Law Updates

Latest notifications, circulars, orders and compliance changes.

From

Department

Reset

Tip: Use date range and department to narrow down results.

Showing 6 of 26 result(s)

Clear filters

Subject

What will be the impact of BIS Amendments Occupational Safety, Food Storage, and Respiratory Device Standards?

Summary: What BIS has Notified? BIS published this amendment notification on 11 June 2026 under Ref: HQ-PUB015/1/2020-PUB-BIS (1554), signed by Chitra Gupta, Scientist G & DDG (Hallmarking and Training). This notification issues Amendment No. 1 (June 2026) to three existing Indian Standards, meaning these are targeted, surgical updates to existing standards rather than full replacements. Complete Schedule of the Three Amended Standards S. No Standard Title Amendment Effective Date Old Version Valid Until 1 IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 Eye and Face Protection for Occupational Use- Part 1: General Requirements (First Revision) [ISO 16321-1: 2021] Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 2 IS 16144: 2014 Food Grain Storage Godowns- Code of Practice Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 3 IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 Respiratory Protective Devices- Methods of Test and Test Equipment, Part 6: Mechanical Resistance/Strength of Components and Connections (First Revision) [ISO 16900-6: 2021] Amendment No. 1, June 2026 10 June 2026 9 December 2026 Implementation Timeline Gazette notification date: 11 June 2026 Amendment effective date: 10 June 2026 (all three) Concurrent validity: The standards without the amendment remain valid until 9 December 2026 Final compliance deadline: 9 December 2026, after which only the amended versions are recognized The 6-month transition window (10 June → 9 December 2026) is the industry's window to update all products, test reports, certifications, and operational procedures referencing these standards. Standard 1: IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022- Eye and Face Protection for Occupational Use The Standard in Context IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 is India's national standard governing general requirements for eye and face protectors used in occupational settings. It adopts ISO 16321-1: 2021 as the base and covers: Safety spectacles and goggles for industrial, chemical, and general workshop use. Face shields for grinding, welding, and chemical splash protection Welding filters and screens. Lens performance requirements: optical clarity, refractive power, prismatic deviation, light transmission Frame and housing requirements: mechanical strength, material compatibility, resistance to ignition Field of vision requirements Marking and user information requirements The parent IS 8521 Part 1: 2022 was itself the first revision, updating older standards to align with the new ISO 16321 series (which replaced the earlier ISO 16321: 2005 and related parts). Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 makes targeted corrections or additions to specific clauses within the 2022 version. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Since the document provides the metadata (amendment number, dates) but not the clause-level amendment text, the nature of Amendment No. 1 to IS 8521 (Part 1) is inferred from typical BIS amendment practice and the ISO 16321-1: 2021 framework: Corrigenda or clarification to specific clauses that generated industry queries or ambiguity post-2022 publication Updated test method references within the standard typically cross-reference to other parts of IS 8521 or allied IS (e.g., IS 17274 respiratory protection test methods amended in the same batch, suggesting a coordinated update) Material or chemical restriction updates aligning lens or frame material requirements with current REACH or BIS chemical restriction norms Revised marking requirements updated ISI mark placement, user information leaflet content, or shelf-life labelling for anti-fog coatings. Who is Affected? The revised standard will have implications across the personal protective equipment (PPE) ecosystem, affecting not only manufacturers and importers of eye and face protection equipment but also industries where the use of protective eyewear is mandatory under workplace safety regulations. The key stakeholders impacted by this development are outlined below: 1.    Manufacturers of eye and face protection equipment: Industrial safety equipment manufacturers (3M India, Honeywell Safety India, Karam Industries, Mallcom India, Safari Industries, Frontier Safety, dozens of MSMEs across Jalandhar, Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai) Welding equipment manufacturers are producing integrated face shields. Importers of safety spectacles, goggles, and face shields 2.    End-user industries with mandatory PPE compliance: Construction and infrastructure- every construction site under building regulations and Labor Code requires eye protection in specified operations. Mining- DGMS (Directorate General of Mines Safety) mandates eye protection in hazardous zones. Chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing- eye/face protection in chemical handling Metal fabrication and welding- grinding and welding operations Automotive manufacturing- machine operators and assembly workers IT/electronics manufacturing- soldering, chemical etching 3.    Regulatory authorities: DGFASLI (Directorate General Factory Advice Service and Labor Institutes) and Factory Inspectorates who enforce eye protection compliance under the Factories Act and Labor Codes OISD (Oil Industry Safety Directorate) for petroleum sector eye protection requirements DGMS for the mining sector Why BIS Amended this Standard? The amendment to IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 reflects BIS's ongoing efforts to strengthen product quality, improve worker safety, and align Indian standards with evolving industry and regulatory requirements. Several factors are likely to have contributed to the decision to revise the standard, including changes in occupational safety regulations, market surveillance findings, and developments within the PPE manufacturing sector. 1. Occupational Safety is a National Priority: Post-Labour Code Reforms. India's four new Labor Codes, including the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, have shifted the regulatory architecture for worker safety. The implementation of the OSHWC Code and associated rules has created renewed focus on PPE standards: Eye and face injuries are among the most common occupational injuries. Correcting or clarifying IS 8521 Part 1 ensures consistent product quality and enforcement. DGFASLI and State Factory Inspectorates use BIS standards as the reference for PPE compliance audits 2. Market Monitoring Findings:  BIS conducts regular market surveillance (including testing of BIS-certified products). Amendment No. 1 may address: Non-conformity patterns detected in surveillance testing Industry-reported interpretation issues Gaps between IS 8521: 2022 and its ISO 16321-1: 2021 source standard 3. Post-COVID Surge in PPE Manufacturing:  The COVID-19 period saw rapid expansion of PPE manufacturing in India. Many new manufacturers entered the eye protection market, and Amendment No. 1 may tighten specific parameters where new production has shown inconsistency. Impact on Eye and Face Protection Businesses The introduction of Amendment No. 1 to IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022 will also require manufacturers, importers, and end-user organizations to review their existing compliance frameworks and ensure alignment with the revised requirements. While the amendment may not necessitate significant changes for every stakeholder, proactive compliance assessment will be essential before the implementation deadline. 