Law Updates

Subject

Summary: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has released a consultation paper proposing amendments to the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024. The draft aims to strengthen service quality standards, improve consumer protection, and introduce new quality benchmarks for modern telecom technologies, including 5G networks. Stakeholders are invited to submit their comments on the consultation paper until 26 August 2026. Counter comments are required by 7 September 2026. These amendments, upon notification, shall become effective as of 1 October 2026. Until then, these amendments remain subject only to public consultation and shall not have any legal force. The proposed changes in the draft introduce various QoS (Quality of Service) requirements, including network performance, broadband speed, outage reporting, billing issues, 5G Network Slicing, and compliance reporting. The changes are expected to improve service quality and will require telecom operators to analyze their existing systems upon the rules' promulgation. Key Highlights of the Consultation Paper In the TRAI consultation paper, several alterations have been recommended in the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024. Some of the alterations have been suggested to enable better network monitoring, ensure consumer protection, and update QoS standards in light of developments in 5G technology, among other reasons. Some of the key areas include: Proposes amendments to the QoS Regulations, 2024. Introduces new Quality of Service parameters for telecom networks. Proposes a 98% accuracy benchmark for geospatial coverage maps. Revises broadband speed assessment methodology. Introduces reporting requirements for significant network outages. Proposes consumer compensation for outages exceeding 24 hours. Introduces monitoring requirements for 5G network slicing and PRB utilisation. Revises compliance reporting and financial disincentive provisions. Invites stakeholder comments before finalising the amendments. Why Has TRAI Proposed These Amendments? TRAI has proposed these amendments to align the Quality of Service framework with the changing telecom landscape. The increasing use of 4G, 5G, high-speed broadband, and advanced network technologies has created the need for more accurate performance monitoring and stronger consumer protection measures. Such improvements include greater transparency, higher-quality services, more comprehensive reporting, and, most importantly, quality services for telecom customers across all wireless, wireline, and broadband systems. Improve Network Quality Monitoring The draft amendments propose changes to Quality of Service parameters that can make measuring network performance easier. The amendments introduce new QoS parameters. Support 5G Network Deployment The consultation paper introduces provisions related to Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilisation and network slicing, recognising the operational requirements of 5G services. Service providers planning to deploy new network slices may also be required to submit relevant details to TRAI before implementation. Strengthen Consumer Protection In addition, the aim is to enhance the consumer experience through stringent measures to report network outages and provide compensation. The bill suggests rebates or extended validity for consumers who experience network outages lasting more than 24 hours. Increase Transparency The new changes also intend to enhance transparency of telecom companies by ensuring the publication of geospatially accurate network maps that have been validated through physical/virtual drive tests. Improve Regulatory Compliance The consultation document proposes changes to compliance reporting rules and financial penalties to promote better reporting and the timely submission of regulatory reports. This is done to improve regulatory compliance in the telecommunications sector. Regulatory Background The proposed amendments have been issued under the powers conferred on the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) by Section 36, read with Section 11(1)(b)(i) and 11(1)(b)(v) of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. These provisions empower TRAI to frame regulations and prescribe standards for the quality of telecom services nationwide. The amendments seek to revise the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024, which currently prescribe the Quality of Service (QoS) benchmarks that telecom service providers must follow for access and broadband services. The draft proposes updates to these regulations instead of introducing an entirely new regulatory framework. Why Was the Existing Framework Reviewed? The consultation paper explains that the telecom sector has undergone rapid technological changes with the expansion of 4G, 5G, fibre broadband, and advanced network capabilities. As a result, several existing QoS parameters require revision to ensure they continue to measure service quality and accurately reflect current network technologies. What Does the Draft Amendment Cover? Rather than doing away with the 2024 Regulations altogether, the draft contains amendments to certain clauses in the existing regulations. Some of the amendments include: Introduction of new Quality of Service Parameters Revision of performance standards Introduction of new reporting criteria for network outages Introduction of provisions for 5G Network Slicing Introduction of improved consumer protection clauses Revised Compliance Reporting Requirements Financial Incentives Discontinuation Scope and Applicability The proposed amendments apply to telecom service providers offering access and broadband services in India under the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024. They cover multiple technologies, services, and stakeholders across the telecom ecosystem. Stakeholders and Services Covered Category Coverage Under the Draft Amendments Wireless Access Service Providers Subject to revised QoS parameters, network monitoring, outage reporting, and compliance requirements. Wireline Access Service Providers Covered under the proposed Quality of Service amendments for access services. Wireless Broadband Service Providers Required to comply with revised broadband performance and reporting standards. Wireline Broadband Service Providers Covered under updated Quality of Service benchmarks for broadband services. 4G Network Operators Subject to revised speed assessment and network performance requirements. 5G Network Operators Required to monitor PRB utilisation, network slicing, and other technology-specific parameters. Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) Required to comply with revised reporting, monitoring, and consumer protection provisions. Telecom Subscribers Expected to benefit from improved service quality, greater transparency, and enhanced consumer protection. Why Does This Consultation Paper Matter? The proposed amendments represent an important step towards modernising India's telecom Quality of Service framework. As telecom networks continue to evolve with wider 5G deployment, increasing broadband usage, and higher customer expectations, the existing regulatory framework requires periodic updates to remain effective. If implemented, the proposed amendments could: Improve the accuracy of telecom network performance monitoring. Strengthen consumer protection during service disruptions. Increase transparency through reliable coverage maps. Support efficient management of 5G services. Enhance regulatory compliance across telecom operators. Since the amendments are currently under consultation, stakeholders have the opportunity to review the proposals and submit their feedback before the regulations are finalised. Major Proposed Amendments Under the Draft Regulations The draft amendments introduce several new Quality of Service (QoS) measures while revising existing performance benchmarks under the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024. The proposals mainly focus on improving network performance monitoring, strengthening consumer protection, enhancing service transparency, and introducing new compliance requirements for evolving technologies such as 5G. 1. New Quality of Service Parameters According to the consultation paper, there will be additions to some QoS parameters and changes to others. This is done to ensure the telecom network's performance is measured accurately. Some of the major proposed parameters include: Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilisation in 5G networks Silence Call Rate Mean Time-To-Repair (MTTR) Quality of Experience Score (QoES) Revised fault incidence parameter Improved download and upload speed benchmarks Enhanced network outage monitoring These additions reflect the increasing complexity of modern telecom networks and the growing adoption of advanced broadband technologies. 2. Higher Accuracy Requirement for Coverage Maps TRAI has proposed stricter requirements for the geospatial coverage maps published by telecom service providers. Under the draft amendments: Coverage maps published on service providers' websites should achieve at least 98% accuracy. The benchmark will be assessed every month. The proposed requirement is scheduled to take effect from 1 October 2026 if the amendments are notified. To improve reliability, service providers will also need to validate these maps through physical or virtual drive tests, particularly in locations where consumers have reported network-related issues over the past 3 months. 3. Revised Broadband Speed Performance Benchmarks The consultation paper proposes revisions to the way broadband speed performance is measured. Instead of focusing only on declared speeds, the draft introduces technology-specific benchmarks that compare the 80th percentile of measured download and upload speeds with the typical speeds offered under 4G and 5G tariff plans. According to the proposal: Every tariff offering should meet the declared typical download and upload speeds. Performance will be assessed monthly. Different tariff offerings may be grouped only under specified conditions. Each 5G network slice may be evaluated separately where applicable. These changes are intended to improve transparency and ensure that subscribers receive speeds closer to those promised by service providers. 4. Stricter Reporting of Significant Network Outages TRAI has also proposed stronger monitoring requirements for significant network outages. Under the draft amendments, service providers would be required to: Report significant network outages to TRAI within 24 hours from the start of the outage. Monitor outages affecting an entire district or more than 10% of subscribers in a Licensed Service Area for over four continuous hours. Maintain monthly compliance with the reporting benchmark. These proposals seek to improve regulatory oversight while ensuring quicker reporting of major service disruptions. 5. Consumer Rebate for Long Network Outages The draft amendments introduce additional consumer protection measures for prolonged service disruptions. Where a significant network outage continues for more than 24 hours, the proposals provide that. Post-paid subscribers should receive a proportional rent rebate based on the affected period. Pre-paid subscribers should receive an extension of the validity of their subscribed tariff plan for an equivalent number of affected days. These measures are intended to ensure that subscribers receive compensation when prolonged outages affect service availability. 6. New Requirements for 5G Network Slicing One of the most notable additions to the consultation paper concerns 5G network slicing. The draft proposes that: Service providers planning to introduce a new 5G network slice should submit details of both proposed and existing network slices to TRAI. The information should be submitted at least 21 days in advance. Providers should demonstrate that sufficient network capacity is available across different slices. The consultation paper also introduces a new benchmark requiring the percentage of 5G cells with daily Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilisation above 80% to remain within the prescribed limit. These proposals aim to support efficient resource allocation and maintain service quality as 5G networks continue to expand. 