
Loading...
Law Update
Quick note
Below is the official summary and the reference document preview. Use “Open PDF” for full screen view.
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has withdrawn 31 Indian Standards covering a mix of older electronic equipment, television and radio components, link and test connectors, a surgical retractor, pulse measurement, cloud computing terminology, alarm systems and radio-frequency cables.
The withdrawal date shown against all 31 standards is 17 August 2026. BIS issued the notification on 19 August 2026 under Rule 15(1) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 2018. The notification later appeared in the Gazette of India dated 1 September 2026.
For most businesses, the real question is not simply, “Has this standard been withdrawn?” The more useful question is, “Are we still using this standard anywhere?”
A withdrawn IS number may still be sitting in an old drawing, purchase order, product specification, test report, customer requirement or tender document. That is where manufacturers, importers, laboratories and procurement teams need to look first.
The notification itself does not say that products covered by these standards are banned. It also does not announce automatic cancellation of BIS licences, mandatory retesting or a new certification requirement.
Here are the basic details of the notification.
| Particular | Details |
| Issuing authority | Bureau of Indian Standards |
| Department | Department of Consumer Affairs |
| Type of document | Withdrawal notification |
| Reference number | HQ-PUB017/1/2020-PUB-BIS (1591) |
| Notification date | 19 August 2026 |
| Gazette date | 1 September 2026 |
| Legal provision cited | Rule 15(1) of the Bureau of Indian Standards Rules, 2018 |
| Number of standards withdrawn | 31 |
| Withdrawal date | 17 August 2026 |
| Broad areas covered | Electronics, measuring equipment, medical equipment, television/radio, connectors, cloud computing, alarm systems and RF cables |
| Replacement standards listed in this notification | No |
| New BIS certification requirement created by this notification | Not expressly stated |
The dates deserve some attention. BIS dated the notification 19 August 2026, but the Schedule shows 17 August 2026 as the date from which each listed standard stood withdrawn.
So businesses should not treat 19 August or 1 September as the withdrawal date simply because those dates appear elsewhere in the Gazette.
The notification is clear about the action being taken. BIS has cancelled and withdrawn the Indian Standards listed in the Schedule, with the withdrawal taking effect from the respective dates specified in the notification.
This is the core regulatory action outlined in the notice.
Importantly, the notification does not introduce a new compliance framework. It does not prescribe new application procedures, certification fees, testing requirements, or transition provisions.
Nor does it state that products previously manufactured or marketed with reference to these standards must automatically be redesigned or removed from the market.
This distinction is important. Withdrawal of an Indian Standard is a standards-related regulatory action. It should not be interpreted in the same way as a Quality Control Order or another product-specific compliance notification that imposes mandatory certification or market requirements.
In practical terms, BIS is no longer keeping the listed standard in force from the stated withdrawal date.
What happens next for a particular company depends on how that standard was being used. For example, the IS number may appear in:
That is why simply reading the Gazette is not enough. Companies that use these standards should trace where the old reference exists within their own documents and processes.
Withdrawal also should not automatically be read as:
The notification does not state any of these consequences. Where a product is covered by a Quality Control Order, BIS certification scheme or another sector-specific law, that separate requirement needs to be checked on its own.
The Schedule contains the following standards.