1. For BIS ISI-Certified Manufacturers Must review Amendment No. 1 clauses as published For each amended clause, determine whether: Their current product design and testing already complies. They need to modify product design, materials, or manufacturing process. They need to conduct additional or revised testing. If product modification is required: submit revised test reports to a BIS-designated lab and update BIS licence documentation before 9 December 2026 If no product modification is required: record the compliance verification assessment internally and maintain it as evidence for BIS surveillance inspections. 2. For Importers Importers of eye and face protection products under BIS FMCS (Foreign Manufacturer Certification Scheme) must: Ensure foreign manufacturers are informed of Amendment No. 1 Verify compliance of imported products with amended IS 8521 Part 1 requirements Update FMCS certificate where test reports need updating 3. For End-User Companies Update procurement specifications to reference IS 8521 (Part 1): 2022, including Amendment No. 1 June 2026. When next reviewing PPE vendor approvals, verify that certified products comply with the amended standard. Include amended standard reference in Safety Management System documentation. Standard 2: IS 16144: 2014 Food grain Storage Godowns Code of Practice The Standard in Context IS 16144: 2014 is India's Code of Practice for food grain storage godowns, the primary national standard governing the design, construction, operation, and management of storage facilities for food grains (wheat, rice, pulses, coarse cereals, oilseeds). This standard cover: Structural requirements: Foundation, floor, wall, and roof specifications for grain godowns. Ventilation requirements: Natural and mechanical ventilation to control the temperature and moisture. Moisture and humidity management: Vapor barriers, damp-proof courses, moisture monitoring. Pest management: Fumigation provisions, aeration systems, pest monitoring. Fire safety: Firefighting infrastructure, clearance requirements. Operational requirements: Stacking patterns, stack heights, cleaning protocols. Record keeping: Stock records, quality monitoring, inspection logs. Safety and health: Worker safety in storage operations. This is a 2014 standard, 12 years old, receiving its first amendment. Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 updates specific operational or technical clauses. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Based on the evolving policy and operational landscape in Indian food grain storage, Amendment No. 1 to IS 16144: 2014 most likely addresses: Silo and steel bin storage provisions: India has rapidly expanded scientific bulk storage (steel silos) alongside traditional godown storage. The amendment may add or revise provisions for bin/silo storage operations Fumigation safety updates: Revised protocols for phosphine fumigation, including the updated gas-tight sealing requirements, phosphine monitoring standards, and worker safety protocols (aligned with the current CIBRC and DGFASLI guidance) Cold storage provisions for millets and high-oil grains: Reflecting national policy push for millet production (2023 was International Year of Millets) Digital record-keeping and monitoring provisions: Recognizing that modern warehouse management uses IoT-based temperature, humidity, and CO₂ monitoring Updated fire safety requirements: Potentially updated distances, firefighting equipment specifications. Solar power integration: Provisions for solar panels on godown rooftops are increasingly common and need guidance on installation without compromising structural integrity Who is Affected? The revised standard is expected to impact a wide range of stakeholders involved in the storage, handling, financing, regulation, and insurance of food grains. Both public and private sector entities that operate or rely on warehousing infrastructure will need to assess their compliance with the updated requirements. 1. Direct stakeholders: Food Corporation of India (FCI) operates the largest network of foodgrain storage facilities in the world (over 600 lakh metric tons capacity) Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) and State Warehousing Corporations (SWCs) across all states NAFED, NCCF, and other commodity procurement agencies State civil supplies corporations and state food departments Private warehousing companies (All Cargo, DHL Supply Chain, Mahindra Logistics, hundreds of registered warehouse service providers under WDRA) Commodity traders and agricultural produce traders with licensed storage facilities Cold storage operators storing temperature-sensitive foodgrains and pulses FSSAI-licensed food storage operators (FSSAI references storage standards in its food safety regulations) 2. Indirect stakeholders: Farmers and Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) also using storage facilities for post-harvest management under PM-ASA and other schemes. Banks and NBFCs providing warehouse receipt financing who require IS-compliant storage as a condition of their lending programs. Warehousing Development and Regulatory Authority (WDRA), which requires IS compliance in accredited warehouses Insurance companies providing crop storage insurance using IS compliance as an underwriting consideration. Why BIS Amended IS 16144? The revision of the food grain storage standard reflects the growing need to strengthen India's agricultural storage infrastructure, improve food security, enhance safety practices, and align warehousing systems with emerging national priorities. Several factors are likely to have influenced the decision to update the standard. India's Food Security Imperatives: India manages the world's largest buffer stock of food grains, over 80 million metric tons at peak. Post-harvest storage losses in India have historically been estimated at 5-10% of grain production, billions of kilograms wasted annually due to poor storage. Updating storage standards directly addresses this massive national economic loss. PMGSY / PM-ASA Expansion Creating New Storage Infrastructure:  The Pradhan Mantri Annadata Aay Sanrakshan Abhiyan (PM-AASHA) and expanded MSP procurement are driving the construction of thousands of new primary agricultural market and storage facilities. These new facilities must be built to current standards. PM Gati Shakti and National Logistics Policy: The National Logistics Policy 2022 identified inadequate agricultural storage as a major supply chain bottleneck. The government's Rs 1 lakh crore push for storage infrastructure (announced in Union Budget 2023-24), creating 700 lakh metric tons of decentralized cooperative and PACS-level storage, makes updating the storage code of practice urgent. Fumigation Safety Incidents:  Phosphine fumigation-related deaths and accidents at grain storage facilities have been reported across multiple states. The amendment may tighten safety protocols specifically around confined-space entry, phosphine monitoring equipment requirements, and rescue protocols. Climate Change Resilience:  Higher ambient temperatures and humidity variability, direct consequences of climate change, are stressing existing storage infrastructure. The amendment likely adds guidance on climate-adaptive storage design. Impact on Food Storage Businesses The introduction of Amendment No. 1 to IS 16144:2014 will also require various stakeholders across the warehousing, logistics, agriculture, finance, and insurance sectors to review their existing practices and ensure that compliance with the revised requirements. The amendment is also expected to influence both operational procedures and future infrastructure development. 1. For Government and Public Sector Warehousing FCI, CWC, SWCs, and state food departments must: Review all godowns against Amendment No. 1 requirements by 9 December 2026 Prepare the capital expenditure plans for any structural or operational upgrades. Update their Standard Operating Procedures for storage operations to incorporate amended IS requirements. Train godown managers and warehouse supervisors on updated requirements. 2.    