
Loading...
Latest notifications, circulars, orders and compliance changes.
Showing 6 of 7 result(s)
Clear filtersSubject
TRAI Extends Deadline for Comments on quality of service Consultation Paper to 2 September 2026Summary: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has given stakeholders more time to respond to its consultation on proposed changes to the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024. TRAI had issued the Consultation Paper on 5 August 2026. Comments were originally due by 26 August 2026, and counter-comments by 7 September 2026. Through Press Release No. 115/2026 dated 25 August, TRAI extended the deadline for comments to 2 September 2026 and stated that the deadline for counter-comments would be 15 September 2026. The extension followed requests from industry associations and other stakeholders. The development matters because the underlying consultation is much wider than a simple deadline change. TRAI is examining proposed rules affecting 5G network slicing, network congestion, coverage maps, significant outages, broadband fault repair, billing complaints, service-quality reporting and financial disincentives. These are, however, draft proposals. They should not be treated as final compliance requirements until TRAI issues the final amendment. Notification at a Glance Particular Verified Details Regulator Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Related Ministry Ministry of Communications Document Press Release No. 115/2026 PIB Release ID 2303218 Press Release Date 25 August 2026 Consultation Paper Date 5 August 2026 Subject Draft amendments to the 2024 telecom and broadband quality of service Regulations Original Comments Deadline 26 August 2026 Revised Comments Deadline 2 September 2026 Original Counter-Comments Deadline 7 September 2026 Revised Counter-Comments Deadline in Press Release 15 September 2026 Reason for Extension Requests from industry associations and stakeholders Nature of Document Consultation/deadline extension not a final amendment What Has TRAI Announced in the Latest quality of service Consultation Update? TRAI has not announced a final amendment to the Quality of Service Regulations. The immediate announcement is much narrower: stakeholders have been given additional time to respond to proposals already placed in the public domain. The consultation was released on 5 August 2026. Its original timetable allowed comments until 26 August and counter-comments until 7 September. TRAI subsequently said it had received requests from industry associations and stakeholders seeking more time, after which the comments date was moved to 2 September and, according to Press Release No. 115/2026, counter-comments to 15 September. That distinction matters. A telecom company does not become subject to the proposed 2026 provisions simply because the Consultation Paper has been issued. The consultation is an opportunity to examine the draft, point out difficulties, suggest alternatives, and place technical or commercial concerns before TRAI. What Is the Regulatory Framework Behind the Consultation? The existing framework is the Standards of Quality of Service of Access (Wireline and Wireless) and Broadband (Wireline and Wireless) Service Regulations, 2024, notified on 2 August 2024. The Regulations came into force from 1 October 2024. Their application covers service providers holding specified access-service licences, Unified Licences with access-service authorisation, internet-service authorisation under a licence, and entities authorised under the Telecommunications Act, 2023 to provide access or broadband services. The existing Regulations also contain an exclusion for certain internet service providers whose subscriber count does not exceed the prescribed level. TRAI explains in the 2026 Consultation Paper that the 2024 framework consolidated quality of service requirements for access and broadband services and established parameters, benchmarks and reporting requirements. Following implementation, TRAI issued several directions on reporting, audits, coverage maps, and publication of performance. The current consultation is therefore not a completely new quality of service regime. It is a proposed revision of an operating framework that has been in force since October 2024. Why Is TRAI Proposing Changes to the 2024 quality of service Regulations? TRAI says the proposed changes arise from its experience implementing the 2024 Regulations, interactions with service providers, technological developments, and the need for reliable digital connectivity. The Consultation Paper identifies four broad areas for review: emerging 5G issues such as network slicing, the framework for publishing coverage maps, changes needed for more effective quality of service monitoring, and correction of minor inconsistencies or issues identified during implementation. This explains why the proposed amendment contains both major new ideas and relatively technical corrections. Some proposals could introduce new monitoring obligations, while others are intended to clarify how an existing parameter should be calculated or reported. What Are the Major Changes Proposed in the TRAI Consultation Paper? The Consultation Paper runs far beyond the deadline-extension announcement. Several proposed changes could materially affect telecom and broadband operations if they are eventually adopted. Area Proposal Under Consultation Possible Business Relevance Coverage maps Minimum 98% accuracy benchmark Greater validation and mapping controls 5G network slicing New PRB-utilisation parameter Cell-capacity and slice monitoring New 5G network slices Information to TRAI 21 days in advance Advance regulatory planning Silence calls ≤1% benchmark Additional voice-quality monitoring Wireline broadband MTTR ≤10 hours Stronger fault-repair monitoring Billing complaints Resolution within one week Faster complaint-handling processes Network outages Revised significant-outage framework Reporting and subscriber rebate implications Quality of Experience Proposed service-wise QoE Score Greater public comparison of providers Compliance reports Stronger treatment of incorrect reporting Higher data-governance importance Other non-compliance Proposed Regulation 16B Wider enforcement coverage Every item in this table remains proposed at the consultation stage. 1. Accuracy of Network Coverage Maps One of the clearest proposals concerns network coverage information. Under the draft, TRAI proposes replacing the existing parameter, based largely on the availability of a service-wise geospatial coverage map, with an accuracy-based parameter carrying a benchmark of at least 98%. The proposed assessment period is monthly. The Consultation Paper explains the concern behind this change. TRAI observed that a coverage map can technically exist without necessarily matching actual on-ground experience. Areas shown as covered may still produce weaker coverage in field tests. The proposed framework therefore goes further into validation. Draft Schedule III deals with technology-wise maps for 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G, self-validation, updating the map when network coverage changes, and possible validation by TRAI through field samples. For operators, the practical issue is no longer simply whether a map has been uploaded. If the proposal survives consultation, the quality and reliability of the underlying map could itself become a measurable quality of service matter. 2. 5G Network Slicing and PRB Utilisation The draft also responds to the growing use of 5G network slicing. Network slicing allows different virtual network segments to be created over shared physical infrastructure for different service needs. One slice may be designed for a particular business or use case while another serves general traffic. TRAI proposes a new parameter based on cells having daily Physical Resource Block (PRB) utilisation above 80%, with the proposed benchmark set at not more than 1%. TRAI describes PRB utilisation as a way to monitor whether radio resources are becoming persistently congested. The thinking behind the proposal is straightforward: specialised network slices should not result in inadequate capacity for other users. The draft also proposes that a service provider planning to create a new 5G network slice submit details of proposed and existing slice parameters to TRAI at least 21 days in advance, demonstrating sufficient capacity in the relevant cells. For 5G operators, this could bring network-slice planning much closer to regulatory and quality of service teams rather than leaving it only as a network-engineering decision. 3. New Silence Call Rate Parameter TRAI has proposed a new Silence Call Rate parameter with a benchmark of ≤1%. A silence call is a situation where a voice call remains connected but usable speech is not heard as expected. TRAI says such instances have been observed during drive tests and have also been reported by consumers. The current quality of service Regulations do not contain a dedicated silence-call benchmark. If adopted, operators would have another measurable voice-quality parameter to monitor and report. For network teams, this may require closer examination of call-performance data rather than relying only on more familiar parameters such as call setup success or dropped calls. 4. Mean Time-To-Repair for Wireline Broadband The Consultation Paper proposes adding a Mean Time-To-Repair (MTTR) requirement for broadband delivered over wireline media. TRAI notes that an MTTR benchmark already exists for access service (wireline) but was omitted for broadband (wireline) when the 2024 framework was prepared. The proposed benchmark is ≤10 hours, assessed quarterly. This proposal could have a direct operational effect on fibre, copper and cable broadband providers if finalised. Fault-ticket systems, field teams, restoration processes and escalation mechanisms may all need to produce reliable evidence of repair times. 