| Sl. No. | Indian Standard | Subject | Withdrawal Date |
| 1 | IS 2321 – 1963 | General Purpose Amplitude Modulated Radio Frequency Signal Generators | 17 August 2026 |
| 2 | IS 3437 – 1972 | Direct Reading Pointer Indicator Type Electronic Voltmeter | 17 August 2026 |
| 3 | IS 3886 – 1966 | General Purpose Audio Frequency Signal Generators | 17 August 2026 |
| 4 | IS 3915 – 1966 | Measurement of Audio Frequency Signal Generators | 17 August 2026 |
| 5 | IS 4330 – 1967 | Measurement of Cathode-Ray Oscilloscope | 17 August 2026 |
| 6 | IS 8316 – 1977 | Retractor, Hajek's Pattern | 17 August 2026 |
| 7 | IS 9858 – 1981 | Safety Requirements for Electronic Measuring Apparatus | 17 August 2026 |
| 8 | IS 10662 : 1992 | Receivers for Colour Television Broadcast Transmissions | 17 August 2026 |
| 9 | IS 13409 : 1992 | High Frequency Transreceivers | 17 August 2026 |
| 10 | IS 13901 (Part 2) : 1993 | Ferrite Components for CTV — Cores for Line Output Transformers | 17 August 2026 |
These entries cover electronic measurement, radio-frequency applications, television equipment and one medical/surgical equipment standard.
| Sl. No. | Indian Standard | Subject | Withdrawal Date |
| 1 | IS 13984 (Part 1) : 1995 | Link and Test Connectors — Test Schedule and Requirements | 17 August 2026 |
| 2 | IS 13984 (Part 2/Sec 1) : 1994 | Two-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 3 | IS 13984 (Part 2/Sec 2) : 1994 | Three-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 4 | IS 13984 (Part 2/Sec 3) : 1994 | Four-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 5 | IS 13984 (Part 2/Sec 4) : 1995 | Six-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 6 | IS 13984 (Part 3/Sec 1) : 1995 | Two-Way Flat Mounting Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 7 | IS 13984 (Part 3/Sec 2) : 1995 | Two-Way Upright Mounting Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 8 | IS 13984 (Part 3/Sec 3) : 1995 | Three-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 9 | IS 13984 (Part 3/Sec 4) : 1995 | Four-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
| 10 | IS 13984 (Part 3/Sec 5) : 1995 | Six-Way Socket Link and Test Connector | 17 August 2026 |
A large part of the Gazette is devoted to different parts and sections of the IS 13984 series for link and test connectors.
| Sl. No. | Indian Standard | Subject | Withdrawal Date |
| 1 | IS 13984 (Part 4/Sec 1) : 1995 | U-Link Polarized Plug | 17 August 2026 |
| 2 | IS 13984 (Part 4/Sec 2) : 1995 | U-Link Non-Polarized Plug | 17 August 2026 |
| 3 | IS 13984 (Part 4/Sec 3) : 1995 | Double U-Link Plug Polarized | 17 August 2026 |
| 4 | IS 13984 (Part 5/Sec 1) : 1995 | Polarized Cord Plug | 17 August 2026 |
| 5 | IS 14501 (Part 2) : 1998 | Pulse Measurement and Analysis | 17 August 2026 |
| 6 | IS/ISO/IEC 17788 : 2014 | Cloud Computing - Overview and Vocabulary | 17 August 2026 |
| 7 | IS/IEC 60839-7-2 : 2001 | Alarm Systems - Common Application Layer Protocol | 17 August 2026 |
| 8 | IS/IEC 61196-3 : 1998 | Coaxial Cables for Local Area Networks | 17 August 2026 |
| 9 | IS/IEC 61196-3-1 : 1995 | Coaxial Cables - 500 m Reach and up to 10 Mb/s | 17 August 2026 |
| 10 | IS/IEC 61196-3-2 : 1997 | Solid Dielectric Coaxial Cables — 185 m Reach and up to 10 Mb/s | 17 August 2026 |
| 11 | IS/IEC 61196-3-3 : 1997 | Foamed Dielectric Coaxial Cables — 185 m Reach and up to 10 Mb/s | 17 August 2026 |
The final part of the Schedule moves from connectors to pulse measurement, cloud terminology, alarm systems and radio-frequency cables.
The 31 withdrawn standards are spread across several very different fields. Treating them as one product category would be misleading.
1. Electronic Measurement and Signal Equipment
Several of the older standards deal with instruments used to generate or measure electrical and electronic signals.