For Private Warehousing and Logistics Companies Companies with WDRA-accredited warehouses must: Verify continued accreditation compliance under amended IS 16144 Update their WDRA accreditation documentation to reference IS 16144: 2014 with Amendment No. 1 Companies applying for new WDRA accreditation after 10 June 2026: Must design and operate per the amended standard from day one 3.    For FPO and PACS Storage Facilities New storage facilities being constructed under PM cooperative storage schemes: Engineering designs must be drawn to IS 16144: 2014 + Amendment No. 1 Project management consultants must include amendment compliance as a design specification. 4.    For Banks and Insurers Banks financing warehouse receipt (pledge/hypothecation) transactions must update their warehouse eligibility criteria to require IS 16144: 2014 + Amendment No. 1 compliance. Insurance companies providing crop storage insurance should add amended IS compliance as a policy condition in new policies issued after 9 December 2026 Standard 3: IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 Respiratory Protective Devices Test Methods, Part 6: Mechanical Resistance/Strength The Standard in Context IS 17274 is India's multi-part standard series for respiratory protective devices (RPDs), the technical backbone of mask, respirator, and breathing apparatus testing in India. It adopts the ISO 16900 series as the base. Part 6 specifically covers test methods for evaluating the mechanical resistance and strength of RPD components and connections, including: Headband and harness testing: Tensile strength, elongation, and durability of head straps Valve testing: Mechanical resistance of inhalation and exhalation valves under cyclic breathing simulation Facepiece connection testing: Mechanical strength of connections between facepiece body, filters, cartridges, and exhalation valves Body strength testing: Resistance to deformation and distortion of the facepiece body. Connector and thread testing: Mechanical integrity of bayonet, screw, and push-fit connections. Drop and impact resistance: Drop test protocols for complete assembled devices. This Part 6 (2023) itself was the first revision, meaning it had already incorporated one round of ISO updates. Amendment No. 1 of June 2026 makes further targeted corrections or updates. What the Amendment Likely Contains? Amendment No. 1 to IS 17274 Part 6 most likely addresses: Coordination with IS 8521 (Part 1) Amendment No. 1: Both are in the same notification batch, strongly suggesting the amendments are technically interlinked. RPD and eye/face protection are often used together in combination PPE configurations. Shared test or marking provisions may need simultaneous updating. Updated test equipment specifications: Revised specifications for tensile testing rigs, cycling breathing machines, or torque measurement equipment Additional test conditions: For RPDs intended for extreme temperature or humidity environments Correction of errors or inconsistencies: Identified since the 2023 publication through PESO, BIS tech committee, or ISO feedback Who is Affected? The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 will impact a broad range of stakeholders involved in the manufacturing, testing, certification, procurement, and use of respiratory protective devices (RPDs). The key affected groups are outlined below: 1. Respiratory protective device manufacturers: Major RPD manufacturers: 3M India, Honeywell Safety Products India, Karam Industries, Venus Safety, Mallcom India, Scott Safety India, and hundreds of MSME manufacturers in Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat, Maharashtra N95 and FFP2/FFP3 respirator manufacturers (COVID-19 expansion created many new manufacturers) Gas mask and SCBA (Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus) manufacturers for industrial and defense use Half-face and full-face elastomeric respirator manufacturers 2. Test laboratories: SITRA (South India Textile Research Association) key BIS-designated lab for PPE testing DRDO laboratories conducting RPD testing for defense procurement NABL-accredited independent labs providing commercial RPD testing services 3. Industrial users with mandatory RPD compliance: Chemical industry: handling toxic gases, vapors, particulates. Pharmaceutical manufacturing: containment and operator protection. Mining and tunneling: dust and toxic gas control Firefighting: SCBA use Construction: silica dust, asbestos abatement Agricultural sector: pesticide applicators Why BIS Amended IS 17274 Part 6? The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6) reflects BIS's continued focus on strengthening the quality, reliability, and safety performance of respiratory protective devices (RPDs). The revision is likely to be driven by evolving industry requirements, increased workplace safety expectations, and the need to maintain consistency across India's personal protective equipment (PPE) standards framework. 1. Post-COVID RPD Manufacturing Quality Control- India's rapid expansion of domestic N95 and other RPD manufacturing during COVID-19 created a large new manufacturing base. Post-pandemic surveillance of this industry found: Quality inconsistencies in mechanical construction (headband failures, valve leakage from mechanical failure) The amendment tightens and clarifies mechanical testing requirements to address these quality gaps. 2. Occupational Health Enforcement Under New Labor Codes- The OSHWC Code 2020 and its state-level rules are increasing enforcement of RPD use in industries including: Chemical plants Pharmaceutical manufacturing Mining and quarrying Updated mechanical testing standards for RPDs ensure that all RPDs in these workplaces meet current safety benchmarks. 3. Harmonization Between PPE Standards- Issuing Amendment No. 1 to both IS 8521 Part 1 (eye protection) and IS 17274 Part 6 (RPD testing) in the same notification batch is deliberate; it reflects BIS's systems approach to PPE standards, ensuring that combination PPE scenarios (e.g., full-face respirator with integrated eye protection) are covered coherently. 4. India's Defence and Emergency Response Procurement- DRDO, Indian Army (Chemical Corps), and National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) procure RPDs based on IS standards. Amendment No. 1 keeps the IS current with evolving military and civil protection operational requirements. Impact on Respiratory Protective Device Businesses The amendment to IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 will require manufacturers, testing laboratories, and industrial users of respiratory protective devices to review their compliance processes and ensure alignment with the updated requirements. Stakeholders should assess the implications of the amendment well before the implementation deadline to avoid any disruptions in certification, procurement, and product approvals. 1.    For BIS ISI-Certified RPD Manufacturers Review Amendment No. 1 to IS 17274 Part 6 clauses upon BIS publication of the amendment document Assess impact on: Test methods used in their BIS licence-linked test reports Their in-house QC testing procedures for mechanical resistance If test methods change: commission revised testing at BIS-designated lab and update licence documentation by 9 December 2026 Update QMS (ISO 9001 / BIS factory QMS) test procedures to reference the amended standard 2.    For Test Laboratories Update SOPs for all mechanical resistance tests covered by IS 17274 Part 6 Verify and validate the test equipment against any revised specification in the amendment Update NABL accreditation scope to reference the amended standard Communicate updated test capabilities to RPD manufacturer clients. 3.    