
Loading...
Latest notifications, circulars, orders and compliance changes.
Showing 2 of 2 result(s)
Clear filtersSubject
Semicon 2.0 Scheme 2026: Eligibility, Incentives, Investment Limits and Application ProcessSummary: India’s scheme for incentivizing the semiconductor industry has advanced to its next stage. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), in its notification dated 31 August 2026, introduced the Semicon 2.0 Scheme for Development of Semiconductor Design and Manufacturing Ecosystem in India. What makes this scheme important is its breadth. It is not limited to companies planning multi-billion-rupee wafer fabs. Support has been extended across chip design, semiconductor intellectual property, equipment, raw materials, testing, silicon and compound semiconductor fabrication, displays, ATMP/OSAT, advanced research and talent development. The scheme has been divided into 6 pillars and 10 categories, and each category works differently. Some offer support linked to capital expenditure. Others focus on access to design infrastructure, seed funding, equity investment, royalties, or sales-linked reimbursement. For businesses, the starting point is therefore not “How much subsidy can we get?” The first question is simpler: Which Semicon 2.0 category actually fits the proposed project? Semicon 2.0 Notification at a Glance Particular Details Scheme Semicon 2.0 - Scheme for Development of Semiconductor Design and Manufacturing Ecosystem in India Ministry Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Division IPHW Division Notification date 31 August 2026 File number F. No. W-38/6/2025-IPHW Policy background National Policy on Electronics 2019 and earlier Semicon India Programme Structure 6 pillars and 10 categories Nodal agency India Semiconductor Mission Main areas Design, equipment, materials, fabs, displays, packaging, R&D and talent Application period Initially 3 years Project duration Project-specific, preferably up to 6 years Application route Nodal Agency portal during application windows Evaluation Technical and financial appraisal Detailed guidelines To be issued separately by MeitY The notification provides the overall structure of the scheme, but it does not contain every application form, documentary requirement, timeline, or disbursement detail. MeitY has expressly provided for separate scheme guidelines. What exactly is Semicon 2.0? Semicon 2.0 is a Government support scheme designed to develop more parts of India's semiconductor industry inside the country. That distinction matters. It is not a licence that every semiconductor business must obtain. Nor is it a general law imposing one compliance requirement on all electronics companies. Instead, it provides different kinds of fiscal and infrastructure support to eligible projects. A fabless chip-design startup, for example, may need access to expensive design software, prototyping, or seed funding. A silicon wafer fab needs large-scale capital support. A company making semiconductor-grade gases or substrates has an entirely different cost structure. A university or research institution may need support for R&D or training infrastructure. Semicon 2.0 creates separate routes for each of these areas. The Government's stated objective is to build a self-reliant and globally competitive semiconductor design and manufacturing ecosystem, strengthen supply-chain resilience, and support technological leadership in critical sectors. Why Has Semicon 2.0 Been Introduced? The notification links Semicon 2.0 with the National Policy on Electronics 2019 and the experience gained from the first Semicon India Programme. According to MeitY, approvals under the earlier programme generated interest in semiconductor manufacturing and also created demand for upstream products in the semiconductor ecosystem. The new scheme takes that idea further by extending support to more parts of the value chain. That is an important policy shift from a business point of view. A semiconductor fab cannot operate independently. It depends on design companies, specialised machinery, wafers, gases, chemicals, substrates, testing, packaging, research capability, and skilled workers. If most of those inputs continue to come from outside the country, adding fabrication capacity alone does not create a deep domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Semicon 2.0 tries to address that gap. How Does Semicon 2.0 Cover the Semiconductor Value Chain? A useful way to understand the scheme is to look at the semiconductor value chain from start to finish. Stage Support Under Semicon 2.0 Chip and IP design Categories 1 and 2 Commercial deployment of chips Category 3 Equipment and semiconductor-grade materials Category 4 Silicon wafer fabrication Category 5 Compound semiconductors, photonics, MEMS and discrete fabs Category 6 OLED, Micro LED and LCD display fabs Category 7 Assembly, testing and packaging Category 8 Advanced semiconductor R&D Category 9 Semiconductor workforce and training Category 10 This is why Semicon 2.0 cannot be evaluated using a single incentive percentage. The commercial and eligibility conditions depend heavily on where the applicant sits in this chain. What are the 6 Pillars and 10 Categories under Semicon 2.0? The notification divides eligible activities into six broad pillars. Pillar Category Area Pillar 1 - Design 1 Semiconductor IPs, chips, SoCs and modules of national importance Pillar 1 - Design 2 Semiconductor IPs, chips and SoCs for commercial use Pillar 1 - Design 3 Deployment-Linked Incentive Pillar 2 - Machines and Materials 4 Semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem Pillar 3 - More Fabs 5 Silicon semiconductor wafer fabs Pillar 3 - More Fabs 6 Compound semiconductor, photonics, MEMS, sensor and discrete fabs Pillar 3 - More Fabs 7 Display fabs Pillar 4 - ATMP/OSAT 8 Assembly, testing, marking and packaging Pillar 5 - R&D 9 Advanced semiconductor technologies Pillar 6 - Talent 10 Semiconductor talent development The structure expressly covers 6 pillars and 10 categories. Category 1: Semiconductor Design for National Importance and Strategic Priorities The first category is meant for semiconductor technologies connected with national importance and strategic or critical infrastructure. Its scope includes semiconductor IP cores, chips, System-on-Chips or SoCs, and modules. A System-on-Chip combines several electronic or computing functions on one integrated chip instead of using multiple separate components. Eligibility under this category is fairly specific. The applicant must be: Incorporated in India, Headquartered in India, Substantially operational in India, Supported by a significant domestic manpower presence, and Owned and controlled by Indian citizens. The company can participate on its own or through a consortium involving global companies, R&D organisations or academic institutions. There are also strategic conditions that businesses should not overlook. The implementing company has to support and maintain the semiconductor solution over the long term. Government directions relating to security, export controls, foreign acquisition or control, and other strategic matters must also be followed. The intellectual-property arrangement is unusual. IP developed under this category is to be co-owned by the applicant and C-DAC. C-DAC cannot commercially use that jointly owned IP unless the applicant fails to meet its contractual obligations. Projects under this category are expected to be taken up through an RFP issued by C-DAC. Technical and financial evaluation forms part of that process. For companies working on strategic semiconductor technology, this is therefore not a simple subsidy application. IP structure, long-term support, security conditions, and the RFP terms are central to the project. Category 2: Commercial Semiconductor IP, Chips and SoCs Category 2 deals with semiconductor designs meant for commercial products. It is especially relevant to fabless semiconductor companies. A fabless company designs chips but does not necessarily own the fabrication facility where those chips are physically manufactured. Eligible companies must be incorporated and headquartered in India and have significant operations and manpower in the country. Unlike Category 1, ownership and control may be with Indian citizens or Overseas Citizens of India. Eligible companies may also work in consortium with global companies, R&D organisations and academic institutions. Another important condition is that the IP rights and all associated design and development files must remain within India. Eligible applicants may also access benefits under the Research, Development and Innovation Scheme where applicable. Financial support under Category 2 is split mainly between Design Infrastructure Support and Product Design Linked Incentive. Design Infrastructure Support: What Does DIS Offer? Chip design is expensive even before manufacturing begins. Engineering teams need specialised Electronic Design Automation software, access to fabrication for prototypes, existing IP blocks, and tools for validating the chip after it has been manufactured. Design Infrastructure Support, or DIS, addresses some of these needs. Eligible organisations can receive access to facilities such as: The national EDA tools grid, Multi-Project Wafer fabrication services, Semiconductor IP cores, Compute Sub-Systems, And post-silicon validation services. An EDA tool is specialised software used by semiconductor engineers to design, simulate, and verify chips. A Multi-Project Wafer, or MPW, allows multiple chip designs to share the same wafer fabrication run. This can be particularly useful during development because a company does not have to bear the full cost of an entire wafer run for one early design. Indian academic institutions and eligible startups and MSMEs are expressly included for specified DIS support. P-DLI Seed Funding for Startups and MSMEs The Product Design Linked Incentive is likely to attract attention from young semiconductor companies because it includes a specific seed-funding route. Eligible startups and MSMEs may receive milestone-linked advance seed funding equal to: 50% of project cost or 15 crore rupees, whichever is lower. The limit applies per application. The words “whichever is lower” matter. A startup cannot assume that every approved application will receive 15 crore rupees. A 12 crore rupees project, for instance, would first be restricted by the 50% project-cost condition. Funding is also milestone-linked. It should therefore be treated as conditional project support rather than unrestricted cash. For founders assessing semiconductor startup funding in India, this distinction is important when preparing financial projections or speaking to investors. Equity Co-Investment under Semicon 2.0 Eligible startups and MSMEs may also move beyond the seed-funding stage through equity co-investment. The notification provides for co-investment in companies that have secured funding from Venture Capital or Private Equity investors. The Government investment is to be made on terms and conditions similar to those offered by those VC or PE investors. That is different from a normal subsidy. With equity financing, ownership and valuation matter. Companies should therefore consider the Government's participation alongside