7. Introduction of Silence Call Rate Benchmark The discussion paper proposes a new parameter, the Silence Call Rate, for telecommunications. According to the draft amendments, Silence Call Rate should not exceed 1%. The compliance assessment will be conducted monthly. The suggested parameter will come into effect from 1 October 2026, upon notification. It will help improve the quality of voice calls by eliminating silent audio. Old vs Proposed Requirements The following table highlights some of the key changes proposed in the consultation paper. Existing Framework Proposed Amendment Existing QoS parameters under the 2024 Regulations Introduction of additional QoS parameters, including PRB utilisation, Silence Call Rate, MTTR, and QoES Existing coverage map requirements Minimum 98% accuracy with validation through physical or virtual drive tests Existing broadband performance monitoring Speed assessment based on the 80th percentile of measured download and upload speeds Existing outage reporting provisions Reporting of significant network outages to TRAI within 24 hours No specific rebate provision for prolonged outages Consumer compensation through rent rebate or tariff validity extension for outages exceeding 24 hours Existing compliance reporting mechanism Revised reporting requirements and updated compliance framework Proposed Compliance Requirements for Telecom Service Providers If the draft amendments are notified, telecom service providers may need to review their existing compliance systems to align with the revised Quality of Service framework. Some of the key proposed compliance requirements include: Quality Monitoring Service providers may need to monitor newly introduced Quality of Service parameters, including PRB utilisation, Silence Call Rate, Mean Time to Repair (MTTR), and Quality of Experience Score (QoES). Coverage Map Validation Operators would be required to maintain accurate geospatial coverage maps and validate them through physical or virtual drive tests wherever necessary. Broadband Speed Monitoring Telecom operators may need to periodically assess download and upload speeds against the prescribed benchmarks and maintain supporting records for compliance purposes. Outage Reporting The draft requires timely reporting of significant network outages and maintenance of supporting information relating to such incidents. 5G Network Slice Reporting Operators planning new network slices may need to submit advance information to TRAI and demonstrate adequate network capacity before deployment. Consumer Complaint Management The proposed framework also places greater emphasis on resolving customer complaints, maintaining service quality records, and implementing appropriate compensation measures where required. Proposed Financial Disincentives The consultation paper also proposes revisions to the financial disincentive framework applicable to non-compliance with the Quality of Service Regulations. The proposed changes seek to strengthen regulatory enforcement by addressing issues such as: Submission of incorrect or false information  Delay in submission of compliance reports Failure to comply with prescribed Quality of Service benchmarks Other regulatory violations under the amended framework The revised provisions are intended to improve accountability and encourage accurate regulatory reporting by telecom service providers. The detailed financial disincentive mechanism will apply only after the proposed amendments are finalised and notified. Timeline of the Draft Amendments Event Date Consultation Paper Issued 5 August 2026 Last Date for Stakeholder Comments 26 August 2026 Last Date for Counter Comments 7 September 2026 Proposed Effective Date (If Notified) 1 October 2026 Since the amendments are currently under consultation, stakeholders can review the draft proposals and submit feedback before TRAI issues the final regulations. Impact of the Proposed Amendments on Telecom Service Providers The suggested amendments may have a major impact on how telecom service providers monitor network performance, comply with regulations, and provide services to their subscribers. While the amendments are still in the consultative process, operators might have to review their current practices and prepare for any changes if the new regulations are announced. Wireless and Mobile Service Providers The wireless operators might have to enhance their network monitoring practices by including more QoS parameters in their reports, improving the accuracy of their coverage maps, reporting any network disruptions within the required timelines, and ensuring that their performance standards meet the revised benchmarks. Wireline and Broadband Service Providers Broadband providers may be required to evaluate download and upload speeds using the revised assessment methodology proposed in the consultation paper. They may also need to ensure that customers receive service quality consistent with the typical speeds offered under their tariff plans. 5G Network Operators The draft amendments impose new requirements on operators offering 5G services, such as monitoring PRB usage, providing advance notice of the creation of new network slices, and ensuring sufficient network capacity to support different services. Regulatory and Compliance Teams It may be necessary for compliance teams to assess their reporting practices internally and, if the amendments are adopted, improve documentation and record-keeping to submit regulatory reports on time. Benefits of the Proposed Amendments The consultation paper aims to modernise the existing Quality of Service framework while improving accountability across the telecom sector. Some of the expected benefits include: More accurate monitoring of telecom network performance. Improved transparency through reliable geospatial coverage maps. Better assessment of broadband download and upload speeds. Stronger consumer protection during prolonged network outages. Enhanced Quality of Service monitoring for 5G technologies. Improved regulatory reporting and compliance practices. Greater transparency and consistency in service delivery. These proposals seek to balance technological advancements with consumer interests by encouraging telecom operators to maintain higher service quality standards. Operational Challenges for Telecom Operators Telecom operators can face several implementation difficulties if the suggested amendments are adopted, particularly in adjusting their processes to the new QoS criteria. Some of the key challenges may include: Upgrading existing QoS monitoring systems. Validating geospatial coverage maps through physical or virtual drive tests. Measuring additional performance indicators for 5G networks. Maintaining accurate and timely compliance reports. Monitoring network slices and PRB utilisation. Managing consumer compensation for prolonged outages. Strengthening internal audit and documentation processes. The extent of these changes will depend on the final version of the regulations issued after the consultation process. Is This a Positive Regulatory Step or an Additional Compliance Burden? The proposed amendments aim to improve service quality, consumer protection, and regulatory transparency. At the same time, they may require telecom service providers to strengthen their monitoring systems, reporting mechanisms, and compliance processes if the draft regulations are notified. Benefits vs Compliance Challenges Proposed Amendment Regulatory Benefits Compliance Challenges 98% Accurate Coverage Maps Improves transparency and helps subscribers understand actual network availability. Requires regular validation through physical or virtual drive tests and periodic map updates. Technology-wise Broadband Speed Benchmarks Encourages delivery of speeds closer to those promised under tariff plans. Requires continuous speed monitoring, data analysis, and periodic reporting. Significant Network Outage Reporting Strengthens regulatory oversight and improves transparency during major outages. Requires real-time outage detection, documentation, and reporting within prescribed timelines. Consumer Compensation for Long Outages Protects subscribers affected by prolonged service disruptions. Increases operational responsibility for calculating and processing rebates or validity extensions. 5G Network Slicing Requirements Supports efficient network resource allocation and reliable 5G services. Requires advance reporting to TRAI, network capacity planning, and ongoing monitoring. PRB Utilisation Monitoring Helps maintain network capacity and service quality in 5G networks. Requires advanced monitoring tools and periodic performance reporting. Silence Call Rate Benchmark Improves overall voice call quality and customer experience. Requires enhanced voice quality monitoring and network optimisation. Mean Time-To-Repair (MTTR) Encourages faster fault resolution and reduced service downtime. Requires stronger maintenance processes and detailed fault management records. Quality of Experience Score (QoES) Focuses on improving the actual user experience. Requires collection and analysis of additional customer experience data. Enhanced Compliance Reporting Improves regulatory transparency and consistency across operators. Increases documentation, record-keeping, and internal compliance efforts. Revised Financial Disincentive Framework Promotes greater accountability and accurate regulatory reporting. Raises compliance risks and necessitates stronger governance and internal controls. The amendments would help to improve the Quality of Service framework, although the compliance obligations of telecommunication service providers would increase. The overall effect is contingent upon the amendments announced by TRAI following the consultation process. What Should Telecom Service Providers Do Next? Since the amendments are currently under public consultation, telecom service providers should begin evaluating their readiness while monitoring further regulatory developments. Some practical steps include: Consider the consultation paper and proposed modifications. Consider existing QoS Monitoring systems. Find deficiencies in existing compliance procedures. Compare network performance with the proposed standards. Review the outage reporting process and customer complaints system. Consider the preparedness for 5G network slicing and PRB monitoring. Send any comments or suggestions to TRAI before the end of the consultation period. Taking these preparatory steps can help organisations respond more efficiently once the amendments are finalised. How Corpseed Can Help? Staying abreast of changing telecom regulations can be challenging, particularly when evolving QoS standards require additional monitoring and reporting to ensure compliance. Corpseed offers comprehensive regulatory assistance to ensure that telecom service providers comprehend the changing regulations, compliance requirements, and implementation once notification of the amendments is received. Telecom Regulatory Compliance Advisory Corpseed offers advisory on telecom regulations issued by TRAI and helps businesses understand the implications of both current and proposed regulatory requirements. Services include: Interpretation of TRAI regulations and consultation papers Regulatory impact assessment Compliance roadmap preparation Advisory on telecom licensing and regulatory obligations Regulatory Gap Assessment A compliance assessment provides an opportunity to identify any gaps between the existing system and the proposed QoS framework. Assessment covers: Status of Compliance of Existing QoS Processes of Network Monitoring Reporting Processes Consumers’ Grievance Redressal Process Determination of compliance gaps and areas of improvement Compliance Documentation Support It is essential to have proper documentation in accordance with the regulations to prove your compliance status and assist with inspections. Corpseed helps in: Compliance documentation preparation Compliance checklists preparation Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Regulatory Documentation Management Regulatory Reporting Documentation Internal Compliance Reviews and Audit Support Periodic compliance reviews can help businesses identify risks related to their compliance status. Support includes: Internal compliance audits Review of Quality of Service processes Compliance risk identification Corrective action recommendations Audit readiness support Regulatory Interpretation and Implementation Guidance New regulations must always be followed, but the organization may need help implementing them. Corpseed can help you with: Interpreting new QoS parameters introduced Interpreting new regulatory requirements Implementation of regulatory changes Alignment with new regulatory requirements Continuous regulatory assistance Ongoing Compliance Management Regulations governing telecom companies keep changing as technology evolves. Corpseed helps businesses remain compliant continuously. Some of the services provided by Corpseed include: Regular regulatory update notifications Continuous compliance monitoring Assistance with periodic regulatory filings Compliance calendar management Assistance in changing regulatory requirements Whatever the interpretation of the consultation papers, preparedness for compliance, or changing regulatory requirements, Corpseed offers comprehensive services to assist in navigating the ever-changing telecom regulatory landscape in India.