For Industrial Procurement Teams Update RPD procurement specifications to reference IS 17274 (Part 6): 2023 with Amendment No. 1, June 2026 During the next vendor/product requalification cycle, request updated test certificates from suppliers How Businesses Across All Three Standards Will Achieve Compliance? The amendments introduced across the three standards require businesses to adopt a structured compliance approach. While the specific technical requirements may differ for each standard, the overall compliance framework remains largely similar and can be implemented through the following steps: Step 1: Obtain the Amendments from BIS Purchase Amendment No. 1 documents for each relevant standard from the BIS online shop (shop.bis.gov.in). These amendments are typically 1–10 pages and contain the specific clause additions, deletions, or some modifications. Step 2: Conduct a Gap Assessment For each amended clause: What does the amendment change vs the current version? Does the current product/facility/process comply with the amended requirement? If not, what needs to change: design, material, process, equipment, or documentation? Step 3: Implement Changes For each gap identified: Product manufacturers: Modify design, material, or process; commission revised testing at a BIS-designated lab. Storage facility operators: Implement operational or structural changes; update SOPs. Test laboratories: Update SOPs, validate any new test equipment requirements. Step 4: Update Documentation and Certifications Update BIS licence application files (for ISI-certified manufacturers) Revise procurement specifications, quality plans, and management system documentation Update any product labelling, user manuals, or declaration of conformity that references the standard. Step 5: Complete Before 9 December 2026 This is a firm date after which only the amended standard versions are recognized. All BIS-certified products, accredited facilities, and procurement contracts must reference the amended standards by this date. Benefits for Businesses After Implementation While compliance with Amendment No. 1 may require initial review and process updates, the revised standard offers several long-term benefits for businesses operating in the respiratory protective device (RPD) ecosystem. 1. For PPE Manufacturers (Eye and Face, Respiratory) Benefit Details Product Credibility ISI-certified PPE complying with amended standards carries stronger market credibility in government, industrial, and institutional procurement Export Opportunities IS standards aligned with ISO 16321-1 and ISO 16900-6 enable export to markets that recognize ISO-based national standards Reduced Liability Risk PPE failure causing injury is a major legal and reputational risk. Compliance with the latest amended standard is the strongest available defense Market Access Government tenders (CPWD, PSUs, defence) mandating IS compliance will require updated certification amendment compliance to maintain tender eligibility 2. For Food Storage Operators Benefit Details Reduced Post-Harvest Losses Updated storage practices = less grain spoilage = direct financial benefit for FCI, CWC, traders, and farmers WDRA Accreditation Maintenance Continued access to warehouse receipt financing, which is a critical working capital instrument for grain traders and FPOs Insurance Compliance Reduced storage loss claims → better insurance experience → lower premiums over time Worker Safety Updated fumigation and operational safety protocols protect godown workers from phosphine exposure and other hazards Is this the Right Decision? All three amendments represent correct and proportionate regulatory action. Key reasons: Standard Justification IS 8521 Part 1 India's OSHWC Code implementation makes PPE standards updates essential, post-COVID expansion of eye protection manufacturing makes quality tightening appropriate IS 16144 Post-harvest food loss is a Rs 90,000+ Cr annual problem; updating the storage code of practice is an obvious, necessary step for India's food security agenda IS 17274 Part 6 Coordinated RPD testing standard update alongside eye protection amendments shows systematic, coherent PPE standards management The 6-month transition window is appropriately calibrated sufficient for most businesses to assess and comply without operational disruption. How do these Amendments Improve Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, and Environmental Conditions? The amendments introduced across these standards are designed not only to strengthen regulatory compliance but also to enhance product quality, improve user confidence, and promote more sustainable and responsible industry practices. Their benefits extend beyond manufacturers to consumers, workers, regulators, and the broader environment. 1. Quality Improvements Eye and Face Protection: Clearer, more comprehensive performance requirements mean all ISI-certified products must actually protect eyes from the specified hazards at the specified intensity levels. Amendment-driven quality tightening reduces the market presence of safety spectacles that pass current tests but fail under real-world industrial conditions. Food Grain Storage: Updated operational requirements translate directly into less grain damaged by moisture, pests, fumigation accidents, and structural failures quality preservation in storage: better-quality grain reaching mills and consumers. Respiratory Devices: Tighter mechanical testing reduces failures in the field: headbands that don't snap, valves that don't fail, connections that don't leak. Every improvement in mechanical integrity of an RPD directly protects the wearer's health. Consumer and Worker Satisfaction Workers wearing the updated-standard eye protection and RPDs get genuine protection rather than false comfort. Grain consumers benefit from better-stored, less-contaminated grain reaching processing plants. Farmers selling stored grain under WDRA-accredited warehouse receipts benefit from better-maintained grain quality and therefore better realization prices. 2. Environmental Improvements Food grain Storage: Reducing post-harvest storage losses means less land, water, fertilizer, and agricultural inputs are wasted a massive embedded resource saving. Better fumigation protocols under amended IS 16144 reduce phosphine gas release into the atmosphere and prevent groundwater contamination from fumigant residues. Reduced spoilage means less rotted grain entering waste streams. PPE Manufacturing and Disposal: Longer-lasting PPE (better mechanical strength) means less frequent replacement, directly reducing PPE waste volumes, which are a significant environmental problem (masks, respirators, and goggles are not easily recyclable). Business Opportunities for Corpseed 1. BIS PPE Certification and Licence Management Service Target Clients Details IS 8521 (Part 1) licence amendment or fresh ISI certification Safety spectacle and face shield manufacturers Manage testing, documentation, and BIS interface IS 17274 Part 6 test method update advisory RPD manufacturers with existing BIS licences Review amendment impact, coordinate revised lab testing Combination PPE (RPD + eye) compliance advisory Industrial manufacturers making combo products Navigate both amendments simultaneously FMCS update for imported PPE Importers of safety glasses, goggles, respirators Update foreign manufacturer's Indian certification 2. Food Storage Compliance Advisory Service Target Clients Details IS 16144 Amendment No. 1 compliance audit Private warehousing companies, WDRA-registered warehouses Gap assessment and remediation planning New storage facility IS 16144 design review Agricultural infrastructure project developers Verify designs against the amended standard before construction WDRA accreditation advisory New and existing registered warehouses Maintain/obtain WDRA accreditation under amended IS 3. Industrial Safety Compliance Packages Bundle PPE-related BIS certification services with broader occupational health compliance under OSHWC Code rules Target chemical plants, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and mining companies facing increased DGFASLI/DGMS scrutiny Offer an "OSHWC PPE Compliance Pack" inventory all PPE in use, verify current IS compliance, identify upgrades needed post-amendments, manage BIS certification for in house manufactured or imported PPE.

