regulatory advising services as a result of the planned licence transfer structure. Businesses can navigate ownership changes while adhering to regulations with the help of law firms, corporate advisors, and compliance consultants with experience in the explosives and chemical industries. Structuring mergers and acquisitions involving the ammonium nitrate licences, assisting with corporate restructuring projects, offering this guidance on succession planning for licence holders, and representing clients in PESO licence transfer proceedings are some of the major advisory opportunities. Expert advice in this area is anticipated to grow in value as companies look to minimize operational interruptions during the ownership changes.  Corpseed's Position in the Ammonium Nitrate Compliance Market For Corpseed, the 2026 draft amendments reinforce and expand an existing compliance service vertical: Explosive and Hazardous Chemical licensing (AN licence, PESO approvals) is already part of the regulatory compliance landscape Corpseed operates The CCTV compliance requirement creates an advisory angle helping mining and infrastructure clients understand what exactly is required, how to document it for PESO, and managing the PESO interface. The licence transfer reforms create a high-value advisory service for corporate clients navigating M&A in the mining and infrastructure sector. "The 2026 Draft AN Rules are Coming: Are Your Storehouses CCTV-Ready and Are Your Licences Transfer-Proof?"