Subject

Summary: The Kerala State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) has published its Revised Categorisation List as of 03.08.2026. The KSPCB industry categorisation list 2026 places 739 industrial, service, infrastructure and environmental-service activities across five categories: Red, Orange, Green, Blue and White. The most visible entries dated 3 August 2026 concern hotels, restaurants, standalone banquet or marriage halls, waste-battery collection centres and non-leather footwear manufacturing. The category is not a label to select by business name alone. Room count, seating capacity, event area, fuel, boiler and genset type, wastewater generation, treatment method, production capacity and specific operations can move similar businesses into different categories. A hotel using cleaner or gaseous fuel may be placed below an otherwise comparable hotel, but only where the exact description and listed conditions are satisfied. This update explains what the source expressly records, what the wider CPCB framework says, and which practical checks businesses should complete. The source does not state a separate effective date, transition period, compliance deadline, fee, or penalty. Those details must not be inferred from the words 'as on 03.08.2026'. KSPCB Revised Category List for Consent Renewal at a Glance Particular Verified Detail Issuing/publishing authority Kerala State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB), as identified by the official hosting page and circular references Document type Consolidated revised categorisation list; not presented as a Gazette notification, signed order or amendment text Exact title Revised lists of Red, Orange, Green and White Category industries and non-industrial operations; separate Blue Category list for essential environmental services Reference numbers Primarily KSPCB/258/2025-SEE-1, with KSPCB/159/2022-SEE-3, PCB/T4/115/97 and other historical circular references Document date Primarily KSPCB/258/2025-SEE-1, with KSPCB/159/2022-SEE-3, PCB/T4/115/97 and other historical circular references Issue/publication date Not expressly specified Effective date Not expressly specified Transition period/deadline Not expressly specified Governing framework Not stated at document level. KSPCB's official consent pages connect CTE/CTO administration to the Water Act, 1974 and Air Act, 1981; CPCB's 2025 methodology provides the national classification framework. Coverage 145 Red, 205 Orange, 206 Green, 12 Blue and 171 White entries - 739 listed activities in total Main affected stakeholders Existing and proposed units, hotels, restaurants, banquet halls, waste-battery collection centres, manufacturers, project developers, consultants and KSPCB consent teams Core development A consolidated Kerala list current to 3 August 2026, with new or revised dated entries and detailed process, capacity and pollution-control qualifiers Fees/penalties A consolidated Kerala list current to 3 August 2026, with new or revised dated entries and detailed process, capacity and pollution-control qualifiers The Regulatory Framework If a business is setting up or running an activity in Kerala that falls under pollution-control rules, KSPCB consent may be required. CTE is taken before the project starts, while CTO is required before operations begin, depending on whether the Water Act, Air Act or both apply. The approval process also covers other environmental permissions related to water, air and waste. The classification of industries was updated nationally by CPCB in 2025. The Pollution Index (PI) is worked out using water, air and industrial waste parameters. Industries with a score of 80 or more are Red, those between 55 and below 80 are Orange, 25 to below 55 are Green, and anything below 25 is White. Blue is separate from these bands, and covers essential environmental services dealing with domestic, or household pollution. CPCB explains that classification can guide consent management, inspection frequency, siting, pollution control planning and progressive environmental management. It also recognises that cleaner technologies, cleaner fuel, operating scale and segregated processes may justify different sub-categories. This is why the same broad activity can appear more than once in the Kerala list. Legal distinction: The category gives a business an idea of which compliance route may apply, but it is not the whole approval process. Depending on the activity, the business may still need consent conditions, waste authorisations, environmental clearance, local permissions or compliance with siting rules. Any later directions issued by CPCB or KSPCB may also need to be followed. How to Read the Five KSPCB Categories Category Kerala Entries CPCB Reference How to Read It Red 145 PI 80 or more under the CPCB framework Highest pollution potential; the Kerala list includes major chemical, metallurgical, waste-processing, infrastructure and high-threshold service activities. Orange 205 PI 55 to below 80 Moderate-to-high potential; many activities appear here where capacity, wastewater, fuel or process increases pollution load. Green 206 PI 25 to below 55 Lower pollution potential, often linked to cleaner fuel, smaller scale, dry processing or reduced wastewater generation. Blue 12 Separate essential environmental services category Kerala lists MSW facilities, waste-to-energy, biomining, C&D waste processing, sewage treatment and specified CBG activities. White 171 PI below 25 Activities with very low pollution potential, but only within the stated process, capacity, fuel, wastewater and equipment limits. Scope and Applicability The revised list covers factories, services, healthcare, hospitality, infrastructure and waste management activities in Kerala. It can apply to new units as well as existing businesses making changes to capacity, equipment, fuel or processes. A category should not be picked just because a keyword matches. Businesses need to check the full activity description and remarks, along with factors such as scale, fuel, wastewater, and waste generation. The following factors repeatedly control category selection: Scale: room count, seating capacity, event area, production capacity, power load, wastewater volume and number of beds. Process: dry processing, wet processing, washing, dyeing, surface treatment, spray painting, pickling, moulding, extraction, heat treatment and chemical reaction. Fuel and utilities: coal or liquid fuel, cleaner or gaseous fuel, electricity, boiler type, genset capacity and whether utilities are supplied by another industry. Wastewater and waste: whether wastewater is generated or discharged, whether a municipal sewer connected to a terminal STP is available, and whether hazardous or regulated waste is handled. Pollution controls: standalone sewage treatment, oil and grease traps, compliant gensets, adequate control measures and adherence to CPCB guidelines. The list does not create a blanket exemption for an entire trade. For instance, a dry assembling activity can appear in White, while related wet processing, surface treatment or emission-generating work appears in a higher category. What the 3 August 2026 Revision Records The list covers industries, services, healthcare, hospitality, infrastructure, and waste management activities in Kerala. It applies to both new, and existing units making operational changes. The category depends on the actual activity, not just a matching keyword. Check the activity description and remarks before deciding. Activity Group Category Coverage What the List Records Hotels, motels and resorts Red, Orange, Green and White Room-count bands and cleaner/gaseous-fuel variants; conditions cover gensets, boilers, grease traps and wastewater management. Restaurants, dhabas and eateries Orange, Green and White Category determined by seating capacity: above 200, 101-200, and up to 100 seats. Standalone banquet/marriage halls Orange, Green and White Category determined by congregation area: above 2,500 sqm, above 1,000 to 2,500 sqm, and up to 1,000 sqm. Waste-battery collection centres Green Must follow CPCB guidelines for collection, handling, storage and transportation of waste batteries, as amended from time to time. Non-leather footwear manufacturing White Limited to dry process and no boiler. Existing White-list entries White Rows 1-84 and row 86 also show 03-Aug-26 alongside earlier dates. The consolidated data does not identify the exact amendment to each row. Detailed Sector Entries Dated 3 August 2026 The following sectors have specific classifications in the revised list and are worth checking closely before deciding which category applies. Hotels, Motels and Resorts For hotels, motels and resorts, the category depends on the number of rooms and the type of kitchen fuel used. So, the room count alone does not decide the category. Hotel Profile Category Express Qualification/Condition Above 300 rooms Red No cleaner-fuel qualifier stated in this Red entry. Above 300 rooms using cleaner/gaseous kitchen fuel Orange CPCB IV+ or 100% gas genset; electric or gas boiler; oil and grease trap; standalone STP. 101-300 rooms Orange No separate conditions printed against this row. 21-100 rooms Orange No cleaner-fuel qualifier stated in this Orange entry. 21-100 rooms using cleaner/gaseous kitchen fuel Green Compliant/gas genset; electric/gas boiler; grease trap. More than 50 rooms require standalone STP; 21-50 rooms follow CPHEEO wastewater methods. Up to 20 rooms Green No separate conditions printed against this row. Up to 20 rooms using cleaner/gaseous kitchen fuel White The row states the cleaner/gaseous-fuel condition; no separate remark is printed against row 170. A hotel should therefore document the actual kitchen fuel, boiler arrangement, genset specifications, room count and wastewater route. Merely planning to use a cleaner fuel is not the same as satisfying every condition attached to the lower category. Restaurants, Dhabas and Eateries Seating Capacity Category Source Position More than 200 seats Orange Listed at Orange serial number 160. 101 to 200 seats Green Listed at Green serial number 136. Up to 100 seats White Listed at White serial number 169; the remarks placement across pages is ambiguous and requires careful confirmation. The remarks for the White-category restaurant mention a few conditions, including compliant gensets, an oil and grease trap at the kitchen outlet, and proper wastewater management as per the CPHEEO Manual. Since the remarks continue from the banquet-hall entry on the previous page, it is not fully clear which conditions apply to each category. Businesses should get written confirmation from KSPCB before relying on the White classification. Standalone Banquet and Marriage Halls Congregation Area Category Express Qualification/Condition More than 2,500 sqm Orange Area means the space earmarked for congregation of guests, as shown in the building plan, fire NOC, local-authority permission or venue layout. More than 1,000 sqm and up to 2,500 sqm Green Oil and grease trap at the kitchen outlet. Up to 1,000 sqm White Conditions begin in the remarks column and continue across the page break; exact allocation should be confirmed with KSPCB. The floor area should be checked from the official building or venue records rather than estimated from marketing material. The same method should be followed for the lower categories as well. If the area is unclear, it is better to check with KSPCB. Waste-Battery Collection Centres and Non-Leather Footwear Waste-battery collection centres: Green Category, with a requirement to follow CPCB guidelines for collection, handling, storage and transportation of waste batteries, as amended from time to time. The row does not state that Green classification replaces any separate obligation under applicable battery-waste rules. Non-leather footwear manufacturing: White Category only where the operation is dry and does not use a boiler. A unit carrying out wet processing, moulding, coating, heating or another unlisted process should not assume that this row applies. Conditions That Can Change a Unit's Category Decision Factor Why It Matters Evidence to Review Cleaner/gaseous fuel Can move certain hotel profiles to a lower category when every linked condition is met. Fuel invoices/specification, kitchen equipment and boiler details Genset standard Higher-capacity or non-compliant gensets can alter pollution potential. CPCB also states that a White or Green sector with a higher-category genset may be treated in the higher category. Nameplate capacity, fuel type, emission standard and maintenance records Wastewater generation Several White entries state or imply movement to Green when wastewater is generated; many other categories use KLD/MLD thresholds. Water balance, discharge route, STP/sewer records and sampling plan Production capacity Limits such as tonnes per day, metric tonnes per month or kilograms per day are part of the category description. Installed capacity, consented capacity and actual production data Dry versus wet process A dry, assembling-only or physical-mixing activity may be White while wet processing or chemical treatment is higher. Process flow diagram, machinery list, raw materials and cleaning method Surface treatment/painting Pickling, electroplating, heat treatment, spray painting and similar operations frequently move fabrication activities upward. Operation-wise layout and outsourced-process contracts Important Source Ambiguities and Drafting Issues The revised list is useful for checking the current classifications, but a few points need to be read carefully: No separate commencement clause: The list is marked “as on 03.08.2026”, but does not mention a separate effective date, transition period or deadline. No redline: the document does not identify whether an entry is new, substituted, clarified or simply carried forward. Earlier and latest versions must be compared before describing a change as a reclassification. Overlapping hospitality entries: Similar room-count bands appear in different categories. Cleaner fuel, and attached conditions appear to explain some differences, but not every row is fully qualified. Page-break ambiguity: the White-category banquet-hall conditions begin on page 37 and continue on page 38 beside the restaurant and hotel rows. The formatting does not clearly allocate every condition. Typographical defects: examples include split words and duplicated wording in remarks. These should not be silently converted into new legal duties. White-category dated rows: many White entries carry 03-Aug-26 alongside earlier dates, but the list does not explain the nature of the 2026 action for each row. Impact on Businesses The revised list may change how a business applies for consent and what pollution-control measures or documents it needs. What actually changes will depend on the activity, its existing consent and the KSPCB requirements that apply to it. Stakeholder Immediate Impact Likely Operational/Cost Effect Priority Concern Hotels and resorts Re-map category by room count, kitchen fuel and controls. Possible changes to STP, genset, boiler and grease-trap planning. Do not rely on room count alone. Restaurants and eateries Confirm the licensed seating capacity band. Wastewater and kitchen controls may require review. Clarify the White-entry remarks. Banquet/marriage halls Measure congregation area from official plans or permissions. Grease trap, genset and wastewater arrangements may affect readiness. Resolve page-break ambiguity in writing. Waste-battery collection centres Map the activity to Green and the CPCB guideline condition. Storage, handling and transport controls may need a gap assessment. Category does not replace separate waste duties. Manufacturers/assemblers Check every process qualifier and capacity threshold. A new boiler, wet step, surface treatment or wastewater stream can raise the category. Maintain an accurate process inventory. MSMEs and startups Select the category before committing to site and machinery. Early design decisions can prevent rework in applications and pollution controls. Use the exact row, not a broad trade name. The operational and cost effects above are reasonable business implications, not confirmed financial consequences stated by KSPCB. The source provides no fee table or cost estimate. What Businesses Should Do Next Businesses should treat category mapping as a controlled compliance exercise. The steps below help connect the source list with a clear and defensible decision without assuming requirements that are not actually stated. Priority Action Responsible Team Relevant Timing Expected Outcome Immediate Prepare a complete activity profile: products/services, capacity, room/seat/area thresholds, process steps, fuel, boilers, gensets, water balance, wastewater and waste streams. Operzations, engineering and EHS Before category selection Accurate factual baseline Immediate Match the profile to the exact KSPCB category row, serial number, circular reference and remarks. EHS/legal Before filing or renewal Traceable category rationale High Compare the mapped category with the current CTE/CTO and any pending application. EHS/legal As soon as practical Identify mismatch or amendment need High Seek written KSPCB clarification where two rows overlap or the page-break remarks affect the chosen category. Authorised signatory/legal Before relying on the lower category Documented regulatory position High Close source-based control gaps, including applicable genset, boiler, grease-trap, STP, wastewater or battery-handling conditions. Engineering/operations/EHS Before commissioning or relevant filing Controls aligned with the selected row Ongoing Update process-flow diagrams, machinery and capacity records whenever operations change. Operations/EHS At each modification Early reclassification check Ongoing Monitor later KSPCB circulars and the official revised-list page. Compliance/legal Periodic review and before renewal Current category mapping How Corpseed Can Help Corpseed can support businesses that need a defensible category assessment or consent strategy under the revised Kerala list. The work should begin with the actual process and pollution profile, not a pre-selected category. Applicability assessment against the exact KSPCB serial number, category, circular reference and remarks. Process, capacity, fuel, wastewater and waste-stream review to identify category-changing factors. Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate application support for eligible projects. Compliance gap assessment for gensets, boilers, grease traps, STPs and other source-linked controls. Technical-document review, including process flow, machinery, water balance and pollution-control descriptions. Support for written representations or clarification requests where the list contains overlapping or unclear entries. Renewal and modification support when an existing unit changes capacity, fuel, equipment or process. Ongoing monitoring support for later KSPCB/CPCB category and guideline updates. A pollution control consent consultant can help align the factual profile, category rationale and application record before submission. Corpseed does not guarantee approval or a fixed processing time; the final category and consent decision remain with the competent authority. Call to action: Hotels, restaurants, banquet halls, manufacturers and waste-battery collection centres can request a category and consent-readiness review before filing, renewal or operational modification. Corpseed's environmental compliance services can identify the exact KSPCB row, unresolved conditions and evidence gaps that need attention. Key Takeaways KSPCB industry categorization list 2026 is a list of 739 items for Kerala, up to date as on 3, August 2026. It contains 145 Red, 205 Orange, 206 Green, 12 Blue and 171 White entries. It has the latest dated rows that make room count, seating, congregation area, cleaner fuel, wastewater and operating process central to classification. Hotels can fall in Red, Orange, Green or White depending on room count, fuel and listed pollution controls. Restaurants are divided by seating capacity: above 200, 101-200 and up to 100 seats. Standalone banquet or marriage halls are divided at 1,000 sqm and 2,500 sqm of congregation area. Waste-battery collection centres appear in Green with a CPCB-guideline condition; non-leather footwear is White only for dry processing without a boiler. The list does not expressly state a separate effective date, deadline, fee or penalty. Ambiguous pagination and overlapping entries should be clarified with KSPCB before a business relies on a lower category. Disclaimer This content is for general information. It summarises an official categorisation list and selected official framework sources available as of 6 August 2026. It is not legal, technical or financial advice. Businesses should obtain document-specific professional advice and, where the source is unclear, written confirmation from KSPCB before making a category, consent, investment or operational decision.

