
Loading...
Law Update
Quick note
Below is the official summary and the reference document preview. Use “Open PDF” for full screen view.
The Central Government has changed the DGFT clear float glass import policy for specified glass measuring 4 mm to 12 mm in thickness. Under this, imports covered by ITC (HS) codes 70051090 and 70052990 have moved from “Free” to “Restricted.” However, an import remains “Free” where its cost, insurance, and freight (CIF) value is 34,000 rupees or more per metric tonne (MT).
The measure directly affects importers dealing in the covered clear float glass. It may also influence procurement decisions, supplier contracts, shipment planning, and document review. Advance Authorisation holders, Export Oriented Units (EOUs), and Special Economic Zone (SEZ) units receive conditional relief, provided the imported inputs are not sold into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA).
This change is a Minimum Import Price (MIP) condition. It is not a customs duty or tax. Importers should therefore assess product coverage, tariff classification, CIF value and eligibility for relief before committing to a transaction.
| Particular | Verified detail |
| Issuing ministry and department | Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce |
| Issuing authority | Central Government, notification issued through the Directorate General of Foreign Trade |
| Document type | Import-policy amendment notification |
| Electronic publication detail | The Gazette carries electronic identifier CG-DL-E-19082026-275564 and a digital signature dated 19 August 2026 |
| Effective date | Not separately stated, the notification links the one-year MIP period to its date of publication |
| Governing law and policy | Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, paragraphs 1.02 and 2.01 of Foreign Trade Policy 2023 |
| Products covered | Clear float glass of 4 mm-12 mm under the specified ITC (HS) codes |
| ITC (HS) codes | 70051090 and 70052990 |
| Earlier import policy | Free |
| Revised import policy | Restricted, subject to the CIF/MIP condition |
| MIP threshold | 34,000 rupees per MT on a CIF basis |
| Conditional relief | Advance Authorisation holders, EOUs, and SEZ units, subject to the no-DTA-sale condition |
| Validity period | One year from the date of publication |
The core result is straightforward: a covered import at 34,000 rupees CIF per MT or above remains under the Free category. A covered import below that level falls under the Restricted category unless the notification’s conditional relief applies.
The notification was issued under Sections 3 and 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Section 3 provides the legal basis for the Central Government to regulate imports and exports. Section 5 concerns the formulation and amendment of the Foreign Trade Policy. The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 is administered by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry through the Department of Commerce.
Paragraph 1.02 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2023 allows the Central Government to amend the policy by notification. Paragraph 2.01 provides the basic import-policy rule: imports are Free unless regulated through Prohibition, restriction, or exclusive trading through State Trading Enterprises. These provisions are available in the official FTP 2023, Chapters 1 and 2.
ITC (HS) is the Indian Trade Classification based on the Harmonised System. It assigns codes to goods and states their import or export policy. Schedule I of ITC (HS) contains the import-policy regime. Classification at the correct eight-digit level matters because two products that appear commercially similar may have different policy treatment.
“Free” is an import-policy classification. It does not mean that the goods are free from customs duty, taxes, documentation, valuation checks, or other laws. In the same way, the 34,000 rupees MIP is not an additional duty. It is the value level used by this notification to decide whether the covered import remains Free or becomes Restricted.
The notification is limited to clear float glass measuring 4 mm to 12 mm and falling under either of the two named eight-digit ITC (HS) codes in Chapter 70. The product description, thickness, and tariff code must therefore be considered together.
| ITC (HS) code | Source description | Covered product or condition | Revised position |
| 70051090 | “Other” under non-wired glass having an absorbent, reflecting, or non-reflecting layer | Clear float glass of 4 mm-12 mm that is properly classified under this code | Restricted, Free where CIF is 34,000 rupees per MT or above |
| 70052990 | “Other: Other” under other non-wired glass | Clear float glass of 4 mm-12 mm that is properly classified under this code | Restricted, Free where CIF is 34,000 rupees per MT or above |
The broader six-digit entries 700510 and 700529 appear in the table as parent descriptions. The operative amendments are shown against 70051090 and 70052990. Businesses should not assume that every glass product under Chapter 70, or every product under the broader parent headings, is covered by this particular measure.