their existing cap table, future fundraising and exit plan. Royalty Financing for Other Eligible Companies Eligible Category 2 companies other than startups and MSMEs can use royalty financing. Under this route, financial support is provided on a co-investment basis. The beneficiary company pays 5% of the net revenue of the relevant product or technology until 1.5 times the financial support has been recovered. In simple terms, the Government's recovery is linked to the commercial performance of the supported product. This structure may reduce immediate repayment pressure, but it creates a continuing obligation against product revenue. Companies comparing grant support, equity and royalty financing should therefore model each option separately. What Happens if a Company Exits P-DLI Funding? The scheme allows an exit, but an exit does not mean the financial obligation disappears. Funding Route Exit Requirement Seed funding/equity co-investment Aggregate seed funding plus market value of Government equity, or 1.5 times total financial support, whichever is higher Royalty financing: exit within 4 years of last disbursement Repay 1.5 times financial support Royalty financing: exit after 4 years Repay 2 times financial support These provisions apply where the beneficiary decides to exit or ceases to meet eligibility or other scheme conditions. For founders and investors, this is not a minor clause. It can affect exit economics, valuation discussions, and decisions around changing the business model after receiving support. Category 3: Deployment-Linked Incentive The third design category deals with commercial deployment rather than the initial design stage. It covers semiconductor IP cores, chips, and SoCs that are launched for the first time after the scheme announcement and had no prior sales by the applicant before that announcement. Applicants eligible under Categories 1 and 2 can apply. The incentive is: 9% reimbursement on net sales for five years. The ceiling is: 30 crore rupees per application, and 120 crore rupees in total per company, including group companies, across multiple eligible products. This is not the same as P-DLI. P-DLI supports product development through financing. DLI comes later and links support to the sales of the eligible product. DIS vs P-DLI vs DLI Feature DIS P-DLI DLI What it mainly supports Design infrastructure Product development financing Commercial deployment Form of support Access to tools/services Seed funding, equity, royalty Sales-linked reimbursement Stage Design/prototyping Development Post-launch Key limit Access subject to scheme/vendor terms Funding-specific conditions 9% for 5 years Important ceiling Depends on support type Seed: 50% of project cost or 15 crore rupees, whichever is lower amount applies 30 crore rupees/application; 120 crore rupees/company For companies planning a semiconductor-design project, mixing these three concepts can lead to incorrect funding assumptions. They apply at different stages and use different financial mechanisms. Category 4: Semiconductor Equipment, Materials and Testing One of the most commercially useful parts of Semicon 2.0 is Category 4. The scheme recognises that domestic fabs will also need a domestic supplier base. Eligible activities include: R&D for semiconductor equipment, Semiconductor-grade raw materials, Wafers, Photomasks, Photoresist, Substrates, Chemicals, Gases, Display-fab glass, Semiconductor testing and characterisation, Equipment manufacturing, Refurbished equipment, Sub-assemblies, And components. Except for semiconductor testing and characterisation facilities, applicants are expected to own or possess licensed technologies for the proposed unit. Investment, Revenue and Support Sub-Vertical Minimum Investment Minimum Revenue Support Semiconductor equipment R&D 300 crore rupees 120 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Semiconductor-grade raw materials 50 crore rupees 20 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Test and characterisation 100 crore rupees 40 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Equipment, refurbished equipment, sub-assemblies and components 300 crore rupees 120 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX + applicable PLI The revenue condition includes group companies and applies to any one of the three financial years before the year of application. This category creates a meaningful opening for businesses that may never build a fab themselves but can supply the fabs that are being developed. PLI for Domestic Semiconductor Equipment and Components Certain equipment-related projects under Category 4 also receive a Production-Linked Incentive. The PLI is based on the value of the Bill of Materials sourced from domestic manufacturers. The rates decline over five years: 10% → 8% → 6% → 4% → 2% The benefit starts from FY 2028-29 and is subject to an overall ceiling of 50% of eligible CAPEX. A Bill of Materials, usually shortened to BoM, is the list and value of parts and materials used to make a product. This incentive makes domestic sourcing relevant to the financial model of an eligible equipment project, not merely to its procurement strategy. Category 5: Silicon Semiconductor Wafer Fabs Category 5 is aimed at large silicon semiconductor fabrication projects. The financial and technical entry conditions are high. Requirement Condition Wafer size 300 mm Installed capacity 40,000 wafer starts/month or more Technology Production-grade owned or licensed technology Minimum capital investment 20,000 crore rupees Minimum revenue 7,500 crore rupees Revenue test Any one of the 3 FYs before application; group/JV included Fiscal support 40% of eligible CAPEX on pari-passu basis These conditions are expressly provided in the notification. The 40% support looks substantial on paper, and it is. But a project of this scale still needs very large promoter funding, credible technology, execution capability, suppliers, utilities, manpower and customers. The subsidy does not replace the underlying business case. Category 6: Compound Semiconductors, Photonics, MEMS and Discrete Fabs Category 6 provides a route for specialised fabs that do not fall within the large 300 mm silicon-fab framework. Technology Minimum Wafer Size Sensors, including MEMS 200 mm Compound semiconductors 150 mm Discrete semiconductor fabs 150 mm Photonics 100 mm Minimum wafer sizes differ by technology: The minimum installed capacity is 500 wafer starts per month. Applicants must own or possess production-grade licensed technology for the proposed process. Other key thresholds are: Minimum investment: 500 crore rupees Minimum revenue: 200 crore rupees Fiscal support: 35% of eligible CAPEX on a pari-passu basis This category is relevant to specialised semiconductor manufacturing, but it remains a serious industrial investment. Smaller scale than a silicon mega-fab does not mean low-cost entry. Category 7: OLED, Micro LED and LCD Display Fabs Display manufacturing has its own set of thresholds. Technology Minimum Capacity Minimum Investment Minimum Revenue Support OLED - Generation 6 or above 30,000 panels/month 10,000 crore rupees 5,000 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX Micro LED 500 sq. m. panel area/month 1,500 crore rupees 600 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX LCD - Generation 8 or above 60,000 panels/month 10,000 crore rupees 5,000 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX The applicant must also own or possess production-grade licensed technology for the relevant process. Micro LED has a much lower investment threshold than OLED or LCD, but 1,500 crore rupees remains a large project. Technology, scale, and access to licensed processes will therefore matter as much as subsidy availability. Category 8: ATMP and OSAT Support Semiconductor fabrication produces dies, but those dies are not ready to go straight into electronic products. They still need assembly, testing, marking, and packaging. ATMP stands for Assembly, Testing, Marking, and Packaging. OSAT means Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test. Semicon 2.0 divides this category into advanced and legacy packaging. Advanced Packaging The notification includes: 2.5D packaging, 3D packaging, Wafer-level chip-scale packaging, Heterogeneous integration, And advanced substrates. Advanced Packaging vs Legacy Packaging Requirement Advanced Packaging Legacy Packaging Minimum investment 1,000 crore rupees 1,000 crore rupees Minimum revenue 200 crore rupees 200 crore rupees Technology Production-grade owned/licensed Production-grade owned/licensed Fiscal support 35% eligible CAPEX 25% eligible CAPEX Advanced packaging therefore receives a higher support percentage despite having the same stated investment and revenue thresholds. For applicants considering an ATMP or OSAT project, correctly classifying the proposed packaging technology can directly affect the incentive available. Category 9: R&D for Advanced Semiconductor Technologies Research and development has been made a separate pillar rather than being treated as an incidental part of manufacturing. The notification covers technologies such as: Advanced CMOS-based fabrication, Silicon photonics, Display fabrication, Chiplet-based technologies for advanced packaging, And other advanced semiconductor technologies. Semiconductor companies can apply independently or in consortium with academic institutions or R&D organisations. Support may be up to 75% of project cost, including State incentive, and may cover eligible CAPEX as well as OPEX. Part-funding from the Research, Development and Innovation Scheme may also be included where necessary. Again, “up to 75%” is a maximum, not a promised rate for every proposal. Detailed eligibility and funding conditions are to come through separate guidelines. Category 10: Talent Development Building semiconductor plants is only part of the problem. India also needs people who can design chips, operate fabrication equipment, work in packaging plants, process laboratories and support specialised manufacturing. Category 10 therefore covers talent from undergraduate and postgraduate education through doctoral research and shop-floor technicians. On the design side, it can support access to: Advanced chip-design tools, MPW fabrication, Post-silicon validation, And capacity-building projects. On the manufacturing side, the scheme supports training infrastructure, hands-on shop-floor training, and the strengthening of national nanofabrication and process laboratories. Eligible institutions include Indian academic institutions, R&D organisations, laboratories, scientific societies and domestic training institutions. Fiscal support can be up to 75% of project cost, including State incentive, covering eligible capital and operating expenditure. Complete Semicon 2.0 Investment and Revenue Comparison Project Minimum Investment Minimum Revenue Support Equipment R&D 300 crore rupees 120 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Raw-material manufacturing 50 crore rupees 20 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Testing/characterisation 100 crore rupees 40 crore rupees 30% eligible CAPEX Equipment/components 300 crore rupees 120 crore rupees 30% CAPEX + applicable PLI Silicon wafer fab 20,000 crore rupees 7,500 crore rupees 40% eligible CAPEX