Subject

Summary: India has enacted definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke from Australia, China PR, Colombia, Indonesia, Japan, and Russia. This has been done by means of Notification No. 18/2026-Customs (ADD), issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, on 27 July 2026. This has been notified as G.S.R. 667(E) in the Gazette of India. The Anti-Dumping Duty on Low Ash Metallurgical Coke 2026 will be levied on metallurgical coke with an ash content of less than 18%, subject to certain exceptions. Rates of duty will range from USD 42.95 to USD 128.83 per metric tonne. The duty rate will depend on the country of origin and the country-of-export route, but not on specific producers. The importer, the Customs authority, steel or pig iron manufacturing unit, ferroalloy manufacturing unit, traders, and the procurement team need to assess their product specifications and export route before completing the bill of entry form. The notification is a customs duty. It does not ban imports, give import licenses , or register importers. Low Ash Metallurgical Coke Anti-Dumping Duty 2026 at a Glance Particular Verified details Issuing authority Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India Document type Definitive anti-dumping duty notification Notification number No. 18/2026-Customs (ADD) Gazette reference G.S.R. 667(E), Gazette No. 605 File number CBIC-190349/76/2025-TRU Date of issue and publication 27 July 2026 Legal basis Section 9A (1) and 9A (5), Customs Tariff Act, 1975, read with Rules 18 and 20 of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995 Covered product Low Ash Metallurgical Coke, meaning metallurgical coke with ash below 18%, subject to stated exclusions Indicative tariff items 2704 00 10, 2704 00 20, 2704 00 30 and 2704 00 90 Subject countries Australia, China PR, Colombia, Indonesia, Japan and Russia Main stakeholders Importers, actual users, steel and pig iron units, ferroalloy manufacturers, exporters, customs teams and domestic producers Duty range USD 42.95 to USD 128.83 per metric tonne Duration Five years from the date of provisional-duty imposition, unless revoked, amended or superseded earlier Separate compliance deadline Not expressly specified; liability is assessed at import Nature of requirement Mandatory customs levy where the goods and trade route fall within scope The snapshot should not replace shipment-level review. The notification states that tariff classification is only indicative. The product description controls whether the duty applies. The Regulatory Framework The Central Government levied duty under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Section 9A provides legal authority to levy anti-dumping duties on products imported into India at less than their normal value if dumping causes injury. Customs (ADD) also refers to Rule 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. The investigation has been conducted by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR). The Ministry of Finance has imposed the customs duty based on DGTR's findings. Both have different roles: one investigates dumping and injury, while the other imposes duties based on the findings. From investigation to definitive duty Preliminary findings by DGTR were released on 14 November 2025. In view of such preliminary findings, the Central Government has imposed provisional duty. Finally, DGTR issued its final findings on 28 April 2026. According to the final findings, it was established that dumping of the subject goods had occurred in India, that the domestic industry had suffered substantial injury, and that the dumped imports were the cause of such injury. With the notification of 27 July 2026, the trade remedy takes the form of definitive duty. This notification does not set a quota or stop covered imports. Imports may continue after payment of the applicable duty and other customs charges. An exclusion may be used only when all stated product, user, end-use, and documentary conditions are met. What Has Changed This has changed from the provisional duty to definitive anti-dumping duty. The definitive regime entails fixed amounts per metric tonne, specific to each country, and applies to all producers. There are further clear exclusions for specific products and uses. Definitive duty now applies to covered Low Ash Metallurgical Coke associated with six subject countries. The duty is a fixed USD amount per metric tonne, converted and paid in Indian currency. The notification covers direct and specified indirect trade routes involving a subject country. No producer receives an individual rate. The table records “Any” under producer. Product description, not tariff code alone, decides coverage. Three categories are outside the duty, with conditions for two actual-user exclusions. The measure has a five-year duration counted from the provisional-duty date, subject to earlier revocation, amendment or supersession. Country-wise definitive duty rates Country linked through origin or export    Producer    Amount    Unit    Currency     Country linked through origin or export Producer Amount Unit Currency Australia Any 71.16 Metric tonne USD China PR Any 128.83 Metric tonne USD Colombia Any 118.55 Metric tonne USD Indonesia Any 67.50 Metric tonne USD Japan Any 42.95 Metric tonne USD Russia Any 84.16 Metric tonne USD The amount for China PR is the highest, while the amount for Japan is the lowest. These figures are duty rates, not product prices. The notification does not provide percentage rates, minimum import prices, producer-specific margins or a separate rate for traders. Scope, Trade Routes and Product Exclusions The core covered product is Low Ash Metallurgical Coke, defined as metallurgical coke with ash content below 18%. The listed tariff items are 2704 00 10, 2704 00 20, 2704 00 30 and 2704 00 90. Because classification is described as indicative, using a different tariff item does not by itself take goods outside the duty. Customs will look at the product description. How the origin-export rule works For each subject country, the table captures two route patterns: Goods originating in that subject country and exported from any country, including the same country. Goods originating in a country other than the six subject countries but exported from that subject country. This design addresses both direct exports and specified routing through another country. Importers should therefore check origin and export country together. A review based only on the port of loading, the supplier's address, or the invoice country may yield an incorrect result. Exclusions from the definitive duty Excluded category Product condition End use or user condition Evidence required by the notification Ultra-low phosphorous metallurgical coke Phosphorus up to 0.030%; size up to 30 mm; 5% size tolerance Imported by an actual user for ferroalloy manufacturing At import, an undertaking to the Deputy or Assistant Commissioner of Customs to pay otherwise leviable duty plus applicable interest if the specified use is not met Semi-coke or soft coke Product must be semi-coke or soft coke No special end use stated No special document stated in this notification Specified LAM Coke for small blast furnaces Size 20–40 mm; mean size about 30 mm ± 2 mm Imported by an actual user for pig iron manufacture in blast furnaces up to 130 cubic metres At import, the undertaking described above and a valid State Pollution Control Board or Central Pollution Control Board certificate confirming blast-furnace capacity The two actual user exemptions are restricted. The presence of either the qualifying substance or size criteria alone is not sufficient where the mentioned condition does not cover the importing party or end use. There is no definition of “actual user” contained in the notification. Also, there is no mention of the application form, test procedure, laboratory, or the separate cost of exemption. With respect to the small blast furnace exemption, the undertaking and the capacity certificate issued by the pollution control board are mandatory upon importation. The capacity certificate verifies the furnace's capacity, not its product quality. In the case of ultra-low phosphorus coke, the undertaking addresses the legitimate end use and refund of duty, along with interest. Implementation Timeline/Norms The notification links definitive duty to the earlier provisional measure. Dates must be read separately because the issue date, provisional date, final-findings date and duty duration do not perform the same function. Event Date Regulatory meaning DGTR preliminary findings 14 November 2025 Recommended provisional duty Provisional-duty notification 31 December 2025 Starting point used for the five-year duration DGTR final findings 28 April 2026 Recommended definitive duty after final investigation Definitive-duty notification 27 July 2026 Published the definitive levy and operative conditions The duty is stated to remain effective for five years from the provisional-duty imposition date, unless revoked, amended or superseded earlier. The notification does not state a separate calendar expiry date. Businesses should therefore avoid publishing an assumed final expiry date without first checking for any subsequent government action. It is expressly stated in the proviso that no duty will be levied from the date the provisional duty ceased to be levied until the day before the issue of the definitive notification. The date of cessation of the provisional duty is not mentioned in this proviso of the document. Duty is payable in Indian currency. The exchange rate is the rate notified by the Ministry of Finance under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The relevant date is the date on which the bill of entry is presented under section 46. Importers should not use DGTR's investigation exchange rate or a commercial bank rate for the customs calculation. Why Was This Implemented? "The official justification provided is a trade remedy against injury caused due to dumping." DGTR identified three conditions that were inter-related:  first, the exports are being sold at dumped prices second, the Indian industry is facing material injury third, there is a nexus between the dumped goods and injury. DGTR's final findings dated 28 April 2026 record that imports from the subject countries increased, undercut domestic prices and suppressed price increases. DGTR also recorded lower capacity use, losses, cash losses, negative returns and rising inventory in the domestic industry. These findings belong to the investigation record they should not be treated as a forecast of future market performance. The lesser duty route was adopted, and the DGTR suggested imposing duty based on the lower of the dumping margin or the injury margin. The objective is to remedy an existing injury, but not to take action that would amount to an outright ban on imports. The notification itself incorporates the fixed quantities and exceptions; it does not prescribe production targets within the country. Impact on Businesses Effect will depend on the role the firm plays in the production chain. Importers face responsibility for the assessment and payment of customs duties. There may be an alteration in landed cost for industrial firms. Local producers enjoy protection against the impact of price dumping of imported goods. Importers and customs teams For consignments covered by the new rule, there is a charge per metric ton. The duty on the imported goods should be converted from US dollars to Indian currency using the notified customs exchange rate and the correct rate of the country of origin. Important concerns are: Taking the tariff