Classification should be supported by the product’s actual characteristics. Commercial descriptions alone may not be enough. Technical specifications, composition, coating details, thickness and intended product identity may all be relevant to a classification review.
The earlier policy allowed imports under both named codes under the Free category. The revised entry places them in the Restricted category but creates a value-based route under which imports remain Free.
| Compliance area | Earlier position | Revised position | Practical meaning |
| ITC (HS) 70051090 | Free | Restricted, but Free at CIF value of 34,000 rupees per MT or above | CIF value now affects the import-policy category |
| ITC (HS) 70052990 | Free | Restricted, but Free at CIF value of 34,000 rupees per MT or above | The same threshold applies to this code |
| CIF/MIP condition | No condition shown in the earlier entry | 34,000 rupees per MT on CIF basis | Values below the threshold do not qualify for the Free route |
| Eligible conditional relief | Not applicable under the earlier Free entry | Available for named export-linked categories | Values below the threshold do not qualify for the Free route |
| Duration | Not applicable | One year from publication | The measure is expressly time-limited |
The restriction and MIP should be read as one combined policy mechanism. The entry is classified as Restricted, while the policy condition allows Free import when the CIF value reaches or exceeds the specified amount.
The MIP is a price floor for obtaining Free import treatment under this notification. It is measured on CIF value per metric tonne. CIF normally refers to the combined cost of the goods, insurance, and freight up to the relevant import point.
| CIF value per MT | Import-policy position | Source-based meaning |
| Below 34,000 rupees | Import-policy position | The value-based Free import condition is not met, unless the conditional relief applies |
| Exactly 34,000 rupees | Free | The wording includes 34,000 rupees because it says “34,000 rupees and above” |
| Above 34,000 rupees | Free | The value-based condition is satisfied |
The threshold must not be compared only with the basic product price when freight or insurance is separately recorded. The notification expressly uses the CIF value, not merely the invoice price, ex-works value, or free-on-board value.
The notification does not set out a calculation formula, an exchange-rate rule, or a special customs-valuation method. Importers should ensure that the value used for policy assessment matches the supporting transaction and customs documents. Any valuation uncertainty should be resolved before shipment or clearance rather than handled through an assumed calculation.
The following decision guide helps identify the issues that need to be reviewed. It is not a substitute for a formal classification or valuation opinion.
| Applicability question | If yes | If no |
| Is the product clear float glass covered by the notification? | Check its thickness and tariff code | This particular notification may not apply |
| Is the thickness between 4 mm and 12 mm? | Continue the assessment | The stated product scope is not met |
| Does it fall under 70051090 or 70052990? | Review CIF value | Do not apply this notification without another legal basis |
| Is the CIF value at least 34,000 rupees per MT? | Import remains Free under this policy condition | Import falls under Restricted policy unless conditional relief applies |
| Is the importer an Advance Authorisation holder, an EOU, or an SEZ unit? | Review the DTA sale condition | The special relief in paragraph 2 is unavailable |
| Will the imported inputs be excluded from DTA sales? | The named category may use the conditional relief | The special relief in paragraph 2 is unavailable |
The analysis should be completed for each product and transaction. A business handling several glass specifications should not apply one conclusion across its entire product range without checking the relevant characteristics and codes.
For covered goods below 34,000 rupees CIF per MT, the notification does not provide the value-based Free import route. Their policy status is Restricted unless the special relief for the named categories applies.
The notification itself does not provide a dedicated application form, a list of supporting documents, an approving authority, or a processing timeline for these glass imports. However, paragraph 2.08 of FTP 2023 states the general rule that Restricted goods may be imported only in accordance with an authorisation or permission, or under a procedure prescribed through a notification or public notice.
This distinction matters. The legal position is not that a below-MIP import is automatically prohibited. It is also not correct to assume that clearance will be available through a routine filing. The applicable authorisation or permission route, if pursued, must be checked against the current DGFT framework and the facts of the transaction.