They include standards for:
Companies dealing with old testing setups, service manuals or legacy equipment may still find these IS numbers in internal documents.
2. Medical Equipment
IS 8316 – 1977 covers a Retractor, Hajek's Pattern. Because this is a medical/surgical equipment standard, it should not be grouped blindly with the surrounding electronics entries. Anyone using this standard in medical-device documentation should review its present relevance separately.
3. Television and Radio Equipment
Three withdrawn standards deal with colour television receivers, high-frequency transreceivers and ferrite components used in CTV line output transformers.
These may be more relevant to legacy products, older component drawings and archival technical documents than to current mainstream equipment.
4. Link and Test Connectors
The IS 13984 family forms the largest block in the notification. It includes standards for:
The important point here is the Part and Section number. A company should not simply search for “IS 13984” and stop there. The exact Part and Section used in a drawing or specification should be matched against the Gazette.
5. Cloud Computing
IS/ISO/IEC 17788: 2014, titled Information Technology — Cloud Computing — Overview and Vocabulary, is also withdrawn.
This does not mean cloud services in India have suddenly become non-compliant. The standard deals with cloud-computing overview and terminology, and the notification does not introduce a new cloud certification requirement.
6. Alarm Systems
IS/IEC 60839-7-2: 2001 deals with message formats and protocols used for serial data interfaces in alarm-transmission systems.
7. Radio-Frequency and Coaxial Cables
Four standards from the IS/IEC 61196-3 family have been withdrawn.
They deal with coaxial cables used in LAN and digital-communication applications, including specifications based on cable reach, transmission speed and dielectric construction.
The Gazette does not give a separate reason for each standard. That means it would be unsafe to write that all 31 were withdrawn because they were “obsolete”, “replaced” or “technologically outdated”.
Some standards in the list are several decades old, but age alone does not tell us why BIS withdrew them.
The correct reading is simpler: BIS has formally withdrawn the listed standards, but this notification does not explain the individual reason for each withdrawal.
No replacement or superseding standard is identified in this notification. That is a point businesses should handle carefully.
If a product specification currently cites one of the withdrawn standards, the next step should not be to pick another IS number that appears similar. The correct current reference needs to be checked from official BIS material.
Depending on the product, that review may involve:
The Gazette itself does not answer those questions.
The notification does not say that every BIS licence or certificate linked to one of these standards is automatically cancelled.
The position needs to be checked product by product. A business should look at:
This is where a BIS certification consultant can be useful. The value is not in simply filling an application form. It lies in establishing what standard actually applies before a business spends money on testing, documentation or a fresh certification exercise.
Manufacturers should start by checking where the withdrawn IS number appears in their existing records. A quick search of the exact standard number can help identify documents, specifications or processes that may still refer to it.
The review should cover key technical and quality records, including:
Once a reference is found, ask a second question: why is it there?
Sometimes the standard is merely a historical design reference. In another case, it may be part of a customer contract or regulatory requirement. Those situations cannot be treated in the same way.
Manufacturers should therefore avoid two extremes ignoring the withdrawal entirely, or immediately changing every document without checking the legal and technical context.
Importers often depend on documents prepared outside India. That makes old Indian Standard references easy to miss.
Supplier test reports, technical specifications and purchase contracts should be checked where one of the 31 standards is relevant.
Importers may also need to review:
The Gazette does not say that imports automatically stop because a standard has been withdrawn.
If the product is subject to mandatory BIS certification, the current requirement should be checked separately before goods are ordered, tested or shipped.
Laboratories may still have withdrawn IS numbers built into everyday templates and procedures.
Typical places to check include:
The laboratory should not silently replace the withdrawn standard with another test method.
Where testing is linked to BIS certification or another regulatory requirement, the correct current method should be confirmed first.
Procurement documents tend to stay in circulation for years, especially where older technical specifications are copied into newer tenders. That creates a real possibility that one of the withdrawn IS numbers remains in:
A withdrawn or outdated standard does not, by itself, make an existing tender or contract invalid.