classification as conclusive despite being governed by product description. Considering only the country of origin or destination, without considering the other. Filing an actual-user exclusion without an undertaking or capacity certificate. Using purchase specifications that do not clearly show ash, phosphorus or size data relevant to scope. Budgeting on a foreign-exchange rate that is not the rate applicable on the bill-of-entry date. Steel, pig iron and ferroalloy manufacturers Downstream users could see a rise in the cost of landed inputs where the import falls within scope. The specific commercial impact will depend on the country of origin, amount shipped, agreements, currency, and whether a local source is available. There is no stated downstream cost or price impact in the notification. Some practical downstream users could be exempted through narrow exemptions. Users in the ferroalloy industry could qualify for the ultra-low-phosphorus coke exemption. Users in pig iron production who use blast furnaces with a capacity of 130 cubic metres could qualify for the 20-40mm LAM Coke exemption. Traders, exporters and overseas suppliers This table applies to all producers; as such, changing suppliers will not affect the producer rate. Exporters are supposed to match up the invoices, certificates of origin, specifications, and shipping documents. Buyers must not assume that transiting the merchandise through another country will absolve them of paying the duty. The actual user exclusions apply to the user's importation of the item. Domestic coke manufacturers There may be more space for domestic producers to compete based on better pricing. Imposing a duty can minimize the price advantage associated with dumping. Nevertheless, there is no assurance of increased sales, margin, and plant utilization. Domestic suppliers will still compete based on other factors. Financial and operational effect The obligation could affect cash flows related to imports, landed-cost systems, purchase orders, and inventory management. Organizations might need to make system adjustments to use the same origin-export correspondence across their customs, procurement, and finance departments. Costs may arise from specification inspections, sampling, or testing conducted as internal control measures. How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance? This notice does not specify a distinct registration or application process. Compliance will be achieved through proper shipping inspection, customs declaration, duty payment, and, if applicable, fulfillment of exclusion criteria. An effective control approach should include the following priorities: Ensure that the goods match the product description. Verify if the product is metallurgical coke and its ash content does not exceed 18%. Consider claims regarding semi-coke or soft-coke very carefully, as the description determines the classification. Map both origin and export country. Compare the trade route with the twelve entries in the duty table. Keep origin evidence, commercial documents and transport records consistent. Apply the correct country rate. Use the fixed USD-per-metric-tonne amount for the relevant subject country. Confirm quantity in metric tonnes and do not substitute a percentage calculation. Use the correct exchange-rate formula. Calculate the duty at the official exchange rate notified by the government on the date of submission of the bill of entry. Coordinate finance and customs documents for consistency with landed cost estimates. Verify an exclusion before shipping. Match all criteria in terms of chemistry, size, user and use. Prepare the documentation required in the notification requesting an assurance or certificate from the pollution control board. Keep testing results easily traceable. Although the notification does not specify the testing methodology, the importer must retain the supplier’s specifications and any test results used to describe the imported product. This is a good internal control, not a mandatory laboratory testing requirement of the notification. Look out for amendments. The notification can be revoked, modified or superseded within five years. Rate tables and exclusions must be verified against the latest official notification for each shipment. There is no provision for return, audit cycle, renewed duty, filing fee or separate compliance deadline in Notification No. 18/2026-Customs (ADD). There is no penalty schedule also. While normal customs and legal consequences may apply to an incorrect description, this article has not verified the penalty, if any. Benefits for Businesses The provision might be useful for some practical applications, though results will differ from stakeholder to stakeholder. More accurate data on landed cost: Importers can rely on established country-specific figures when modelling their purchases and prices. Better competition conditions: Domestic manufacturers get protection that compensates for injury inflicted by dumping practices. The scope of products is clear: the ash threshold, references to tariffs, and exclusions allow for the identification of affected shipments. Understanding specific requirements: Exclusions allow maintaining access to special types of coke required by ferroalloy and pig iron plants. Known route specificity: The table describes the link between the country of origin and the country of export. Better internal controls: Procurement, quality, customs and finance teams have a common basis for shipment review. Reduced dispute risk through preparation: Complete origin, specification and end-use records can support a more consistent customs position. These are possible compliance and market benefits, not guaranteed savings. Businesses sourcing covered goods will still need to absorb, negotiate or pass through the duty's commercial effect. Practical Challenges and Cost Pressures Importers face a direct per-tonne cost that varies by country. The effect grows with shipment quantity and the applicable customs exchange rate. Working capital may also increase because duty is payable upon import. Operational difficulty is likely to centre on product evidence. Ash, phosphorus and size can decide scope or exclusion. Procurement descriptions that use broad terms such as “met coke” may be too weak for an accurate assessment. Actual users must also connect product specifications to the stated manufacturing use. MSMEs will have fewer in-house customs and laboratory resources. The exclusion from small blast furnaces benefits a certain group of people, but it requires an undertaking and a capacity certificate to qualify. Coordination is essential before the cargo reaches its destination. Is This a Right Decision or Additional Burden? The measure has an evident regulatory foundation. The investigation by DGTR, allowing participation of interested parties, issuing provisional and final findings, and determining dumped imports resulting in actual injury form the grounds for imposing a duty based on the lower of the dumping or injury margin. The exclusions also show an attempt to account for downstream needs. Semi-coke and soft coke remain outside scope. Actual ferroalloy users may import specialised ultra-low phosphorus coke under an undertaking. A narrow size grade for pig iron manufacture in blast furnaces up to 130 cubic metres is excluded when the actual-user and certificate conditions are met. The weight of the burden persists. For those importing under coverage, the applicable duty ranges between USD 42.95 and USD 128.83 per metric ton. Further, downstream businesses will require adjustments to their procurement agreements, working capital requirements, and sourcing plans. The extent to which that is necessary will depend upon technical considerations and routing through the two countries involved. MSMEs will experience a greater impact of the administration of this measure. Overall, the determination is a well-targeted trade remedy based on the alleged dumping and injury, but its fairness will depend on the correct administration of the measure. Description first should preclude tariff-code manipulation, while exclusions should be properly administered in all situations where they apply. This measure needs to be seen as both a documentation and a cost change. Business Opportunities Created The notification can shift demand and service needs without creating a guaranteed market outcome. Domestic metallurgical coke producers may compete for demand that was previously met by dumped imports. Alternative country-of-origin sourcing or contract terms that make explicit who assumes the risk of anti-dumping duties can be considered by buyers. Customs and trade professionals can assist with origin and export routing, rate validation and entry billing controls. Testing and inspection companies can help with voluntary product verification where businesses require ash, phosphorus or size validation. Technology vendors can incorporate country routing and rate verification into landed cost and customs management. Compliance staff can design controlled processes for user-initiated certificate validation. Logistics and procurement advisors can help businesses assess the cost-effectiveness of local versus foreign sourcing. The strongest opportunities relate to evidence, sourcing and cost control. The notification does not create a new licensing market or require every importer to obtain certification. Services should therefore focus on actual customs and product-scope needs. How Can Corpseed Help? Corpseed can provide import compliance services for businesses handling Low Ash Metallurgical Coke. Support should begin with an assessment of applicability and evidence, rather than assuming that every shipment attracts duty or qualifies for exclusion. Assess product scope against the below-18% ash definition and stated exclusions. Review country of origin and country of export against the twelve duty-table entries. Check the correct fixed-rate and exchange-rate methods for landed-cost planning. Conduct a compliance gap assessment across purchase orders, invoices, specifications and customs records. Support document preparation for actual-user undertakings where an exclusion applies. Review the pollution-control-board capacity certificate needed for the small-blast-furnace exclusion. Coordinate product regulatory consulting or testing support where technical evidence needs strengthening. Provide ongoing compliance support for later amendments, shipment controls and internal team training. Corpseed's customs compliance consulting can connect procurement, quality, finance and customs documentation. The final customs position must reflect the shipment facts and the latest official notification; professional support cannot guarantee acceptance or a fixed clearance time. Importers, ferroalloy manufacturers and pig iron units seeking a shipment-level review can speak with a Corpseed regulatory compliance consultant about product scope, duty mapping and exclusion documentation. Final Takeaway The Anti-dumping Duty of Low Ash Metallurgical Coke 2026 imposes clear fixed anti-dumping duties on relevant imports from Australia, China PR, Colombia, Indonesia, Japan and Russia. Tariff duty rates range from $42.95 to $128.83 per metric tonne, while the description of the articles governs disputes over tariff classification. It will be necessary first to review the relevant product specifications, origin/export route, and exclusions. The five-year period starts on the imposition of provisional duty on 31 December 2025 and may be earlier due to government action and a non-levy gap. Proper assessment before filing the bill of entry is the most important step at this stage.