Subject

What Is the Impact of BIS's Latest Standards Update on Paints, Soil Testing, Oils, and Traditional Medicine?

Summary: Introduction The Bureau of Indian Standards ( BIS ) has notified 17 Indian Standards through Notification Ref. HQ-PUB013/1/2020-PUB-BIS (1548), effective from 2 June 2026. Of these 9 are revisions of existing standards and 8 are newly introduced standards. BIS has provided a six-month transition period, allowing the previous versions of revised standards to remain valid until 2 December 2026. The notification impacts manufacturers, testing laboratories, exporters and other businesses operating in the affected sectors. Complete Schedule of All 17 Standards S. No. No., Year & Title of the Indian Standards Established Date of Establishment No. , Year & Title of the Indian Standards to be Withdrawn, if any Date of Withdrawal 1 IS 75: 2026 Linseed/Flaxseed Oil, Raw and Refined- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 75- 1973 Specification for Linseed Oil, Raw and Refined (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 2 IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026 Methods of Sampling and Test for Paints, Varnishes and Related Products Part 5 Mechanical Test on Paint Films Section 1 Hardness Tests (Fourth Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1)-1988 Methods of Sampling and Test for Paints, Varnishes and Related Products Part 5 Mechanical Test on Paint Films Section 1 Hardness Tests (Third Revision) 02 December 2026 3 IS 887: 2026 Animal Tallow- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 887- 1977 Specification for Animal Tallow (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 4 IS 1420: 2026 Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate- Specification (Third Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 1420: 1989 Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate-Specification (Second Revision) 02 December 2026 5 IS 12410: 2026 Soil Reclamation- Terminology (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 12410- 1988 Terminology Related to Soil Reclamation 02 December 2026 6 IS 13213: 2026 Solvent-Borne Polyurethane Enamel Paint (Two Pack)- Specification (Second Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 13213: 2018 Polyurethane Full Gloss Enamel (Two Pack)-Specification (First Revision) IS 16239: 2021 Polyurethane Matt Finish (Two Pack) -Specification 02 December 2026 7 IS 14684: 2026 Total Nitrogen and Nitrogen Compounds in Soils- Methods of Determination (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 14684: 1999 Determination of Nitrogen and Nitrogenous Compounds in Soils 02 December 2026 8 IS 14685: 2026 Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soils- Methods of Determination (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 14685: 1999 Determination of Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soils 02 December 2026 9 IS 15386: 2026 ISO 15081: 2011 Pressurized Irrigation Systems- Graphical Symbols (First Revision) 02 June 2026 IS 15386: 2003 Pressurized Irrigation Systems- Graphic Symbols 02 December 2026 10 IS 19809: 2026 ISO 20122: 2024 Vegetable Oils-Determination of Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons (MOSH) and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH) with Online-Coupled High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection (HPLC-GCFID) Analysis-Method for Low Limit of Quantification 02 June 2026 NA NA 11 IS 19851: 2026 Hydnocarpus Pentandra (Buch.-Ham.) Oken Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 12 IS 19852: 2026 Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 13 IS 19853: 2026 Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Flower for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 14 IS 19854: 2026 Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Br., ex DC. Whole Plant for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 15 IS 19855: 2026 Phyla nodiflora (L.) Greene Whole Plant for Use in Traditional Medicine Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA 16 IS 19858: 2026 Preparation of Cattu Tablet (Herbal Extract Tablet) Code of Practice 02 June 2026 NA NA 17 IS 19861: 2026 Strychnos nux-vomica L. Seed for Use in Traditional Medicine- Specification 02 June 2026 NA NA Implementation Timeline Establishment date: 2 June 2026 (all 17 standards) Gazette notification: 3 June 2026 Concurrent validity of old IS versions: Until 2 December 2026. Old IS withdrawal: 2 December 2026 after which only the 2026 versions are valid. New standards (no predecessor): Operative from 2 June 2026 immediately applicable. Group 1: Linseed (Flaxseed) Oil- IS 75: 2026 The revision of IS 75 marks an important step towards improving the quality, safety, and testing requirements for linseed oil used across multiple industries. What Has Changed? BIS has revised the Indian Standard for linseed (flaxseed) oil by introducing IS 75: 2026, replacing the older IS 75: 1973 standard. Linseed oil is widely used in paints and coatings, edible oil products, Ayurveda, nutraceuticals, and leather treatment applications. The revised standard is expected to modernize quality and safety requirements by introducing: Updated physicochemical parameters such as acid value, iodine value, and saponification value. Stricter limits for contaminants including heavy metals and pesticide residues. Modern testing methods aligned with current national and international practices. Clearer classification of industrial-grade, food-grade, and pharmaceutical-grade linseed oil. Who Will Be Affected? The revision will impact several stakeholders across industries, including: Edible oil and nutraceutical manufacturers. Paint and coating manufacturers using linseed oil as a raw material. Ayurvedic and traditional medicine manufacturers. Leather treatment product manufacturers. Testing laboratories and importers of linseed oil. Why Did BIS Revise the Standard? The previous version of the standard was issued more than 50 years ago and no longer reflected current industry requirements. BIS has updated the standard to improve product quality, strengthen consumer safety, and align with modern manufacturing practices. The revision is also driven by: Growing demand for flaxseed oil in the nutraceutical sector. Increased focus on contaminant control and food safety. The need for better raw material quality standards for paint and coating manufacturers. Impact on Businesses Companies that deal with linseed oil might need to examine their current offerings and quality control procedures. Manufacturers might have to update standards, carry out new testing and make sure suppliers follow the updated guidelines. Key areas requiring attention include: Product testing and quality verification. Supplier compliance assessments. Updates to technical documentation and quality records. BIS certification and license amendments, where applicable. How to Comply? To prepare for the transition, businesses should: Obtain and review IS 75: 2026. Compare current specifications with the revised requirements. Conduct testing through NABL-accredited laboratories. Update supplier agreements and inspection procedures. Revise BIS certification applications and compliance documents. Group 2: Paint Products The paint industry has received two important updates under the latest BIS notification . These revisions aim to modernise paint testing methods, improve product performance standards, and simplify compliance requirements for manufacturers and testing laboratories. IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026- Paint Hardness Testing: What Has Changed? IS 101 (Part 5/Sec 1): 2026 updates the methodology used to measure the hardness of paint films, a key parameter for evaluating the durability and scratch resistance