5. Faster Resolution of Billing and Charging Complaints The existing provision referred to resolution of billing or charging complaints within four weeks. TRAI now proposes reducing that period to one week, while keeping the benchmark at 100%. This is a proposal with a clear customer-service impact. If adopted, affected providers would need to examine whether their current complaint-management workflow allows billing disputes, charging issues, and related monetary complaints to be investigated and closed within the shorter period. 6. Changes Relating to Significant Network Outages The draft also revisits the treatment of significant network outages. For wireless access services, the proposal would cover an event where service in a district remains unavailable continuously for more than four hours, or where more than 10% of subscribers in a Licensed Service Area experience complete loss of service for more than four continuous hours. For outages continuing beyond 24 hours, the draft provides for proportional rent rebate for applicable post-paid subscribers and validity extension for applicable pre-paid subscribers. Similar concepts appear in the proposed wireline-broadband provisions, although the exact definition and treatment differ by service. Operators should therefore study the actual drafting rather than treating “network outage” as a single uniform concept across all services. 7. Quality of Experience Score Traditional quality of service regulation mainly relies on measurable technical benchmarks. TRAI is now proposing an additional consumer-facing layer. The draft would allow TRAI to publish a service-wise Quality of Experience Score (QoES) based on factors relating to network performance, consumer service and consumer perception gathered from multiple sources. The concept could matter commercially as well as regulatorily. A publicly available experience score may influence how consumers, enterprises and other stakeholders compare service providers. For operators, this would make customer experience, complaint handling and perceived service quality more closely connected to public regulatory reporting. What Are the Revised Deadlines for Comments and Counter-Comments? According to the 25 August 2026 PIB and TRAI press releases: Submission Original Date Date Announced on 25 August 2026 Extension Comments 26 August 2026 2 September 2026 7 days Counter-comments 7 September 2026 15 September 2026 8 days TRAI said the extension was granted after considering requests received from industry associations and stakeholders. There is, however, an official-site discrepancy that businesses should check before relying on the second date. TRAI's homepage currently displays 2 September 2026 for comments and 15 October 2026 for counter-comments. The individual consultation page lists a 2 September closing date. Until TRAI clarifies or publishes a later formal extension, the safest course is to verify the live deadline directly with the Authority before submitting counter-comments. What Is the Difference Between Comments and Counter-Comments? The two stages serve different purposes. Comments are the first substantive responses to the Consultation Paper. A service provider, industry association or other stakeholder can examine the proposed clauses, explain whether it agrees or disagrees, identify implementation issues and provide technical or regulatory justification. Counter-comments come later. They allow stakeholders to consider positions raised by others and respond where further clarification, disagreement or additional evidence is necessary. The original Consultation Paper asked stakeholders to give paragraph-wise input, comments or counter-comments along with justification and supporting references where available. The consultation should therefore be viewed as a structured policy-feedback exercise rather than a simple yes-or-no vote. Why Did TRAI Extend the Consultation Deadline? TRAI gives a specific reason: requests were received from industry associations and stakeholders seeking an extension. Nothing in the release says that the draft was defective, that its implementation had been postponed, or that TRAI had changed its position on any proposal. Those conclusions should not be drawn from the deadline extension alone. From a business perspective, however, more time can be valuable. The draft deals with network engineering, customer service, regulatory reporting, financial exposure, and public disclosure. A meaningful response may therefore require input from several internal teams rather than only the legal department. Who Should Pay Attention to the TRAI quality of service Consultation? Telecom and Access Service Providers Wireless and wireline access providers have the clearest interest because several proposals deal directly with mobile coverage, network outages, 5G capacity, voice performance and reporting. Broadband Service Providers Wireline broadband businesses should closely review the proposed MTTR requirement, fault-incidence calculations, network-outage provisions, billing complaint timelines and reporting changes. 5G Network and Engineering Teams Network-slicing proposals are technical enough that regulatory teams may not be able to assess them alone. Network planners may need to examine PRB utilisation, capacity thresholds and the proposed 21-day advance information requirement. Customer-Service and Billing Teams A proposed reduction in the billing/charging complaint-resolution period from four weeks to one week could require changes to escalation, investigation and account-adjustment processes. Regulatory, Compliance and Legal Teams These teams need to ensure that business responses distinguish between current law and proposed provisions, and that any objection is supported by operational or technical evidence. The existing 2024 Regulations apply to specified licensed or authorised service providers, with the application provisions set out in Regulation 1. How Can Stakeholders Submit Comments to TRAI? The 25 August extension release says that comments and counter-comments may be sent electronically to: The original Consultation Paper also asks stakeholders to justify their input and, where available, provide supporting references. TRAI's consultation webpage additionally displays an Add/View Comments facility requiring login. Businesses should check the live consultation page and submission instructions immediately before filing. Does This Deadline Extension Create a New Compliance Requirement? No. The deadline-extension notice itself does not create a new substantive quality of service compliance requirement. That is one of the most important points in this update. Three things must be kept separate: Stage Legal Position 2024 quality of service Regulations Existing regulatory framework currently in force 5 August 2026 Consultation Paper Proposed amendments open for stakeholder feedback Final 2026 Amendment Not the same as the consultation will depend on subsequent TRAI action The Consultation Paper contains a draft notification titled the proposed First Amendment Regulations, 2026, and the draft currently refers to 1 October 2026 as its proposed commencement date. That date is part of the draft text and should not be presented as the effective date of a final regulation unless TRAI formally notifies the amendment. The correct approach for businesses right now is to review, comment, and prepare not to treat every draft provision as already binding. Is Submission of Comments to TRAI Mandatory? The consultation notice does not say that every regulated entity is legally required to submit comments. Submitting comments is a form of participation in the regulatory consultation. That is different from complying with an existing quality of service benchmark or filing a mandatory performance report. A service provider may still have a strong commercial reason to participate. If a proposal creates technical difficulty, raises implementation concerns, or needs clearer drafting, the consultation is the stage at which those concerns can be placed on record. But failure to comment should not be described as a quality of service violation merely because an organisation chose not to participate. What Should Businesses Review Before Making a TRAI Submission? A useful submission should start with the exact proposed clause rather than a general objection. For each relevant amendment, businesses should examine the existing requirement, TRAI's proposed language, technical feasibility, availability of reliable data, system changes needed, implementation time, impact on network operations, effect on consumers and possible cost consequences. For example, an operator assessing the proposed 98% coverage-map accuracy benchmark may need input from radio-network planning, GIS and drive-test teams. A company responding to the one-week billing complaint proposal will need operational information from customer service, billing and dispute-resolution functions. The point is to show why a provision works or does not work—not simply to state that it is difficult. How Should Businesses Prepare an Effective TRAI Consultation Response? A practical response can follow a simple sequence: Identify the exact paragraph or draft provision being addressed. State clearly whether the stakeholder agrees, disagrees, or proposes modification. Explain the technical, operational or consumer basis for the position. Add supporting data or references where reliable evidence is available. Explain foreseeable implementation difficulties without exaggeration. Suggest workable wording or an alternative approach where possible. Check that claims made by different internal teams do not conflict. Submit the final response using TRAI's applicable instructions and within the confirmed deadline. This is practical preparation guidance, not a statutory filing checklist. What Should Telecom Businesses Do Before 2 September 2026? With the comment’s deadline stated as 2 September 2026, affected stakeholders have very little time left to complete their review. Businesses that intend to