Subject

Summary: The Directorate General of Foreign Trade ( DGFT ) has opened India-Oman CEPA TRQ applications 2026 for the financial year 2026-27. Public Notice No. 24/2026-27 was issued on 3 August 2026 and published in the Gazette of India on 4 August 2026. Applications are invited from 4 August through 19 August 2026. The notice covers 30 Harmonised System (HS) tariff lines, including dates, marble, chemicals, polymers, PET flakes and aluminium. It also names extra documents for selected marble and PET flake applications. This is an allocation notice, not a general ban or product standard. A Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) gives eligible imports an agreed tariff treatment up to a fixed quantity. Public Notice No. 24 starts the FY 2026-27 round it does not state every tariff rate or repeat the full procedure.  Notification at a Glance Particular Verified details Issuing authority Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce and Industry Document type Public Notice published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1 Notice number Public Notice No. 24/2026-27 File number F. No. 01/89/180/07/AM-26/PC-2(A)/E-46336 Gazette identifier CG-DL-E-04082026-275171 Gazette No. 220 Date of issue 3 August 2026 Date of publication 4 August 2026 Application window 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026 Governing framework Paragraphs 1.03 and 2.04 of Foreign Trade Policy 2023 Public Notice No. 20/2026-27 Annexure VIII of Appendix 2A of the Handbook of Procedures 2023 Covered activity Applications for FY 2026-27 TRQ allocation for listed imports under the India-Oman CEPA Main stakeholders Indian importers and users of the listed goods marble processors polymer, chemical and aluminium buyers PET flake applicants Core change Opens a new application window, states permitted quantities and adds product-specific supporting documents Separate effective date Not expressly specified the operational application window begins on 4 August 2026 Fees and penalties Not specified in this public notice Nature of requirement Mandatory for applicants seeking allocation under this application round extra documents apply only to the named products The notice bears 3 August as its issue date, while Gazette publication and filing begin on 4 August. The final date is 19 August 2026. The Regulatory Framework India-Oman CEPA and the TRQ mechanism The India-Oman Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) took effect on 1 June 2026. DGFT Trade Notice regarding CEPA implementation: Importation of lines identified as sensitive shall be subject to concession based on quota as opposed to concession without quantity restrictions. The Department of Commerce has identified certain sensitive items in India’s offer as subject to tariff liberalization under the TRQ system. TRQ is an agreement between a commodity and a certain quantity. An allocation does not eliminate classification, origin, and customs requirements, nor does it constitute automatic clearance. DGFT's procedural foundation Public Notice 24 draws authority from sections 1.03 and 2.04 of Foreign Trade Policy 2023. It is an amendment to Public Notice 20/2026-27, which introduced the procedure for India-Oman into Annexure VIII of Appendix 2A of the Handbook of Procedures 2023. Both notices are necessary for applicants: Public Notice 20 for the procedure, and Public Notice 24 for the live window, quantity, and additional document. The DGFT offers a TRQ system using the Import Management System. Public Notice 24 clarifies that there is no charge, quota formula, minimum request or priority system. Applicants should verify this in the operative module and Annexure VIII rather than assuming it. DGFT Import Management System What Has Changed? The procedure is defined in Public Notice No. 20. Public Notice No. 24 triggers the new application cycle for FY 2026-27 and provides product-level quantities. It also sets the requirements for accompanying documents for selected marble and PET flake lines. There will be a fixed filing period between 4 August and 19 August 2026. There are 30 HS Codes, but some share the combined quantity. For marble block applications under Serial No. 3, a valid Chartered Engineer Certificate is required. Applicants for the products grouped as marble slabs at serial numbers 4, 25, 26 and 27 must provide a valid pre-purchase agreement with the supplier in Oman.  PET flake applicants with serial numbers 22, 23, and 24 must provide a Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change NOC as per the cited office memorandum.  An Annexure-A template sets out the information and certification expected from the Chartered Engineer for marble blocks.  The notice does not say that every listed importer needs all three document types. Each condition attaches to a specific product group. Applying a marble requirement to a polymer or aluminium line would overstate the notice. Products and Permitted TRQ Quantities for FY 2026-27 The HS code should be used to read the product schedule and not just the trade name. The same descriptions can be seen in different tariff codes. Several quantities can apply to more than one HS code, and the number is shared among these tariff codes. Serial number(s) and HS code(s) Product description Permitted TRQ quantity 1-2: 08041010, 08041090 Dates, fresh dates, other 2,000 MT shared 3: 25151210 Marble and travertine blocks 1,00,000 MT 4: 25151220 Marble and travertine slabs 15,00,000 sq. m 5: 29053100 Ethylene glycol (ethanediol) 1,50,000 MT 6: 38170011 Linear alkylbenzenes 1,049 MT 7-13: 39011010, 39011020, 39011090, 39012000, 39014010, 39014090, 39019000 Listed polyethylene and other primary-form polymer lines 75,000 MT shared 14-16: 39021000, 39023000, 39029000 Polypropylene, propylene copolymers and other listed lines 10,700 MT shared 17: 39031990 Other under the stated tariff heading 34.802 MT 18: 39033000 ABS copolymers 1.054 MT 19: 39041020 Suspension grade PVC resin 166.666 MT 20: 39041090 Other under the stated PVC tariff line 355.937 MT 21: 39042100 Non-plasticised 6.00 MT 22-24: 39076110, 39076190, 39076930 PET flakes and listed related primary forms 2,000 MT shared 25-27: 68022110, 68022120, 68022190 Marble blocks/tiles, monumental stone and other listed items 15,00,000 sq. m shared 28: 76011010 Unwrought, non-alloyed aluminium ingots 30,434.909 MT 29: 76012010 Unwrought aluminium alloy ingots 81.296 MT 30: 76051100 Non-alloyed aluminium wire exceeding 7 mm cross-sectional dimension 199.1 MT The polymer group includes technical distinctions based on ethylene monomer content and specific gravity. Applicants should preserve the exact eight-digit HS classification used in the notice. A commercial description such as "polyethylene" is too broad to establish coverage. The notice uses "Pet Flakes" in its document clause, while the tariff table uses "PET Flake (Chip)" for two lines and "Other Primary Form" for another. This article treats PET as the material abbreviation, not the word "pet." Classification should follow the HS code and tariff description. Scope and Applicability The invitation covers applicants seeking FY 2026-27 TRQ allocation for the listed imports from Oman. Marble block applicants at serial 3 need the Chartered Engineer certificate. Marble applicants at serials 4 and 25-27 need the supplier agreement. PET applicants at serials 22-24 need the stated MoEF&CC NOC. Products outside Table 1 receive no TRQ invitation through this notice. Businesses not seeking this CEPA allocation have no stated filing duty under Public Notice No. 24. No general exemption, MSME relaxation or startup category is stated. Allocation also does not remove separate customs, environmental, standards or product controls. Mandatory Documents for Selected Products Chartered Engineer certificate for marble blocks For serial number 3, a valid Chartered Engineer certificate is mandatory. It must certify installed marble-processing capacity, machinery installation and production during the preceding three financial years. Annexure-A provides a draft template. Required field or evidence What Annexure-A asks for Certificate identity Certificate number and date Importer particulars Name, Importer-Exporter Code and address Machinery details Model number, installation or commissioning date, installation date and whether the machinery works Capacity Marble block processing capacity in MT per year Production history Production in FY 2023-24, FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 Basis of certification Examination of records and/or physical inspection Goods confirmation Imported goods are natural marble description and quantity match supporting documents Authentication Chartered Engineer's signature, name, registration number, seal and stamp Production figures, machinery records and capacity should support the certificate. The notice states that there is no specific rejection or penalty rule for a mismatch. Pre-purchase agreement for specified marble lines A valid pre-purchase agreement with the Oman supplier is mandatory for serial numbers 4, 25, 26 and 27. No format, value, duration or minimum quantity is prescribed. The executed agreement should clearly connect the applicant, supplier and intended goods. There is a drafting point that deserves care. Clause 3(ii) calls all four entries "Marble Slabs," but the table describes serial 25 as marble blocks/tiles, serial 26 as monumental stone and serial 27 as "other." The document expressly attaches the agreement requirement to all four serial numbers. Businesses should follow the serial-number reference even where the collective label is narrower than the table descriptions. MoEF&CC NOC for PET flakes For serial numbers 22, 23 and 24, an NOC from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) is mandatory. It must be obtained in accordance with Office Memorandum No. 23/66/2019-HSMD dated 23 August 2022. The notice does not reproduce the NOC procedure, processing time or supporting papers. PET applicants should confirm that their approval matches the applicant, material and proposed import. Implementation Timeline/Norms Event Relevant date Required attention Public Notice No. 20 issued 13 July 2026 Established the India-Oman CEPA TRQ procedure in Annexure VIII Public Notice No. 24 issued 3 August 2026 Announced the FY 2026-27 invitation and evidence conditions Application window opens, and Gazette publication occurs 4 August 2026 Eligible applicants may submit new TRQ applications Application window closes 19 August 2026 Filing must be completed by the stated end date Relevant quota year FY 2026-27 Allocation relates to the Indian financial year named in the notice The source provides no later correction period, extension, allocation date or separate transition phase. It also does not state when DGFT will decide applications. Businesses should not plan around an assumed grace period. Why This Was Implemented? The official purpose of the public notice is to invite new applications for the allocation of the India-Oman CEPA TRQ for FY 2026-27. It is an operationalization of the framework issued in the notification of 13 July by specifying the filing period and the quantities involved. The context, rather than the purpose, of Public Notice No. 24 determines the logic of the additional documents. A tariff quota allows tariff concessions with a quantified limit. This is accomplished through the combination of product codes, origin documents, and the allocation mechanism. The additional documents are used as controls for product-specific purposes as follows: The Chartered Engineer Certificate links marble block access to processing facilities, functioning equipment, and previous production. The Oman supplier agreement links the selected marble applications to the source agreement. The MoEF&CC NOC links PET-based allocation to the environmental clearance referred by DGFT. Specific HS codes and quantities link the allocation to the specific tariff lines.  The notice does not claim that these controls were introduced to protect domestic industry or to increase recycling. Impact on Businesses The immediate consequence is a filing deadline that is too short. Commercial value will depend on allocation, tariff preferences, origin, and landed cost. The announcement ensures that no allocation or saving occurs. Marble producers and importers Marble companies have the most additional evidence. Applicants for Serial 3 require confirmed plant and three years' production information. Applicants for Serial 4 and 25 to 27 will need a supplier in Oman. Quantity must be the same in the certificate, contract, and application. Chemical and polymer consumers Chemical and polymer consumers will need proper classification. Some quota amounts are combined across multiple HS code numbers and cannot be treated separately on each line. PET flake applicants The MoEF&CC NOC is mandatory for the named lines. An absent or mismatched NOC does not meet the express document condition, although the notice states no specific consequence. Aluminium importers Aluminium contracts, requests and customs papers should use consistent units. The three entries cover different goods, each with a separate code and quantity. MSMEs and smaller importers Smaller firms may face a higher relative burden because the window is brief and specialist evidence may be needed. The notice contains no MSME preference or relaxation. No tariff saving can be calculated from this notice alone because it omits preferential rates. The CEPA tariff schedule, customs notification and shipment data are also needed. How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance No. 24 Public Notice does not set out an entire filing sequence. The following is a practical checklist, not an alternative to Annexure VIII or the live DGFT Import Management System. Verify product eligibility and classification. Align the technical product with the eight-digit HS code, description and unit in Table 1. Obtain customs advice on classification where required. Study the operative allocation process. Refer to Public Notice No. 20/2026-27 and to Annexure VIII of Appendix 2A. Review the live DGFT Import Management System for any fields, declarations, fees, technical specifications and instructions applicable in the absence of such in Public Notice No. 24. Prepare product-specific information. The Marble block applicants will need to fill out the Chartered Engineer certificate along with supporting records. The other applicants regarding marble will require the agreement of Oman suppliers. The PET applicants will need to verify their MoEF&CC NOC.  Ensure consistency in commercial information. The importer name, IEC, HS code, product description, volume, supplier, and supporting documents must be consistent within a single transaction. Any inconsistencies must be sorted out before filing. Apply during 4-19 August 2026. Make the online filing before the due date. Save the acknowledgement, final application form, and uploaded documents as internal records.  