Compound/photonics/MEMS/discrete fab 500 crore rupees 200 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX OLED display fab 10,000 crore rupees 5,000 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX Micro LED fab 1,500 crore rupees 5,000 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX LCD display fab 10,000 crore rupees 5,000 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX Advanced packaging 10,000 crore rupees 200 crore rupees 35% eligible CAPEX Legacy packaging 1,000 crore rupees 200 crore rupees 25% eligible CAPEX The figures show why category selection matters. A business cannot look at the 35% or 40% support figure in isolation. Eligibility may first depend on investment, revenue, installed capacity, and technology. Which Semicon 2.0 Category May Fit Your Business? Business Type Likely Category Fabless semiconductor startup Category 2 Strategic semiconductor design company Category 1 Company deploying a newly launched eligible chip Category 3 Semiconductor raw-material company Category 4 Equipment or component manufacturer Category 4 Silicon wafer fab Category 5 MEMS/sensor manufacturer Category 6 Photonics manufacturer Category 6 Compound semiconductor manufacturer Category 6 OLED/Micro LED/LCD manufacturer Category 7 ATMP/OSAT company Category 8 Advanced semiconductor R&D business Category 9 University/R&D institution Category 9 or 10 Semiconductor training organisation Category 10 Can Foreign or Global Companies Participate? The answer depends on the category. Under Categories 1 and 2, eligible Indian companies may participate through consortium arrangements with global companies, R&D organisations and academic institutions. That does not mean any foreign company can apply directly on identical terms. For Category 1, the eligible company itself must be Indian incorporated, headquartered in India and owned and controlled by Indian citizens. For Category 2, Indian citizens as well as OCIs are recognised in the ownership and control condition. A proposed joint venture or consortium should therefore be checked against the specific category rather than relying on a general assumption about foreign participation. Why Technology Licensing Deserves Early Attention Several manufacturing categories require the applicant to own or possess production-grade licensed technology for the proposed process. That is a deeper condition than purchasing equipment. A company may have enough capital to build a plant but still fail to meet the scheme conditions if it does not have legally usable technology for the intended manufacturing process. For this reason, technology agreements, licensing rights and long-term process access should ideally be reviewed alongside financial planning. Waiting until the application stage can create problems if the commercial arrangement with the technology provider does not match the project submitted to ISM. What Does Pari-Passu Support Mean? A number of Semicon 2.0 manufacturing categories use the expression pari-passu. In practical terms, it means Government support is linked with eligible project spending according to the approved funding structure rather than functioning as an unconditional upfront payment of the full incentive amount. The notification does not prescribe one identical instalment schedule for every category. Applicants should therefore avoid assuming that 35% or 40% support will automatically be received at the beginning of construction. Actual release will depend on approval conditions and detailed scheme guidelines. How to Apply for Semicon 2.0 The scheme will initially remain open for applications for three years, and applications have to be submitted through the portal of the Nodal Agency during the relevant application window. Before filing, a business should practically work through a few checks: Identify the correct Semicon 2.0 category. Match the project with the category's eligibility conditions. Check ownership and control requirements where applicable. Review technology ownership or licensing. Verify capital-investment and revenue thresholds. Confirm required production capacity. Understand the exact financial-support mechanism. Review royalty, equity, or exit obligations where applicable. Prepare technical and financial project information. Track the ISM application window and subsequent MeitY guidelines. Not every step above is prescribed word-for-word as a statutory application sequence. Several are practical preparation measures based on the conditions that the applicant will eventually need to demonstrate. How Long Can a Semicon 2.0 Project Run? The three-year application period should not be confused with project duration. The notification says supported projects will be given a duration on a project-to-project basis, preferably up to six years. Different incentive mechanisms may also have their own periods. For instance: DLI runs for five years on eligible net sales. The Category 4 domestic-BoM PLI starts in FY 2028-29 and runs for five years. The overall project itself may have a longer implementation period. Financial models should therefore keep the application period, project implementation period, and incentive period separate. What Does India Semiconductor Mission Do? The India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) is the nodal agency for the scheme. Its responsibilities include: Inviting applications, Carrying out technical appraisal, Carrying out financial appraisal, Recommending applicants for selection, And performing other functions assigned by MeitY. ISM can also implement the three design and deployment categories relating to IPs, chips and SoCs with C-DAC's assistance. This makes ISM the central operational body for companies planning to participate in Semicon 2.0. How Will Applications Be Evaluated? Submitting an application does not automatically lead to incentive approval. The notification says the nodal agency will evaluate applications on an ongoing basis. Factors expressly mentioned include: Process technology, Project implementation capacity, Operating capability, Offtake, Financial parameters, And technical parameters. “Offtake” broadly relates to the market or customer arrangements for the output of the project. For large manufacturing proposals, this means a technically impressive facility may still need to show a credible route to customers and operations. Businesses should avoid relying on unofficial evaluation scorecards unless later guidelines introduce them. Who Approves Semicon 2.0 Projects? Approval authority depends on the project category and, for certain categories, project cost. Project Cost Approval Authority Semiconductor design categories and talent development Below 100 crore rupees Secretary, MeitY Same categories Above 100 crore rupees and up to 500 crore rupees Minister for Electronics and Information Technology Same categories Above 500 crore rupees Union Cabinet Other Semicon 2.0 categories Relevant project cost Union Cabinet route after recommendation The nodal agency first evaluates and recommends proposals. For other categories, recommended proposals are to be placed before the Union Cabinet through MeitY. This is one reason businesses should distinguish eligibility from approval. Meeting minimum conditions gets a project into consideration, it does not guarantee selection. How Will the Incentive Money Be Released? MeitY will make budgetary provision for support given to approved applicants. Disbursement will then be made by the nodal agency based on the conditions of approval. The notification does not prescribe a universal payment schedule. That matters when preparing project finance. A company should not structure its entire funding plan around receiving the maximum incentive at the beginning of the project. Cash-flow planning should instead account for promoter contribution, debt or equity requirements, and the actual disbursement terms eventually attached to approval. What is Still Awaited under the Detailed Guidelines? MeitY has expressly stated that separate scheme guidelines will be issued. The scheme and its guidelines may also be reviewed and amended. Area Current Position 6 pillars and 10 categories Confirmed Main fiscal-support structure Confirmed Major manufacturing thresholds Confirmed Nodal agency Confirmed Approval route Confirmed Three-year application period Confirmed Exact application windows To be announced Complete forms Not expressly specified Final document checklist Not expressly specified Detailed scoring methodology Not expressly specified Detailed milestone verification Further guidance may be required Detailed Category 9 eligibility Separate guidelines to come Category 10 support details Separate guidelines to come Uniform disbursement schedule Not expressly specified For applicants, this means early project preparation is useful, but filing assumptions should remain flexible enough to accommodate the detailed guidelines. What Does Semicon 2.0 Mean for Startups and MSMEs? For semiconductor startups, the biggest attraction may not be the large fab subsidies. The more relevant support may come through: EDA tool access, MPW services, IP cores, Validation infrastructure, Seed funding, Equity co-investment, And later-stage DLI support. This can help with some of the costs that appear before a semiconductor product starts generating revenue. Even so, the scheme does not make product development risk-free. Seed funding is milestone-linked. Equity changes the company's ownership structure. Royalty financing creates revenue-linked repayment. DLI becomes relevant only when an eligible product is commercially deployed. Startups should therefore evaluate the scheme as part of their funding strategy, not as a replacement for one. What Does Semicon 2.0 Mean for Semiconductor Manufacturers? Manufacturers face a different set of questions. For them, the issue is less about access to EDA tools and more about: Plant scale, Technology rights, Revenue capacity, Production capability, Project finance, Suppliers, Customers, And implementation. A silicon fab needs at least 20,000 crore rupees of capital investment under the notified threshold. OLED and LCD fabs require at least 10,000 crore rupees. Even specialised Category 6 fabs start at 500 crore rupees. Government support can materially change project economics, but it cannot replace a viable plant design or sound financing plan. This is where professional semiconductor project consultancy becomes relevant: businesses need to understand the scheme alongside the underlying industrial project, rather than treating incentive filing as a separate paperwork exercise. What Does the Scheme Mean for Equipment and Material Suppliers? This may be one of the areas with the widest business opportunity. Not every company entering the semiconductor sector needs to manufacture chips. Category 4 expressly covers: Wafers, Photomasks, Photoresist, Substrates, Chemicals, Gases, Equipment, Refurbished equipment, Sub-assemblies, Components, And testing infrastructure. For established engineering, chemical, materials, or precision-manufacturing businesses, Semicon 2.0 may therefore create a route into the semiconductor supply chain without the need to build a full fabrication facility. The eligibility requirements still need to be checked carefully, especially the investment, revenue, and technology conditions. Is