participate should first identify which proposals actually affect their network or operations. There is little value in submitting broad observations on every clause if only a few provisions create a real issue. Technical comments should be checked by the relevant network or systems team. Consumer-service proposals should be validated with operational teams. Legal and regulatory teams should review the final wording to ensure it does not confuse existing obligations with proposed ones. The final response should then be internally approved and sent using TRAI's official submission mechanism. What Should Stakeholders Do Before the Counter-Comment Deadline? Counter-comments require a different exercise. Once stakeholder comments are available, businesses should examine whether another submission raises an issue affecting their position. A counter-comment may be useful where another proposal would materially affect network design, compliance processes, competition, consumer experience or implementation feasibility. Not every stakeholder needs to respond to every comment. Given the present discrepancy between the 15 September date in Press Release No. 115/2026 and the 15 October date shown on TRAI's homepage, organisations planning to file counter-comments should verify the deadline directly with TRAI. TRAI quality of service Consultation Timeline Date Development Meaning 2 August 2024 quality of service Regulations notified Principal regulatory framework 1 October 2024 2024 Regulations came into force Existing rules became operational 5 August 2026 Draft amendment Consultation Paper released Stakeholder consultation opened 26 August 2026 Original comments date Superseded by extension 25 August 2026 Extension announced More time provided 2 September 2026 Revised comments deadline Current comments date shown by TRAI 7 September 2026 Original counter-comments date Superseded by extension release 15 September 2026 Counter-comments date stated in Press Release 115 Verify before filing due to site discrepancy 15 October 2026 Date currently displayed on TRAI homepage Official-site discrepancy requiring confirmation The underlying 2024 Regulations were notified on 2 August 2024 and came into force on 1 October 2024. The 2026 consultation and subsequent extension are confirmed by TRAI and PIB. What Could the Proposed Financial Disincentive Changes Mean? This part needs particularly careful wording because the amounts appear in the draft amendment, not in a final 2026 regulation. TRAI proposes separating different types of non-compliance more clearly. Proposed Regulation 16A deals with incorrect compliance reports. The draft provides for a financial disincentive of up to โน2 lakh per benchmark per compliance report for a first contravention, up to โน5 lakh for a second consecutive false report for the same parameter, and up to โน10 lakh for subsequent consecutive cases. The draft also proposes treating a sufficiently large mismatch between reported and assessed data as false reporting in the circumstances specified. Proposed Regulation 16B would address certain other provisions not already covered by specified financial-disincentive clauses. The proposal provides for up to โน5 lakh per instance, potentially increasing to โน8 lakh for a second consecutive contravention and โน10 lakh for later consecutive contraventions. The draft also proposes that failure to submit a compliance report within three months of its due date could attract a financial disincentive up to โน10 lakh per report. Again, these figures are proposals under consultation. They should not be described as newly effective penalties. What Happens After TRAI Receives the Comments and Counter-Comments? TRAI can consider stakeholder submissions as part of its regulatory review. That does not mean every suggestion will be accepted. TRAI may retain a proposal, revise it, remove it, or alter its wording before issuing any final regulation. The final amendment may therefore differ from the 5 August draft. Businesses should avoid redesigning their compliance framework solely on the assumption that every draft clause will survive unchanged. At the same time, proposals with potentially substantial operational consequences should be assessed early so implementation does not begin only after the final notification. Could the Consultation Lead to Future quality of service Compliance Changes? Yes. That is precisely why the consultation deserves attention. The proposals deal with matters that could require changes to network monitoring, complaint systems, regulatory reporting, GIS coverage maps, 5G capacity management and consumer-facing processes. A 5G operator may need different PRB reporting. A broadband company may need tighter fault-restoration monitoring. A customer-service team may need to process billing complaints much faster. Regulatory teams may need stronger validation before submitting quality of service data. But these are future compliance possibilities based on the current draft. They are not yet final requirements. Impact of the Proposed Changes on Telecom Businesses If the proposals are finalised substantially in their present form, their effect is unlikely to remain confined to regulatory teams. Network operations may face tighter monitoring of congestion, outages, silent calls and fault restoration. IT and data teams may need to improve the accuracy and traceability of quality of service information. GIS and radio-planning teams could have greater responsibility for published coverage information. Customer-service teams may face shorter complaint-resolution periods. Finance and billing teams may need dependable processes for rebates, validity extensions and customer adjustments. Management teams may need stronger assurance that compliance reports are based on validated data, especially where inaccurate reporting could carry separate financial consequences. The wider message is that quality of service regulation is becoming increasingly linked to the actual consumer experience rather than remaining only a set of network-level engineering metrics. Is the TRAI Deadline Extension Helpful for the Telecom Industry? For a consultation of this technical depth, additional time is useful. The proposed amendments touch radio networks, broadband operations, consumer complaints, financial exposure, reporting, and 5G architecture. A meaningful response can require coordination between people who normally work in separate functions. The extension allows businesses to improve the quality of their submissions and gives industry associations more room to consolidate member views. There is still a burden. Analysing a 200-plus-page Consultation Paper, testing proposals against network data and obtaining internal approvals can demand substantial effort, especially within a short response period. Even so, consultation-stage effort is usually more useful than raising implementation concerns only after a provision has been finalised. The real value of the extension lies in giving stakeholders a better opportunity to put specific, evidence-based concerns before the regulator. Business and Regulatory Perspective TRAI's draft shows how telecom regulation is moving alongside changes in network technology. The 2024 framework already created a consolidated quality of service structure. The 2026 proposals look at problems that have become clearer during implementation and at newer issues such as commercial 5G network slicing. TRAI specifically notes that network-slice services have begun to emerge on 5G Standalone networks in India, prompting examination of their possible impact on ordinary subscribers. The coverage-map proposal follows a similar logic. Publishing a map is useful only if customers can reasonably rely on it. TRAI therefore wants the regulatory focus to shift from simply making coverage information available towards assessing whether that information is accurate. For businesses, the direction is clear even before the final amendment: regulatory evidence will increasingly depend on measurable, auditable and consumer-relevant data. What Telecom and Broadband Businesses Should Monitor Next Businesses should watch the TRAI consultation page rather than treating the 25 August extension notice as the end of the process. The immediate items to monitor are publication of stakeholder comments, confirmation of the correct counter-comment deadline and any additional clarification issued by TRAI. After the consultation closes, attention should shift to any final amendment notification. At that point, businesses should compare the final text against the August draft clause by clause. Effective dates, transition arrangements, and technical specifications should be taken only from the final official document. Where a proposed provision is changed or dropped, internal planning should be adjusted accordingly. How Corpseed Can Help with TRAI and Telecom Regulatory Compliance? Telecom regulation often involves more than reading the wording of a notification. A proposed quality of service rule may need to be checked against network systems, operational data, reporting procedures and existing authorisations before its real business impact becomes clear. Corpseed can support businesses through relevant telecom regulatory compliance services, including regulatory applicability assessment, TRAI notification and consultation-paper review, compliance-gap assessment, regulatory research, documentation support, proposed-rule impact analysis and ongoing compliance monitoring. For a consultation such as this one, support can also focus on organising regulatory requirements, identifying business functions affected by individual proposals and reviewing documentation before a representation or response is finalised. Professional support cannot guarantee that TRAI will accept a stakeholder's position. Its value lies in helping the business prepare a clear, consistent and evidence-based regulatory response and understand what may need to change if the proposals are eventually notified.