Prepare post-allocation measures separately. A TRQ allocation is part of the import process. Public Notice No. 20 requires a Certificate of Origin issued by Oman at the time of clearance. In addition, the applicant must review the customs, environmental and product-specific controls for each shipment. The notice names no application fee and no correction mechanism. It would be unsafe to state that filing is free or that an error can be repaired after 19 August. Practical Challenges and Risks to Avoid Reading a shared quota as a per-code quota: Several figures span multiple HS lines. This can distort sourcing plans and requested quantities.  Using only a trade name: Polymer, marble and aluminium entries contain technical distinctions that affect coverage.  Submitting an unsupported CE certificate: Production, capacity and machinery details should agree with underlying records and any inspection evidence.  Ignoring serial numbers: The supplier agreement applies to serials 4 and 25-27 despite the collective "marble slabs" label.  Assuming the notice grants customs clearance, allocation, origin proof, and import clearance are related but separate controls.  Waiting for the NOC: PET applicants face a timing risk that the notice will not be relaxed.  Assuming an extension: No grace period or extension appears in the notice.  No fine, prosecution provision, or cancellation rule appears in Public Notice No. 24. Commercial risks include a late application, no allocation, a sourcing delay, and an inability to claim the intended quota treatment. Benefits for Businesses For a compliant applicant, the round can create practical value without changing the need for careful import controls. Access to quota-based CEPA tariff treatment: An allocation may allow eligible goods to use the agreed treatment within the applicable quota and customs rules.  Clear annual quantity signals: Product-wise limits help importers assess whether an Oman sourcing plan is commercially meaningful.  More sourcing options: Indian users of covered dates, marble, chemicals, polymers, PET materials, and aluminium can assess Oman as a source.  Better procurement discipline: Origin, classification, quantity and supplier evidence must be aligned before filing.  Improved record quality: The marble certificate encourages processors to maintain reliable machinery, capacity and production records.  Greater planning certainty: A stated window and annual quantities are clearer than an open-ended or informal allocation process.  Cross-team control: Procurement, customs, environment, production, and legal teams can coordinate around a single filing event.  These are potential benefits. The notice promises no allocation, duty saving or faster clearance. Is This a Right Decision or Additional Burden? The decision has a sound administrative purpose. A TRQ needs a controlled application window, product mapping and annual quantities. Without those elements, the negotiated tariff treatment would be hard to administer. Product-specific evidence can also connect applications to real business activity and applicable environmental controls. However, the burden is very real. Time is limited. Marble block producers will need to show professional certification that covers production for three years. On the other hand, those applying for marble beyond what is already covered need an authentic supply agreement, while PET applications require a different ministry NOC. Small companies will have less in-house capability to manage their documentation. This shows that while the round needs to open to use the CEPA quota, access hinges on well-communicated digital guidelines and assessments. Public Notice No. 24 has made this easier by listing out the quantities and additional documents needed. However, important aspects of the procedure have been left for Annexure VIII. Business Opportunities Created The notice creates focused opportunities around lawful trade and implementation rather than a new unrestricted market. Marble processors may strengthen capacity records, asset registers and production reporting to support current and later regulatory filings.  Chartered Engineers with suitable competence may support the source-based certification required for serial number 3.  Environmental consultants may assist PET businesses in understanding the MoEF&CC NOC pathway, without replacing the ministry's decision.  Customs and product-classification specialists can review technically close HS lines before an applicant commits to a code.  Import compliance services can help connect DGFT filing, origin evidence, procurement documents and customs readiness.  Compliance teams can create controls for allocation, use and shipment evidence.  Quota availability, tariff difference, freight, contract price and customs requirements affect the commercial case. The notice gives no revenue forecast or assured saving. What Affected Businesses Should Review Now Priority Action Responsible team Deadline or timing Expected outcome 1 Confirm the exact HS code and shared or standalone quota Customs, tax and product team Before filing Correct product mapping 2 Check Annexure VIII and the live DGFT module Compliance and legal Immediately Complete procedural view 3 Obtain the applicable CE certificate, Oman supplier agreement or MoEF&CC NOC Production, procurement or environment team Before filing Source-based evidence ready 4 Reconcile IEC, names, product descriptions and quantities Finance, legal and compliance Before submission Consistent application record 5 Submit and retain the final acknowledgement Authorised DGFT filing team By 19 August 2026 Time-stamped filing evidence 6 Prepare origin and clearance controls Logistics and customs team Before shipment and clearance Post-allocation readiness This table separates immediate filing work from later shipment controls. It does not imply that DGFT must allocate the amount requested. How Can Corpseed Help? Corpseed can provide document-specific import compliance services for businesses assessing or preparing an India-Oman CEPA TRQ request. Review whether the product and eight-digit HS code appear in Public Notice No. 24/2026-27.  Explain the relationship between Public Notices No. 20 and 24, Annexure VIII and the DGFT TRQ module.  Support online licence application preparation and filing within the stated window.  Review the Chartered Engineer certificate against Annexure-A and available production records.  Check whether the Oman pre-purchase agreement identifies the relevant parties, products and commercial terms.  Coordinate document readiness for the MoEF&CC NOC condition applicable to PET flake lines.  Assist with Certificate of Origin and customs compliance planning after allocation.  Provide regulatory approval services and ongoing file and record support for the import transaction.  Corpseed's role is to help applicants organise facts, documents and filings. DGFT and other competent authorities retain decision-making power. No adviser can guarantee allocation, approval, duty savings or customs clearance. Affected importers seeking a structured filing review can contact Corpseed for import compliance services before the 19 August 2026 deadline. Final Takeaway Applications under the India-Oman CEPA TRQs for the 2026 quota round are available from 4 to 19 August 2026 for FY 2026-27 imports in the mentioned HS Codes. DGFT has provided 30 HS Codes, each with separate and combined quotas, and requiring additional documentation for certain marble and PET flake goods. The first step would be to check the HS classification, Annexure VIII, and submit the required documents within the due dates. Businesses must understand that tariff classification, allocation, proof of origin, and customs clearance are four different procedures.

Subject

Summary: The Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has issued the Delhi Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Amendment Rules, 2026. The final rules modify the method for granting authority to manufacturers, repairers, and dealers of weights and measures in Delhi. The licensing system has been replaced by a registration certificate, which remains valid unless it is suspended or revoked. The Delhi Legal Metrology Amendment Rules 2026 provide for issuance of self-declaration without prior inspection. They also make amendments to the forms, fees, records and transition provisions. The said notification is dated 28th July, 2026. Delhi Gazette Extraordinary No. 204 is dated 29th July, 2026. The above rules will come into force from the date of publication in the Gazette. The firms can verify their filing mechanism with the Controller of Legal Metrology . Delhi Legal Metrology Amendment Rules 2026 at a Glance Particular Verified details Issuing authority Weights and Measures Department (Department of Legal Metrology), Government of NCT of Delhi Rule-making authority Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, after consultation with the Central Government Document type Final amendment rules published by notification Title Delhi Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Amendment Rules, 2026 File number F. No. 12(2)/W&M/Enforcement/2026/953 Notification date 28 July 2026 Gazette publication Delhi Gazette Extraordinary No. 204, dated 29 July 2026 Effective date Date of publication in the Official Gazette the Gazette issue bears 29 July 2026 Governing law Section 53 read with section 2(q) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 Rules amended Delhi Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Rules, 2011 Main stakeholders Manufacturers, repairers and dealers of weights and measures Core change Renewable licences replaced by continuing, self-declaration-based registration General compliance deadline No separate general deadline stated existing licences continue until their stated expiry Nature of requirement Final and mandatory, not a draft or advisory The draft was published on 8 May 2026 and in two Hindi and two English daily newspapers on 14 May 2026. The authority invited objections or suggestions for 30 days. The final notification records that none were received during that period. The Regulatory Framework The Weights and Measures (Legal Metrology) Act, 2009 regulates weights and measures in trade. Section 53 allows the State Government to make rules for particular matters after consultations with the Central Government. The Administrator of a Union Territory is considered the State Government for this matter under Section 2(q). Delhi used that authority to make the 2011 Enforcement Rules, effective from 1 April 2011. Rule 11 created licences valid for at least one year and renewable for one to five years. Renewal applications were due within 30 days before expiry. See the official 2011 Rules. The 2026 amendment substitutes Rules 11 and 12, alters Rule 13, makes terminology changes throughout the rules and replaces Schedules II-A, III, IV, V, VI and VII. Schedule II-B, which contained renewal forms, is omitted. The amendment therefore changes both the legal status of the authorisation and the paperwork supporting it. The India Code has 2026 changes to replace ‘licence’ with ‘registration certificate’ in the central Act on 1 May 2026. It seems that the language used in Delhi aligns with this change. This interpretation is not explained separately in the notification. Scope and Applicability The rules cover manufacturers, repairers and dealers of weights or measures under Delhi’s enforcement framework. “Weight or measure” includes weighing and measuring instruments. Stakeholder Covered by the new registration framework? Main responsibility Manufacturer Yes Use LM-1, maintain facilities and records, obtain required verification and stamping Repairer Yes Use LR-1 to furnish security, maintain tools and records, obtain required verification Dealer Yes Use LD-1 maintain records do not deal in non-standard weights or measures Manufacturer repairing its own product used outside the State of manufacture Separate repairer certificate not required Give advance information about the repair to the concerned legal metrology officer Person bona fide repairing equipment owned or possessed by that person Repairer certificate not required Limited to genuine repair of that equipment Existing Delhi licence holder Temporarily covered through transition Continue under the existing licence until its stated expiry, then obtain a registration certificate The exemptions remove only the separate repairer certificate in the stated cases. They do not expressly remove verification, stamping, accuracy or other duties. What Has Changed? The amendment replaces periodic licensing with continuing registration and places more weight on accurate self-declaration. Compliance area Earlier position under the 2011 Rules Position under the 2026 amendment Business meaning Authorisation Licence Registration certificate Forms and records must be updated Pre-issue process No promise of issue without inspection Self-declaration no pre-issue inspection Entry-stage inspection removed Validity At least one-year renewable for one to five years Valid unless suspended or cancelled Routine renewal removed Renewal form Schedule II-B applied Schedule II-B omitted No renewal application under the amended framework Manufacturer issue fee ₹500 per year ₹5,000 for issue Higher upfront fee, without recurring renewal under Rule 11 Repairer issue fee ₹100 per year ₹2,000 for issue Higher upfront fee ₹5,000 security deposit also applies Dealer issue fee ₹100 per year ₹2,000 for issue Higher upfront fee, without recurring renewal under Rule 11 Alteration and duplicate ₹50 and ₹10 ₹1,000 and ₹500 Certificate changes and replacement copies cost more Transfer Not saleable or transferable Also, not inheritable Inheritance expressly barred Existing licences Renewable under the earlier system Valid until their stated expiry and deemed certificates during that period Conversion is deferred until existing validity ends Application forms, certificate formats, the departmental register, the security schedule, and the business registers are also replaced. Firms reaching licence expiry must use the new forms. Detailed Requirement-Wise Analysis 1. Self-declaration does not remove enforcement. Rule 11(1) requires issue on self-declaration without prior inspection. The declaration must be accurate: a materially false or incorrect application statement can support suspension and cancellation. That relief is limited to the issuance of certificates. Wider inspection, verification, stamping, record-production and enforcement powers remain. Self-declaration is not a waiver of product or premises compliance. 2. Continuing validity and no routine renewal A fresh certificate shall remain valid unless it is suspended or cancelled by the Controller or any authorised officer. Rule 11(2), which provided the requirement for renewal, has been omitted. The language related to renewals has been removed from the rules, while Schedule II-B has also been withdrawn. Continued validity does not mean that the certificate can be transferred. Forms make the certificate valid for the party named and the premises mentioned therein. 