The key question is what the purchaser actually intended when the requirement was drafted. They may have referred to a specific historical standard, or they may have expected the latest applicable standard to be followed.
If the requirement is unclear, it is better to seek clarification before submitting a quotation or proceeding with supply.
This is one of the more practical consequences of the notification.
An older IS number may sit quietly in technical documentation for years. It may be copied from one drawing to another without anyone questioning whether the reference is still current.
Companies using any of the 31 standards should search:
The main risk here is often inconsistency rather than an immediate legal penalty.
A drawing may quote one standard, a test report another and a purchase order a third. That creates avoidable confusion for engineering, quality and procurement teams.
The practical impact of a withdrawn standard may differ from one business to another. Manufacturers and importers may need to review existing technical documents, supplier records and compliance references to identify where the withdrawn standard is still being used.
| Stakeholder | What May Need Attention |
| Manufacturers | Product drawings, test methods, specifications and BIS applicability |
| Importers | Supplier documents, test reports and Indian compliance references |
| Testing laboratories | Methods, report templates and customer instructions |
| Procurement teams | Tender clauses, POs and vendor specifications |
| Engineering teams | Tender clauses, POs and vendor specifications |
| Compliance teams | BIS licences, QCO mapping and internal compliance records |
The impact will not be equal for everyone.
A company that has never used any of these standards may have nothing substantial to change. A manufacturer that still uses IS 13984 throughout product drawings and supplier documents may have a much larger clean-up exercise.
The Gazette does not prescribe a specific penalty for continuing to have one of these old references in company documents. Still, leaving the matter unchecked can create practical problems.
This checklist is meant for internal review. It is not a list of new legal duties created by the Gazette.
| Review Area | What to Check |
| Standard mapping | Is any of the 31 withdrawn standards still used? |
| Product mapping | Which products, parts or SKUs refer to it? |
| Certification | Is the product covered by BIS certification or a QCO? |
| Testing | Do existing test reports cite the withdrawn IS number? |
| Replacement | Has a current official standard been identified? |
| Procurement | Do POs or tenders still use the withdrawn reference? |
| Supplier records | Are vendors working to the old specification? |
| Internal documents | Do drawings, SOPs or quality documents need review? |
| Record keeping | Has the assessment and any change been documented? |
The first step is not to file a new application or make immediate changes to your compliance process. Start by assessing whether the withdrawn standard actually applies to your products, operations, contracts or existing documentation.
Once that connection is established, the business can determine what, if anything, needs to be updated.
A sensible review can follow this order:
This avoids unnecessary retesting, premature document changes or incorrect certification decisions.
For a company that still uses one of these withdrawn standards, the difficult part is usually not identifying the Gazette entry. The real work is understanding what the withdrawal means for the particular product.
Corpseed can support businesses through BIS certification services, product-compliance review and technical-document assessment.
Corpseed can examine the product category and help determine whether an active BIS certification requirement, QCO or other regulatory framework applies.
Technical files, test reports, specifications and compliance records can be reviewed to identify where the withdrawn IS number is still being used.
Where a later or replacement standard needs to be identified, Corpseed can support the review using relevant official BIS references rather than relying on assumptions.
If the product is covered by an applicable certification requirement, a BIS certification consultant can assist with documentation, testing coordination and the relevant certification process.
This can be particularly useful for manufacturers and importers that are unsure whether a withdrawn standard affects an existing licence, a new application or a product already under compliance review.
Where testing is genuinely required under the applicable framework, Corpseed can assist with laboratory coordination and technical documentation.
Corpseed's BIS compliance services in India can support businesses reviewing product standards, regulatory applicability, certification records and technical documentation.
The objective should be to make the right compliance decision first, rather than starting a new certification or testing exercise simply because a standard has been withdrawn.
Document Preview
Embedded reference document