Semicon 2.0 a Good Decision or an Additional Burden? The scheme has clear advantages, but the commercial burden should not be ignored. Positive Side Practical Challenge Support across the semiconductor value chain Several categories need very high investment Dedicated support for startups Milestone and funding conditions apply EDA and MPW infrastructure Technical teams are still necessary 35–40% eligible CAPEX support for major categories Promoters still need large-scale financing Support for materials and equipment Technology and revenue thresholds apply Advanced packaging gets stronger support Licensed process technology is needed R&D support up to 75% Maximum support is not guaranteed Talent development gets a dedicated pillar Separate guidelines are still awaited Where the Scheme Helps Semicon 2.0 addresses a real structural problem: semiconductor manufacturing depends on an ecosystem. If India supports only one or two fabs but continues importing most equipment, specialised materials, packaging, design technology and trained manpower, the local value chain remains shallow. The scheme gives policy support to more of those missing links. For startups, design, infrastructure, and funding can reduce early-stage cost pressure. For manufacturing companies, CAPEX support can improve project economics. For equipment and materials manufacturers, the scheme opens a route into a growing industrial supply chain. Where the Burden Remains A high incentive percentage does not make a weak project viable. Semiconductor manufacturing remains expensive and technically demanding. Technology licensing can be difficult. Skilled people are limited. Large manufacturing projects need long-term financing and credible customer demand. The Government also evaluates implementation capacity, operations, and offtake, which makes commercial preparation as important as eligibility. The Practical View Semicon 2.0 is more useful as an industrial-development framework than as a simple subsidy scheme. Companies that already have a credible product, technology, promoter structure, or manufacturing plan may find meaningful financial support under it. Businesses that begin with only the question “What subsidy can I claim?” may struggle because the scheme asks for much more than investment alone. Business Opportunities under Semicon 2.0 The scheme can create opportunities in several parts of the semiconductor industry. Opportunity Relevant Category Chip and SoC design 1–3 Semiconductor IP 1–3 EDA and design infrastructure 2 Semiconductor equipment 4 Equipment refurbishment 4 Wafers and substrates 4 Semiconductor chemicals and gases 4 Testing and characterisation 4 Silicon fabs 5 Compound semiconductors 6 MEMS and sensors 6 Photonics 6 OLED/Micro LED/LCD 7 Advanced packaging 8 Legacy packaging 8 Legacy packaging 9 Technical training 10 The commercial potential should still be evaluated project by project. The notification does not provide market size or revenue guarantees for these sectors. Key Risks Businesses Should Avoid The biggest mistake would be treating Semicon 2.0 as one uniform incentive programme. Businesses should be careful about: Selecting the wrong category, Assuming sector presence means eligibility, Overlooking ownership conditions, Treating technology access as the same as a valid production licence, Confusing investment thresholds with incentive amounts, Treating “up to” funding as guaranteed, Confusing P-DLI and DLI, Overlooking equity or royalty consequences, Ignoring group-company and JV treatment in revenue calculations, Building cash flows around full upfront incentive payment, Or relying on unofficial application checklists before MeitY/ISM issues the relevant guidance. Careful eligibility screening at the beginning can save a great deal of restructuring later. What Should Businesses Do Next? Businesses considering the scheme should begin with a project-level assessment rather than a generic subsidy search. A sensible internal review would cover the proposed activity, relevant category, ownership structure, technology rights, and capital investment, past revenue, production capacity, expected funding mechanism and approval route. For manufacturing projects, technology agreements should be reviewed alongside project finance. For design startups, the impact of seed funding, Government equity, or royalty financing should be modelled before selecting a support route. Businesses should also monitor future MeitY and India Semiconductor Mission announcements because the detailed scheme guidelines will fill in several operational areas. How Corpseed Can Help with Semicon 2.0 Applying for Semicon 2.0 involves more than submitting an application. A business first needs to understand which category fits its project, whether it meets the required conditions, and what financial or technical requirements may apply. As a Semicon 2.0 consultant, Corpseed can help businesses understand the scheme and prepare their project in a more organised way. 1. Choosing the Right Semicon 2.0 Category Corpseed can help businesses identify the category that best matches their proposed semiconductor project. Review the nature of the proposed business or project. Identify the relevant Semicon 2.0 category. Check whether the project falls under design, manufacturing, materials, equipment, ATMP/OSAT, R&D, or talent development. Avoid applying under a category that does not match the project. Explain the support available under the relevant category. 2. Checking Project and Applicant Eligibility Each Semicon 2.0 category has its own conditions. Corpseed can help businesses carry out an initial eligibility check before they move ahead with the application. Review applicant eligibility. Evaluate category-specific requirements. Analyze investment requirements, if any. Evaluate minimum income requirements, if any. Analyze production/capacity requirements. Pinpoint eligibility gaps that may need to be addressed before application. 3. Reviewing Investment and Financial Requirements Large semiconductor projects can involve substantial investment. Corpseed can help businesses understand the financial conditions linked to the selected category. Check minimum capital investment requirements. Review applicable revenue thresholds. Explain the available fiscal-support structure. Help distinguish CAPEX support, DLI, P-DLI, PLI, seed funding, and other forms of assistance. Review financial information required for project preparation. Help businesses understand that the maximum incentive is not automatically guaranteed. 4. Ownership, Technology and Licensing Review Some Semicon 2.0 categories contain specific conditions relating to ownership, control and access to technology. Corpseed can assist with: Reviewing ownership and control requirements Checking Indian incorporation or headquarters conditions where applicable Reviewing technology-related eligibility Examining available technology or licensing documents Identifying whether production-grade licensed technology may be required Checking whether the proposed structure broadly matches the selected scheme category This step is particularly important for semiconductor fabs, display fabs, ATMP/OSAT facilities, and other technology-heavy manufacturing projects. 5. Project Report and Documentation Support A strong semiconductor project application needs clear technical and financial information. Through semiconductor incentive consultancy, Corpseed can help organise the project information required for application preparation. Support may include: Project report preparation support Technical information coordination Financial information coordination Application-document organisation Project structure review Supporting information preparation Examining the application to ensure no information is left out It will be essential to compare the document checklist with the MeitY and India Semiconductor Mission guidelines after issuance. 6. Application Preparation and Query Support Once the prescribed application process and relevant window are available, Corpseed can assist businesses in preparing for submission. Application preparation support Filing assistance using the procedure that has been notified Information scrutiny before filing the application Application monitoring assistance Support for answering questions or clarifications sought Co-ordination of supporting documentation Approval readiness review Approval or incentive sanction by Corpseed is not guaranteed, as the ultimate decision rests on the assessment by the Government. 7. Semiconductor Project and Post-Approval Support A semiconductor project may require other registrations and approvals in addition to Semicon 2.0 support. Through semiconductor project consultancy, Corpseed can help businesses understand the wider project requirements that may apply separately. This may include: Identifying other project-related approvals Supporting semiconductor manufacturing setup planning Coordinating applicable registrations and licences Assisting with post-approval requirements Helping businesses track scheme-related conditions Supporting ongoing documentation and compliance requirements where applicable For a silicon fab, ATMP/OSAT facility, semiconductor-material unit, equipment manufacturing project, or testing facility, looking at these requirements early can help avoid unnecessary changes later. Corpseed's role is to help businesses understand the correct Semicon 2.0 route, assess their readiness, and prepare their project in line with the applicable scheme conditions, rather than approaching the application only as a subsidy form. Key Takeaways MeitY notified Semicon 2.0 on 31 August 2026. The scheme has 6 pillars and 10 categories covering design, equipment, materials, fabs, packaging, R&D and talent. Eligible startups and MSMEs may receive milestone-linked seed funding of 50% of the project cost or 15 crore rupees, whichever is lower. Category 3 grants a 9% DLI on net sales for 5 years but is subject to certain caps of 30 crore rupees per application and 120 crore rupees per company. The silicon wafer fabs need at least an investment of 20,000 crore rupees and have 40% CAPEX eligibility according to the notification conditions. Advanced packaging receives 35% eligible CAPEX support, compared with 25% for legacy packaging. ISM is the nodal agency. Applications are initially open for three years, while the project duration is determined project by project and is preferably up to six years. Separate MeitY guidelines remain important because several detailed operational requirements are yet to be prescribed. Semicon 2.0 gives semiconductor businesses more than one route into India's incentive framework. A startup designing chips, a company supplying semiconductor gases, a MEMS manufacturer, an ATMP operator, and a large silicon fab developer can all potentially fall within the scheme, but not under the same conditions. That is why the headline incentive percentage should never be the only basis for a decision. Ownership, technology, investment, revenue, capacity, financing terms, and approval requirements need to be checked together. For businesses planning a serious semiconductor project, the next useful step is to map the project against the correct Semicon 2.0 category and then review the detailed MeitY and ISM guidelines as they are issued.