Subject
Telecom Authorisation Rules 2026: New DoT Compliance GuideSummary: The Telecommunications (Authorisation for Telecommunication Network) Rules, 2026, notified by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on 20th July 2026, set out a brand-new authorisation system for anyone who wants to build, run, maintain, or expand a telecom network in India. If you are a telecom infrastructure company, an internet exchange operator, a satellite gateway provider, a cloud-hosted network provider, or a business exploring mobile number portability services, this notification changes how you apply for approval, what fees you pay, and what compliance obligations you must follow going forward. These rules have brought a change in the licensing procedure, and the new system of “authorizations” has been introduced based on the Telecommunications Act, 2023. Those businesses that fail to change their procedures and requirements in accordance with the new rules may face difficulties, as well as rejections of their applications. Expert advice on regulation compliance will ensure a smooth transition for you. Key Highlights (Bullet Points) The Ministry of Communications, Department of Telecommunications, notified the Telecommunications (Authorisation for Telecommunication Network) Rules, 2026 vide G.S.R. 644(E), dated 20th July 2026. These rules are made under Section 56 of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 (44 of 2023), read with Section 3(1)(b) and 3(6) of the Act. A draft of these rules was first published on 9th October 2025 (G.S.R. 746(E)) inviting public objections and suggestions, which were considered before finalising the rules. The rules came into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, i.e., 20th July 2026. Six categories of authorisation are created: Infrastructure Provider, Digital Connectivity Infrastructure Provider, Internet Exchange Point Provider, Satellite Earth Station Gateway Provider, Cloud-Hosted Telecommunication Network Provider, and Mobile Number Portability Provider. The first five authorisations apply to the national area (all of India); Mobile Number Portability authorisation applies to a zonal area (India divided into two zones). Applications must be submitted through a central government portal, accompanied by a processing fee and an auditor's eligibility certificate. Only Mobile Number Portability Provider authorisation carries an annual authorisation fee (1% of Adjusted Gross Revenue, or 30% of the applicable entry fee, whichever is higher); the other five authorisation types have no authorisation fee. Every authorisation is valid for a maximum of 20 years (10 years for Mobile Number Portability), and is granted on a non-exclusive basis. Entities cannot hold overlapping licenses or authorisations covering the same telecom network scope and area. The guidelines include strict security requirements such as the board’s majority Indian citizenship, foreigner security checks, data localization in India, and trusted source/trusted product criteria for telecommunications equipment. These regulations outline the procedures for renewal, transfer, cancellation, and surrender of authorization. The Regulatory Framework Before going further, here are a few terms explained. Telecommunications Act, 2023 is the central law that governs how telecom networks and services are authorised, regulated, and controlled in India. It replaced the older telegraph-era licensing framework. Authorisation (as used in these rules) is the government's formal permission to establish, operate, maintain, or expand a telecommunication network. It is similar to what used to be called a "license" under the old system, but now covers a wider, more structured set of categories. New Authorised Entity means any company that has obtained authorisation under Section 3(1) of the Act, or has migrated its existing licence to the terms of an authorisation under Section 3(6) of the Act. Portal refers to the DoT's digital platform through which applications, reports, and communications under these rules are submitted and processed. Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), relevant only for Mobile Number Portability providers, is the revenue figure (after specific deductions like dividend income, interest income, and capital gains) on which the annual authorisation fee is calculated. Applicable Act, Authority, and Purpose These guidelines have been formulated by the Central Government (Department of Telecommunications) in terms of Sections 56(1) and 56(2)(a) and (d) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023, along with Sections 3(1)(b) and 3(6). They are formulated to prescribe the terms and conditions for granting authorisations to establish, operate, maintain and expand the telecommunication networks and also for providing a uniform process for transition from licences to authorisations. Scope and Industries Covered The rules apply to: Companies seeking to build passive telecom infrastructure (towers, ducts, right of way). Companies providing digital connectivity infrastructure (wireline networks, radio access networks, wireless LANs, transmission links). Internet Exchange Point operators. Satellite earth station gateway operators. Cloud-hosted telecom network providers (virtualised, software-based network functions). Mobile Number Portability service providers. What Has Changed Earlier, telecom networks in India were largely governed under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and licenses issued under it. The 2026 Rules formally shift this to an authorisation-based system under the Telecommunications Act, 2023, with clearly defined categories, a digital portal-driven process, and updated fee structures. Aspect Earlier Regime (Indian Telegraph Act, 1885) New Regime (Telecommunications Rules, 2026) Legal basis Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Telecommunications Act, 2023 Approval type License / Letter of Intent Authorisation (6 defined categories) Application process Manual/departmental process Fully through a central government portal Categories of authorisation Not separately defined this way Infrastructure, Digital Connectivity Infra, IXP, Satellite Gateway, Cloud-Hosted Network, Mobile Number Portability Overlapping approvals Not explicitly restricted in this manner New authorised entity cannot hold overlapping license/authorisation of the same scope and area Authorisation fee Fee structures under old license terms No fee for 5 categories 1% of AGR (or 30% of entry fee, whichever is higher) only for Mobile Number Portability Duration Varied by license type Maximum 20 years (10 years for Mobile Number Portability) Data storage Not uniformly mandated in this form All network data, logs, and information must be stored within India Security vetting Existing but less structured Mandatory MHA security vetting for foreign nationals in key roles, done annually Trusted product sourcing Existing guidelines Formalised under a designated authority (National Cyber Security Coordinator) with a defined process Pending license applications (pre-2026) Processed under Telegraph Act Lapse if license wasn't issued before these rules commenced, unless reapplied under new rules Key takeaway: If your business held a pending application or letter of intent under the old Telegraph Act framework and the licence was not issued before 20th July 2026, that letter of intent has lapsed you now need to reapply under the new authorisation process. However, fees already paid can be adjusted. Implementation Timeline Effective Date: These rules came into force on 20th July 2026, the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. Background timeline: The draft rules were first published on 9th October 2025, with a 30-day window for objections and suggestions from the public, which the Central Government has now considered before finalising the rules. Renewal deadline: Entities must apply for renewal of authorisation at least 12 months before expiry, along with the prescribed processing fee. Reporting deadlines: Annual disclosures (equity details, controlling persons, compliance confirmation) must be submitted every year in the form and by the date specified on the portal shareholding changes must be reported within 15 days company name changes within 30 days. Guarantee renewal: Entities must extend the validity of their financial guarantee at least one month before its expiry, without waiting for a government reminder. Applicability trigger: Any new applicant for telecom network authorisation, and any existing licensee migrating from the old Telegraph Act regime, is covered from the effective date. Required action: Businesses should also identify which of the six authorisation categories applies to their operations, register on the DoT portal, and prepare the auditor's eligibility certificate before applying. Why Was This Implemented? The Government's objective behind these rules is to modernise and streamline telecom sector regulation under the new Telecommunications Act, 2023 framework: Ease of doing business objective: Moving to a fully digital, portal-based authorisation system is intended to make applications, renewals, and reporting faster and more transparent compared to the older manual licence process. National security objective: The rules also introduce structured security vetting for foreign nationals in leadership roles, mandatory data localisation, and a trusted sources/trusted products framework to safeguard India's telecom infrastructure. Regulatory clarity objective: By defining six distinct authorisation categories with clear scopes, the rules reduce ambiguity about what activities each type of authorisation permits. Fair competition objective: Non-exclusive authorisation, prohibition on overlapping licenses, and fair and non-discriminatory infrastructure-sharing requirements aim to promote healthy competition among telecom network providers. Revenue and fiscal objective: The Adjusted Gross Revenue-based fee scheme applicable to the Mobile Number Portability service providers and the entry fees and guarantees as provided under Schedule A ensure the standardised revenue framework applicable to this particular category. Migration objective: The provisions ensure a systematic approach to migration of the licensees licensed under the old Telegraph Act to the new licensing regime without affecting their existing rights and responsibilities. Impact on Businesses The notification will have varying implications across the industrial ecosystem, affecting business expansion plans, supply chains, investment decisions, and compliance strategies for multiple stakeholders. Manufacturers and Telecom Equipment Suppliers: Manufacturers, vendors, and suppliers of telecom equipment must ensure their products meet the trusted sources and trusted products requirements, since new authorised