
Loading...
Law Update
Quick note
Below is the official summary and the reference document preview. Use βOpen PDFβ for full screen view.
The Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board (RSPCB) has extended the compliance deadline for tyre pyrolysis units to 30 September 2026, underscoring the need for industry stakeholders to adjust their planning timelines accordingly.
For tyre pyrolysis plant owners across Rajasthan, this is not just another date change. It affects how much time remains to plan investment, complete engineering upgrades, and secure fresh Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) approvals for continuous-type plants.
RSPCB regulates industrial pollution across Rajasthan. Tyre pyrolysis units fall under its watch because the process can release smoke, oil vapour, and other emissions if not properly managed.
The latest office order does three simple things. It pushes the compliance date forward and emphasizes that switching to continuous-type technology offers significant safety, environmental, and operational efficiency benefits, thereby encouraging industry confidence.
Here is a quick summary of the notification.
Quick Facts Table
| Detail | Information |
| Issuing Authority | Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board (RSPCB) |
| Earlier Deadlines | 31.12.2025 to 31.03.2026 to 30.06.2026 |
| Revised Deadline | 30.09.2026 |
| Who Must Comply | All existing batch-type tyre pyrolysis units in Rajasthan |
| Approvals Required | All existing batch-type tyre pyrolysis units in Rajasthan must obtain Consent to Establish (CTE) and Consent to Operate (CTO) for their new continuous-type plants, thereby clarifying the essential regulatory steps for compliance. |
Consent to Establish, or CTE, is a permission a business needs before building or modifying a plant. Consent to Operate, or CTO, is the permission required actually to run the plant. Both come from the State Pollution Control Board.
RSPCB is telling every batch-type tyre pyrolysis unit in the state to switch to the continuous process, and it has now given three extra months to complete this switch, helping industry stakeholders plan effectively and feel more in control.
Tyre pyrolysis is a process that breaks down old, waste tyres using heat in a chamber without oxygen. The process produces pyrolysis oil, char, steel wire, and gas. The oil can be used as an industrial fuel, and the char can be processed further.
RSPCB had actually stopped approving new tyre pyrolysis units in Rajasthan since 2012. Older batch-type plants raised concerns about smoke, odour, and safety, especially when run manually without proper automation.
Over time, national studies changed the picture. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), along with expert institutes such as NEERI and IIT Delhi, studied both advanced batch-automated plants and continuous-type plants. The results showed that continuous-type plants, along with advanced automated batch plants, controlled emissions far better than old-style manual batch units.
Based on this research, CPCB issued a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for tyre pyrolysis oil units on 16 January 2024. This SOP laid out safety rules, site requirements, and pollution control norms for the sector across India. Following this direction, RSPCB decided that Rajasthan would move fully toward continuous-type technology.
Timeline Table
| Date | Development |
| 2012 | RSPCB stops granting approvals to new tyre pyrolysis units in Rajasthan |
| 17.08.2023 | RSPCB issues the original order requiring conversion to continuous type by 31.12.2025 |
| 16.01.2024 | CPCB issues national SOP for tyre pyrolysis oil (TPO) units |
| 30.12.2025 | RSPCB extends the deadline to 31.03.2026 |
| 30.03.2026 | RSPCB extends the deadline further to 30.06.2026 |
| 14.09.2026 | RSPCB extends the deadline again to 30.09.2026 |
RSPCB is not introducing a brand-new rule. It is giving batch-type tyre pyrolysis units more time to complete a conversion that was already ordered back in August 2023.
The core requirement has not changed at all. Only the deadline has moved.
Under the original 2023 order, RSPCB said that the Consent to Operate for batch-type units would be renewed only if the units converted to a continuous process by 31 December 2025. That date was later pushed to 31 March 2026, then to 30 June 2026. The latest order pushes it once more, to 30 September 2026.
Existing batch units that do not convert to continuous-type technology by the new deadline risk losing their Consent to Operate renewal, which could lead to operational shutdowns and regulatory penalties, underscoring the critical need for timely compliance.