of coatings. The revised standard introduces several improvements, including: Additional testing methods such as instrumented indentation testing, and updated pencil hardness testing. Alignment of Konig and Persoz pendulum hardness tests with current ISO standards. Updated temperature, and humidity requirements for testing conditions. Clear guidance on referee test methods for dispute resolution. Recognition of modern digital and computer controlled testing equipment. Who Will Be Affected? The revised testing standard will impact: Decorative, industrial, automotive, marine and wood-finish paint manufacturers. Independent paint testing laboratories. Certification bodies and regulatory authorities involved in quality assessments. IS 13213: 2026- Solvent-Borne Polyurethane Enamel Paint (Two Pack) IS 13213: 2026 is one of the most significant revisions in this notification. The standard combines the earlier gloss and matt polyurethane paint standards into a single framework while introducing updated technical requirements. What Has Changed? The revised standard introduces three major changes: Consolidation of Standards: Manufacturers now have a single standard covering both gloss and matt finish PU paints, reducing confusion, and simplifying compliance requirements. Updated Chemical Requirements: The standard introduces revised quality and safety parameters including: Updated VOC limits to support environmental and workplace safety objectives. Revised restrictions on heavy metals such as lead, chromium, and cadmium. Updated requirements for binders and hardeners based on current PU coating technologies. Performance Enhancements: The revision also strengthens performance requirements through: Higher weather resistance testing standards. Updated gloss retention requirements. Revised adhesion criteria. Expanded chemical resistance testing. Who Will Be Affected? The revised standard will affect: Polyurethane paint manufacturers. Industrial coating applicators and fabricators. Furniture and wood-finish manufacturers. Automotive coating companies. Importers and distributors of PU paints. Why Did BIS Revise IS 13213? The polyurethane coatings market has evolved significantly over the past few years, creating a need for updated technical requirements. BIS has revised the standard to reflect modern coating technologies, align with international practices, and simplify compliance by replacing two separate standards with a single comprehensive framework. The update also supports environmental goals through stricter VOC and heavy metal requirements. Impact on Paint Businesses Manufacturers producing BIS-certified PU paints will need to: Update BIS licence references to IS 13213: 2026. Obtain fresh test reports based on the revised requirements. Complete the transition before the withdrawal of the previous standards. Industrial users and procurement teams should also update tender specifications and technical documents to reference the new standard. Group 3: Soil Testing Standards The latest BIS notification introduces important updates for soil testing and land reclamation standards. These revisions are intended to align soil analysis methods with modern scientific practices while supporting India's agricultural productivity, environmental monitoring, and land restoration initiatives. IS 12410: 2026: Soil Reclamation Terminology: What Has Changed? IS 12410: 2026 updates the terminology used in soil reclamation activities, replacing the earlier 1988 version. Soil reclamation plays a vital role in restoring degraded, saline, waterlogged, and polluted land for productive use. The revised standard updates definitions and terminology to reflect modern practices, including: Phytoremediation and bioremediation techniques. Soil carbon sequestration and climate-related initiatives. Precision soil amendment methods. Advanced approaches for reclaiming sodic and acidic soils. The update also aligns Indian terminology with internationally recognised soil science frameworks and environmental programmes. IS 14684: 2026, Determination of Total Nitrogen and Nitrogen Compounds in Soil: What Has Changed? The revised standard modernises the methods used to measure nitrogen content in soil, replacing testing procedures that have been in place since 1999. Key updates include: Improved Kjeldahl digestion procedures. Introduction of automated nitrogen analysers and combustion-based testing methods. Updated methods for measuring ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite levels. Lower detection limits for improved testing accuracy. Enhanced quality assurance and calibration requirements. IS 14685: 2026- Determination of Total Sulphur and Sulphur Compounds in Soil: What Has Changed? This revision updates the analytical methods used to determine sulphur content in soil and incorporates modern laboratory technologies. Major changes include: Advanced combustion-based sulphur analysis methods. Revised sulphate determination procedures. Introduction of ICP-OES and ICP-MS testing techniques. Improved detection capabilities for low sulphur concentrations. Who Will Be Affected? The revised soil standards will impact a wide range of stakeholders, including: Government and private soil testing laboratories. NABL-accredited testing facilities. Agricultural universities and research institutions. Fertiliser manufacturers and agribusiness companies. Environmental consultants and EIA professionals. Mining companies conducting land rehabilitation studies. Infrastructure developers involved in land reclamation projects. State agriculture departments operating soil testing programmes. Why Did BIS Revise These Standards? The revisions support India's growing focus on soil health, sustainable agriculture, and environmental management. Modern testing methods provide more accurate data for fertiliser recommendations, land restoration projects and environmental assessments. The updates also align Indian standards with current international practices and scientific advancements, helping laboratories generate more reliable and globally comparable results. Impact on Businesses and Laboratories The revised standards may require organisations involved in soil testing, agriculture, environmental consulting, and land reclamation to take several compliance-related actions, including: Updating laboratory testing methods to align with the revised BIS standards.  Validating and calibrating analytical equipment based on the new testing requirements.  Revising quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures.  Updating NABL accreditation scopes and technical documentation where applicable.  Training laboratory personnel on the revised testing methodologies and terminology.  