Subject
Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) 2026: Eligibility, Incentives and Rules for ManufacturersSummary: The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has introduced the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme 2026, or MPMS, to support mobile phone manufacturing in India and encourage the growth of Indian mobile brands. The Scheme Notification was issued on 21 August 2026 under F. No. W/11/2026-IPHW. MPMS has a budgetary outlay of 62,500 crore rupees, including administrative charges, and runs for five financial years, from FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31. Instead of using one common eligibility and incentive structure for everyone, MeitY has divided the Scheme into two parts. Target Segment 1 (TS1) focuses on mobile phone manufacturing, while Target Segment 2 (TS2) targets qualifying Indian mobile phone brands. For manufacturers, the Scheme is mainly a performance-based financial opportunity. It is not a compulsory licence, certification or manufacturing approval. A company must satisfy the applicable eligibility conditions and meet the required sales or brand-related criteria to benefit from the incentives. Notification at a Glance Particular Details Scheme Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) Issuing Authority Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Division IPHW Division Document Type Scheme Notification File Number F. No. W/11/2026-IPHW Notification Date 21 August 2026 Gazette Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I—Section 1 Scheme Budget 62,500 crore rupees, including administrative charges Scheme Period FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31 Target Segment 1 Incentivizing mobile phone manufacturing Target Segment 2 Supporting Indian mobile phone brands TS1 Minimum Turnover 10,000 crore rupees in FY 2025-26 TS2 Minimum Turnover 1,000 crore rupees in FY 2025-26 Domestic Sourcing Incentive Up to 1.5% of Eligible Sales TS2 Design and R&D Incentive An additional 3% of Eligible Sales Detailed Scheme Guidelines To be issued separately by MeitY Application Deadline Not expressly specified Separate Effective Date Not expressly specified The distinction between the notification date and the performance period deserves attention. The Gazette is dated 21 August 2026, while FY 2026-27 is stated to be the first performance year for TS1. The notification does not separately declare an effective date. Businesses should therefore use the dates exactly as the Scheme describes them rather than treating the publication date as an assumed effective date. The Regulatory Framework MPMS is a Government incentive scheme administered through MeitY. Its purpose differs from that of rules that require a manufacturer to obtain a licence or comply with a compulsory product standard. A company does not become non-compliant simply for not participating in MPMS. Participation matters to manufacturers and brands seeking the financial and other support offered under the Scheme. Three Government-level bodies are particularly relevant to its implementation. The first is MeitY, which has issued the Scheme and will issue separate implementation guidelines. The second is the Project Management Agency (PMA), which will examine applications, verify eligibility and check eligible claims. The third is the Empowered Committee (EC), which will consider cases examined by the PMA and make recommendations to the competent authority. This structure also means that meeting a turnover condition alone should not be treated as a guarantee of an incentive. The application, eligibility verification, claim examination and approval process still applies. Why Has the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme Been Introduced? MeitY links the Scheme with the growth of India's electronics and mobile phone manufacturing sector. According to the notification, electronics manufacturing has grown sevenfold, and electronics exports have grown elevenfold since FY 2014-15. The Government also states that smartphones became the country's single largest exported product in 2025, overtaking diesel fuel and cut diamonds. Against this background, MPMS has several stated objectives. It aims to: Increase the global competitiveness of India's mobile manufacturing sector, Increase manufacturing scale, Deepen the mobile phone manufacturing supply chain, Raise Domestic Value Addition, or DVA, Build stronger domestic manufacturing capabilities, Support the development of Indian mobile phone brands, and Generate employment. The design of the incentives shows where the Government wants businesses to focus. Manufacturing growth receives support, but additional benefits are attached to domestic component sourcing and, for qualifying Indian brands, domestic design and R&D. MPMS Budget, Duration and Target Segments The total budget for MPMS is 62,500 crore rupees, including administrative charges. The Scheme is described as budget-limited. It also allows the incentive allocation to shift between TS1 and TS2 based on funding requirements and the response received in each Target Segment. The five Scheme years are: FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 FY 2030-31 The division between TS1 and TS2 is more than an administrative classification. TS1 is aimed at manufacturers operating at substantial scale and places considerable importance on additional sales. TS2 has a lower turnover threshold but asks Indian brands to meet conditions relating to Indian ownership, management control, intellectual property and in-house design and R&D. This makes Target Segment one of the first questions a business should examine. Who Does the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme Apply To? Direct eligibility under MPMS mainly concerns mobile phone manufacturers, including qualifying Electronics Manufacturing Services companies. Business Category MPMS Relevance Mobile phone manufacturers Can qualify under the relevant Target Segment if conditions are met EMS companies Expressly included among eligible manufacturers Existing mobile brands Can be relevant under TS1 New mobile brands Can enter TS1 after satisfying the prescribed sales condition New mobile brands Specifically covered by TS2 Component manufacturers Mainly indirect beneficiaries of the localisation push, unless otherwise covered Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) companies manufacture electronic products for brands and other businesses. MPMS expressly recognises these companies rather than restricting the Scheme only to businesses selling phones under their own brand. Component manufacturers sit in a different position. The Scheme can make domestic component sourcing more attractive, but the notification does not say that every component manufacturer becomes a direct MPMS applicant. TS1: Who Is Eligible for Mobile Phone Manufacturing Incentives? TS1 is meant for large-scale mobile phone manufacturing. A mobile phone manufacturer, including an EMS company, must: Be registered in India, and Have a minimum turnover of 10,000 crore rupees in FY 2025-26. That is the starting eligibility test. Claiming an incentive involves additional conditions. For existing brands, the Scheme sets annual Threshold Sales. For new brands, it first requires the brand to reach a prescribed annual sales level in India. The calculations are made on a brand-by-brand basis, which is particularly relevant when one applicant handles several brands or when a brand uses more than one EMS manufacturer. Existing Mobile Phone Brands For TS1, the Scheme defines an existing brand as one that had domestic manufacturing and sales in FY 2025-26. Such a brand must achieve the specified additional sales each year to be eligible to claim the incentive for that year. This requirement is called Threshold Sales. New Mobile Phone Brands A new brand follows a different route. It becomes eligible under MPMS only after achieving total annual sales of 10,000 crore rupees in India. After reaching that level, it must satisfy a Threshold Sales requirement of 5,000 crore rupees year-over-year to avail the incentive. The notification does not prescribe a minimum number of years for which the new brand must have existed. Annual Sales Thresholds under TS1 For an existing brand, the threshold rises each year. Financial Year Threshold Sales Over and Above FY 2025-26 Total Sales FY 2026-27 5,000 crore rupees FY 2027-28 10,000 crore rupees FY 2028-29 15,000 crore rupees FY 2029-30 20,000 crore rupees FY 2030-31 25,000 crore rupees These figures should not be confused with the 10,000 crore rupees turnover condition for entry into TS1. The turnover requirement checks whether the manufacturer falls within the eligible applicant category. Threshold Sales determine whether the existing brand meets the sales condition for claiming the incentive in a particular Scheme year. By FY 2030-31, an existing brand must therefore reach Threshold Sales of 25,000 crore rupees in addition to its total FY 2025-26 sales. How Are Baseline Sales and Eligible Sales Calculated Under TS1? The actual incentive calculation starts with Baseline Sales. The Scheme states that FY 2026-27 is the first performance year. Baseline Sales For each financial year, Baseline Sales are determined by taking the brand's domestic sales of the Target Segment product in the preceding financial year and adding 15% to that amount. In simple terms: Baseline Sales = Previous financial year's domestic Target Segment sales + 15% The baseline is therefore not fixed permanently at FY 2025-26. It moves from year to year. That makes the sales hurdle more demanding than a structure based on one fixed base year. As the previous year's sales rise, the next year's baseline also changes. Eligible Sales Once the baseline has been established, Eligible Sales are calculated as: Eligible Sales = Total Target Segment sales for the financial year – Baseline Sales The Scheme calculates Baseline Sales, Eligible