Old vs New Comparison Table
| Point | Earlier Position | Current Position |
| Deadline for conversion | 30.06.2026 | 30.09.2026 |
| Technology required | Continuous-type plant | Continuous-type plant (unchanged) |
| Approval needed | CTE and CTO from RSPCB | CTE and CTO from RSPCB (unchanged) |
| New unit approvals | Only continuous type allowed | Only continuous type allowed (unchanged) |
| Batch type renewal | Conditional on conversion plan | Conditional on conversion plan (unchanged) |
So the notification is really a timeline update, not a policy change. The direction of the tyre recycling industry in Rajasthan remains fixed toward continuous-type technology.
RSPCB has not detailed the reasons in the brief order, but recognizing practical challenges such as funding, construction timelines, and application processing helps industry owners feel supported and better prepared during this transition.
Below are the likely reasons, explained through the lens of the challenges tyre pyrolysis businesses have reported and the outcomes RSPCB appears to be targeting.
Continuous-type plants need significant capital investment. Reason for extension: businesses need more time to arrange funds and select the right technology supplier. Expected benefit: a properly funded conversion instead of a rushed, poorly built plant.
The engineering and civil work required to set up a new plant may take several months. Reason for extension: It is not possible to complete construction, equipment installation, and testing within a short period. Expected advantage: Plants will be prepared for inspection.
CTE and CTO applications will require documentation and verification. Reason for extension: Regional offices will need time to process multiple applications. Expected advantage: Smoother processing of applications without last-minute bottlenecks.
Shutting down batch units not in compliance with the requirements may cause problems in managing tyre waste. Reason for extension: Rajasthan will need continuous tyre-recycling capacity. Expected advantage: Continuous recycling of tyres in Rajasthan.
A continuous-type plant feeds raw material in and continuously removes finished output, without stopping and restarting the chamber for each batch. This single design difference creates a chain of environmental and safety advantages.
Continuous plants generally run at more stable temperatures. A stable process controls smoke and fumes better than a chamber that repeatedly heats and cools. Studies referenced in the CPCB SOP found that continuous-type plants, along with advanced automated batch plants, had no significant negative impact on ambient air quality.
Another consideration is automation. Continuous process plants typically have PLCs (programmable logic controllers), sensors, and automatic feeding systems. This leads to less handling of hot materials and, hence, a reduced risk of work-related injuries.
The plant also becomes more efficient. By continuously processing the rubber waste without repeatedly shutting down and starting up, the plant consumes less energy per tonne of tyre waste processed than an interrupted cycle would.
Benefits Table
| Area | Batch Type Plant | Continuous Type Plant |
| Emission control | Harder to control, especially during startup | More stable and easier to monitor |
| Fuel efficiency | Energy lost during repeated heating cycles | Energy saved through continuous heat retention |
| Worker safety | More manual handling of hot chambers | Automated feeding reduces manual risk |
| Long-term outlook | Facing regulatory phase-out | Preferred and promoted technology |
Both technologies are used to convert waste tyres into pyrolysis oil, char, steel, and gas. The difference lies in how the raw material moves through the reactor.
A batch-type plant loads shredded tyre material into a closed chamber. The chamber is sealed, heated, and left to complete the pyrolysis reaction. Once finished, the chamber cools down, and workers remove the output before loading the next batch. Basic batch plants often depend heavily on manual labour and simple temperature controls.
A continuous type plant, on the other hand, keeps the reactor running non-stop. Fresh shredded tyre material enters at one end through an automatic feeding system, while oil, gas, char, and steel are separated and collected at the other end. The reactor rarely needs to shut down, apart from scheduled maintenance.