Paragraph 2 of the notification states that the MIP condition will not apply to imports by Advance Authorisation holders, Export Oriented Units, and SEZ units, provided the imported inputs under the named codes are not sold into the DTA. The “Effect of the notification” section also states that the restriction does not apply to these imports, subject to the same condition.
| Eligible category | Relief stated | Attached condition | Important limitation |
| Advance Authorisation holder | MIP condition does not apply | Imported inputs under the named codes must not be sold into DTA | Relief is linked to eligible status and the use of imported inputs |
| Export Oriented Unit | MIP condition does not apply | Imported inputs must not be sold into DTA | EOU status alone is not enough if the condition is breached |
| SEZ unit | MIP condition does not apply | Imported inputs must not be sold into DTA | Relief is conditional, not a general exemption for every SEZ-related transaction |
This relief should not be described as unconditional. An importer must fall within one of the named categories, and the imported inputs must remain outside DTA sale. The notification does not extend the relief to ordinary importers, distributors, or other categories merely because the goods may later be used in manufacturing or export.
The Domestic Tariff Area broadly refers to India’s domestic market outside the SEZ framework. For this notification, the practical point is that imported inputs brought in under the conditional relief cannot be sold into the DTA.
Businesses using the relief should decide the intended use and movement of the glass before import. Procurement, stores, production, finance, and compliance records should consistently show how inputs are received, used, and controlled. If commercial plans involve domestic sale, transfer or disposal, the effect on eligibility should be checked before relying on the relief.
The notification does not prescribe a special permission process, a record-retention period, or a penalty for breach of this condition. Those matters should not be invented. Other schemes, SEZ, customs, or authorisation conditions may still apply independently and should be examined for the specific importer.
Express condition in the notification
The express condition has two parts: the importer must be an Advance Authorisation holder, an EOU, or an SEZ unit, and the imported inputs under codes 70051090 or 70052990 must not be sold into the DTA.
The notification does not provide an official document checklist for establishing compliance with this condition.
Recommended internal evidence
The following records may help a business support its position. They are recommended internal evidence, not a mandatory list created by Notification No. 29/2026-27:
Good records cannot cure an ineligible transaction, but they can make the basis of the business’s position easier to demonstrate and review.
The notification states that the MIP condition will remain applicable for one year from the date of its publication. It does not print a separate expiry date.
| Event | Date or source wording | Legal or practical relevance |
| Notification date | 18 August 2026 | Date printed on Notification No. 29/2026-27 |
| DGFT portal listing | 18 August 2026 | DGFT lists the notification and creation time on this date |
| Gazette issue date | 18 August 2026 | Date printed in Gazette No. 4390 |
| Electronic Gazette detail | Identifier includes 19 August 2026, digital signature is also dated 19 August 2026 | Shows electronic processing/publication details that should be considered near expiry |
| Duration | One year from the date of publication | The exact end date is not printed in the notification |
The DGFT notification portal records Notification No. 29/2026-27 dated 18 August 2026. The Gazette is also dated 18 August, although its electronic identifier and signature show 19 August. Businesses planning shipments near the end of the one year should confirm the operative end date with DGFT or another competent official source, rather than relying on an assumed calendar calculation.
FTP 2023 also contains general transitional arrangements for changes from Free to Restricted. Paragraph 1.05 states, among other things, that item-wise policy is governed by the policy on the date of import, changes normally apply prospectively, and imports already made before the restriction are not affected. It also addresses certain commitments backed by an Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit and excludes high-sea sales from that facility. These are general FTP rules, not terms written into this glass notification, so their use must be assessed against the dates and documents of the actual consignment.
Accurate documentation becomes especially important because the policy result depends on both classification and CIF value. A minor description mismatch or unexplained value difference can create questions even when the commercial transaction is genuine.