Sales, and Threshold Sales separately for each brand. This point matters because the incentive is not simply calculated on a company's total turnover. The relevant brand and Target Segment sales have to be identified correctly. TS1 Incentive Rates from FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31 The TS1 incentive structure is slightly more complicated than a simple flat percentage. It has two parts. First Portion of Eligible Sales For the first portion, paragraph 7.3(a) refers to Eligible Sales up to the difference between: The average sales of FY 2023-24, FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26, and Baseline Sales for the relevant financial year. The applicable rates reduce gradually over the Scheme period. Financial Year Incentive Rate FY 2026-27 2.75% FY 2027-28 2.75% FY 2028-29 2.50% FY 2029-30 2.50% FY 2030-31 2.25% The wording of this part is technical, and the Gazette does not explain every possible calculation situation in detail. Businesses should therefore be careful about building financial projections around their own interpretation before the detailed Scheme Guidelines are available. Remaining Eligible Sales Eligible Sales remaining over and above the portion described above are subject to another rate. Financial Year Incentive Rate FY 2026-27 5% FY 2027-28 5% FY 2028-29 4.5% FY 2029-30 4.5% FY 2030-31 4% For this reason, calling TS1 simply a "5% incentive scheme" would leave out an important part of the actual calculation. The incentive depends on which portion of Eligible Sales is being considered and on the financial year in which the claim is made. Additional Incentive for Domestic Sourcing of Mobile Components MPMS provides manufacturers with an additional incentive when certain mobile phone components and sub-assemblies are sourced domestically. The maximum additional incentive is 1.5% of Eligible Sales. The break-up is: Component or Sub-Assembly Additional Incentive Display Module 0.30% Camera Module 0.30% Enclosure 0.50% Batteries, including cells 0.20% USB cables, including connectors 0.20% Maximum Total 1.50% This part of MPMS is particularly relevant to manufacturers considering the economics of localisation. Domestic sourcing, however, is not described as a blanket requirement that every applicant must fulfil to participate in MPMS. The additional 1.5% is an extra incentive linked to localisation. That is an important distinction. When Can the Domestic Sourcing Incentive Be Claimed? Simply purchasing one of the listed components in India is not enough to establish eligibility for the additional incentive. The notification says that the relevant component or sub-assembly must be localised for at least 25% of the total mobile phone units sold in a financial year. The additional incentive is paid on a pro rata basis. The Gazette does not specify the detailed evidence manufacturers must provide to prove localisation. For instance, it does not specify in this notification: A supplier certificate format, A domestic-value calculation, An auditor's certificate, A prescribed component-origin declaration, or A particular verification process. Businesses should wait for the official implementation requirements before treating any internally developed documentation process as sufficient. What Is the Incentive Ceiling Under MPMS? The incentive percentages are only one part of the calculation. MPMS also sets a brand-wise incentive ceiling based on the annual commitment submitted by the applicant or brand. The total incentive disbursement is limited to the lower of: The cumulative annual commitment, or The overall budgetary outlay available under the Scheme. This makes it difficult to estimate an applicant's potential benefit merely by multiplying a sales figure by the headline incentive percentage. The annual commitment and the overall Scheme ceiling have to be considered as well. TS2: Supporting Indian Mobile Phone Brands TS2 takes a different approach. Its focus is not simply on producing more phones. The segment is meant to help develop Indian mobile brands that retain ownership, management, intellectual property and design capability within India. It provides both fiscal and possible non-fiscal support. The initial turnover requirement is also much lower than TS1, although businesses must satisfy a more detailed Indian-brand test. Who Is Eligible Under TS2? An applicant under TS2 must be a mobile phone manufacturer, including an EMS company, that: is registered in India, and Has a minimum turnover of 1,000 crore rupees during FY 2025-26. The qualifying brand must then meet all the prescribed Indian-brand conditions. One major difference from TS1 is that Indian brands under TS2 do not have a minimum Threshold Sales requirement. Eligibility of Indian brands under this segment is subject to selection by the Empowered Committee. What Makes a Mobile Phone Brand an "Indian Brand" Under MPMS? A brand does not qualify under TS2 merely because its phones are manufactured in India or because it markets itself as Indian. The Scheme gives five specific conditions. The Brand Must Be Registered or Incorporated in India The brand should be registered or incorporated in India. This creates the basic domestic corporate link required under TS2. Intellectual Property and Trademark Must Be Held in India The intellectual property and trademark associated with the brand must be held within India. Businesses with complicated overseas IP structures may therefore need to examine this condition carefully before assuming TS2 eligibility. Management Control Must Remain With Indian Citizens The brand's management must be in the hands of Indian citizens. This is a separate requirement from shareholding. A company should therefore not look only at its equity ownership while reviewing the Scheme. Indian Citizens Must Hold More Than 51% Shareholding The entity claiming Indian Brand status must have more than 51% shareholding held by Indian citizens. The wording is "more than 51%". It should not be simplified to "51% or more". In-House R&D and Design Must Be in India The brand must also have in-house Research and Development (R&D) and design capabilities in India. This gives TS2 a clear product-development element. The Gazette, however, does not tell businesses exactly how much R&D expenditure, infrastructure, staffing or design activity will be considered sufficient. Those details should come from the official implementation framework rather than assumptions. How Does the One-Year Gestation Period Work Under TS2? TS2 applicants may be given a one-year gestation period. Without that period, FY 2026-27 is the first performance year. If the applicant opts for the gestation period, FY 2027-28 becomes the first performance year. The baseline changes at the same time. For a normal TS2 applicant: Baseline Sales = FY 2025-26 sales For an applicant using the gestation period: Baseline Sales = FY 2026-27 sales The notification does not spell out all the consequences of this one-year shift. In particular, it does not separately explain in this provision whether the gestation option changes the end of the five-year Scheme tenure. That point should be read together with the detailed Scheme Guidelines when they are issued. How Are Eligible Sales Calculated Under TS2? TS2 uses a simpler calculation than TS1. Eligible Sales are calculated by subtracting the applicable Baseline Sales from the brand's total sales for that financial year. Eligible Sales = Total sales during the relevant financial year – Baseline Sales Both Baseline Sales and Eligible Sales are calculated brand-wise. Unlike TS1, the TS2 notification does not add a moving 15% increment to the previous year's baseline. What Incentives Are Available to Indian Mobile Phone Brands? A qualifying Indian brand can potentially access three forms of fiscal incentive under TS2. 5% Incentive on Eligible Sales The main TS2 incentive is 5% of Eligible Sales of mobile phones manufactured in India. The notification does not show a tapered, year-by-year TS2 base rate, unlike the TS1 table. Additional Domestic Sourcing Incentive Indian brands can also benefit from the domestic sourcing incentive. The Scheme states that the calculation criteria for this incentive are the same for both Target Segments. This brings the same component categories, localisation requirement and maximum 1.5% additional incentive into the TS2 structure. Additional 3% for Indian Design and R&D A further 3% incentive on Eligible Sales is available for Indian product design and R&D. This is one of the most commercially interesting parts of TS2 because the Scheme does not look only at where the phone is assembled. It also gives financial weight to where the product is designed and developed. The notification does not yet provide detailed qualification parameters for this 3% incentive. Applicants should therefore avoid defining "Indian design and R&D" until the Government provides the implementation criteria. TS1 vs TS2: What Is the Real Difference? Parameter TS1 TS2 Main focus Increasing mobile phone manufacturing Supporting Indian mobile phone brands Minimum FY 2025-26 turnover 10,000 crore rupees 1,000 crore rupees Threshold Sales Applicable for existing brands No minimum Threshold Sales Baseline Previous year's domestic sales + 15% FY 2025-26 sales, or FY 2026-27 with gestation Main incentive Two-part tapered structure 5% of Eligible Sales Domestic sourcing incentive Up to 1.5% Up to 1.5% Indian design and R&D incentive No separate 3% stated Additional 3% One-year gestation Not stated Available subject to Scheme provision Indian ownership conditions Not prescribed in the same manner Mandatory Indian IP/trademark condition Not prescribed in the same manner Mandatory EC selection of Indian brands Not stated in the same form Applicable TS1 is therefore more closely linked with scale and continued sales growth. TS2 asks a different question: whether the business is genuinely structured as an Indian brand with Indian control, ownership, and