Detailed Comparison Table
| Parameter | Batch Type Plant | Continuous Type Plant |
| Working method | Load, process, unload in cycles | Continuous feed-in and output |
| Production process | Stop-start operation | Uninterrupted operation |
| Capacity | Generally suited to smaller volumes | Generally suited to larger volumes, above 60 TPD in many state guidelines |
| Fuel use | Higher due to repeated heating | Lower due to sustained heat |
| Labour requirement | Higher, more manual handling | Lower, mostly automated |
| Automation | Limited in basic units | High, with PLC-based controls |
| Pollution | Higher risk during load/unload cycles | Lower risk with steady-state operation |
| Safety | More exposure to hot chambers | Reduced worker exposure |
| Maintenance | Frequent, tied to each cycle | Scheduled, less frequent interruption |
| Product quality | Can vary batch to batch | More consistent output quality |
| Operating cost | Lower entry cost, higher running cost | Higher entry cost, lower running cost over time |
| Regulatory acceptance | Being phased out for renewal in Rajasthan | Actively promoted by RSPCB and CPCB |
| Long-term suitability | Limited future for renewal approvals | Aligned with future compliance direction |
Which Technology Is Better for Future Compliance?
Continuous-type technology is the clear direction for future compliance in Rajasthan. RSPCB has stopped approving new batch-type units since 2012, and is now phasing out renewal approvals for existing batch units unless they convert. Any business planning to remain in the tyre pyrolysis sector over the next several years should treat continuous conversion as a business necessity, not just a paperwork requirement.
The notification is specific about which units fall under its scope.
Businesses should treat 30 September 2026 as the final checkpoint, not the starting point for planning. Working backwards from that date helps avoid a last-minute rush.
Timeline Table
| Milestone | Suggested Timeframe |
| Internal compliance review | Immediately |
| Budget approval and vendor selection | Within 4β6 weeks |
| CTE application submission | Within 2β3 months |
| Plant construction and machine installation | Ongoing, based on vendor timeline |
| Pollution control equipment installation | Before commissioning |
| Site inspection by RSPCB | Before CTO application |
| CTO application and approval | Before 30.09.2026 |
| Final compliance confirmation | On or before 30.09.2026 |
Numbered Milestone List
Compliance under this notification covers more than just changing machinery. It touches technology, paperwork, and monitoring.
Compliance Checklist
Step 1: Confirm the current clearance status. See if the existing "Consent to Operate" mentions anything about conversion. It provides the actual deadline for that particular unit.
Step 2: Evaluate the existing plant. Find out which parts of the present batch system - land, shredders, or storage spaces - can be re-used in the new continuous process.
Step 3: Decide on continuous-type technology. Make a comparison of vendors not only in terms of cost but also in terms of capacity and service support.
Step 4: Develop technical documentation. Have the process flow diagrams and the technical description of the equipment ready for submission with the CTE application.
Step 5: Apply for Consent to Establish. Submit the CTE application along with required documents to the regional RSPCB office.
Step 6: Execute construction and installation. Coordinate closely with the technology vendor to avoid delays in machine delivery or civil work.
Step 7: Installation of pollution control devices. Install scrubbers, gas handling system, and monitoring instruments along with the plant, and not as an afterthought.
Step 8: Ask for site inspection. Once the plant installation is completed, ask the RSPCB to inspect the plant in accordance with the approved drawings.
Step 9: Apply for Consent to Operate (CTO). Get the CTO approved along with the required documents and inspection clearance.
Step 10: Comply with CTO requirements. After obtaining the CTO's approval, comply with the requirements to prevent future complications.
| Document | Purpose | Issuing Authority (where applicable) |
| Existing Consent to Operate copy | Shows current approval status | RSPCB |
| Land ownership or lease documents | Confirms legal right to operate at the site | Revenue Department / Owner |
| Process flow diagram | Explains how the continuous plant will function | Prepared by applicant/consultant |
| Equipment specification sheet | Details machinery and pollution control systems | Technology vendor |
| CTE application form | Formal request for establishment approval | RSPCB |
| CTO application form | Formal request for operation approval | RSPCB |
| Hazardous waste authorisation (if applicable) | Covers handling of pyrolysis byproducts | RSPCB / State Pollution Control Committee |
| Site layout plan | Shows plant location, buffer zones, and safety distances | Prepared by applicant/consultant |
Each document helps RSPCB verify that the plant is designed and built to meet environmental and safety standards before it begins full operation.
Positive Impact
Business Challenges
Switching from batch to continuous technology is a bigger commitment than a routine equipment upgrade.