Importers should consider the following practical controls:
DGFT import policy and customs assessment are connected but not identical. Customs authorities may examine classification, value, and clearance documentation, while the DGFT framework determines the import-policy category. A review should therefore address both sides without treating the MIP as a customs duty.
| Unclear issue | What the notification states | What remains unspecified | Practical response |
| Consignments in transit | No specific transitional clause | Treatment of particular in-transit shipments | Review FTP paragraph 1.05 and shipment documents |
| Date for testing CIF compliance | Threshold is based on CIF per MT | No special testing date or method | Align the assessment with applicable import and customs rules |
| Currency conversion | Threshold is stated in rupees | The exchange-rate method is not stated | Obtain transaction-specific valuation advice |
| Below-MIP procedure | Policy becomes Restricted | No glass-specific application process is given | Check FTP paragraph 2.08 and the current DGFT procedure |
| Proof of relief | Eligible categories and DTA conditions are named | No official evidence list is provided | Maintain relevant status, import, and end-use records |
| DTA movement after import | Imported inputs must not be sold into DTA | No special disposal or regularisation process is stated | Check before any proposed transfer or sale |
| End of one-year period | MIP applies for one year from publication | Exact expiry date and post-expiry entry are not printed | Monitor DGFT and verify near the end date |
| Extension or withdrawal | Nothing further is announced | Future government action is unknown | Rely only on later official notifications |
Reporting these gaps does not mean the transaction is unregulated. It means the short notification does not answer every operational question, and other verified policy or procedural provisions may need to be consulted.
The immediate effect is strongest for importers whose covered glass has a CIF value below 34,000 rupees per MT. Other stakeholders may experience indirect commercial effects, but those outcomes will depend on contracts, suppliers, and market conditions.
Importers and traders
Importers must add an MIP check to product classification and landed-cost review. Supplier quotations can no longer be assessed only on commercial price. The value per MT also affects whether the shipment can use the Free policy route. Importers handling lower-priced glass may need to reconsider sourcing terms or examine the applicable Restricted import route.
Advance Authorisation holders, EOUs and SEZ units
The conditional relief may preserve sourcing flexibility for export-linked operations. Its value depends on meeting the no-DTA-sale condition. These businesses may need stronger inventory and end-use controls so imported inputs covered by the relief are not mixed with stock intended for domestic sale without a proper review.
Domestic glass manufacturers
The MIP may reduce the price advantage of covered imports below the threshold. This could alter competitive conditions for some domestic suppliers. The notification does not state a market-protection objective, an expected price effect, or a production target, so any such impact should be treated as a likely commercial implication rather than an official finding.
Smaller businesses may face additional work in checking classification, value, and shipment documents. Distributors and downstream users could also see changes in quotations or availability where their suppliers rely on imported glass. The notification does not establish that prices will rise or supplies will fall.
Internal business teams
Procurement must verify product and supplier terms. Finance should confirm the CIF basis. Logistics and customs teams should check shipping and entry documents. Legal and compliance teams should review policy coverage, transitional questions and eligibility for relief.
| Stakeholder | Immediate impact | Operational or cost implication | Priority concern |
| Ordinary importer | MIP determines Free or Restricted treatment | More pre-shipment review | Classification and CIF value |
| Advance Authorisation holder | Conditional relief may apply | End-use and DTA controls | Preserving eligibility |
| EOU/SEZ unit | Conditional relief may apply | Inventory segregation and traceability | No sale of covered inputs into DTA |
| Domestic manufacturer | Competitive position may change | Commercial effect depends on market response | Monitoring import and pricing trends |
| Distributor/downstream user | Supplier terms may change | Possible procurement adjustment | Contract and supply planning |
The policy change should be built into purchase decisions before a contract becomes difficult to amend. Importers may need quotations that clearly separate or identify product price, freight, and insurance so the CIF value per MT can be reviewed.
Purchase orders should accurately describe the glass, including relevant technical features and thickness. Contracts may also need suitable provisions dealing with tariff classification, policy changes, documentary cooperation, shipment timing, and responsibility for regulatory delays. These are commercial safeguards, not conditions created by the notification.
Shipment planning deserves particular attention during the first weeks of the measure and near the end of its one-year duration. Businesses should avoid assuming that an order date alone fixes the policy treatment. FTP 2023 uses the date-of-import framework and includes specific transitional conditions that need to be matched with transport and payment documents.