entities can only procure and install trusted products, and non-compliant suppliers risk being blocked. Importers and Exporters: Businesses importing telecom hardware or software for use in Indian networks must factor in the trusted-source approval process before their equipment can be deployed in any authorised telecom network. Branding Organizations: Enterprises that brand telecommunication services through partner infrastructure or connectivity platforms must ensure that their partners have valid and non-conflicting authorization to prevent any disruptions to the services. MSMEs and New Startups: Emerging enterprises that participate in infrastructure sharing, Internet exchange points, and cloud-based networks can take advantage of zero authorizations for five out of six categories, despite having to satisfy certain criteria. Large Enterprises: Established telecom players need to review whether any of their existing licenses overlap with a new authorisation they intend to apply for, since overlapping approvals are not permitted and existing overlapping licenses must be relinquished. Traders, Distributors, and Retailers: Businesses that depend on stable connectivity infrastructure from authorised entities should monitor their providers' compliance status, since revocation or suspension of an authorisation requires the network to be maintained only until a specified effective date. OEMs and Service Providers: OEMs supplying telecom equipment and system integrators offering managed telecom services must maintain detailed supply chain, software update, and command log records as mandated under the security conditions. Operationally, businesses must build in time for portal-based applications and audits legally, non-compliant equipment sourcing or overlapping authorisations risk rejection or blocklisting financially, the Mobile Number Portability category involves significant entry fees and guarantees, and from a documentation standpoint, auditor certifications are now a mandatory part of nearly every stage: application, annual reporting, and fee computation. How Businesses Will Achieve Compliance? Follow this roadmap if your business is applying for, or already holds, a telecom network authorisation: Identify the correct authorisation category. Determine whether your business needs Infrastructure Provider, Digital Connectivity Infrastructure Provider, Internet Exchange Point Provider, Satellite Earth Station Gateway Provider, Cloud-Hosted Telecommunication Network Provider, or Mobile Number Portability Provider authorisation. Eligibility Criteria. Check whether the company satisfies all the norms of compliance to FDI, has an excellent record, has no dues pending and does not have any other overlapping license/authorization. Portal Registration. Register your company in the portal maintained by DoT for obtaining authorization, security clearance and trustworthy product. Documents. Make ready the auditor’s certificate regarding the eligibility along with the company's registration and shares documents. Application and Processing Fee. Apply and pay the non-refundable processing fee as per Schedule A. Letter of Intent compliance. On receiving a Letter of Intent, pay the entry fee and submit the required unconditional guarantee (where applicable) within the specified terms. Testing and technical conformity. Ensure telecom equipment and networks conform to applicable standards, and be ready for performance testing by the government or designated agency. Security vetting and Trusted Source/Trusted Product registration. Undergo full security vetting by the Ministry of Home Affairs for foreign personnel occupying key positions, and register with the authorized agency as a Trusted Source and Trusted Product user before procurement of equipment. Approval for sensitive areas. Seek prior approval before setting up telecom networks in sensitive areas as per government guidelines. Renewals. Renew before expiry of 12 months from the date of authorization with the appropriate application fees. Reporting. Provide annual disclosures, report changes in shareholding, and any other information required by the Central Government. Record keeping. Keep command logs, software update logs, and supply chain records for the specified time periods (12 months for real-time logs and 24 months for digital logs of command logs; 6 years for billing and accounting records). Common compliance mistakes to avoid: Applying for a new authorisation without first relinquishing an overlapping existing license. Assuming a pending Telegraph Act-era letter of intent automatically carries over it lapses if the license wasn't issued before 20th July 2026. Overlooking the requirement to store all network data, logs, and information within India. Failing to renew the financial guarantee at least one month before its expiry. Deploying telecom equipment before checking whether it falls under a category requiring trusted-source approval. Practical tip: Before applying, map your current business activities against the six authorisation categories carefully; several rules explicitly restrict entities from operating outside the scope of their authorisation. Benefits for Businesses The new authorisation regime streamlines compliance, while at the same time establishing a system where telecom companies can work and invest more openly and efficiently. Compliance helps keep you out of any legal troubles or breach proceedings. Eliminates legal risks and penalties via compliance obligations as opposed to license conditions. Zero authorisation fee for five of the six categories significantly reduces the cost of entry into infrastructure, digital connectivity, internet exchange, satellite gateway, and cloud-hosted network businesses. Market access through a clearer, faster, portal-based approval process compared to the earlier license system. Business continuity through defined renewal, transfer, and migration pathways that protect existing rights and obligations. Fair infrastructure sharing provisions allow businesses to share passive infrastructure, right of way, and network capacity on fair, non-discriminatory terms with other authorised entities. Operational efficiency from a single, standardised digital portal handling applications, reporting, and compliance submissions. Right Decision or Additional Burden? This notification indicates a major structural change, and a balanced approach can help businesses to plan accordingly. Benefits: Transitioning to a digitized portal-based authorization process from the previous license approach eliminates certain procedural hassles. Waiver of all authorization fees for five out of the six categories makes it easier for small businesses to venture into infrastructure and connectivity businesses. Non-exclusive authorization conditions and fair-sharing provisions encourage healthy competition. Challenges: New security requirements such as data localization requirements, MHA’s clearance of foreign individuals and procurement of approved trusted sources introduce more compliance requirements that businesses have to be wary of. Businesses with an international supply chain or foreign leadership face the challenge of restriction of overlap between licenses/authorizations. Cost of Compliance vs. Business Readiness: Businesses with good data localization practices and security will face less hassle during compliance compared to businesses using offshore data infrastructure or using unvouched foreign employees. The Impact of This Notification in the Long Run: In the long run, this model will result in a more digitized and transparent telecom authorization process for businesses. Business Opportunities Created Zero-fee entry into infrastructure and connectivity businesses: The exemption of authorisation charges from the categories of Infrastructure Provider, Digital Connectivity Infrastructure Provider, Internet Exchange Point Provider, Satellite Earth Station Gateway Provider and Cloud-based Telecommunication Network Provider has set the stage for new players. Infrastructure sharing agreements: The regulations clearly allow fair and non-discriminatory sharing of passive infrastructure, right of way, and capacity sharing of networks. Cloud-hosted telecom services: The new Cloud-Hosted Telecommunication Network Provider authorisation category creates a formal pathway for businesses offering virtualised, software-based telecom network functions. Trusted product manufacturing and supply: Equipment manufacturers and suppliers that align early with the trusted sources and trusted products framework stand to benefit as authorised entities can only procure trusted products. Compliance and security consulting: Rising demand for security vetting coordination, data localisation architecture, and trusted-source documentation creates opportunities for compliance consultants and technology advisors. Mobile Number Portability services: Though this category carries entry fees and a guarantee requirement, it represents a defined, zone-based business opportunity for eligible companies. Why Choose Corpseed? Navigating six distinct authorisation categories, portal-based applications, security vetting requirements, and a detailed fee and guarantee structure requires more than a surface reading of the notification it requires correctly mapping your business model to the right authorisation scope and preparing documentation that meets DoT's exact requirements. The expert regulatory consultancy professionals at Corpseed can assist telecommunication firms at all levels, from finding the appropriate authorization category to drafting auditor eligibility certificates and portal applications, handling entry fee and guarantee applications, coordinating security vetting and trusted source registrations, and renewals and transfer of licenses from the outdated Telegraph Act licenses. Backed by pan-India assistance, experts in telecom and technology regulation, clear process, and a good history of assisting clients, Corpseed can help businesses avoid the painful experience of rejection of application or non-compliance being detected too late. Corpseed's Core Message A regulatory shift of this scale from license to authorisation, from manual process to digital portal, from general conditions to category-specific technical and security requirements can easily trip up businesses that try to navigate it alone. Waiting until an application is rejected, a guarantee lapses, or a security vetting requirement is missed can cost your business valuable time and market opportunity. Talk to Corpseed's regulatory compliance experts today to get a clear assessment of which authorisation category fits your telecom business, and get end-to-end support for portal registration, documentation, security compliance, and approvals under the Telecommunications (Authorisation for Telecommunication Network) Rules, 2026.