IP and product-development capability. Fiscal and Non-Fiscal Support for Indian Mobile Brands The financial incentives under TS2 are clearly identified in the notification. Non-fiscal support is less specific. MeitY states that because fiscal and non-fiscal measures need to work together to build Indian brands, the Government may introduce necessary non-fiscal measures as required. The Empowered Committee can recommend such measures. What those measures will actually be is not stated. There is therefore no basis at present to promise an Indian brand: Procurement preference, Tax relief, Customs benefits, Advertising assistance, Export subsidies, or Market-development support Under this clause. Those benefits should be discussed only if the Government formally introduces them. Can an Applicant Submit More Than One MPMS Application? The notification is direct on this point. An applicant making multiple applications will not be eligible under MPMS. The Gazette does not go further into group-company situations, related entities or common promoter structures. Businesses with complicated corporate arrangements should therefore wait for more detailed guidance rather than assuming how the restriction will apply across an entire group. Can MPMS Applicants Participate in Other Government Schemes? Yes, at least from the standpoint of basic eligibility. The notification states that eligibility under MPMS does not affect eligibility under any other Scheme, and vice versa. That does not necessarily mean two Government incentives can always be claimed on the same sale, investment or expenditure. Those questions depend on the conditions of MPMS and the other Scheme involved. The safer reading is that participation in one Scheme does not automatically disqualify a business from another. How Will MPMS Approval and Incentive Disbursement Work? Incentives are to be disbursed to mobile phone manufacturers, including EMS companies, in India. The sales calculations behind those incentives are nevertheless performed for the brand. Applicants can submit claims quarterly, provided they meet the eligibility criteria. The Scheme Notification does not provide the entire claim workflow. Instead, it states that the approval and disbursement procedures will be handled under the Scheme Guidelines. For businesses preparing early, this distinction matters. There is no reason to rely on unofficial document lists, filing portals, application dates or processing periods until MeitY publishes them. What If One Brand Uses Several EMS Manufacturers? This situation is specifically covered. Where one brand gets its phones manufactured through more than one EMS Company, that brand must provide the necessary certification for: Baseline Sales, Threshold Sales, and Eligible Sales. The logic is fairly practical. MPMS measures performance at the brand level, even when manufacturing is divided among several companies. Sales information, therefore, needs to be consolidated in a way that prevents the same brand's performance from being counted inconsistently across different EMS manufacturers. The notification does not identify the certifying person, the prescribed certificate, or the required format. Those details should come from the Scheme Guidelines. Role of the Project Management Agency MPMS will be implemented through a Project Management Agency (PMA). The PMA is not simply a payment-processing body. Its role covers much of the Scheme's initial administration. According to the notification, its responsibilities include: Appraising applications, Verifying eligibility, Examining claims eligible for incentive disbursement, Compiling Scheme progress and performance information, Collecting data relating to incremental investment and Eligible Sales, and Providing secretarial, managerial and implementation support. MeitY may also assign further responsibilities to the PMA from time to time. The reference to incremental investment in the PMA's data work should not be read as an invented minimum investment threshold. The eligibility clauses reproduced in this notification do not prescribe such a figure. What Does the Empowered Committee Do? The Secretary, MeitY, will chair the Empowered Committee (EC). Its members will come from: NITI Aayog, Department of Economic Affairs, Department of Expenditure, Department of Revenue, Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, and Directorate General of Foreign Trade. Members must be at least of Joint Secretary Rank. The Committee will consider applications that the PMA has found eligible and recommend suitable cases to the competent authority. It performs a similar review for claims submitted for incentive disbursement. The EC also has an ongoing review function. It can examine the performance of eligible companies in areas such as production, employment generation and value addition. Where changes are needed for implementation, the Committee may recommend amendments to the Scheme. Can New Mobile Products Be Included Later? MPMS has been written with technological change in mind. The notification allows the Empowered Committee to consider adding new or advanced products under a Target Segment based on technological advancement in the mobile phone sector. No future products are named in the Gazette. Businesses should therefore treat this as an enabling provision rather than assuming that any particular emerging device or technology is already covered. How Will MPMS Affect Mobile Manufacturers and the Supply Chain? The impact will not be the same for every business. Large Mobile Phone Manufacturers For a large manufacturer, TS1 can provide a meaningful production-linked financial benefit, but the sales hurdles are high. A business has to consider: 10,000 crore rupees FY 2025-26 turnover eligibility, Brand-wise Threshold Sales, A moving Baseline Sales calculation, The two-part incentive rate, Localisation requirements for additional incentives, and Quarterly claim readiness. The commercial question, therefore, is not simply "Are incentives available?" It is "Can this brand realistically generate Eligible Sales after meeting the Scheme's thresholds and baseline rules?" EMS Companies EMS businesses have been expressly brought into the Scheme. This matters because a large part of modern mobile production can take place through contract manufacturing rather than a brand operating every factory itself. The Scheme recognises that model while continuing to calculate sales at the brand level. Indian Mobile Brands TS2 gives Indian brands a route that does not require the same 10,000 crore rupees turnover entry threshold as TS1. In return, the brand must demonstrate a much stronger Indian connection through ownership, control, and IP and product development capabilities. For a qualifying brand, the combination of: 5% Eligible Sales incentive, Up to 1.5% domestic sourcing incentive, and 3% Indian design and R&D incentive Makes TS2 materially different from a basic manufacturing subsidy. Component Suppliers Suppliers of display modules, camera modules, enclosures, batteries, cells and USB cable assemblies may see greater interest from manufacturers trying to improve localisation. That is a likely commercial effect, not a guaranteed outcome for the Government. Whether a supplier gains new orders will still depend on technical qualification, pricing, production capacity, quality and commercial decisions made by handset manufacturers. Finance and Compliance Teams Companies considering MPMS will need reliable internal data. Brand-level sales numbers, turnover, manufacturing arrangements and sourcing information can directly affect eligibility and incentive calculations. TS2 applicants will also need clarity on corporate ownership, IP, trademarks, management control and R&D arrangements. This is where poor internal records can become a practical problem, even if the underlying business appears eligible. What Are the Potential Benefits of MPMS? For businesses that fit the Scheme, the benefits are fairly clear. First, incentives are linked to actual manufacturing performance. A manufacturer that produces in India and generates Eligible Sales may access financial support according to the applicable rate. Second, localisation receives an extra reward. The additional incentive of up to 1.5% gives manufacturers another reason to examine domestic component sourcing. Third, Indian brands receive separate treatment. They are not simply placed inside the same framework designed for very large manufacturing companies. Fourth, product development receives financial recognition. TS2 gives an additional 3% incentive for Indian design and R&D. Fifth, EMS manufacturing is recognised. The Scheme acknowledges that a brand may rely on specialist manufacturing companies. None of these benefits is automatic. Actual payment depends on Scheme eligibility, performance, verification, approval, applicable ceilings and future procedural requirements. What Could Be Difficult for Businesses? MPMS is financially attractive on paper, but some conditions will require careful planning. TS1 Is Designed for Scale The 10,000 crore rupees turnover threshold already limits the pool of potential TS1 applicants. The annual Threshold Sales then rise from 5,000 crore rupees above FY 2025-26 sales to 25,000 crore rupees above the same base by FY 2030-31. This makes TS1 difficult to treat as an easy incentive for smaller manufacturers. The Baseline Keeps Moving For TS1, Baseline Sales are based on the previous year's domestic sales plus 15%. A company cannot therefore rely on a fixed historical benchmark throughout the Scheme. Localisation Needs to Reach a Meaningful Level A manufacturer cannot claim the extra domestic-sourcing incentive merely because it has started buying a small number of components locally. The 25% unit condition has to be considered. TS2 Requires More Than Indian Incorporation An Indian-registered company may still fall short if its IP, management control, shareholding, or in-house