Source-based legal consequences
Notification No. 29/2026-27 does not state a separate fine, confiscation provision, or penalty amount. It should therefore not be used as the basis for quoting a specific penalty.
The wider FTDR Act, FTP, customs law, and other applicable rules may contain consequences for non-compliant imports or incorrect declarations. The applicable provision depends on the facts and should be examined separately rather than presented as an automatic result of this notification.
Practical business risks
Possible operational risks include:
These are possible business outcomes. They are not separate statutory penalties declared by the notification.
| Priority | Action | Responsible team | Timing | Expected control outcome |
| 1 | Confirm product type, thickness and eight-digit ITC (HS) code | Technical, customs, and compliance | Before order or shipment | Correct scope assessment |
| 2 | Calculate and support CIF value per MT | Procurement and finance | Before finalising price | Clear threshold position |
| 3 | Identify Free or Restricted treatment | Compliance and customs broker | Before shipment | Reduced clearance uncertainty |
| 4 | Check eligibility for Advance Authorisation, EOU or SEZ relief | Legal and scheme team | Before claiming relief | Valid eligibility position |
| 5 | Review the no-DTA-sale condition | Operations, stores, and compliance | Before import and during use | Better control over imported inputs |
| 6 | Review the no-DTA-sale condition | Legal, logistics, and finance | Immediately for open transactions | Correct date-based analysis |
| 7 | Review the no-DTA-sale condition | Procurement, finance, and logistics | Before filing | Consistent evidence |
| 8 | Monitor official developments | Compliance | Throughout the one-year period | Timely response to later changes |
These actions are practical controls. The notification itself does not prescribe this sequence. Where a consignment is below the MIP or facts are unclear, businesses should obtain transaction-specific guidance before relying on a particular import route.
Importers should monitor the DGFT portal for any clarifications, public notices, trade notices, corrigenda, amendments, extensions, or withdrawals related to the two codes. They should also watch for an updated ITC (HS) entry and any official customs implementation guidance.
Monitoring becomes especially important near the end of the one year. The present notification does not say whether the MIP will automatically disappear from the published tariff entry, be extended, or be replaced by another condition. Only a later official measure can confirm that position.
Importing clear float glass under the revised policy requires a combined review of the product, thickness, ITC (HS) classification, CIF value, importer category, and intended use. Corpseed’s import compliance services can help businesses identify gaps before the goods are shipped or presented for customs clearance.
1. Product Coverage and ITC (HS) Classification
The notification applies only to specified clear float glass measuring 4 mm to 12 mm under ITC (HS) codes 70051090 and 70052990. Corpseed can assist with:
This review helps businesses avoid applying the notification to products outside its stated scope.
2. MIP, CIF Value and Import-Policy Review
The import-policy position depends on whether the CIF value is below, equal to, or above 34,000 rupees per metric tonne. Corpseed can help with:
This assessment gives importers a clearer understanding of the applicable policy before finalising the shipment.
3. Advance Authorisation, EOU and SEZ Relief
Conditional relief is available to Advance Authorisation holders, Export Oriented Units and Special Economic Zone units. Corpseed can support businesses by:
The relief is not automatic. It depends on the importer’s eligibility and compliance with the notification’s conditions.
4. DTA Condition and Import Documentation
Eligible imported inputs must not be sold into the Domestic Tariff Area. Corpseed can assist businesses with:
Consistent records can help reduce questions regarding the classification, valuation, and use of the imported material.
5. Compliance Gap and Clarification Support
Some operational questions are not directly answered by the notification. Corpseed can help importers:
This allows businesses to make decisions based on verified information instead of unsupported assumptions.
6. Regulatory Monitoring and Transaction Support
The MIP condition applies for one year from the date of publication. Corpseed can support businesses by:
The final classification, valuation, authorisation and clearance position depends on the actual goods and transaction documents. Importers planning shipments under ITC (HS) codes 70051090 or 70052990 may contact Corpseed for a focused review before finalising shipment terms.
The DGFT clear float glass import policy now links Free import treatment to a specific CIF value.
Document Preview
Embedded reference document