3. Display, facilities and internal controls Every registered manufacturer, repairer and dealer must maintain the workshop, equipment, tools and registers required by the certificate’s terms and conditions. The certificate must be displayed at a conspicuous place in the business premises. Certificate conditions require compliance with the Act, the rules, and the Controller’s directions. Holders must surrender the certificate on closure or cancellation. 4. Product-specific duties remain The new Schedule III retains duties that apply to each business type: A manufacturer must present weights, measures, weighing instruments or measuring instruments made and intended for use within Delhi to the legal metrology officer for verification and stamping before sale.  A repairer shall submit such repaired items for stamping in accordance with Rule 14(1). In case the servicing or repair operation results in defacing, removal, or breakage of any valid stamp prior to the expiry of that stamp, the item shall be submitted for re-verification and stamping. A dealer must not sell, offer, expose or possess for sale any non-standard weight or measure.  Simpler registration therefore does not relax product standards. Application Forms and Records Schedule II-A now contains three application forms: LM-1 for manufacturers, LR-1 for repairers and LD-1 for dealers. Applications go to the Controller or another officer authorised for this purpose. The notification does not specify an online portal, processing time, a detailed scrutiny sequence, or a separate submission deadline. Form Applicant Main information expressly requested LM-1 Manufacturer Business and premises details, establishment date, owners, partners or directors trade licence, manufacturing activity products workforce trademark machinery workshop and testing facilities electricity finance and bankers tax IDs, earlier applications sales geography model approval details LR-1 Repairer Concern and workshop details, establishment date owners, partners or directors, trade licence and tax IDs, types of equipment repaired, operating area, experience staff machinery and tools, electricity, test-weight stock, earlier applications LD-1 Dealer Establishment and ownership details trade licence product categories tax registration intended imports sources, manufacturer’s mark and certificate importer registration and Central Government model approval where applicable earlier applications Each applicant certifies that the information is true, agrees to comply with applicable law, and will deposit the scheduled fee when required. Schedule VII prescribes separate operating registers. Manufacturers track monthly opening stock, production, sales (both inside and outside Delhi), dispatch vouchers, and closing balance. Repairers record the user, items received, receipt, repair and verification charges, total charged, and return date. Dealers track opening stock, supplies brought from within and outside Delhi, sales inside and outside Delhi, dispatch vouchers, destination State, total sales and balance. These are statutory formats. Rule 13 continues to require the appropriate registers and specified periodical reports or returns. Fees, Security Deposit and Cost Structure Item Amount under Schedule IV or VI Who pays Issue of manufacturer registration certificate ₹5,000 Manufacturer Issue of repairer registration certificate ₹2,000 Repairer Issue of dealer registration certificate ₹2,000 Dealer Alteration of registration certificate ₹1,000 Certificate holder requesting alteration Duplicate registration certificate ₹500 Certificate holder requesting a duplicate Security deposit for each repairer certificate ₹5,000 Registered repairer The notification does not state professional, testing, verification or portal charges. New issue fees are higher than the former annual rates, but renewal is no longer available. The net effect depends on operating duration and later alterations. Implementation Timeline/Norms Event Relevant date Required action Draft notification issued and made available 8 May 2026 Stakeholders received 30 days to submit objections or suggestions Newspaper publication 14 May 2026 Two Hindi and two English daily newspapers carried the draft Final notification date 28 July 2026 Final rules signed and issued Gazette date and commencement 29 July 2026 Amended framework takes effect based on the commencement clause Existing licence expiry Individual date printed on each licence Holder must obtain a registration certificate under the amended rules after expiry The electronic identifier contains 4 August 2026, but Gazette No. 204 is dated 29 July. The document does not call 4 August a separate effective date. For a time-sensitive filing, retain the Gazette and seek confirmation if the department uses another operational date. Why Was This Implemented? The notification does not set forth a stated policy purpose. The notification sets out the consultation process and absence of objection, followed by the amendments themselves. Such an additional purpose would have to be considered an interpretation rather than a formal statement. Three possible objectives based on its format include: To replace license renewals with one certificate of continuous registration.  To use self-certification to eliminate pre-issue inspection as an obstacle to entry.  To retain accountability via declaration, recordkeeping, display, verification and stamping, and suspension or cancellation.  The system emphasizes ongoing oversight of renewal. Suspension, Cancellation and Drafting Points to Watch If the application contains any false or misleading information, the Controller or an authorized officer can suspend the certificate. The holder should also have the chance to show cause. If the investigation is not complete within three months, then the suspension will automatically be vacated. After inquiry, the authority may cancel the certificate, again after a show-cause opportunity. The notification does not create a new monetary penalty schedule for these changes. Rule 12 contains a drafting issue. Sub-rules (1) and (2) cover any holder, but sub-rules (3) to (5) use repairer-specific wording. Manufacturers and dealers should not assume this removes all post-suspension duties; clarification may be needed. A cancelled repairer must dispose of controlled weights and measures within 30 days. For sufficient cause, an extension up to three months may be allowed. Failure permits seizure and disposal by an authorised officer. Impact on Businesses The primary commercial consequence is a simplified process for entering and maintaining continuity, along with higher reliance on authentic information. Manufacturers: Manufacturers do not undergo inspection before issuance or renewal. The LM-1 continues to request information on machinery, facilities, employees, trademarks, taxes, and model approval. The products that are to be used in Delhi need to be authenticated and stamped. Repairers:  Repairers enjoy the same benefits but are required to deposit ₹5,000 per certificate, resource and record maintenance and verification. Dealers and import-linked sellers:  Dealers must disclose product categories and import-linked registration, source and model-approval information. They must keep the stock and sales register and cannot deal in non-standard weights or measures. MSMEs and compliance teams:  MSMEs may benefit from avoiding renewal and pre-issue inspection, but face higher upfront fees. They may need better document and inventory control because declaration errors threaten the certificate. Legal, operations, quality and finance teams should share ownership:  registration data must match actual premises, equipment, products and responsible persons. Records, fees, verification and stamping need named owners. How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance? The notification provides an application destination and forms, but not a complete filing workflow. Affected firms should follow these source-linked priorities: Confirm coverage. Identify manufacturing, repair or dealer activity. Use repair exemptions only when their exact facts are met.  Check current authorisation. An existing licence is deemed a certificate until its printed expiry. Plan the new application before that date.  Use the correct form. Select LM-1, LR-1 or LD-1. Match all statements to actual premises, ownership, products and approvals.  Prepare payment. Pay the issue fee when required. A repairer must also furnish ₹5,000 security per certificate.  Display and protect the certificate. Display it prominently. Do not sell, transfer or treat it as inheritable.  Maintain Schedule VII records. Complete every applicable column and preserve referenced receipts and dispatch vouchers.  Keep product controls active. Follow verification and stamping duties screen out non-standard products.  Control changes. Review ownership, premises and scope changes. Use alteration where applicable so the certificate stays accurate.  Practical Challenges Information about the filing process: There has been no discussion of using a portal, a standard procedure, or a personal officer procedure. Pre-existing procedures may be necessary.  Higher costs at the start: Application fees, amendment fees, duplication fees have risen sharply in comparison to before, and the renewal process is no longer possible.  Danger of self-certification: Incorrect information will result in suspension or cancellation. Check before signing.  Discipline in the registration process: Information on stocks, sales, repairs, and vouchers should be provided monthly. Details regarding the transition: The transition will take place on the expiry date of the existing license.  Rule 12 terminology: Repair-oriented language in an otherwise general suspension rule leaves ambiguity for manufacturers and dealers. Benefits for Businesses In respect to a cooperative operator, some of the advantages brought about by the amended model include: Pre-inspection before issuance of a certificate is eliminated. A certificate will have no automatic expiration or renewal period. A transition regulation ensures that current licenses do not become void. Different forms for manufacturers, repairers, and dealers make required information clear. The repair exemption under express repairs eliminates the redundancy of authorization in the two scenarios mentioned above. Continuing validity may eliminate the need to renew certificates and resubmit applications. Fee amounts help applicants’ budget for statutory registration fees. Standardized registers will ensure better management of inventory, services and dispatch. Continuing validity does not mean automatic approval. Suspension, cancellation, verification and recording are still necessary. Is This a Right Decision or Additional Burden? Eliminating renewal and pre-issue inspections will reduce waiting and paperwork. Existing licensees get a transition period, and the authority gains the means to counter false statements and violations. The load is shifted. Fees increase, repairers provide guarantees, and all licensees must have reliable data. MSMEs lacking professional staff might require additional measures. All things considered, the concept is quite acceptable as long as the administration is precise. The special wording in Rule 12 for repairers remains the weakest part. Clarification regarding filing, amendment, and suspension will do. Business Opportunities Created The amendment creates demand for related compliance support: Applicability reviews for manufacturers, repairers, dealers and mixed-activity businesses.  Registration support using Forms LM-1, LR-1 and LD-1.  Technical documentation checks for machinery, workshop capability, testing facilities and model approval data.  Register design and staff training based on the revised Schedule VII formats.  Compliance gap assessments for verification, stamping, display and product controls.  Reviews for companies licensed with various expiry dates.  Readiness in audits and inspections post self-declaration issue.  Advice for any changes in ownership, premises, or products that require a certificate amendment. Testing and calibration providers may see structured demand, but the rules estimate no market size or revenue. What Affected Businesses Should Review Now Priority Action Responsible Team Relevant Timing Expected outcome  Verify whether the business is a manufacturer, repairer, dealer or more than one Legal and operations Immediately Correct form and certificate scope  Record the expiry date of every current licence Compliance Immediately Accurate transition calendar  Compare actual operations with LM-1, LR-1 or LD-1 disclosures Operations and legal Before application Accurate self-declaration  Review product verification, stamping and standard controls Quality Before and after registration Continuing product compliance  Implement the applicable Schedule VII register Operations and finance From operation under the new certificate Traceable statutory records  Confirm filing and payment directions with the Delhi authority. Compliance before submission. Correct administrative route  A new applicant should use the amended framework. An existing licensee should prepare for registration at licence expiry. How Can Corpseed Help? Regulatory compliance services for Delhi applicants Corpseed can provide regulatory compliance services aligned with the specific duties outlined in the notification. Support may include: Applicability assessment for manufacturing, repair and dealer activities.  Selection and review of Form LM-1, LR-1 or LD-1.  Registration compliance consulting for the new self-declaration framework.  Review of premises, ownership, tax, trade-licence and product information.  Technical compliance consulting for machinery, tools, testing facilities and model approval records.  Compliance gap assessment for display, verification, stamping and Schedule VII registers.  Assistance with transition planning, certificate alteration and duplicate requests.  Ongoing legal compliance support for records and inspection readiness.  Corpseed can help present accurate information and build legal controls. Acceptance and regulatory action remain subject to the authority's approval, and government timing cannot be guaranteed. Manufacturers, repairers and dealers seeking a regulatory compliance consultant may contact Corpseed for a document-specific review before filing or before an existing Delhi licence expires. Final Takeaway Under the Delhi Legal Metrology (Amendment) Rules 2026, the system of renewable licences has been replaced by a self-declaration-based Registration Certificate for the manufacture, repair and sale of weights and measures. The new registration certificates are valid unless suspended or cancelled, while the licences remain valid until their expiry dates. The first step is to check whether the law applies to the organization, use the proper form, and pay the new fee. The maintenance of new registers, as well as the systems of verification and stamping, should also be considered. Proper regulatory compliance services may help avoid filing mistakes.