R&D structure does not meet the stated conditions. Important Procedural Details Are Still Outside the Notification The Gazette provides the policy structure but leaves many practical steps to be detailed in separate Guidelines. Businesses should therefore be careful about committing to an application strategy based on assumptions. Is MPMS a Benefit or an Additional Business Burden? The Scheme is voluntary and incentive-based, so describing it simply as an additional compliance burden would not be accurate. At the same time, claiming a substantial Government incentive naturally comes with performance and verification conditions. What Businesses May Gain What They Need to Manage Production-linked financial incentive High turnover and sales conditions Up to 1.5% domestic sourcing incentive Localisation threshold Separate route for Indian brands Ownership and control tests Additional 3% for Indian design and R&D In-house capability requirement Five-year Scheme period Ongoing performance tracking Recognition of multi-EMS manufacturing Brand-level certification Possible non-fiscal support Details not yet defined For businesses already operating at the required scale, TS1 may provide a useful way to support further production growth. TS2 may be particularly relevant for Indian brands that already have the ownership, IP and product-development structure described in the Gazette. The harder question will be commercial viability. A company still needs to compare the potential incentive with the sales growth, localisation effort, internal controls and investment decisions required to earn it. Business Opportunities Created by MPMS 2026 MPMS is primarily a mobile manufacturing incentive, but its commercial effects can extend further into the supply chain. Mobile Phone Manufacturing Eligible manufacturers have a direct financial reason to expand production and increase qualifying sales. EMS Manufacturing Contract manufacturers can participate in the Scheme structure where the eligibility conditions are met. This may make large-scale EMS capacity strategically important for brands that do not manufacture all phones themselves. Component Localisation The Scheme specifically identifies: Display modules, Camera modules, Enclosures, Batteries and cells, and USB cables and connectors. Indian businesses manufacturing these parts may find themselves relevant to handset makers reviewing localisation plans. Indian Mobile Brands TS2 gives qualifying domestic brands a separate policy route, particularly where they control their IP and maintain product design and R&D capabilities in India. R&D and Product Design The additional 3% TS2 incentive makes Indian design and R&D commercially relevant for the incentive calculation, rather than treating them as background activities. The Scheme does not guarantee new orders, market share or revenue in any of these areas. These are business opportunities that may arise from the incentive design. Scheme Guidelines Will Be Important Before Applications Begin The Gazette sets out the core structure of MPMS, but it is not the final procedural manual. MeitY expressly states that Scheme Guidelines for implementation will be issued separately. That means businesses still need official details on several practical matters. The notification itself does not presently give: An application opening date, An application closing date, An application portal, Prescribed application forms, A complete document list, Detailed localisation evidence requirements, The certification format for multi-EMS brands, The method for proving Indian design and R&D, Application fees, Claim-processing timelines, or A complete disbursement workflow. These should not be filled in from older schemes or unofficial sources. There are also areas where the Guidelines may help businesses understand the Gazette more clearly, including the practical calculation under TS1 paragraph 7.3(a) and the working of the TS2 gestation period within the Scheme tenure. Can MPMS Change During Its Five-Year Period? Yes. The notification allows MPMS and its Guidelines to be reviewed and amended from time to time. The areas that can be reconsidered include: Products covered under TS1 and TS2, Applicable incentive rates, Scheme tenure, Sales, Gestation period, and Other matters considered necessary for effective implementation. The Empowered Committee may recommend such amendments, subject to approval by the Minister of Electronics and Information Technology. Manufacturers planning around MPMS should therefore monitor subsequent MeitY notifications and Guidelines rather than relying solely on the original Gazette. What Should Mobile Manufacturers and Indian Brands Do Now? There is no reason to wait until an application window opens before checking whether MPMS is commercially relevant. Businesses can start with the information already available. Identify whether TS1 or TS2 is relevant. A large manufacturer and an Indian brand may face very different eligibility tests. Check FY 2025-26 turnover carefully. The basic threshold is 10,000 crore rupees for TS1 and 1,000 crore rupees for TS2. Review sales at the brand level. TS1 applicants should understand their FY 2025-26 position, annual Threshold Sales and moving baseline before estimating possible incentives. Map domestic component sourcing. Manufacturers interested in the extra 1.5% should check the listed components and the extent to which sourcing is already localised. Test the Indian-brand conditions for TS2. Incorporation alone is not enough. IP, trademarks, management control, shareholding, R&D and design all need attention. Review multi-EMS manufacturing arrangements. Brands using more than one EMS Company should prepare for consolidated brand-level sales certification. Keep the financial model conservative. Do not treat the maximum headline rates as guaranteed incentive receipts before applying the correct Eligible Sales rules and ceiling. Track Meet’s Scheme Guidelines. Application procedures, evidence requirements and claim mechanics should be taken from the final official instructions. How Corpseed Can Help With MPMS A first reading of MPMS may make eligibility look like a turnover question. In practice, there is more to review. For TS1, businesses need to understand the relationship between turnover, Threshold Sales, Baseline Sales, Eligible Sales and incentive rates. For TS2, the assessment covers areas such as Indian shareholding, management control, intellectual property, trademarks, domestic R&D, and product design. Corpseed can provide PLI scheme consulting services for manufacturers and brands that want to assess their position before moving into the formal application or claim stage. Relevant support can include: MPMS eligibility assessment: Checking whether the applicant's business profile fits TS1 or TS2. Target Segment review: Comparing the company's manufacturing and brand structure with the conditions applicable to the relevant segment. PLI eligibility assessment: Reviewing turnover, brand status and Scheme-specific qualifying conditions before an application is prepared. Sales-data review: Helping organise Baseline Sales, Threshold Sales and Eligible Sales information for internal assessment and future claim preparation. Indian-brand eligibility review: Assessing incorporation, Indian shareholding, management control, IP, trademarks and in-house R&D/design position under TS2. Domestic sourcing assessment: Reviewing the listed components, localisation position and conditions attached to the additional sourcing incentive. Multi-EMS readiness support: Helping organise brand-level sales and manufacturing information where a brand uses several EMS companies. Scheme Guideline review and application support: Interpreting later MeitY Guidelines and assisting with the formal process once application and claim procedures are officially notified. Incentive claim support: Helping businesses organise information for claims based on the final Government requirements. Ongoing regulatory compliance services: Supporting electronics manufacturers with related regulatory and documentation matters where separately applicable. The purpose of professional support is to help a business determine whether the Scheme fits its actual operating structure and to organise the information needed for an accurate application. It cannot guarantee selection by the Empowered Committee, approval by the competent authority or payment of a particular incentive amount. Mobile phone manufacturers, EMS companies and Indian brands considering MPMS can seek PLI scheme consulting services to review their eligibility, sales structure, localisation position and application readiness against the official Scheme conditions. Key Takeaways The Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme 2026 offers substantial financial support, but it has been designed for specific categories of manufacturers and Indian mobile brands rather than the entire electronics sector. The practical points businesses should remember are: MPMS has a budget of 62,500 crore rupees and runs from FY 2026-27 to FY 2030-31. TS1 requires a turnover of at least 10,000 crore rupees in FY 2025-26. Existing TS1 brands must satisfy rising annual Threshold Sales. TS1 uses a moving Baseline Sales calculation based on the previous year's domestic sales plus 15%. Domestic sourcing of specified components can provide an additional incentive of up to 1.5%. TS2 has a lower 1,000 crore rupees turnover threshold, but qualifying brands must meet Indian ownership, control, and IP and R&D conditions. Eligible TS2 brands receive a 5% base incentive, with an additional 3% available for Indian design and R&D. Applicants making multiple applications are not eligible. Quarterly claims are permitted subject to the Scheme conditions. Detailed application and disbursement requirements will depend on separate MeitY Scheme Guidelines.
Subscribe to Us
Find different law updates directly in your inbox. Subscribe now.