Challenge vs Possible Solution Table
| Challenge | Possible Solution |
| High upfront investment | Explore phased investment or equipment financing options. |
| Choosing the right vendor | Compare multiple vendors and check past installations. |
| Operational downtime | Plan construction during a lower-demand business period |
| Complex documentation | Engage an environmental compliance consultant early. |
| Approval delays | Submit complete, error-free applications the first time. |
Comparison Table
| Category | Batch Type Outcome | Continuous Type Outcome |
| Environment | Higher emission risk | Lower emission risk |
| Business | Variable output quality | Consistent output quality |
| Compliance | Facing phase-out | Fully aligned with regulation |
| Operations | Higher manual dependency | Higher automation, lower risk |
Missing the 30 September 2026 deadline can create serious business disruption.
The transition period also opens doors for several types of service providers.
Opportunity Table
| Business Type | Opportunity Created |
| Technology suppliers | Rising demand for continuous-type pyrolysis reactors and automation systems |
| Engineering companies | Rising demand for continuous-type pyrolysis reactors and automation systems |
| Environmental consultants | Demand for CTE/CTO documentation and regulatory guidance |
| Compliance agencies | Demand for end-to-end approval support and inspection readiness |
| Pollution control equipment manufacturers | Demand for scrubbers, condensers, and monitoring instruments |
| Investors | Opportunity to fund modernised, compliant tyre recycling capacity in Rajasthan |
| Benefits | Challenges |
| Continuous plants control smoke and fumes more effectively than manual batch chambers | Continuous type technology needs a much larger upfront investment than a basic batch setup |
| Stable, steady-state operation reduces emission spikes during startup and shutdown cycles | Civil work, foundations, and layout often need to be rebuilt, not just upgraded |
| Automated feeding systems cut down manual handling of hot material, improving worker safety | Skilled operators and technicians are needed to run automated, PLC-based systems |
| Consistent process conditions lead to more uniform pyrolysis oil, char, and gas quality | Vendor selection takes time, and demand for continuous plant suppliers may rise as the deadline nears |
| Lower fuel use per tonne of tyre waste over time, since the chamber does not repeatedly cool and reheat | Documentation for CTE and CTO takes technical expertise many small operators do not have in-house |
| Aligns with RSPCB's long-term direction, so future renewals face less regulatory risk | Construction and installation may cause temporary downtime, affecting short-term revenue |
| Supports Rajasthan's broader air quality and pollution control goals under CPCB's SOP | Smaller, standalone operators may struggle to match the compliance pace of larger, well-funded units |
| Reduces the chance of sudden regulatory action, like non-renewal of Consent to Operate | A last-minute rush near 30.09.2026 could strain RSPCB's inspection and approval capacity |
| Positions the business for continued market access to buyers of pyrolysis oil and byproducts | Financing options for equipment upgrades may not be easily available to every business |
| Creates a safer, more modern work environment that can help with hiring and retention | Learning new operating procedures and safety protocols takes time and training |
The table leans toward the extension being a workable middle path rather than a pure burden. The environmental and long-term business case for continuous-type technology is strong, but the short-term financial and logistical load falls unevenly; larger units can absorb it more easily than smaller ones, which is where early planning and consultant support matter most.
Corpseed works with businesses across India on environmental compliance, hazardous waste management, and Pollution Control Board approvals. For tyre pyrolysis units in Rajasthan, this kind of support can make the RSPCB tyre pyrolysis compliance deadline easier to manage.
Compliance Position Review
Technical and Legal Documentation
CTE and CTO Application Support
Hazardous Waste Authorisation
End-to-End Project Coordination
The RSPCB has granted an extension of the deadline for batch-type tyre pyrolysis units to be converted to continuous-type units until 30 September 2026. However, the core condition remains the same. Every single batch unit must make the transition and obtain new CTE & CTO approvals.
This grace period must be treated as additional time for planning purposes, not as grounds for procrastination. The process of choosing the right technology, building, and getting required permits takes months of effort.
An early start will guarantee smooth legal operations in the future, prevent last-minute rushes among vendors and RSPCB officials, and contribute positively to the environment. The only practical recommendation for business owners is to begin the conversion process before 30 September 2026.
Document Preview
Embedded reference document