Subject
TEC Notifies Revised Standards for Telecommunication Equipment: What Manufacturers and Telecom Businesses Need to KnowSummary: The Department of Telecommunications (DoT), through the Telecommunication Engineering Centre ( TEC ), has notified five revised standards for telecommunication equipment under the Telecommunications Act 2023, and the Telecommunications (Framework to Notify Standards, Conformity Assessment and Certification) Rules, 2025. The notification comes into effect from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. The revised standards cover Network Management Systems, Micro Duct Optical Fibre Cables, Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Systems and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Systems. Manufacturers, importers, telecom equipment suppliers, testing laboratories and network solution providers should review the updated technical requirements to determine whether their products, testing procedures, and certification processes need to be aligned with the newly notified standards. Why Has TEC Revised These Standards? As telecommunication technologies continue to evolve, technical standards must be updated to keep pace with new network requirements, cybersecurity challenges, and emerging communication systems. The latest notification revises existing TEC standards to support a consistent framework for testing, conformity assessment, and certification of telecom equipment. The revised standards are intended to: Align technical requirements with the Telecommunications Act, 2023 and the Telecommunications (Framework to Notify Standards, Conformity Assessment and Certification) Rules, 2025. Update testing and performance requirements for notified telecommunication equipment. Support uniform conformity assessment and certification across the telecom sector. Introduce revised standards for emerging technologies such as Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Systems and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Systems. Help manufacturers and suppliers ensure that telecom equipment meets the latest regulatory and technical requirements before deployment or certification. What Has Changed Under the Latest TEC Notification? The latest notification revises technical standards for selected telecommunication equipment notified by the Telecommunication Engineering Centre (TEC). The updated standards replace the earlier versions and will apply from the date of publication in the Official Gazette. Earlier Position Revised Position Earlier TEC standards applied to notified telecom equipment. Revised TEC standards have been notified for specified equipment categories. Existing test procedures were based on previous TEC guidelines. Updated Test Guides have been introduced for notified products. Earlier Generic Requirements governed applicable equipment. Revised Generic Requirements now apply to notified telecom equipment. Limited standards for emerging communication technologies. New and updated standards now cover advanced technologies, including quantum-safe communication systems. Revised Technical Requirements for Notified Telecom Equipment The notification revises technical standards for five categories of telecommunication equipment. Businesses dealing with these products should review the updated requirements, and determine whether any changes to product design, testing or certification are required. 1. Network Management Systems (TEC 48101:2026) The revised Test Guide updates the testing framework for Network Management Systems used to monitor and manage telecom networks. Key Compliance Points Follow the revised TEC 48101:2026 Test Guide. Review existing testing procedures. Update technical documentation, where required. 2. Micro Duct Optical Fibre Cables (TEC 85130:2026 & TEC 85131:2026) TEC has revised both the Generic Requirements and Test Guide for Micro Duct Optical Fibre Cables to standardise product specifications and testing. Key Compliance Points Comply with the revised Generic Requirements. Conduct testing as per the updated Test Guide. Review product specifications and quality control processes. 3. Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Systems (TEC 91010:2026) The notification introduces revised Generic Requirements for Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Systems to support secure communication against evolving cyber threats. Key Compliance Points Review system design against TEC 91010:2026. Update technical and security documentation where necessary. Consider the revised requirements during product development and testing. 4. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Systems (TEC 91000:2026) TEC has also notified revised Generic Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Systems used for highly secure encryption key exchange. Key Compliance Points Ensure QKD systems meet the revised technical requirements. Review system specifications before testing or certification. Maintain supporting technical documentation. 5. Review Compliance Before Product Certification Businesses should verify that their products meet the revised TEC standards before initiating conformity assessment or certification activities. Key Compliance Points Identify the revised standards applicable to your products. Update product specifications and technical records. Align testing with the revised TEC standards. Review certification requirements before market deployment. Track future TEC notifications for additional revisions. Who Will Be Affected by the Revised TEC Standards? Not every telecom business will be affected by the notification. However, if your organisation manufactures, imports, tests, certifies, or deploys any of the notified telecom equipment, it's worth reviewing the revised standards to understand whether any updates to your products or compliance processes are required. The notification is particularly relevant for: Manufacturers of telecom equipment Importers and authorised representatives Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) Network Management System (NMS) providers Manufacturers and suppliers of Micro Duct Optical Fibre Cables Telecom testing and certification laboratories Developers of quantum-safe cybersecurity solutions Companies working on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) technologies Telecom operators and network infrastructure providers Key Compliance Considerations for Businesses Although the notification only revises technical standards, businesses should not treat it as a routine update. Companies dealing with the notified equipment should check whether the revised standards affect their existing products, ongoing certification applications, or future product launches. Taking corrective action early can help avoid unnecessary delays during testing, and regulatory approvals. Some practical steps businesses can take include: Check whether any of the revised TEC standards apply to your products. Compare existing product specifications with the updated technical requirements. Wherever changes are required, revise technical documents and product manuals. Ensure product testing is carried out using the latest TEC Test Guides. Confirm certification requirements before manufacturing, importing, or supplying equipment. Maintain compliance records to support future audits or certification activities. Monitor future TEC notifications for additional revisions or implementation guidance. Why Do These Revised Standards Matter? The revised standards are more than just technical updates. They reflect the telecom sector's shift towards stronger network performance, improved product quality and emerging technologies such as quantum-safe communication. For businesses, understanding these changes early can make future testing and certification much smoother. Benefits for businesses include: Fewer delays during product testing and certification. Better alignment with the latest TEC requirements. Improved product quality and market acceptance. Easier compliance under the Telecommunications Act, 2023. Better preparedness for future regulatory and technology updates. Business Impact of the Revised TEC Standards Although the notification does not introduce new approvals or licences, businesses dealing with the notified telecom equipment should review whether the revised standards affect their existing products or future certification plans. Some of the key business implications include: Existing products may need a compliance review if they were designed or tested against earlier TEC standards. Products awaiting certification should be checked against the revised Test Guides to avoid delays during evaluation. Manufacturers introducing new products should build the revised requirements into product design and documentation from the beginning. Testing laboratories and certification bodies will need to evaluate notified products using the updated standards. Businesses working on quantum communication technologies now have clearer technical benchmarks for developing and testing future-ready solutions. Benefits of the Revised TEC Standards The revised standards are expected to improve consistency across the telecom equipment sector while supporting secure and reliable communication infrastructure. Some of the key benefits include: Establishes updated technical benchmarks for notified telecom equipment. Promotes uniform product testing and conformity assessment. Improves product quality, reliability, and interoperability. Supports the adoption of emerging technologies such as quantum-safe communication. Strengthens cybersecurity preparedness within telecom networks. Enhances confidence among buyers, operators and regulators. Creates greater consistency in certification and regulatory compliance. Is This a Right Decision or a Burden? The revised TEC standards are intended to keep India's telecommunications framework aligned with evolving technologies and global security expectations. While businesses may need to update their compliance processes, the notification also offers long-term benefits by promoting standardisation, product quality, and future-ready telecom infrastructure. Why It Is a Positive Step Updates technical standards to reflect advancements in telecom and cybersecurity technologies. Creates a more uniform framework for testing and conformity assessment. Supports the development and deployment of secure telecom infrastructure. Introduces standards for emerging technologies such as Quantum-Safe Cryptographic Systems and Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). Improves product quality, reliability, and interoperability across the telecom ecosystem. Strengthens confidence in certified telecom equipment among regulators, operators and customers. Compliance Challenges for Businesses Manufacturers may need to review existing products against the revised standards. Technical documentation and product specifications may require updates. Testing procedures may need to be aligned with the revised TEC Test Guides. Businesses developing quantum communication technologies must understand newly introduced technical requirements. Product certification timelines may be affected if compliance gaps are identified during testing. Overall Assessment The revised standards do not change how telecom equipment is regulated, but they do change the technical benchmarks that certain products must meet. Businesses dealing with the notified equipment should review the updated requirements early so that testing, certification, and product launches are not affected. A timely review today can prevent compliance issues later. Business Opportunities Created by the Revised TEC Standards The notification is also expected to create new opportunities for businesses working in telecom infrastructure, cybersecurity, optical fibre technology, and next-generation communication systems. Some sectors likely to benefit include: Telecom equipment manufacturers developing products that comply with the latest TEC standards. Testing and certification laboratories supporting conformity assessment activities. Optical fibre cable manufacturers supplying compliant products for expanding telecom infrastructure. Cybersecurity solution providers developing quantum-safe encryption technologies. Quantum communication technology companies working on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) systems. Network Management System providers offering solutions aligned with updated testing requirements. System integrators and OEMs supporting deployment of standards-compliant telecom equipment. Regulatory and compliance consultants assisting businesses with TEC certification , documentation and conformity assessment. How Corpseed Can Help with TEC Compliance The revised TEC standards create new compliance and advisory requirements for manufacturers, importers, OEMs and telecom solution providers. Corpseed offers end-to-end support to help businesses align with the latest technical and certification requirements. 1. TEC Applicability Assessment Determine whether the revised standards apply to your telecom products and identify the applicable compliance requirements. 2. Technical Documentation Support Review and update product specifications, technical files and supporting documents to align with the revised TEC standards. 3. Testing and Certification Assistance Coordinate with recognised laboratories and assist throughout the TEC testing and conformity assessment process. 4. Gap Assessment and Compliance Review Evaluate existing products against the revised Generic Requirements and Test Guides and recommend corrective actions where required. 5. Regulatory Advisory for Telecom Equipment Provide expert guidance on compliance under the Telecommunications Act 2023, TEC, standards and related regulatory requirements. 6. Ongoing Regulatory Monitoring Keep businesses informed about future TEC notifications, revised standards, certification updates, and implementation guidelines.
