The Government of India has introduced major GST rationalisation measures to reduce production costs, correct the inverted duty structure and reinforce competitiveness in main industries. These modifications cover sectors such as textiles, food processing, leather, handicrafts, packaging, commercial vehicles and eco-friendly products.
Table of Contents
A significant development is the GST Council's approval of refunds for low-value e-commerce exports, irrespective of consignment size. This long-awaited step eases compliance, promotes cash flow, and reduces working capital pressure for small exporters, especially those using courier and postal channels
Relief for MSMEs and Small Exporters
Industry bodies have hailed the removal of the refund cap, citing better liquidity and minimized working capital constraints. MSMEs in textiles, toys, food processing, and handicrafts are expected to profit from lower GST rates, faster refunds, and a smoother supply chain.
The reduction in GST on trucks, packaging materials, toys, and eco-friendly products will also fortify logistics, encourage innovation, and align India with global sustainability standards.
Driving Global Competitiveness
With the cuts in GST rates for instance, minimizing the GST on paper, textiles, leather and wood from 12-18% to 5%, exporters can now provide more competitive prices in international markets. By addressing the reverse duty structure and streamlining the refund procedure, these reforms are set to place India as a strong global hub for manufacturing and exports.
The Commerce Secretary welcomed these reforms as a critical step towards an Atmanirbhar Bharat, which ensures benefits for producers, traders, exporters and ultimately consumers.
GST rationalization marks a landmark in India's economic reforms. By enabling MSMEs, strengthening exports, and passing on cost benefits to consumers, it paves the way for sustainable, competitive development.
This portion of the site is for informational purposes only. The content is not legal advice. The statements and opinions are the expression of author, not corpseed, and have not been evaluated by corpseed for accuracy, completeness, or changes in the law.