Reviewing soil analysis reports, fertiliser recommendation systems, and environmental assessment protocols. Why BIS Revised All Three Soil Standards The Soil Health Card Scheme has created a national network of thousands of soil testing labs, generating data that drives fertilizer recommendations for millions of Indian farmers. Using 1999 and 1988-era analytical methods creates: Inaccurate nitrogen and sulphur data Incorrect fertilizer recommendations Suboptimal crop yields and input wastage Updating IS 14684 and IS 14685 ensures that every lab in the national network is using scientifically current methods. Soil Degradation Policy India's National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) and its soil health components require rigorous, updated methodology for: Monitoring soil carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur across the agricultural landscape. Tracking changes over time (critical for climate reporting). Evaluating the impact of soil reclamation interventions. International Harmonisation Global soil science has moved to combustion-based, automated CNS analysis (Dumas method) and ICP-based methods for most elements. The 1999 IS versions were based on older wet chemistry methods. Updating aligns India with: ISO soil testing standards FAO's recommended soil analytical methods EU's soil monitoring framework methods (relevant for Indian agricultural exports). Food and Export Safety Soil nitrogen and sulphur data underpin: Food safety assessments (nitrate levels in produce depend on soil nitrate supply). Export compliance for vegetables and grains where nitrate content is regulated by EU/USA importers. Impact on Soil Testing Businesses All NABL-accredited soil testing laboratories will need to align their systems with the revised standards: SOP Updates  Laboratories must update Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to reference IS 14684: 2026 and IS 14685: 2026 by 2 December 2026. Method documentation and reporting formats must reflect revised standards. Method Validation  Labs switching from older analytical methods must re-validate updated procedures. Ensure consistency, accuracy, and compliance with revised testing protocols. NABL Accreditation Scope  Update testing scope in the NABL online portal to include revised methods and standards. Maintain alignment with accreditation requirements during transition. Equipment Upgrades  Labs without advanced instruments like combustion CNS analysers or ICP-OES may need to:  Plan capital expenditure for equipment procurement. Or establish referral arrangements with equipped laboratories for specialized testing. Government Laboratory Compliance  State agriculture departments must issue updated technical orders. Ensure all government soil testing labs adopt revised method references before 2 December 2026. Standard 10: IS 19809: 2026- Vegetable Oils (MOSH & MOAH Testing): What It Is? This is a new Indian Standard introducing the testing framework for Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons (MOSH) and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons (MOAH) in vegetable oils. Based on ISO 20122: 2024  Uses advanced analytical method: HPLC–GC–FID (High Performance Liquid Chromatography + Gas Chromatography + Flame Ionization Detection)  Why It Is Important? MOSH and MOAH are hazardous contaminants that can enter vegetable oils through: Lubricating oils used in food processing machinery  Printing inks and adhesives in food packaging (especially recycled materials)  Environmental contamination during production and storage  Mineral oil-based agricultural sprays  Health and Safety Concerns MOAH: Potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic, especially polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). MOSH: Accumulates in human tissues (fatty tissue and lymph nodes) with uncertain long-term effects. Increasing regulatory scrutiny globally, including EU food safety limits under Regulation (EU) 2023/2419. Who Is Affected? This standard has wide industry impact across the food and export ecosystem: Edible oil manufacturers such as Adani Wilmar (Fortune), Ruchi Soya/Patanjali, Marico, Godrej Agrovet, Cargill India, and Bunge India. Importers and exporters of vegetable oils Food manufacturers using edible oils in: Snack foods  Bakery products  Ready-to-eat meals  Confectionery items  Food testing and analytical laboratories  Export-oriented food businesses targeting EU and other regulated markets Why BIS Created This Standard Now Concerns around food safety, export requirements, and rising global scrutiny have made it necessary to introduce a clear testing framework at this stage. 1. EU Market Access India exports significant quantities of edible oils and oil-containing foods to the EU. The EU's 2023 MOSH/MOAH Regulation requires exporters to demonstrate compliance through validated test methods. IS 19809: 2026 (adopting ISO 20122: 2024) gives Indian labs a recognised national standard for conducting these tests. 2. FSSAI Pre-emptive Alignment FSSAI is expected to introduce MOSH/MOAH limits for edible oils in India (following international precedent). Having IS 19809: 2026 as the recognized test method standard ensures Indian labs are ready to test against these future limits. 3. Consumer Protection Even without mandatory limits today, sophisticated Indian consumers and retailers are beginning to ask about MOSH/MOAH in premium and organic oil brands. IS 19809: 2026 enables credible, IS-backed testing. Standards 11-17: Traditional Medicine Standards BIS notified seven new Indian Standards for traditional medicinal materials and herbal formulations all entirely new (no predecessor): Standard Material Common Name/Use IS 19851: 2026 Hydnocarpus pentandra seed Chaulmoogra traditionally used in skin diseases IS 19852: 2026 Butea monosperma seed Flame of the Forest / Palash seed fever, liver, skin diseases IS 19853: 2026 Nelumbo nucifera flower Lotus flower cardiac health, Ayurveda IS 19854: 2026 Alternanthera sessilis whole plant Sessile joy weed traditional hepatoprotective IS 19855: 2026 Phyla nodiflora whole plant Frog fruit Ayurveda, hair and skin preparations IS 19858: 2026 Cattu Tablet (Herbal Extract Tablet) Code of Practice Traditional herbal extract tablet preparation IS 19861: 2026 Strychnos nux-vomica seed Nux vomica Ayurveda (in specific controlled doses) Who Is Affected Ayurvedic medicine manufacturers (Dabur, Himalaya, Hamdard, Baidyanath, Zandu/Emami, Patanjali Ayurved, thousands of smaller units). AYUSH raw material suppliers and herb traders Cattu tablet manufacturers traditional preparation specific to South India, particularly Tamil Nadu and Kerala Herbal extract manufacturers supplying Ayurveda and traditional medicine companies NABL-accredited labs testing herbal/AYUSH raw materials Why BIS Created These Standards? As the AYUSH sector continues to expand in India and international markets, the need for consistent quality standards has become increasingly important. 1. AYUSH Sector Standardisation Priority Since 2021, the Ministry of AYUSH has been actively working with BIS to strengthen standardisation across traditional medicine supply chains. Developing individual Indian Standards for medicinal plant materials helps establish a common standard for quality, and authenticity. These standards help define: Identity requirements- ensuring the correct botanical species and plant part are used Purity requirements- preventing adulteration and ensuring the correct variety is supplied Quality parameters- including ash values, extractive values, and marker compound specifications Contaminant limits- covering heavy metals, pesticide residues, aflatoxins, and other impurities By setting clear specifications, BIS aims to improve consistency across cultivation, processing, testing, and manufacturing activities. 2. Export Market Access India's AYUSH exports now exceed Rs18,000 crore annually, making quality assurance a critical trade requirement. Importers and regulatory authorities in markets such as the EU, USA, Japan and the Middle East increasingly require: National or internationally recognised specification standards. NABL-accredited laboratory test reports. Evidence of consistent quality and traceability throughout the supply chain. These BIS standards provide a recognised framework that supports export documentation and enhances the credibility of Indian AYUSH products globally. 