Subject
Telecommunications (Radio Equipment Possession Authorisation) Rules, 2026 Notified by DoTSummary: The Indian Government has made a new rule about radio equipment. This rule is called the DoT Telecommunications (Radio Equipment Possession Authorisation) Rules, 2026. In simple words, this rule tells us who is allowed to keep, use, buy, sell, rent, repair, test, or show off radio equipment in India, and what steps they must follow to get permission from the government. It also tells us who does NOT need this permission. This rule was made under a bigger law called the Telecommunications Act, 2023, and it came out in the Official Gazette on 8th July 2026. Below, we explain everything in very easy words so that anyone - even a student - can understand what this rule means and why it matters. What are These Rules, and When Did They Start? The Central Government has made a new set of rules called the Telecommunications (Radio Equipment Possession Authorisation) Rules, 2026. These rules come from a bigger law, the Telecommunications Act, 2023. Rule Name: "Telecommunications (Radio Equipment Possession Authorisation) Rules, 2026." These rules started working on the very day they were printed in the Official Gazette (which is like the government's official newspaper). What the Rules Try to Do? These rules build a new online system (using a "portal," which is just a government website) for businesses and other groups that want to keep or use radio equipment for work or technical reasons. The rules cover things like: Who must get permission before keeping radio equipment. Who is allowed to apply for this permission? How to apply - what forms to fill out, which website to use, and what fees to pay. How the government gives, renews, changes, or cancels this permission. Rules about where to keep the equipment, how to test it, how to show it to others, how to throw it away safely, and how to report if something goes wrong. Who does not need this permission at all - like people who already have other licenses, hobby radio users, or normal phone users. In short, these new rules replace old, messy rules (like the ones from the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act of 1933) with one clear, modern system under the new Telecommunications Act, 2023. Who Needs Authorisation, and Who is Eligible? Use cases that need authorisation According to Rule 4(1), if someone wants to keep radio equipment for certain reasons, they must apply for permission first: Group (a): Keeping radio equipment for one or more of these reasons: Making it (manufacturing) Bringing it into India (importing) Selling it Renting it out Fixing it (repair) Testing it Showing it to others (demonstration) Group (b): Keeping radio equipment only for: Bringing it in, buying it, or renting it to test it or show it to someone. So this rule applies to makers, importers, sellers, rental companies, repair shops, testing labs, and demo centres. Who is eligible (Rule 4(2)) People or groups who can apply for this permission include: Companies or LLPs (a type of business), including those with money coming from other countries, as long as they follow India's foreign investment rules and other laws. Individual people, partnership firms, or one-person businesses that already have a valid licence, permit, or registration to run their business. Government bodies - either the Central Government, State Governments, or any group appointed by them to hold radio equipment. People who already hold a licence under an older rule called the Indian Wireless Telegraph (Possession) Rules, 1965. This covers most serious companies and government offices that deal with radio equipment, not just regular people using a phone. How to Apply and What Fees are Involved? Application process (Rule 4(3)) Applications must be done online, on the DoT (Department of Telecommunications) website, called the "portal" (this is explained in Rule 15). When applying, people must give: Details about the radio equipment - its brand, model, and how many pieces. Any other papers or details asked for on the website. Application fee: Everyone must pay Rs. 1,000, and this money will not be given back. If the equipment can block or disturb other telecom signals (like jammers), the person must also show proof that they already got special permission under Section 48 of the Telecommunications Act. What happens to old pending applications Rules 4(4) and 4(5) talk about old, unfinished applications made under the earlier 1933 law: If someone applied for a licence under the old 1933 law but never actually got the licence before these new rules started, that old application is now cancelled automatically. Such people can apply again, but under the new rules. Any fee they already paid earlier can be counted towards the new fee. They only need to pay the extra amount, if any. This basically brings everyone into the new system and clears out old, pending paperwork. How is authorisation granted and its Duration? Grant of authorisation (Rule 5) After someone applies under Rule 4, the government can: Check the application as thoroughly as it wants to make sure the person is eligible. Ask for more information if needed. For Group (a) applicants (manufacture/import/sale/hire/repair/testing/demo), the government may also do a security check, following the steps listed on the website. If satisfied, the government sends an "offer letter" through the website. This letter tells the applicant: What conditions they still need to meet. The full fee they must pay for the entire time period of the permission. Authorisation fee (this money is not refunded): Rs. 10,000 per year for Group (a) permissions. Rs. 2,000 per year for Group (b) permissions (only testing/demo), with a smaller amount charged if the time period is less than a year, but never less than Rs. 500. Once all conditions are met and the fee is fully paid, the government grants permission. This permission will clearly state: Details of the radio equipment (brand, model, quantity). The address where the equipment must be kept. How the equipment should be tested. Rules for demonstrating or showing the equipment. The start date and how long the permission lasts. What the permission is for, whether it's for making/importing/selling/renting/repairing/testing/showing, or a mix of these, or just importing/buying/renting for testing/demo. Duration (Rule 6) For Group (a) permissions: at least 1 year and up to 5 years. For Group (b) permissions: up to 12 months. Renewal (Rule 7) For Group (a) permissions: The renewal application must be sent at least one month before the old permission ends, through the website. If someone misses this deadline, they can still ask for more time. The government may allow it if there is a good reason, but a late fee will apply. When renewed, the new permission lasts as long as stated in Rule 6 and must follow whatever rules and laws are active on the website at that time. Who is Exempt and Does Not Need Authorisation? Rule 10 lists people who do NOT need this new permission: People who already have a licence, registration, or permission under the older Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, or the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933, and are still following those older rules under the new Act's Section 3(6). People who already have permission under some other rule of the new Act, where that rule doesn't ask for this kind of possession permission. People who already have general exemptions under Section 3(3) or Section 4(6) of the Act. People who have exemptions specifically for radio equipment under Section 3(4) or Section 4(7) of the Act. People who already have spectrum (radio frequency space) given to them under Sections 4(4), 4(8), or 4(9). Hobby (amateur) radio operators who hold an Amateur Station Operator Certificate under the Telecommunications (Amateur Services) Rules, 2024. People who own radio equipment that can only hold up to four SIM cards. Ordinary users who can show proof that they are already customers of a telecom company. Important note: People on this exempt list are NOT allowed to manufacture, sell, or rent out radio equipment. They can only use the equipment they already legally have. Conditions and Obligations for Authorised Entities? Rules 8 and 9 explain the responsibilities that come with getting this permission. Who can receive possession (Rule 8) A Group (a) permission-holder can only hand over the equipment to: someone listed under Rule 10 (the exempt people), or someone who also has permission under these rules. A Group (b) permission-holder (testing/demo only) cannot hand the equipment to anyone else at all. This restriction does not apply when equipment is being properly disposed of under Rule 12. General terms and conditions (Rule 9) A person or company with this permission must: Keep the radio equipment safely, exactly as described in the permission papers. Continue to meet the eligibility rules the whole time they hold the permission. Make sure the equipment doesn't break any law, is used only for its permitted purpose, and doesn't cause any safety or health danger. Make sure the equipment follows any technical standards the government sets from time to time. Tell the government immediately, through the website, if their name, address, or contact details change. Keep an updated list of: All the radio equipment they own, Papers, accounts, estimates, and reports about the equipment, And any other information the website asks for. Help the government or its officers when they come to check the equipment physically. Immediately report on the website if any equipment is lost, stolen, or misused. Testing and demonstration rules When testing or showing radio equipment: If the equipment doesn't send out radio waves, or sends very weak ones (up to 100 milliwatts), then: The testing/demo must not disturb anyone else's telecom equipment, network, or service. They also cannot complain if someone else's signal disturbs theirs. If the equipment sends out stronger signals (more than 100 milliwatts), it must follow the terms of whatever spectrum permission was already given under the law. "Interference" means unwanted signals messing up someone else's radio reception, causing errors or loss of information. Non-transferability This permission cannot be given, sold, or passed on to someone else - not even partly, and not directly or indirectly. No agreement or partnership can be made to transfer it either - unless the government specially allows it under conditions it decides. This matters a lot for businesses going through mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring. Surrender and Disposal Surrender (Rule 11) If a company wants to give up (surrender) its permission, it must apply at least 30 days before the date it wants to stop, through the website. The application must include proof that all dues (money owed) have been paid up to that date, along with any other information asked for. The government can approve the surrender, but the company must still follow the disposal rules (Rule 12) and pay any remaining dues. Disposal (Rule 12) Rule 12 has a table that lists different situations (like when a permission expires or is cancelled) and how much time the company gets to get rid of ("dispose of") safely the radio equipment in each situation. Disposal must be done safely and legally, and the company must update its records and the website to show it has been done. Why did DoT Come Up with These Rules, and What Need They Address? Modernising regulatory control Radio and telecom technology have changed a lot over time. The old rules from 1885 and 1933 were made a very long time ago and were not designed for today's advanced radio equipment. The new Telecommunications Act, 2023, wants modern rules that properly manage: Who possesses radio equipment. How it is used. How it is safely thrown away. How to stop people from misusing it. Managing interference, security, and safety Radio equipment, if not controlled, can: Disturb licensed telecom networks. Be misused for illegal communication or signal-jamming. Become dangerous to people's safety or health. So the government needs one central system to know who has what equipment, where it is kept, and why - and to make sure everyone follows proper safety standards and reports problems quickly. Formalising business ecosystems Many companies - manufacturers, importers, testing labs, and system builders - handle radio equipment in loose or informal ways today. These new rules: Put them under one clear legal system. Make everyone's duties very clear. Help the government enforce the law fairly and keep the market disciplined. Impact on Businesses in India and How They Benefit Directly affected businesses Companies that make radio equipment (like base stations, radios, and testing tools). Companies that import or distribute radio equipment. Repair shops and equipment rental companies. Testing and certification labs. Companies that build systems using radio parts, such as IoT devices or private networks. Government departments running technical radio projects. Benefits Clear rules: Now there is one simple set of rules explaining who needs permission, who doesn't, how to apply, and what must be followed. Predictable process and costs: The application fee (Rs. 1,000) and the permission fees (Rs. 10,000 or Rs. 2,000 per year) are all clearly written down, along with how long permissions last and how to renew them. Modern online system: Everything - applying, renewing, changing details, surrendering, updating inventory, and reporting problems - can be done through one website. Less confusion: Businesses can now be confident that keeping their radio equipment is fully legal and properly documented, which lowers the risk of trouble with the government later. More trust from customers and investors: Following DoT's rules shows that a company is reliable and trustworthy, which helps its reputation. Burdens New costs, like the authorisation fee. Extra staff time is needed for paperwork, updating the website, and managing inventory lists. Need to carefully track renewal dates so the permission doesn't expire by mistake. Permission cannot automatically be passed on if the company is restructured or sold. Even so, for serious businesses, these efforts are small compared to the risk of operating without any legal permission at all. Is This the Right Decision or Unfair to Telecom Companies? The right decision from a policy standpoint Radio equipment plays a very important role in: Keeping the country safe. Managing spectrum (radio frequency space) properly. Protecting public safety. The old rules were outdated, so these new rules match today's technology and the 2023 law. Importantly, these rules focus on business and technical use of radio equipment - not on regular people using their phones normally. Telecom operators and industry Companies that already have a telecom licence are mostly exempt under Rule 10, as long as they keep following their existing licence conditions. These new rules mainly affect companies handling radio equipment outside of normal telecom operator networks. So, this is not unfair to telecom companies - in fact, it protects them by preventing random or unmanaged radio devices from disturbing their signals. Businesses that were earlier working informally, without proper permission, will feel the biggest change. But this change is fair because it helps prevent signal disturbance, illegal radio use, and safety risks for everyone. Quality, Consumer Satisfaction and Environmental Conditions Quality and reliability Having to follow official technical standards will improve the overall quality of radio equipment. Keeping proper inventory and records will help companies manage their equipment better and more responsibly. Consumer satisfaction Less signal interference and fewer illegal radio devices mean telecom services will work more smoothly for everyone. Clear rules help keep network performance steady and reduce sudden, unexplained service problems. Environment and safety The disposal rules and safety conditions encourage companies to properly handle old equipment when it's no longer needed - which is important for reducing electronic waste. These rules also make sure equipment doesn't become dangerous to people's health or safety, protecting workers, the public, and the environment from unsafe or abandoned radio devices. Impact on the Indian Economy and Other Countries Indian economy Good effects: Strengthens how telecom infrastructure is managed, which is very important for India's digital growth. Encourages more companies to work formally and legally in the radio equipment business. Reduces the risk of illegal radio use harming licensed telecom networks, which supports more investment in telecom. Cost: Businesses, especially smaller ones, will have new compliance costs to manage. Overall, clearer rules usually build more confidence among investors and make the telecom sector more stable. Other countries Foreign companies that make or sell radio equipment in India must now follow these rules too, often by working with local Indian partners. Having clear rules makes India a more predictable and trustworthy market, which is attractive to foreign technology companies. Countries that export radio or testing equipment to India may see steady demand, backed by this proper, formal permission system. Business Opportunities for Corpseed Corpseed can offer many helpful services connected to these new rules: Authorisation Application Support Complete, end-to-end help with the online application, including: Checking if a company is eligible. Fill out the forms correctly. Collecting all needed documents (equipment details, business licences). Handling the application fee payment. Regulatory Eligibility and Exemption Advisory Helping businesses figure out: Whether they actually need this permission. Whether they might already be exempt under Rule 10 (like telecom operators, amateur radio users, or simple SIM devices). Inventory and Compliance Systems Setting up tools and processes to: Track radio equipment inventory. Keep proper records and generate reports. Update the government portal regularly and stay compliant. Renewal and Modification Management Keeping track of when permissions are about to expire. Managing renewal applications (including handling late fees if needed). Helping with requests to change permission details under Rule 5(4). Surrender and Disposal Planning Helping companies with: Filing surrender applications. Calculating any dues owed. Planning safe and proper disposal under Rule 12. Training and Capacity Building Running workshops for manufacturers, importers, testing labs, and system integrators, covering: Who needs this permission. How to follow the rules properly. How to avoid causing signal interference. Support for Foreign Entrants Helping foreign companies understand: India's local eligibility rules. The full permission application process. How to partner with Indian companies. M&A and Restructuring Advisory Since permissions cannot be transferred, Corpseed can advise on: How to manage permissions during company acquisitions or restructuring. When and how to request special government approval for a transfer.
Subject
India Updates Rules for Telecom Equipment: 8 New Standards Notified by GovernmentSummary: India's Ministry of Communications has officially released 8 new and updated standards for telecom equipment across the country. These revised rules were issued under the Telecommunication Act, 2023, using powers granted by Section 19, read with Rule 5 of the Telecommunications Framework to Notify Standards, Conformity Assessment and Certification Rules, 2025. The standards apply from the date of publication in the Official Gazette. The 8 telecom equipment and systems covered under this notification are: LAN Switch, Firewall System, Element Management System for Next Generation Networks, Network Management System, Signalling Transfer Point, Signalling Gateway, Trunk Media Gateway, and Fraud Management and Control Centre. Each standard carries a unique TEC number for easy identification and tracking. These updated standards are designed to make sure that internet and telephone networks running across India stay fast, secure, and fully protected from fraud. Companies that make or supply telecom equipment in India must now follow these revised guidelines. This move shows the government's strong push toward building a more reliable and future-ready telecom network for every citizen of the country.
Subject
India Officially Approves TEC 21130:2025 - New 5G Dual Core Standard for Telecom EquipmentSummary: The Government of India just made a big move for better internet! On May 15, 2026, the Ministry of Communications (Department of Telecommunication) officially approved a new rule called TEC 21130:2025 - a standard for 5G Dual Core telecom equipment. Think of it like a safety checklist that all 5G devices must pass before they can be sold or used in India. This was done using the Telecom Act 2023 and the Telecom Rules 2025. This helps make India's 5G network faster, safer, and more reliable for everyone.
Subscribe to Us
Find different law updates directly in your inbox. Subscribe now.