2. Preventing Adulteration and Misidentification Many medicinal plant materials are traded in dried or processed forms, making accurate identification difficult. This creates a risk of substitution, adulteration or use of incorrect plant parts. The risk is particularly significant for botanicals such as ‘Strychnos nux-vomica’ where improper identification can have serious safety implications. The new standards address these concerns by including: Botanical and microscopic identification criteria Chemical profiling requirements Purity specifications Defined quality benchmarks These measures help reduce the risk of adulteration while improving consumer safety and product reliability. Animal Tallow and Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate These revisions modernise long-standing industrial standards, bringing them in line with current manufacturing practices, safety expectations, and international quality requirements. Standard 3: IS 887: 2026- Animal Tallow (Third Revision): What Changed This standard replaces IS 887:1977, updating a specification that had remained largely unchanged for nearly five decades. Animal tallow continues to be an important industrial raw material used in: Soap and detergent manufacturing Candle production Leather processing and treatment Rubber and polymer processing Industrial lubricants and specialty chemicals The 2026 revision introduces several important updates: Revised fatty acid composition requirements using modern FAME analysis methods. Updated limits for free fatty acids (FFA) and peroxide value. Improved moisture and impurity specifications. New contaminant requirements covering substances such as pesticides and dioxins. Traceability provisions relating to animal origin and BSE-risk management for cattle-derived tallow. Who Is Affected? The revised standard impacts: Soap and detergent manufacturers Candle manufacturers Leather processing companies Tallow rendering and processing businesses Rubber and polymer manufacturers Importers and traders dealing in animal-derived industrial fats Standard 4: IS 1420: 2026:-Light Basic Magnesium Carbonate (Third Revision): What Changed This standard replaces IS 1420:1989 and updates quality requirements for light basic magnesium carbonate to reflect current industrial, pharmaceutical, and food-grade applications. The material is widely used in: Rubber manufacturing as a reinforcing filler Paints and coatings as a filler and pigment extender Pharmaceutical formulations as an antacid excipient and flow aid Food products as an anti-caking agent (E504) and acidity regulator Cosmetics and personal care products as an alternative to talc The 2026 revision includes: Updated purity specifications based on magnesium carbonate content. Revised heavy metal limits for lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. Particle size distribution requirements for improved performance consistency. Updated moisture content and loss-on-ignition limits. Modernised test methods aligned with current international laboratory practices. Who Is Affected? The revised standard will primarily affect: Rubber manufacturers Paint and coating companies Pharmaceutical excipient manufacturers and suppliers Food additive manufacturers and distributors Cosmetic and personal care product manufacturers Testing laboratories responsible for quality verification Why These Revisions Matter Both standards replace specifications that were several decades old. By updating quality requirements, testing methods, contaminant controls, and traceability provisions, BIS is ensuring that Indian manufacturers can meet modern regulatory expectations while maintaining product quality, safety and competitiveness in domestic and international markets. Benefits for All Affected Businesses The latest BIS standards provide businesses with clearer compliance requirements, improved market credibility, and stronger regulatory support across industries. Immediate Compliance Benefits Benefit Details Single Authoritative Reference Every affected sector now has a current, version-controlled IS eliminating use of outdated standards in contracts and tenders Export Documentation Credibility Updated IS aligned with ISO enables Indian exporters to reference internationally credible standards Legal Protection BIS-certified products under updated standards are protected in consumer disputes and FSSAI/regulatory proceedings Competitive Differentiation Companies that quickly migrate to 2026-compliant certification gain a quality leadership signal over slower competitors Sector-Specific Benefits Sector Key Benefit Paint manufacturers Consolidated IS 13213 reduces compliance documentation burden; updated hardness test methods improve product design feedback Edible oil manufacturers IS 19809 enables EU-compliant MOSH/MOAH testing protecting existing export contracts Soil testing labs Updated methods improve data quality for India's Soil Health Card program AYUSH manufacturers BIS-backed raw material specifications improve product consistency, enable export, and protect against adulteration liability Irrigation industry Updated graphical symbols ensure engineering designs are internationally compatible Is This the Right Decision? All 17 standards in this notification represent necessary, well-calibrated, and overdue regulatory modernization: Several standards were 50+ years old (IS 75 from 1973, IS 887 from 1977) entirely inadequate for modern industry. The 6-month concurrent validity period gives businesses time to transition without operational disruption. The new traditional medicine standards fill a genuine gap India's AYUSH sector had been operating without national IS for many of its key raw materials. IS 19809 (MOSH/MOAH) is forward-looking and directly protects India's edible oil export competitiveness with the EU. The only reasonable concern is lab capacity BIS-designated labs and NABL-accredited facilities may face a surge in testing requests as multiple sectors simultaneously need to validate products against revised IS. This is a genuine transition management challenge, but one that BIS's own technical infrastructure must support. Corpseed's Compliance Support Services The revised BIS standards may require businesses to update certifications, testing procedures, and documentation. Corpseed can assist throughout the compliance process. 1. BIS Certification and License Upgrade Services Standard Service Target Client IS 75: 2026 Linseed oil ISI license fresh application or amendment Edible oil manufacturers, paint raw material suppliers IS 13213: 2026 PU paint ISI license migration from IS 13213 : 2018 and IS 16239 : 2021 All two-pack PU paint manufacturers IS 887: 2026 Animal tallow ISI certification Tallow rendering, soap, candle manufacturers IS 1420: 2026 Magnesium carbonate certification Pharmaceutical excipient, paint filler, rubber filler suppliers IS 19851-19855, 19861 Traditional medicine raw material certification AYUSH manufacturers 2. MOSH/MOAH Compliance Advisory (IS 19809) Help edible oil manufacturers: Find NABL labs equipped with HPLC-GC-FID for IS 19809-compliant testing. Build MOSH/MOAH compliance documentation for EU export buyers. Assess packaging material suppliers' mineral oil risk. 3. Soil Testing Lab Compliance Advisory Help state and private soil labs: Update NABL accreditation scope to IS 14684: 2026 and IS 14685: 2026. Develop revised SOPs for updated methods. Source reference materials and equipment for new analytical methods. 4. AYUSH and Traditional Medicine Compliance Coordinate BIS certification for: AYUSH raw material suppliers seeking IS 19851–19861 compliance. Cattu tablet manufacturers seeking IS 19858 Code of Practice compliance. Bundle with: AYUSH manufacturer licence compliance GMP certification support Heavy metal and pesticide testing coordination for herbal raw materials. 5. Paint Industry Consolidated Compliance Packages For paint companies managing both IS 13213 and hardness testing (IS 101 Part 5/Sec 1): Full BIS licence migration + testing coordination + documentation update. Presented as a single "Paint IS 2026 Upgrade Pack".

Department: Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)Authority: Department of Consumer Affairs

🏷️19-06-2026